Caregiving While Black: LIVE

September 4, 2025 updated by: Fayron Epps, Emory University

Caregiving While Black-LIVE: Empowering Black Dementia Caregivers to Navigate Care

This study will test the psychoeducation course, Caregiving while Black - Learning In Vital Engagement (LIVE), among Black caregivers providing care to persons with dementia. This course aims to enhance Black caregivers' capacity to cope effectively with their caregiving role of navigating care and the world of healthcare in ways that take into consideration the social and cultural context of their unique life experiences.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Black caregivers and their care recipients experience disparities in care, have lower rates of formal service use, and are generally under-treated. More specifically, disparities in healthcare quality include higher rates of missed or delayed dementia diagnoses among Black older adults and a lower likelihood of receiving dementia medication or care from a dementia specialist. Notably, disparities exist for caregivers of persons living with Alzheimer's disease and persons living with dementia (PLWD) as well: Black caregivers report more time spent in caregiving than do White caregivers and use less respite service. Black caregivers also report increased difficulties navigating the healthcare system. Further, racial differences and disparities related to caregiving experiences exist at alarming rates for use of supportive services (33% vs 25%), care hours (54% vs 39%), and living below the federal poverty level (32% vs 12%) among Black caregivers compared to White caregivers. Black families faced with dementia (Medicare beneficiaries) incur 1.7 times more in healthcare cost and higher proportions of preventable hospitalizations than White families. Among PLWD, Black older adults account for nearly a third of preventable hospitalizations. It should be noted that these disparities are not due to biological or genetic differences between racial or ethnic groups, as race and ethnicity are social constructs. Rather, it is more likely due to lived experience and structural racism leading to disparities in social and structural determinants of health. These amplified experiences highlight the importance of this proposal to further develop a course that addresses the cultural and practical reality of supporting a PLWD as a Black in America, as Black caregivers desire better access to culturally relevant caregiving and self-care information. One potential tool to mitigate the aforementioned health disparities is to offer an education tailored and responsive to the needs of Black caregivers. This project responds to a compound gap in psychoeducation aimed at promoting caregiving mastery.

This study will test the psychoeducation course, Caregiving while Black - LIVE, among Black caregivers providing care to persons with dementia. The researchers will employ a mixed-methods pre-post no control design to gather formative and evaluative data from four cohorts (10 participants in each cohort) of Black caregivers. The course is self-paced and participants are asked to complete the course over an 8-week period.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Georgia
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30322
        • Emory University, Nell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Caregiver Inclusion Criteria:

  • at least 18 years of age
  • family member (or friend) who self-identifies as Black American and as the principal caregiver of a community-dwelling PLWD (not in hospice care) and who is the principal companion of that person during healthcare encounters
  • provides some hands-on care multiple times a week
  • has access to an electronic device and/or access to broadband internet
  • able to speak and understand English

Caregiver Exclusion Criteria:

  • persons who cannot provide consent

    • persons who are not yet adults (under 18 years of age)
    • prisoners
    • cognitively impaired adults
  • have plans to relinquish caring responsibilities for PLWD or are considering moving the PLWD to an institutional setting within the next 6 months
  • not able to clearly understand English

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Caregiving While Black-LIVE
Black dementia caregivers participating in the psychoeducation course, Caregiving while Black-LIVE, over an 8 week time period.
Caregiving while Black-LIVE is a psychoeducation program that aims to intensify the development of caregiver mastery by integrating the online learning assets of the fully asynchronous Caregiving while Black program with synchronous, group-based opportunities for interactivity and active learning. The Caregiving while Black course includes topics of navigating the healthcare system, managing home life, and caregiver self-care. Once enrolled in the course, participants will be provided instructions for accessing the weekly sessions and course online, and supplemental course materials will be mailed to them. The Canvas platform enables the research team to monitor each individual's movement in the cohort through the asynchronous part of the course. Nudges and reminders to view these materials are sent twice a week via text or email with participant's consent. Synchronous sessions are conducted on a videoconferencing platform.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ) Score for Feeling Understood by Healthcare Providers Subscale
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6
The Health Literacy Questionnaire assesses multiple dimensions of health literacy with 9 subscales. The subscale of "Feeling understood and supported by healthcare providers" has 4 items where responses are given on a 4-point scale from "strongly disagree" (scored as 1) to "strongly agree" (scored as 4). The total score for this subscale is the average of responses and ranges from 1 to 4. Higher scores indicate that the subscale is an area of health literacy strength.
Baseline, Month 3, Month 6
Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ) Score for Appraisal of Health Information Subscale
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6
The Health Literacy Questionnaire assesses multiple dimensions of health literacy with 9 subscales. The subscale of "Appraisal of health information" has 5 items where responses are given on a 4-point scale from "strongly disagree" (scored as 1) to "strongly agree" (scored as 4). The total score for this subscale is the average of responses and ranges from 1 to 4. Higher scores indicate that the subscale is an area of health literacy strength.
Baseline, Month 3, Month 6
Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ) Score for Ability to Engage With Healthcare Providers Subscale
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6
The Health Literacy Questionnaire assesses multiple dimensions of health literacy with 9 subscales. The subscale of "Ability to actively engage with healthcare providers" has 5 items where responses are given on a 5-point scale from "cannot do" (scored as 1) to "very easy" (scored as 5). The total score for this subscale is the average of responses and ranges from 1 to 5. Higher scores indicate that the subscale is an area of health literacy strength.
Baseline, Month 3, Month 6
Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ) Score for Navigating the Healthcare System Subscale
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6
The Health Literacy Questionnaire assesses multiple dimensions of health literacy with 9 subscales. The subscale of "Navigating the healthcare system" has 6 items where responses are given on a 5-point scale from "cannot do" (scored as 1) to "very easy" (scored as 5). The total score for this subscale is the average of responses and ranges from 1 to 5. Higher scores indicate that the subscale is an area of health literacy strength.
Baseline, Month 3, Month 6
Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ) Score for Ability to Find Information Subscale
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6
The Health Literacy Questionnaire assesses multiple dimensions of health literacy with 9 subscales. The subscale of "Ability to find good health information" has 5 items where responses are given on a 5-point scale from "cannot do" (scored as 1) to "very easy" (scored as 5). The total score for this subscale is the average of responses and ranges from 1 to 5. Higher scores indicate that the subscale is an area of health literacy strength.
Baseline, Month 3, Month 6
Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ) Score for Understand Health Information Subscale
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6
The Health Literacy Questionnaire assesses multiple dimensions of health literacy with 9 subscales. The subscale of "Understand health information well enough to know what to do" has 5 items where responses are given on a 5-point scale from "cannot do" (scored as 1) to "very easy" (scored as 5). The total score for this subscale is the average of responses and ranges from 1 to 5. Higher scores indicate that the subscale is an area of health literacy strength.
Baseline, Month 3, Month 6
Zarit Burden Inventory (ZBI) Score
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6
The Zarit Burden Interview is a 22-item scale of objective and subjective caregiver burden. Responses are given on a 5-point scale where 0 = never and 4 = nearly always. Total scores range from 0 to 88 where higher scores indicate greater feelings of being burdened with providing care.
Baseline, Month 3, Month 6
Center for Epidemiological Studies - Depression Score
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6
Caregiver depression will be assessed with the 20-item Center for Epidemiologic Studies - Depression Scale. Caregivers are asked how frequently they have experienced specific symptoms of depression in the past week. Responses are given as 0 = rarely, 1 = 1-2 days, 2 = 3-4 days, and 4 = 5-7 days. Total scores range from 0 to 60 with higher scores indicating greater symptoms of depression.
Baseline, Month 3, Month 6
Perceived Stress Scale Score
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6
Caregiver stress was assessed with the 14-item Perceived Stress Scale. Responses are given on a scale of 0 to 4 where 0 = never and 4 = very often. Total scores range from 0 to 56 with higher scores indicating greater perceived stress by caregivers.
Baseline, Month 3, Month 6
State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) Score
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6
The STAI is a 20-item self-report scale of positive and negative anxiety experiences. Responses are given on a 4-point scale where 1 = not at all and 4 = very much so. Total scores range from 20 to 80 and higher scores indicate greater anxiety.
Baseline, Month 3, Month 6
Caregiver Assessment of Behavioral Skill Score
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6
The Caregiver Assessment of Behavioral Skill instrument includes 17 items asking how frequently caregivers respond to certain situations. Responses are given on a 3-point scale where "seldom true" is scored as 0 and "true most of the time" is scored as 2 (a response is also available when the situation is not relevant). The total score is is the sum of item ratings and ranges from 0 to 34, where higher scores indicate greater behavioral skills as related to caregiving.
Baseline, Month 3, Month 6
Pearlin Competence and Management of Situation Score
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6
Self-rated caregiving competency is assessed with 4 items asking about feelings the caregiver has as a result of providing care. Responses are given on a 4-point scale where "not at all" is scored as 1 and "completely" or "very" is scored as 4. The total score ranges from 4 to 16 with higher scores indicating greater feelings of competency.
Baseline, Month 3, Month 6

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ) Score for Having Sufficient Information Subscale
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6
The Health Literacy Questionnaire assesses multiple dimensions of health literacy with 9 subscales. The subscale of "Having sufficient information to manage my health" has 4 items where responses are given on a 4-point scale from "strongly disagree" (scored as 1) to "strongly agree" (scored as 4). The total score for this subscale is the average of responses. Higher scores indicate that the subscale is an area of health literacy strength.
Baseline, Month 3, Month 6
Change in Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ) Score for Actively Managing Health Subscale
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6
The Health Literacy Questionnaire assesses multiple dimensions of health literacy with 9 subscales. The subscale of "Actively managing my health" has 5 items where responses are given on a 4-point scale from "strongly disagree" (scored as 1) to "strongly agree" (scored as 4). The total score for this subscale is the average of responses. Higher scores indicate that the subscale is an area of health literacy strength.
Baseline, Month 3, Month 6
Change in Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ) Score for Social Support Subscale
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6
The Health Literacy Questionnaire assesses multiple dimensions of health literacy with 9 subscales. The subscale of "Social support for health" has 5 items where responses are given on a 4-point scale from "strongly disagree" (scored as 1) to "strongly agree" (scored as 4). The total score for this subscale is the average of responses. Higher scores indicate that the subscale is an area of health literacy strength.
Baseline, Month 3, Month 6

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Fayron Epps, PhD, RN, Emory University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 12, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

August 12, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 18, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 18, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

September 20, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

September 23, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 4, 2025

Last Verified

September 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

  • STUDY00005946
  • R21AG083366 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

All of the individual participant data collected during the trial will be made available for sharing, after deidentification.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Data will be available for sharing beginning 3 months and ending 5 years following publication of findings from this study in a scientific journal.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Data will be available for sharing with researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal, for the purposes of achieving the aims in the approved proposal. Proposals should be directed to fepps@emory.edu. To gain access, data requestors will need to sign a data access agreement. Data will be available for 5 years at a third party website.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe