Improving Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder by Reducing Negative Future-Oriented Mental Imagery (PROFIT)

August 22, 2024 updated by: Claudi Bockting, Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)

Improving Treatment of Severe Major Depressive Disorder by Reducing Negative Future-Oriented Mental Imagery

Patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) often do not sufficiently benefit from treatment. That is, around 50% of patients with MDD do not respond to treatment and 20-30% only achieve partial remission. Future-oriented negative mental imagery (e.g., mental images of suicide or own funeral) is likely an important maintaining factor of depression and initial studies in depression indicate that targeting mental imagery with 'imagery rescripting' could be a promising therapeutic technique to reduces depressive symptomatology by targeting these images directly that elicits strong affects/emotions and depressive symptomatology.

Before testing the (cost)effectiveness of future-oriented imagery rescripting to treatment as usual (TAU), a pilot study is needed to examine 1) the acceptability of the intervention, 2) the feasibility of the study, and 3) the variance of effect on reducing depressive symptomatology that can serve as estimate of the sample size for a follow-up randomized controlled trial (RCT).

A multicenter pilot RCT with a mixed factorial design with three time points (i.e., baseline, post-treatment, and follow-up of 3 months) will test 50 patients with MDD who will be randomly allocated to future-oriented imagery rescripting plus TAU or TAU only.

The sample consists of adult patients of 18 years or older with an MDD diagnosis.

All patients in this pilot study receive TAU, which involves a combination of pharmacological and psychological interventions. Half of the patients will also receive 3-5 sessions of future-oriented imagery rescripting (ImRes). In each ImRes session, patients identify an image of a autobiographic catastrophic future event (e.g., catastrophic images of future suicide or the loss of work or a loved one). They are subsequently asked to "rescript" this image into a more benign one.

The primary aim of this pilot study is to determine the acceptability of the intervention. The secondary aims are to elucidate factors that may facilitate or hinder the feasibility of the follow-up RCT (e.g., recruitment process) and to estimate the variance of the effect on reduction of depressive symptomatology, which informs the sample size calculation of the follow-up RCT. To study acceptability, the investigators assess depressive symptoms (BDI-II and BADS) and treatment satisfaction (SRS and CSQ-8). To measure feasibility, the investigators will assess recruitment/admission ratio, dropout and (serious) adverse events. Finally, to estimate the variance of effects, group effects on the BDI-II will be tested at post-treatment and follow-up (corrected for baseline).

Imagery rescripting on negative memories has already proven effective and safe in MDD patients. There is no known major risk associated with study participation. Patient burden comprises an online or phone-based screening interview of maximum 60 minutes and several questionnaires. Participants receive a reimbursement of €25,- after study completion (i.e., after follow-up assessment). The project will contribute to improving the care for patients with MDD. If the results show that the intervention is feasible and acceptable, this pilot study will inform the setup of the main RCT on the (cost)effectiveness of the intervention (ZonMW).

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Noord-Holland
      • Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, Netherlands, 1105 AZ
        • Recruiting
        • Amsterdam UMC (location AMC)
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Prof. Dr. Claudi Bockting

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aged 18 years or older;
  • Meet DSM-5 criteria for major depressive disorder;
  • Presence of 1-3 negative future-oriented mental images, which cause distress;
  • Be able to understand questionnaires and study information letter;
  • In case of medication use: are stable on medication for six weeks or longer.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Current or history of psychotic disorder;
  • Current or history of bipolar disorder;
  • Severe cognitive impairment (e.g., mental retardation) as evidenced by educational records, parental report and/or clinical impression;
  • Current EMDR or imagery rescripting therapy;
  • Other circumstances that might affect participation (e.g., severe medical disorder, relocation).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Treatment as Usual
Participants receive Treatment as Usual (TAU) for their depression (i.e., psychotherapy and/or medication).
Psychotherapy and/or medication
Experimental: Imagery Rescripting
Participants receive Treatment as Usual (TAU) for their depression (i.e., psychotherapy and/or medication) plus 3-5 future-oriented imagery rescripting therapy (45 minutes weekly sessions).
Psychotherapy and/or medication
In this pilot study, in the screening phase, negative or catastrophic future-oriented images will be explored for all patients, including ratings of distress. The future-oriented imagery rescripting consists of 3-5 sessions; each image will be treated in one session, starting with the image that causes highest distress. The protocol is largely based on Hackmann (1998), with minor adaptations from other protocols.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Beck Depression Inventory (Acceptability)
Time Frame: From baseline to the end of the study at follow-up (total of 18 weeks).
Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) for depressive symptoms, consisting of 21 questions with scores between 0-3 whereby a higher score indicates a worse outcome.
From baseline to the end of the study at follow-up (total of 18 weeks).
Behavioral Activation for Depression Scale (Acceptability)
Time Frame: From baseline to the end of the study at follow-up (total of 18 weeks).
Behavioral Activation for Depression Scale (BADS-NL) for depressive symptoms, consisting of 25 questions with scores between 0-6 whereby a higher score indicates a worse outcome.
From baseline to the end of the study at follow-up (total of 18 weeks).
Session Rating Scale (Treatment satisfaction)
Time Frame: During treatment intervention (total of 5 weeks)
Session Rating Scale (SRS) is filled in during the intervention, consisting of 4 visual analogue scales ranging between 0-100.
During treatment intervention (total of 5 weeks)
Client satisfaction Questionnaire (treatment satisfaction)
Time Frame: After the study intervention and at follow-up
Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8), consisting of 8 questions whereby the answers ranged from totally disagree to totally agree
After the study intervention and at follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Recruitment/admission ratio (Feasibility)
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of the study at follow-up (total of 18 weeks).
Recruitment/admission ratio.
From enrollment to the end of the study at follow-up (total of 18 weeks).
Dropout (Feasibility)
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of the study at follow-up (total of 18 weeks).
Dropout.
From enrollment to the end of the study at follow-up (total of 18 weeks).
(serious) adverse events (Feasibility)
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of the study at follow-up (total of 18 weeks).
(serious) adverse events.
From enrollment to the end of the study at follow-up (total of 18 weeks).
Variance of effect
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of the study at follow-up (total of 18 weeks).
Group effects on the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) will be tested at post-treatment and 3 months follow-up (corrected for baseline).
From enrollment to the end of the study at follow-up (total of 18 weeks).

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5
Time Frame: Screening
Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5; SCID-5 - Dutch version: sections on depressive disorders, psychotic disorder, anxiety disorders, substance use disorder and posttraumatic stress disorder
Screening
Positive and Negative Affect Schedule
Time Frame: From baseline to the end of the study at follow-up (total of 18 weeks).
Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) for affect, consisting of 20 questions with scores between 1-5. For the total positive score, a higher score indicates more of a positive affect. For the total negative score, a lower score indicates less of a negative affect.
From baseline to the end of the study at follow-up (total of 18 weeks).
5-level EQ-5D
Time Frame: From baseline to the end of the study at follow-up (total of 18 weeks).
5-level EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L) for quality of life, consisting of 5 questions with scores between 1-5 whereby a higher score indicates a worse outcome.
From baseline to the end of the study at follow-up (total of 18 weeks).
Generalized Anxiety Disorder
Time Frame: From baseline to the end of the study at follow-up (total of 18 weeks).
Generalized Anxiety Disorder questionnaire (GAD-7) for anxiety, consisting of 7 questions with scores between 0-3 whereby a higher score indicates a higher burden.
From baseline to the end of the study at follow-up (total of 18 weeks).
Rating of mental images
Time Frame: From baseline to the end of the study at follow-up (total of 18 weeks).
Rating of mental images on emotions, vividness, uncontrollability, distress and core belief, using a visual analogue scale, ranging from 0-100 whereby a higher score indicates a high level of presence.
From baseline to the end of the study at follow-up (total of 18 weeks).
Prospective Imagery Task
Time Frame: From baseline to the end of the study at follow-up (total of 18 weeks).
Prospective imagery task (PIT) for vivedness and likelihood of mental images, consisting of 20 questions with scores between 0-5, whereby a higher score indicates a higher possibility.
From baseline to the end of the study at follow-up (total of 18 weeks).
Monitoring of Treatment as Usual
Time Frame: From baseline to the end of the study at follow-up (total of 18 weeks).
Monitoring of 'Treatment as Usual' (TAU) via their therapist. "Which therapy has the patient received (including medication + dose; possible in-patient treatment)?"
From baseline to the end of the study at follow-up (total of 18 weeks).

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

November 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 23, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 6, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

June 12, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 23, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 22, 2024

Last Verified

August 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2023.0973
  • NL85551.018.23 (Other Identifier: ToetsingOnline)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Very sensitive information.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe