Efficacy of BIPAMS for Restless Legs Syndrome in Adults With Multiple Sclerosis: A Pilot Study

December 9, 2020 updated by: Robert W Motl, University of Alabama at Birmingham

Efficacy of Project BIPAMS for Restless Legs Syndrome in Adults With Multiple Sclerosis: A Pilot Study

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of a 16-week behavioral intervention for increasing physical activity and reducing restless legs syndrome (RLS) severity in persons with multiple sclerosis (MS) and RLS. The study includes a proposed sample of 20 persons with MS and RLS that will be randomized into either a 16-week behavioral intervention arm aimed at increasing physical activity or a 16-week wait-list control arm.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The primary aim of the proposed pilot RCT involves examining the efficacy of a 16-week behavioral intervention for increasing physical activity and reducing RLS severity in persons with MS and RLS. Secondarily, the investigators will be assessing changes in sleep quality and daytime sleepiness following the behavioral intervention. The study includes a proposed sample of 20 persons with MS and RLS that will complete a baseline testing session for measures of physical activity, restless legs syndrome severity, sleep quality, and daytime sleepiness. Participants will then be randomized into one of two study arms: (1) a 16-week Social Cognitive Theory-based behavioral intervention aimed at increasing physical activity; or (2) 16-week waitlist control with the option of completing the intervention upon completion of the study. All participants will complete a follow-up testing session at the conclusion of each 16-week arm.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

15

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Alabama
      • Birmingham, Alabama, United States, 35294
        • University of Alabama at Birmingham

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis
  • Relapse free in the past 30 days
  • Positive screen for restless legs syndrome
  • Non-active (not engaging in 30 minutes of activity per day on more than 2 days per week in the previous six months)
  • Ambulatory without assistance
  • Internet and email access

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of radiculopathy, peripheral edema, peripheral neuropathy, iron deficiency (i.e., anemia) renal disease, or diabetes
  • Screen at moderate or high risk for undertaking strenuous or maximal exercise

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Behavioral Intervention (BIPAMS)
Participants will complete a 16-week behavioral intervention to increase physical activity levels.
This 16-week behavioral intervention teaches people the skills, techniques, and strategies based on Social Cognitive Theory of behavior change for modifying and self-regulating health behaviors, including physical activity. The behavioral intervention consists of two primary components, namely a dedicated Internet website and one-on-one video chats with a behavioral coach via SkypeTM.
Other Names:
  • Project BIPAMS: Behavioral Intervention for Physical Activity in Multiple Sclerosis (BIPAMS)
No Intervention: Waitlist Control
Participants will have 16-weeks of no intervention or interaction.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Restless Legs Syndrome Severity as measured by the International Restless Legs Syndrome Study Group Scale
Time Frame: Baseline
Participants will complete the International Restless Legs Syndrome Study Group Scale (IRLS), a 10-item questionnaire that provides a global score commonly used to assess the overall severity of symptoms as well as the frequency and impact of symptoms on daily life over the previous week.Overall symptom severity scores are determined by combining the sum of the answers on the questionnaire with total scores ranging from 0-40 and higher scores indicating a greater severity of symptoms.This will be completed at the baseline testing session.
Baseline
Restless Legs Syndrome Severity as measured by the International Restless Legs Syndrome Study Group Scale
Time Frame: Follow-Up
Participants will complete the International Restless Legs Syndrome Study Group Scale (IRLS), a 10-item questionnaire that provides a global score commonly used to assess the overall severity of symptoms as well as the frequency and impact of symptoms on daily life over the previous week.Overall symptom severity scores are determined by combining the sum of the answers on the questionnaire with total scores ranging from 0-40 and higher scores indicating a greater severity of symptoms. This will be completed at the follow-up testing session.
Follow-Up
Physical Activity Levels as measured by the Godin Leisure-Time Exercise Questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline
Participants will complete the Godin Leisure-Time Exercise Questionnaire (GLTEQ) as a measure of the frequency of strenuous, moderate, and mild leisure-time physical activity performed for periods of 15 minutes or more over a typical week. Summary scores are calculated by multiplying the number of strenuous, moderate, and mild bouts by 9, 5, and 3, respectively, and summing those values into an overall score that ranges from 0 to 119; higher scores are represent a greater volume of physical activity. This will be completed at baseline testing.
Baseline
Physical Activity Levels as measured by the Godin Leisure-Time Exercise Questionnaire
Time Frame: Follow-Up
Participants will complete the Godin Leisure-Time Exercise Questionnaire (GLTEQ) as a measure of the frequency of strenuous, moderate, and mild leisure-time physical activity performed for periods of 15 minutes or more over a typical week. Summary scores are calculated by multiplying the number of strenuous, moderate, and mild bouts by 9, 5, and 3, respectively, and summing those values into an overall score that ranges from 0 to 119; higher scores are represent a greater volume of physical activity. This will be completed at follow-up testing.
Follow-Up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sleep Quality as measured by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index
Time Frame: Baseline
The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) measures sleep quality and sleep disturbances over the past four weeks and containing seven different components of sleep. Components of sleep are scored from 0 (fairly good) to 3 (very bad) and component scores are summed for a global score ranging from 0-21; higher scores are indicative of worse sleep quality. Participants will complete this questionnaire at baseline testing.
Baseline
Sleep Quality as measured by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index
Time Frame: Follow-up
The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) measures sleep quality and sleep disturbances over the past four weeks and containing seven different components of sleep. Components of sleep are scored from 0 (fairly good) to 3 (very bad) and component scores are summed for a global score ranging from 0-21; higher scores are indicative of worse sleep quality. Participants will complete this questionnaire at Follow-up testing.
Follow-up
Sleep Quality as measured by accelerometry
Time Frame: Baseline
Accelerometry provides device-measured aspects of sleep quality including sleep onset latency, time in bed, total sleep time, frequency of awakenings, time awake after sleep onset, and sleep efficiency. Participants will be instructed to wear one ActiGraph GT3X+ accelerometer device on the non-dominant wrist each night (i.e., during time in bed for scheduled sleep time) for seven nights following the baseline testing session.
Baseline
Sleep Quality as measured by accelerometry
Time Frame: Follow-up
Accelerometry provides device-measured aspects of sleep quality including sleep onset latency, time in bed, total sleep time, frequency of awakenings, time awake after sleep onset, and sleep efficiency. Participants will be instructed to wear one ActiGraph GT3X+ accelerometer device on the non-dominant wrist each night (i.e., during time in bed for scheduled sleep time) for seven nights following the follow-up testing session.
Follow-up
Daytime Sleepiness as measured by the Epworth Sleepiness Scale
Time Frame: Baseline
The Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) is an 8-item questionnaire whereby participants are asked to rate how likely they would be to doze off or fall asleep during eight different situations in "recent times" to provide a global score of daytime sleepiness. Items are scored on a range of 0 (would never doze) to 3 (high chance of dozing) and summed to provide a global score of daytime sleepiness ranging between 0 and 24 with higher scores indicating more daytime sleepiness. Participants will complete the questionnaire at baseline testing.
Baseline
Daytime Sleepiness as measured by the Epworth Sleepiness Scale
Time Frame: Follow-up
The Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) is an 8-item questionnaire whereby participants are asked to rate how likely they would be to doze off or fall asleep during eight different situations in "recent times" to provide a global score of daytime sleepiness. Items are scored on a range of 0 (would never doze) to 3 (high chance of dozing) and summed to provide a global score of daytime sleepiness ranging between 0 and 24 with higher scores indicating more daytime sleepiness. Participants will complete the questionnaire at Follow-up testing.
Follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Robert W Motl, PhD, University of Alabama at Birmingham

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 23, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

November 23, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 16, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 19, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

August 20, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 11, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 9, 2020

Last Verified

December 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe