Effectiveness of Percutaneous Neuromodulation in the Treatment of Cervical Pain in University Students.

January 27, 2026 updated by: CEU San Pablo University
A non-randomized experimental study will be conducted to investigate the effect of Ecoguided Percutaneous Neuromodulation on patients with and without neck pain in college students. The sample will be collected in a non-probabilistic way at convenience among the students at the San Pablo-CEU University, with a sample that will be divided into two groups: group 1 (G1) with neck pain and group 2 (G2).

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

52

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Madrid
      • Boadilla del Monte, Madrid, Spain, 28668
        • San Pablo CEU University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Current Cervical Pain on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) greater than 3.
  • Neck pain in the last 12 weeks, and no treatment has been performed.
  • Disability index of 8% or more on the Neck Disability Index.
  • That they have undergone treatment.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Neck pain associated with vertigo.
  • Osteoporosis (control X-ray).
  • Diagnosed psychological disorders.
  • Vertebral fractures (control X-ray).
  • Tumors.
  • Diagnosed metabolic diseases.
  • Neck surgery.
  • Belonephobia.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Neck Pain Group
Ecoguided Percutaneous Neuromodulation over the posterior branch of the cervical multifidus, for 10 minutes, with a frequency of 10 HZ.
Active Comparator: Non Neck Pain Group
Ecoguided Percutaneous Neuromodulation over the posterior branch of the cervical multifidus, for 10 minutes, with a frequency of 10 HZ.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain threshold
Time Frame: up to 1 Week
Portable hand pressure algometer (FPX 50/220, Wagner Instruments, Greenwich, USA), measured in kg / cm² (kilogram per centimeter squared).
up to 1 Week

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Health-related quality of life
Time Frame: Baseline
The Short Form Health Questionnaire (SF-36) questionnaire, which examines health-related quality of life under eight sub-titles; It consists of 36 items. The SF36 questionnaire will be used in the study.
Baseline
Pain by visual analog scale
Time Frame: Baseline
usual visual analog scale (VAS) of pain (line from 0: no pain to 10:worst pain)
Baseline
Pain by visual analog scale
Time Frame: after intervention
usual visual analog scale (VAS) of pain (line from 0: no pain to 10:worst pain)
after intervention
Pain by visual analog scale
Time Frame: Follow-up at 1 week
usual visual analog scale (VAS) of pain (line from 0: no pain to 10:worst pain)
Follow-up at 1 week
Neck Disability Index Questionnaire.
Time Frame: Baseline
Quantification of pain and disabilty
Baseline
Neck Disability Index Questionnaire.
Time Frame: after intervention
Quantification of pain and disabilty
after intervention
Neck Disability Index Questionnaire.
Time Frame: Follow-up at 1 week
Quantification of pain and disabilty
Follow-up at 1 week
Kinesiophobia
Time Frame: Baseline
Measured with Tampa Kinesiophobia Scale questionnaire (TSK-11SV) Spanish version. Minimum and maximum values are between 11 and 44 point, a result with higher values indicates higher level of kinesiofobia.
Baseline
Kinesiophobia
Time Frame: after intervention
Measured with Tampa Kinesiophobia Scale questionnaire (TSK-11SV) Spanish version. Minimum and maximum values are between 11 and 44 point, a result with higher values indicates higher level of kinesiofobia.
after intervention
Kinesiophobia
Time Frame: Follow-up at 1 week
Measured with Tampa Kinesiophobia Scale questionnaire (TSK-11SV) Spanish version. Minimum and maximum values are between 11 and 44 point, a result with higher values indicates higher level of kinesiofobia.
Follow-up at 1 week
Pain Catastrophizing Scale
Time Frame: Baseline
Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PAS) will be used to evaluate the participants' pain-related thoughts and feelings.
Baseline
Pain Catastrophizing Scale
Time Frame: after intervention
Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PAS) will be used to evaluate the participants' pain-related thoughts and feelings.
after intervention
Pain Catastrophizing Scale
Time Frame: Follow-up at 1 week
Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PAS) will be used to evaluate the participants' pain-related thoughts and feelings.
Follow-up at 1 week
Health-related quality of life
Time Frame: after intervention
The Short Form Health Questionnaire (SF-36) questionnaire, which examines health-related quality of life under eight sub-titles; It consists of 36 items. The SF36 questionnaire will be used in the study.
after intervention
Health-related quality of life
Time Frame: Follow-up at 1 week
The Short Form Health Questionnaire (SF-36) questionnaire, which examines health-related quality of life under eight sub-titles; It consists of 36 items. The SF36 questionnaire will be used in the study.
Follow-up at 1 week
Sonoelastography
Time Frame: Baseline

This diagnostic test would be executed by a Physiotherapist who has experiences of using General Electric, P9 model ultrasound system for more than three year. The equipment to obtain the image will be used with a frequency of 12 MHz, 22 dB gain, 85 dynamic range, brightness at 17 and depth of 4 cm.

The transducer will be placed on the spinosa of C4 and the probe will be moved towards the transverse of each of the sides, to identify the image of the multifidus muscle in depth.

Once the muscle is located in this segment, a longitudinal and transverse image of the muscle will be obtained, performing the elastography at the same time and calculating the elastographic values (tissue resistance in kilopascals and transmission speed in meters/second).

Baseline
Sonoelastography
Time Frame: after intervention

This diagnostic test would be executed by a Physiotherapist who has experiences of using General Electric, P9 model ultrasound system for more than three year. The equipment to obtain the image will be used with a frequency of 12 MHz, 22 dB gain, 85 dynamic range, brightness at 17 and depth of 4 cm.

The transducer will be placed on the spinosa of C4 and the probe will be moved towards the transverse of each of the sides, to identify the image of the multifidus muscle in depth.

Once the muscle is located in this segment, a longitudinal and transverse image of the muscle will be obtained, performing the elastography at the same time and calculating the elastographic values (tissue resistance in kilopascals and transmission speed in meters/second).

after intervention
Sonoelastography
Time Frame: Follow-up at 1 week

This diagnostic test would be executed by a Physiotherapist who has experiences of using General Electric, P9 model ultrasound system for more than three year. The equipment to obtain the image will be used with a frequency of 12 MHz, 22 dB gain, 85 dynamic range, brightness at 17 and depth of 4 cm.

The transducer will be placed on the spinosa of C4 and the probe will be moved towards the transverse of each of the sides, to identify the image of the multifidus muscle in depth.

Once the muscle is located in this segment, a longitudinal and transverse image of the muscle will be obtained, performing the elastography at the same time and calculating the elastographic values (tissue resistance in kilopascals and transmission speed in meters/second).

Follow-up at 1 week

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 31, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 30, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

November 30, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 3, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 25, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

June 28, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 28, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 27, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Neck Pain

Clinical Trials on Ecoguided Percutaneous Neuromodulation

Subscribe