Re-evaluation of Donor-specific Anti-HLA Alloantibodies Immunoassay After Organ Transplantation, From Antigen Level to Epitope Level (ACORG-HLA)

April 26, 2019 updated by: Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Re-evaluation of Donor-specific Anti-HLA Alloantibodies Immunoassay After Organ Transplantation, From Antigen Level to Epitope Level: a Track to Improve Organ Allocation

Transplantation is the only treatment for end-stage organ dysfunction, with dialysis for the kidney. However, donor / recipient (D / R) tissue incompatibility accounts for the majority of long-term graft losses, through the development of serum-specific donor antibodies (DSA) to human leukocyte antigens (HLA) of donor, with a prevalence of about 10% at 2 years and 20% at 5 years.

DSA immunization is very often directed against one or a few of the donor's incompatible antigens, suggesting that epitopes (and antigens) are not all equally immunogenic. Identifying HLA epitopes that cause the most and the least immunization would help refine the graft distribution to better manage a limited resource by defining the D / R combinations to avoid or promote. Since the immunogenicity of an HLA epitope depends on the HLA of the recipient given the properties of the epitopes mentioned above, a very large cohort is needed to understand this question. To do so, it is necessary to redo these typings with a method exploring all the genes (add DQA1, DRB3 / 4/5, DPB1 and DPA1) when this has not been done after the graft as part of the standard care. This has become possible since 3 years by DNA sequencing called "new generation" (or NGS), a method that is supplanting all others for the medical care of patients in transplantation.

This study is a retrospective cohort study with 5-year follow-up. The investigators' main objective is to evaluate the predictive value of the number of mismatched HLA epitopes for the development of DSA anti-HLA de novo at 2 years. The investigators' secondary objectives are to evaluate this parameter at 5 and 8 years to determine which epitope mismatches should be favored / avoided in the future.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

20000

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

7 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients (adults and children) récipients of a first kidney transplant / heart / lung / liver donor living or deceased,non-immunized anti-HLA before the transplant, having preserved their graft > 2 years will be enrolled

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients (adults and children)
  • patients recipients in France from 2008 to 2015 of a first kidney transplant / heart / lung / liver donor living or deceased, non-immunized anti-HLA before the transplant
  • patients having preserved their graft > 2 years
  • having agreed to the use for research purposes in transplantation of the remains of the DNA and serum samples taken as part of the care of which the remains are available

Exclusion Criteria:

  • no inclusion if one of the inclusion criteria is not met

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of serum-specific donor antibodies (DSA)
Time Frame: at 2 years after organ transplantation
Proportion of serum-specific donor antibodies (DSA) regarding epitope mismatches
at 2 years after organ transplantation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Proportion of dnDSA anti-HLA
Time Frame: at 2 years after organ transplantation
at 2 years after organ transplantation
Proportion of dnDSA anti-HLA
Time Frame: at 5 years after organ transplantation
at 5 years after organ transplantation
Proportion of dnDSA anti-HLA
Time Frame: at 8 years after organ transplantation
at 8 years after organ transplantation
Proportion of non-DSA anti-HLA antibodies
Time Frame: at 2 years after organ transplantation
at 2 years after organ transplantation
Proportion of non-DSA anti-HLA antibodies
Time Frame: at 5 years after organ transplantation
at 5 years after organ transplantation
Proportion of non-DSA anti-HLA antibodies
Time Frame: at 8 years after organ transplantation
at 8 years after organ transplantation
Proportion of both total and HLA class I or class II dnDSA by HLA locus (A, B, C, DRB1, DRB3 / 4/5, DQB1, DQA1, DPB1, DPA1) , by HLA antigen, by epitope, for all types of organs and by organ type
Time Frame: at 2 years after organ transplantation
at 2 years after organ transplantation
Proportion of both total and HLA class I or class II dnDSA by HLA locus (A, B, C, DRB1, DRB3 / 4/5, DQB1, DQA1, DPB1, DPA1) , by HLA antigen, by epitope, for all types of organs and by organ type
Time Frame: at 5 years after organ transplantation
at 5 years after organ transplantation
Proportion of both total and HLA class I or class II dnDSA by HLA locus (A, B, C, DRB1, DRB3 / 4/5, DQB1, DQA1, DPB1, DPA1) , by HLA antigen, by epitope, for all types of organs and by organ type
Time Frame: at 8 years after organ transplantation
at 8 years after organ transplantation
Number of dnDSA anti-HLA both total and by HLA class (class I versus class II), by HLA locus (A, B, C, DRB1, DRB3 / 4/5, DQB1, DQA1, DPB1, DPA1), by HLA antigen, for all organ types and organ type
Time Frame: at 2 years after organ transplantation
at 2 years after organ transplantation
Number of dnDSA anti-HLA both total and by HLA class (class I versus class II), by HLA locus (A, B, C, DRB1, DRB3 / 4/5, DQB1, DQA1, DPB1, DPA1), by HLA antigen, for all organ types and organ type
Time Frame: at 5 years after organ transplantation
at 5 years after organ transplantation
Number of dnDSA anti-HLA both total and by HLA class (class I versus class II), by HLA locus (A, B, C, DRB1, DRB3 / 4/5, DQB1, DQA1, DPB1, DPA1), by HLA antigen, for all organ types and organ type
Time Frame: at 8 years after organ transplantation
at 8 years after organ transplantation
Distribution of anti-HLA dnDSA by targeted epitope and antigen (to define immunodominant and non-immunodominant epitopes and antigens), both total and by HLA class (class I versus class II), by HLA locus for all types of organs and organ type
Time Frame: at 2 years after organ transplantation
at 2 years after organ transplantation
Distribution of anti-HLA dnDSA by targeted epitope and antigen (to define immunodominant and non-immunodominant epitopes and antigens), both total and by HLA class (class I versus class II), by HLA locus for all types of organs and organ type
Time Frame: at 5 years after organ transplantation
at 5 years after organ transplantation
Distribution of anti-HLA dnDSA by targeted epitope and antigen (to define immunodominant and non-immunodominant epitopes and antigens), both total and by HLA class (class I versus class II), by HLA locus for all types of organs and organ type
Time Frame: at 8 years after organ transplantation
at 8 years after organ transplantation
Distribution of strength anti-HLA dnDSA measured by mean fluorescence intensity to identify the immunodominant DSA, both global and by class, by HLA locus by HLA antigen, by epitope, for all types of organs and organ type
Time Frame: at 2 years after organ transplantation
at 2 years after organ transplantation
Distribution of strength anti-HLA dnDSA measured by mean fluorescence intensity to identify the immunodominant DSA, both global and by class, by HLA locus by HLA antigen, by epitope, for all types of organs and organ type
Time Frame: at 5 years after organ transplantation
at 5 years after organ transplantation
Distribution of strength anti-HLA dnDSA measured by mean fluorescence intensity to identify the immunodominant DSA, both global and by class, by HLA locus by HLA antigen, by epitope, for all types of organs and organ type
Time Frame: at 8 years after organ transplantation
at 8 years after organ transplantation
Strength in mean fluorescence intensity of dnDSA anti-HLA de novo specific epitopes of epitopes DQbeta, DQalpha and composites (DQbeta + DQalpha) by antigen DQ
Time Frame: at 2 years after organ transplantation
at 2 years after organ transplantation
Strength in mean fluorescence intensity of dnDSA anti-HLA de novo specific epitopes of epitopes DQbeta, DQalpha and composites (DQbeta + DQalpha) by antigen DQ
Time Frame: at 5 years after organ transplantation
at 5 years after organ transplantation
Strength in mean fluorescence intensity of dnDSA anti-HLA de novo specific epitopes of epitopes DQbeta, DQalpha and composites (DQbeta + DQalpha) by antigen DQ
Time Frame: at 8 years after organ transplantation
at 8 years after organ transplantation
Survival of the graft
Time Frame: at 5 years after organ transplantation
at 5 years after organ transplantation
Survival of the graft
Time Frame: at 8 years after organ transplantation
at 8 years after organ transplantation
Overall survival
Time Frame: at 5 years after organ transplantation
at 5 years after organ transplantation
Overall survival
Time Frame: at 8 years after organ transplantation
at 8 years after organ transplantation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

May 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

May 1, 2019

Study Completion (Anticipated)

May 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 1, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 4, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

March 5, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 29, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 26, 2019

Last Verified

February 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Organ Transplantation

Clinical Trials on DNA sequencing called "new generation" (or NGS)

3
Subscribe