Effects of Proprioceptive Sensitivity Stimulation Via the SURA Electrodevice on Kinematics, Kinetics and Spatiotemporal Parameters of Gait.

Effects of Proprioceptive Sensitivity Stimulation Via the SURA Electrodevice on Kinematics, Kinetics and Spatiotemporal Parameters of Gait: a Pilot Study.

Recovery of function in people with central nervous system (CNS) injury after stroke is very much like a relearning process that takes advantage of preserved sensorimotor circuits. Relearning can be optimised by providing appropriate proprioceptive (or deep sensory) information to the spinal cord with the aim of maximally engaging the preserved neural circuits. The development of the SURA electrodevice offers this sensitive input mechanism, within the Botton Up therapies. And through research on its use, the impact on the different dimensions related to gait and its components, and the translation to the functional reality of the person, will be evaluated.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Objective: To assess whether the SURA electrodevice improves relevant aspects of dynamic balance in stroke survivors.

Methods:The design is a prospective longitudinal randomised controlled trial with simple masking by the examiner to be carried out at the facilities of the Ricard i Fortuny Social and Health Centre (CSSV RiF). The first phase of the intervention (device-on rest phases) will consist of the activation of the device on the muscle motor points of the medial belly of the gastrocnemius, soleus and peroneus muscles. The motor points are the site of penetration of the motor nerve fibers and the highest concentration of motor plates in the muscle, which when stimulated produce the maximum effective muscle contraction. The second phase (OFF activity-device phase) consists of carrying out the therapy as the patient had been doing normally in the Neurorehabilitation department at the center at a rate of 3 sessions per week on an outpatient basis according to their individualized needs.

The control group will perform the same activity, but without the device activated during the device-on rest phases and adapted to the needs of each participant in their usual sessions without a standardized protocol.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Vilafranca Del Penedés
      • Barcelona, Vilafranca Del Penedés, Spain, 08720

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Unilateral hemispheric stroke (ischaemic or haemorrhagic) diagnosed by MRI or CT scan, at least 3 months after onset of stroke
  • Ability to walk at least 10m (irrespective of the need for assistance)
  • Weakness in ankle dorsiflexion of the paretic limb (TFM>3)
  • Ankle ROM >30° and 0° of foot dorsiflexion in knee extension
  • Age between 18 and 85 years
  • Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) > 24 score, non-disabling cognitive impairment
  • Presence of clonus and hyperresistance to passive joint movement.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of Cognitive, visual or cardiorespiratory disorder (including cardiac pacemaker placement, heart failure and arrhythmia)
  • Orthopaedic intervention for IE
  • Balance disorders with vestibular features
  • Skin diseases
  • Botulinum toxin treatment within the last year.
  • In addition, subjects who had participated in other studies in the last six months that could interact with the current study will be excluded.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: EXPERIMENTAL
The first phase of the intervention (device-on rest phases) will consist of the activation of the device on the muscle motor points of the medial belly of the gastrocnemius, soleus and peroneus muscles.The second phase (OFF activity-device phase) consists of carrying out the therapy as the patient had been doing normally in the Neurorehabilitation department at the center at a rate of 3 sessions per week on an outpatient basis according to their individualized needs.
The motor points are the site of penetration of the motor nerve fibres and the highest concentration of motor plates in the muscle, which when stimulated produce the maximum effective muscle contraction. For 15 minutes and in a comfortable seated position at 90° hip, knee and foot, sustained pressure of 30 seconds each shall be exerted through the output plunger of the proprioceptive stimulus device.
Sham Comparator: COMPARATOR
The first phase of the intervention (device-on rest phases) will consist of the activation of the device on the muscle motor points of the medial belly of the gastrocnemius, soleus and peroneus muscles.The second phase (OFF activity-device phase) consists of carrying out the therapy as the patient had been doing normally in the Neurorehabilitation department at the center at a rate of 3 sessions per week on an outpatient basis according to their individualized needs.The control group will perform the same activity, but without the device activated during the device-on rest phases and adapted to the needs of each participant in their usual sessions without a standardized protocol.
The motor points are the site of penetration of the motor nerve fibres and the highest concentration of motor plates in the muscle, which when stimulated produce the maximum effective muscle contraction. For 15 minutes and in a comfortable seated position at 90° hip, knee and foot, sustained pressure of 30 seconds each shall be exerted through the output plunger of the proprioceptive stimulus device.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The kinematics, kinetics and spatio-temporal parameters of gait.
Time Frame: Start of intervention, at 4 weeks and at completion 8 weeks
An instrumented gait analysis will be performed to obtain a set of spatiotemporal, kinematic and kinetic measurements.The movement will be captured by the Ephion Vitality system. The system consists of two pressure templates and seven inertial sensors (measuring linear acceleration, angular velocity and magnetic field in all three dimensions).
Start of intervention, at 4 weeks and at completion 8 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Neuromuscular Activation
Time Frame: Start of intervention, at 4 weeks and at completion 8 weeks
Neuromuscular Activation Myontec surface electromyograph with sensors will collect the electrical activity of the lower limb muscles involved in gait coactivation. (Activation of motor units in milliseconds)
Start of intervention, at 4 weeks and at completion 8 weeks

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Maximum isometric force
Time Frame: Start of intervention, at 4 weeks and at completion 8 weeks
Maximum isometric force Measurement in Newtons of the muscle groups of hip extensors and flexors, hip internal and external rotators, hip abductors and adductors, knee flexors and extensors, dorsiflexors and plantar flexors of the foot, foot inverters and eversors with K-Force Muscle Controller Kinvent manual muscle dynamometry.
Start of intervention, at 4 weeks and at completion 8 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 24, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 20, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 21, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 29, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

May 2, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 14, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 8, 2025

Last Verified

May 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2024-04-18

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe