Chinese Herbal Medicine Treatment as Adjunct Therapy for Parkinson's Disease (HERB-PARK)

October 3, 2024 updated by: Hong Kong Baptist University

Chinese Herbal Medicine Treatment Based on Subgroup Differentiation as Adjunct Therapy for Parkinson's Disease: a Pilot add-on, Randomised, Controlled, Pragmatic Clinical Trial

Background: Parkinson's disease (PD) is a prevalent and debilitating condition. Conventional medications cannot control all symptoms and may inflict adverse effects. A survey reported that Chinese herbal medicine (CHM) is frequently sought. Existing CHM trials were contradictory and often of poor quality due to a lack of methodological rigor. A national clinical guideline was drafted in China with diagnostic criteria and treatment strategy of Chinese medicine (CM) patterns subgroups of PD. The suggested CHM was found to exhibit a neuroprotective effect in in vitro and in vivo studies. This trial aims to preliminarily assess the effect of CHM prescribed based on pattern differentiation on PD symptoms and patients' quality of life, and evaluate the feasibility of the trial design for a future large-scale trial.

Methods: This trial will be a pilot assessor- and data analyst blind, add-on, randomised, controlled, pragmatic clinical trial. 160 PD patients will be recruited and randomised into treatment or control groups in a 1:1 ratio. The trial will be conducted over 32 weeks. PD patients in the treatment group will be stratified into subgroups based on CM pattern and receive CHM accordingly in addition to conventional medication (ConM). The control group will receive ConM only. The primary outcome will be part II of the Movement Disorder Society Sponsored Revision of Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS). Secondary outcomes will include part and total scores of MDS-UPDRS, domain and total scores of Non-motor symptom scale (NMSS). Adverse events will be monitored by monthly follow-ups and questionnaires. Mixed models will be used to analyse data by Jamovi and R.

Expected outcomes: The success of our trial will show that the pragmatic design with subgroup differentiation is feasible and can produce reliable results. It will also provide preliminary data of the effect of CHM on improving clinical outcomes and quality of PD patients. Data collected will be used to optimize the study design of the future large-scale clinical study.

Ethical clearance: Ethical clearance of this study was given by the Research Ethics Committee of Hong Kong Baptist University (REC/20-21/0206).

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

160

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Hong Kong, Hong Kong
        • Department of Medicine, Queen Elizabeth Hospital
      • Hong Kong, Hong Kong
        • Hong Kong Parkinson's Disease Association

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. diagnosed with PD according to United Kingdom Parkinson's Disease Society Brain Bank (UKPDBB) diagnostic criteria
  2. aged 18 to 80 years old
  3. under stable ConM treatment with no alteration of dosage in the past 30 days

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. secondary PD or atypical parkinsonian disorder
  2. used antidepressants in the previous month
  3. with concurrent psychiatric, mood, or other neurological disorders
  4. suicidal (with suicidal thoughts in the past year)
  5. with concurrent severe disorders, such as cancer and myocardial infarction
  6. participation in another Chinese herbal medicine clinical study
  7. pregnant or breast-feeding
  8. Hoehn and Yahr (H&Y) stage 4 or above
  9. liver and renal function derangement

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Conventional medication
Conventional medication for Parkinson's disease include levodopa, dopamine agonist, Monoamine oxidase-B inhibitors, Catechol-O-methyltransferase inhibitors, etc.
Levodopa, dopamine agonist, Monoamine oxidase-B inhibitors, Catechol-O-methyltransferase inhibitors, etc.
Experimental: Chinese herbal medicine treatment plus conventional medication

Participants will receive integrated medicine treatment combining Chinese herbal treatment, given in the form of granules, and conventional medication for 32 weeks. Patients will be differentiated into 4 subgroups based on their Chinese medicine pattern, and receive herbal treatment accordingly. An existing clinical pathway will guide the diagnosis and treatment of the Chinese medicine patterns. The four pattern subgroups are as follows:

1) the "Phlegm-heat stirring Wind" subgroup; 2) the "Spleen-and Kidney-Yang" subgroup; 3) the "Internal Stirring of Yang and Wind" subgroup; and 4) the "Qi deficiency and stasis of Blood" subgroup

To resemble actual clinical practice, minor adjustment of herbal treatment will be possible and also adhere to the mentioned clinical guideline. The dosage of each herbal drug will follow the instructions of China Pharmacopeia.

Levodopa, dopamine agonist, Monoamine oxidase-B inhibitors, Catechol-O-methyltransferase inhibitors, etc.
  1. Huanglian Wendan Decoction
  2. Jin Gui Shen Qi Pill
  3. Liu Wei Di Huang Pill plus Tian Ma Gou Teng Decoction
  4. Bu Yang Huan Wu Decoction

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
the Movement Disorder Society Sponsored Revision of Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) Part II
Time Frame: from baseline to week 32
Assesses the self-reported motor experience of the daily living of Parkinson's patients Scale (Higher the score, the more severe the condition or symptom): 0: Normal, 1: Slight, 2: Mild, 3: Moderate, 4: Severe
from baseline to week 32

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Part I, III and IV as well as the total score of MDS-UPDRS
Time Frame: from baseline to week 32
Comprehensively assesses motor, non motor, and motor complications of Parkinson's patients Scale (Higher the score, the more severe the condition or symptom): Scale: 0: Normal, 1: Slight, 2: Mild, 3: Moderate, 4: Severe
from baseline to week 32
Non-motor symptom scale
Time Frame: from baseline to week 32
Assesses in details the severity of non motor symptoms of Parkinson's Scale (Higher the score, the more severe the condition or symptom): Severity: 0 = None, 1= Mild (symptoms present but causes little distress or disturbance to patient), 2 = Moderate (some distress or disturbance to patient), 3 = Severe (major source of distress or disturbance to patient); Frequency: 1 = Rarely (<1/wk), 2 = Often (1/wk), 3 = Frequent (several times per week), 4 = Very Frequent (daily or all the time)
from baseline to week 32

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Min C Li, PhD, School of Chinese medicine, Hong Kong Baptist University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

January 31, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 7, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 10, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

August 11, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 8, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 3, 2024

Last Verified

January 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

all IPD that underlie results in a publication, including demographics and characteristics, outcome assessment data, etc

IPD Sharing Time Frame

from baseline to week 32

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe