A Diagnostic Prediction Model for Prostate Cancer in Patients With PI-RADS Score 3

February 10, 2025 updated by: XiaoJun, Anhui Provincial Hospital

Construction and Validation of a Diagnostic Prediction Model for Prostate Cancer in Patients With PI-RADS Score 3: a Multicenter, Retrospective Study

The goal of this observational study is to construct a predictive model for improving the diagnostic accuracy in patients with PI-RADS score of 3. The main aims of this study are:

  • Construct a diagnostic model of patients with PI-RADS of score.
  • Internal and external validation of the model.
  • Decision curve analysis. The data of participants was collected retrospectively.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

For patients with a PI-RADS score of 3, the diagnosis of prostate cancer is still use prostate biopsy, but the detection rates of prostate cancer and clinically significant prostate cancer are approximately 30% and 15%. It can be seen that most patients with PI-RADS 3 undergo unnecessary prostate biopsy and bear the risk of complications such as urinary tract infection. This makes most patients with PI-RADS 3 choose to refuse invasive prostate biopsy. Although researchers are committed to exploring biomarkers with high sensitivity and specificity, the application of biomarkers alone often cannot achieve the expected results. At present, the guidelines have recommended the use of diagnostic prediction models to assess patients' prostate cancer risk. Doctors and patients use diagnostic models to assess the risk of prostate cancer before prostate biopsy. For patients with a low probability of cancer, biopsy can be temporarily avoided, which to a certain extent reduces the phenomenon of prostate cancer overdiagnosis. This study plans to work with multiple medical centers to conduct statistical analysis based on existing prostate cancer screening markers combined with patients' clinical data such as prostate volume, prostate-specific antigen density, apparent diffusion coefficient, PI-RADS score and postoperative Gleason score, and then construct a prostate cancer diagnostic model to improve the diagnostic accuracy of prostate cancer for patients with PI-RADS score of 3. This will be of great significance for improving the early diagnosis of patients with PI-RADS 3 and reducing unnecessary prostate puncture biopsies.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

460

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Anhui
      • Bengbu, Anhui, China, 233000
        • Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical University
      • Hefei, Anhui, China, 230001
        • Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC
      • Wuhu, Anhui, China, 241000
        • Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

This is a multicenter retrospective study. All enrolled patients were clinically suspected of prostate cancer (abnormal serum PSA level or DRE), had an indication for prostate biopsy and eventually underwent prostate biopsy. Before biospy, patients also need to complete mpMRI examination, the examination sequence includes at least multi-plane T2WI and multi-b value DWI, and the final patient PI-RADS score needs to be 3.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with clinically suspected prostate cancer (abnormal PSA level or DRE);
  2. All patients have undergone mpMRI and have complete imaging data;
  3. The PI-RADS score of patients was 3;
  4. Prostate biopsy was performed and has clear pathological results.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. The patient's serum tPSA is <4ng/ml or >100ng/ml;
  2. Repeated prostate biopsy;
  3. The patient's clinical, imaging, or pathological data are incomplete.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Patients with clinical suspicion of prostate cancer and have PI-RADS score of 3
Patients with clinical suspicion of prostate cancer (see inclusion criteria) and have PI-RADS score (results of mpMRI) of 3.
All patients were required to underwent transperineal prostate biopsy and have corresponding pathological diagnosis results.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Multivariate logistic regression analyses and calculate the odds ratios (95% confidence interval ) of the clinical variables for clinically significant prostate cancer
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 3 months
The clinically significant prostate cancer was defined as Gleason score ≥ 3+4
through study completion, an average of 3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Validation by calculating the C-statistics, drawing ROC curves (AUC values) and calibration curves.
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 3 months
Evaluate the discrimination and calibration of the model constructed by logistic regression analyses
through study completion, an average of 3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jun Xiao, Pro., The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 31, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

October 31, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 4, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 11, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

July 18, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 10, 2025

Last Verified

February 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe