Integrating Chiropractic Care and Mind-Body Training for the Treatment of Nonspecific Chronic Neck Pain

July 26, 2024 updated by: Peter M. Wayne, Ph.D., Brigham and Women's Hospital

Integrating Chiropractic Care and Mind-Body Training for the Treatment of Nonspecific Chronic Neck Pain in Nurses

Chronic neck pain is particularly prevalent among nurses. Nurses experiencing neck pain frequently report its impacts including decreased job satisfaction and reduced productivity. In recent years, non-pharmacologic approaches have increasingly been used treatments for the management of neck pain. Exercise and manual therapies represent two of the most common non-pharmacologic interventions for pain. The purpose of this study was to perform a pilot study of combined multimodal chiropractic care and Tai Chi for neck pain in nurses to help inform the design of a future, full-scale pragmatic trial.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The lifetime prevalence of chronic neck pain is approximately 50%, and it is associated with substantial societal and individual burden. Neck pain is prevalent among healthcare workers, specifically among nurses. About 45% of nurses experience neck pain, but rates may vary by population and nursing type. Neck pain in nurses significantly contributes to sickness absence and negatively impacts nurses' productivity and performance at work. Neck pain is a burden on nurses' individual health and on the healthcare system as a whole. Two of the most common non-pharmacological approaches for the management of neck pain are exercise and manual therapies, and there is some evidence that multimodal approaches combining the two are more effective than unimodal strategies. Given the widespread availability in most metropolitan areas of both Tai Chi and chiropractic care, development of an evidence-based care regimen integrating Tai Chi mind-body self-care with chiropractic represents a practical strategy for management of neck pain.

To help inform the design of a larger-scale trial evaluating the combined effects of Tai Chi and chiropractic care for neck pain, the investigators propose to conduct a single-arm pilot study to evaluate the feasibility of delivering coordinated chiropractic care and Tai Chi via community-practitioners for nurses at Mass General Brigham Hospitals with chronic neck pain. 21 nurses with chronic neck pain that meet all study eligibility criteria will be recruited to receive 10 chiropractic treatments and weekly Tai Chi training over 16 weeks.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

21

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02215
        • Osher Center for Integrative Health

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Nurses employed at Mass General Brigham Hospitals
  • Chronic nonspecific neck pain at least 5 days a week for at least 3 consecutive months
  • Neck pain level of 3 or higher as reported on a numerical scale ranging from 0 to 10, with 10 described as 'worst neck pain imaginable'
  • Agreeable to participate and commit to study interventions
  • Neck Disability Index score of 5 or greater
  • Fluent in English

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Currently, or having received chiropractic care in past 12 months
  • Regular practice (on average, weekly) of Yoga, Tai Chi or Qigong in the past 6 months
  • Any major systemic illness or unstable medical or psychiatric condition requiring immediate treatment or that could lead to difficulty complying with the protocol
  • Any disability precluding exercise practice
  • History of stroke, carotid artery dissection, or vertebral artery dissection
  • Signs of myelopathy or carotid bruits or evidence of pathological hypermobility (e.g. Ehlers Danlos Syndrome) during the clinical exam
  • Neck pain caused by congenital deformity of the spine that contraindicate treatment, neck pain related to neoplasm, inflammatory rheumatic disease, neurological disorder, active oncologic disease, severe affective disorder, addiction, or psychosis
  • Neck pain associated with radicular pain or radiculopathy
  • Pregnancy
  • Recent spinal injections (in the past 4 weeks)
  • Neck pain with litigation, any prior cervical surgery/spinal surgery within previous year
  • Persons currently involved in a disability/accident claim

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Combined chiropractic care and Tai Chi
All participants will be enrolled in a 16-week intervention period during which time they will receive 10 chiropractic treatments in addition to weekly Tai Chi training.
Chiropractic will be personalized to the patients clinical needs within the scope of chiropractic practice in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts including: posture correction/spinal stabilization exercises; soft tissue relaxation techniques; spinal manipulation/mobilization; breathing and relaxation techniques; stretches, self-care; ergonomic modifications; bracing and supports. Chiropractic will be administered by one of two chiropractors at the Osher Clinical Center. Tai Chi will take place at one of two schools used in prior NIH funded trials.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Recruitment
Time Frame: 6 months
Rate of enrollment (number of interested participants/number enrolled) and the percentage of eligible participants who consented to participate.
6 months
Retention
Time Frame: 16 weeks
Percentage of participants who completed the 16-week intervention and follow-up measures.
16 weeks
Adherence to interventions
Time Frame: 16 weeks
Proportion of participants who attend 70% of the chiropractic visits and 60% of the weekly Tai Chi classes.
16 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain Severity
Time Frame: Assessed at baseline and at week 16.
Measured using a 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS) with 0 indicating "no pain at all" and 10 indicating "worst neck pain imaginable".
Assessed at baseline and at week 16.
Neck Disability Index (NDI)
Time Frame: Assessed at baseline and at week 16.
Self-report questionnaire used to determine how neck pain impacts daily activities of living and self-related neck pain disability. Scores range from 10 - 60. Higher scores indicate greater disability.
Assessed at baseline and at week 16.
Pain on Movement (POM)
Time Frame: Assessed at baseline and at week 16.
Participants are asked to flex, extend, laterally flex, and laterally rotate their necks to the left and right. The evoked pain is measured on a 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS) with 0 indicating "no pain at all" and 10 indicating "worst neck pain imaginable", for each direction. An average score is taken, with scores closer to 10 indicating more pain.
Assessed at baseline and at week 16.
Bothersomeness of Pain
Time Frame: Assessed at baseline and at week 16.
Measured using a 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS) with 0 indicating "neck pain not at all bothersome" and 10 indicating "neck pain extremely bothersome".
Assessed at baseline and at week 16.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures Information System 29 (PROMIS-29)
Time Frame: Assessed at baseline and at week 16.
A system of validated, highly reliable self-reported measures of health status for physical, mental, and social well-being. Raw scores are rescaled to standardized T-scores with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation (SD) of 10. A higher PROMIS T-score represents more of the item being measured.
Assessed at baseline and at week 16.
Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI)
Time Frame: Assessed at baseline and at week 16.
A 3-section, 22-item self-report introspective psychological inventory pertaining to occupational burnout. Raw scores for the first subscale range from 0-54, for the second range from 0-30, and for the third range from 0-48. A higher score in the first two sections and a low score in the last section may indicate the presence of burnout.
Assessed at baseline and at week 16.
Generalized Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES)
Time Frame: Assessed at baseline and at week 16.
The GSES consists of 10 items with a 4-point Likert response scale ranging from 1 ("not at all true") to 4 ("exactly true"). Higher summed scores indicate greater self-efficacy to complete the task.
Assessed at baseline and at week 16.
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale
Time Frame: Assessed at baseline and at week 16.
A 14-item self-report questionnaire, with two seven-item sub scales, that measures current feelings of anxiety and depression. The total score for each sub scale ranges from 0-21, with higher scores representing higher levels of depression and anxiety.
Assessed at baseline and at week 16.
Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness (MAIA)
Time Frame: Assessed at baseline and at week 16.
A self-report questionnaire consisting of 8 scales, addressing 5 dimensions of body awareness. Dimensions are scored individually, and scores for each question are between 0-5, where higher scores equate to more awareness of bodily sensation.
Assessed at baseline and at week 16.
Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia
Time Frame: Assessed at baseline and at week 16.
A 17-item self-report instrument that measures pain-related fear. Scores range from 17-68, with higher scores indicating higher levels of kinesiophobia.
Assessed at baseline and at week 16.
Stanford Presenteeism Scale, 6-item version (SPS-6)
Time Frame: Assessed at baseline and at week 16.
SPS-6 is a 6-item questionnaire assessing work quality and productivity. Scores range from 6-30, with higher scores indicating increased presenteeism.
Assessed at baseline and at week 16.
Trail Making Test II
Time Frame: Assessed at baseline and at week 16.
This two part cognitive tests is scored based on the number of sections it takes to complete each part of the test. Scores higher than the population average indicate higher degrees of cognitive impairment.
Assessed at baseline and at week 16.
Gait Speed
Time Frame: Assessed at baseline and at week 16.
Will be assessed using the ZenoTM Walkway, developed by ProtoKinetics (https://www.protokinetics.com). Participants will be asked to complete walking trials under a quiet walking condition, a fast-speed walking condition, and while completing a cognitive dual task.
Assessed at baseline and at week 16.
Postural Awareness Scale
Time Frame: Assessed at baseline and at week 16.
This 12-item self-report scale includes items that describe the awareness of body posture and postural control. Scores range from 12-84, with higher scores indicating greater postural awareness.
Assessed at baseline and at week 16.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 7, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 2, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

February 2, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 22, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 22, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

July 26, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 29, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 26, 2024

Last Verified

July 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2019P003845

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Given the pilot nature of this study, de-identified aggregate data will be shared in the dissemination of the main trial findings. As done with other trials in the Division of Preventive Medicine at Brigham and Women's Hospital, new research collaborations will be encouraged that make use of the data collected during this trial. Investigators interested in using data from this trial will be directed to contact the multiple principle investigators for data access.

At all times, we are fully cognizant of and will scrupulously follow the guidelines of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), to ensure that participants' rights and confidentiality are not compromised.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Neck Pain

Clinical Trials on Combined chiropractic care and Tai Chi

Subscribe