Pathology Assessment of Mesorectal Fascia After TME by Laparoscopic, Open, TransAnal and Robotic Approaches (LOTARTME) (LOTARTME)

June 30, 2021 updated by: Marco Maria Lirici, San Giovanni Addolorata Hospital

Pathology Assessment of Mesorectal Fascia and Specimen Quality After TME by Laparoscopic, Open, TransAnal and Robotic Approaches (LOTARTME)

TME is the gold standard surgical treatment of rectal cancer. Specimen quality, integrity of mesorectal fascia and lymph nodes harvest are expression of radicality and good surgery. The LOTARTME study is designed to assess which of the open, laparoscopic, robotic and endoscopic transanal approach is superior. Primary outcome is the evaluation of completeness of mesorectal fascia according to Quirke classification. Secondary outcomes are lymph nodes harvest, local recurrences, overall survivals, cancer related survivals. Inclusion criteria: any patient of any age and sex undergoing to intent-to-treat surgery operated by experienced surgeon. Exclusion criteria: patients with rectal cancer undergoing palliative surgery or multivisceral resection; all patients operated by less experienced surgeons. Study period January 1, 2017 - June 30 2021 and patients enrollment: January 1, 2017 - December 31, 2020. Data collection and analysis: data are collected in a prospective database and statical analysis is carried out using AnalystSoft StatPlus for Windows Software.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Developed in 1992 by Heald Total Mesorectal Excision improved the long-term results of rectal cancer treatment with overall survivals increasing up to 80% and local recurrences decreasing down to 4%. Notwithstanding the introduction of laparoscopy and robotic technology and their application in the field of rectal cancer surgery in the last decades, no further improvement of rectal cancer survivals have been reported. Actually, completeness of mesorectal fat and fascia excision seems not to be improved with these new approaches, compared to standard open surgery. It has been proved that local recurrences are strictly related to the quality of TME and are significantly higher when mesorectal fascia is incomplete according to Quirke classification. In 2012 A. Lacy first reported the transanal approach to TME, developed to overcome the high challenges represented by low rectal dissection when difficult anatomy is present (i.e. obese pts, narrow pelvis, bulging tumors) that may impair the quality of surgical specimen and, therefore, increase the incidence of local recurrences and, indirectly, overall cancer related survivals. There is an ongoing clinical trial (COLOR III) that has been designed to assess whether long term results after TaTME are similar, better or worse than those of open or laparoscopic TME. Until then scientists and researchers may evaluate the effectiveness of TaTME compared to other surgical approaches (open, laparoscopic, robotic) assessing the quality of surgical specimens (i.e. completeness of mesorectal excision and integrity of mesorectal fascia according to Quirke classification). Investigators have designed a prospective observational cohort study assessing the quality of specimen and mesorectal fascia in all patients undergoing TME through an open, laparoscopic, robotic and transanal (TaTME) approach between January 2017 and December 2020. All patients have been followed-up with a required minimum follow-up of 6 months. Therefore, the study was terminated on June 2021. Inclusion criteria were: any patient of any age and sex undergoing intent-to-treat surgery operated by experienced surgeon (with ≥ 100 TME performed). Exclusion criteria: patients with rectal cancer undergoing palliative surgery or multivisceral resection, all patients operated by less experienced surgeons (< 100 TME performed).

Objective of the study:

Assessing the quality of the specimen after TME carried out through laparoscopic, open, robotic and endoscopic transanal approach; evaluating whether TaTME might be superior the other approaches in term of radicality of surgery and local recurrencies.

Primary outcome:

Quirke classification of mesorectal fat and fascia completeness. Three grade classification: complete, nearly complete, incomplete.

Secondary outcomes Lymph node harvest Local recurrences Overall survivals Cancer specific survivals Pathology assessment

A fresh specimen or in vacuum packing is sent for macroscopic assessment to the pathologist. The specimen is dealt as follows:

1) assessment of mesorectum quality; 2) ink painting of specimen non-peritonealized bare areas 3) the specimen is opened along the anterior aspect from the top and the bottom, leaving the bowel intact at a level just above and just below the tumour; 4) placement of formalin-soaked gauze wicks into the unopened ends of the bowel; 5) the specimen is fixed in 10% buffered formalin for at least 48 hours.

The fixed specimen is dealt as follows:

1) 3-5 mm intervals slices through the unopened rectum; 2) slices inspection to note: extent of tumour and the closest distance of tumour to the Circumferential Resection Margin (CRM); positive nodes and the distance of any positive node to the CRM; anterior, posterior or lateral closest distance of tumour to CRM; 3) lymph nodes detection within the fat away from the tumour

Block selection according to the followings:

1) tumor blocks showing closest CRM; 2) tumor blocks showing luminal aspect, 3) all lymph nodes; 4) any polyps; 5) proximal and distal resection margins (distal margin includes both mucosa and mesorectum).

The pathologist examined the specimen in a blinded fashion (unaware of the name of the operating surgeon and the technique performed).

Data are collected in a prospective database. Statistical analysis is carried out with AnalystSoft StatPlus for Windows Software. Chi-square test and chi-square test with Yates correction are used considering p-value significative at p<.05.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

153

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Italy
    • RM
      • Roma, RM, Italy, 00182
        • San Giovanni Addolorata Hospital Complex

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Stage 1 and 2 rectal cancer patients (preoperative assessment) undergoing surgery without neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy.

Stage 3 and 4 rectal cancer patients undergoing surgery after long-term or short-term chemoradiation therapy.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • intent to treat procedures
  • procedures performed by experienced surgeons (minimum of 100 TME)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • palliation surgery
  • multivisceral resections
  • procedures performed by inexperienced surgeons (less of 100 TME)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Open TME
Total Mesorectal Excision (TME) is the gold standard surgical treatment of rectal cancer. According to the technique first described by Bill Heald, TME entails the resection of the rectum including the whole mesorectal fat and an intact mesorectal fascia. Open TME is accomplished through a midline xifo-umbilical laparotomy and requires a complete mobilization of the left colon and central ligature of inferior mesenteric artery and vein.
Laparoscopic TME
Laparoscopic TME mirrors the procedure performed through laparotomy with the same operative steps and performing rectal resection including the excision of the surrounding mesorectal fat and fascia.
Robotic TME
Robotic TME mirrors the procedure described by Bill Heald for open surgery but the operation is performed by the master-slave DaVinci System under 3D laparoscopic guidance. The rectal resection is performed including mesorectal fat and fascia.
TransAnal TME
TaTME has first described by Antonio Lacy in 2012. This procedure has two steps: abdominal and perineal. The abdominal step is performed through a laparoscopic approach as described for laparoscopic TME but the caudal dissection is stopped right below the level of the peritoneal rectal reflection (Douglas pouch). The perineal step is accomplished transanally inserting a specially designed platform into the anal canal and performing the total mesorectal excision under endoscopic guidance.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Completeness of mesorectal fascia and specimen quality (specimen integrity after rectal resection)
Time Frame: 4 years
Specimen quality i.e. integrity of mesorectal fascia and clearance of radial margins are an important factor with impact on local recurrency of rectal cancer. the 3-grade Quirke classification is used to assess completeness of mesorectal fascia: complete, nearly complete and incomplete
4 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Lymph node harvest
Time Frame: 4 years
The number of lymph nodes harvested may influence patient's prognosis and survival. A minimum number of nodes is required to assess the cancer stage correctly: stage 2 rectal cancer with a less than 12 node harvest has a behaviour of a stage 3 rectal cancer in the medium and long term follow up.
4 years
Local recurrence
Time Frame: up to 54-month follow-up (range 6-54 months) with a median follow up respectively 54, 39, 38, 39,5 months for the open TME group, for the laparoscopic TME group, for the robotic TME group and for the TaTME group. Overall median FU = 44 months.
Local recurrence rate is intended the incidence of pelvic tumor recurrence, especially localized in the presacral area, and anastomotic recurrence
up to 54-month follow-up (range 6-54 months) with a median follow up respectively 54, 39, 38, 39,5 months for the open TME group, for the laparoscopic TME group, for the robotic TME group and for the TaTME group. Overall median FU = 44 months.
Overal survivals
Time Frame: Overall median follow-up 44 months (FU range 6-54 months), median follow-up per study group: Open TME 54 months, Laparoscopic TME 39 months, Robotic TME 38 months, TaTME 39,5 months.
short and medium term survivals (Kaplan-Meier estimate)
Overall median follow-up 44 months (FU range 6-54 months), median follow-up per study group: Open TME 54 months, Laparoscopic TME 39 months, Robotic TME 38 months, TaTME 39,5 months.
Cancer specific survival (CSS)
Time Frame: Overall median follow-up 44 months (FU range 6-54 months), median follow-up per study group: Open TME 54 months, Laparoscopic TME 39 months, Robotic TME 38 months, TaTME 39,5 months.
Cancer-specific survival (CSS) is defined as the duration from the date of diagnosis until death due to rectal cancer other than other causes
Overall median follow-up 44 months (FU range 6-54 months), median follow-up per study group: Open TME 54 months, Laparoscopic TME 39 months, Robotic TME 38 months, TaTME 39,5 months.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

San Giovanni Addolorata Hospital

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Marco Maria Lirici, MD, San Giovanni Addolorata Hospital Complex; Saint Camillus International University of Health Sciences

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

June 29, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 2, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 30, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

July 2, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 2, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 30, 2021

Last Verified

June 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • SGAddolorataH

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Rectal Cancer

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

CROs by country

CROs in Romania

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Subscribe