To Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Ipsilateral Supraclavicular Lymph Node Dissection for Breast Cancer Patients

September 18, 2024 updated by: Henan Cancer Hospital

To Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Ipsilateral Supraclavicular Lymph Node Dissection for Breast Cancer Patients: A Prospective, Multicenter, Non-interventionist Real World Study

For newly diagnosed ISLNM breast cancer, on the basis of effective treatment of the new auxiliary system, the optimal local treatment of the supraclavicular region remains controversial. Although guidelines such as NCCN recommend simple clavicular radiation therapy, there are studies suggesting that supraclavicular lymph node dissection can improve prognosis, and many hospitals in China are still accustomed to performing supraclavicular lymph node dissection. Therefore, ipsilateral supraclavicular lymph node dissection is the first time to diagnose ipsilateral supraclavicular lymph node metastasis of breast cancer. The effectiveness and safety of (stage IIIc) treatment still require prospective research to confirm.This project is a prospective, multicenter, non-interference real world study. In the real world study, the investigators evaluated the efficacy and safety of ipsilateral supraclavicular lymph node dissection in the treatment of initially diagnosed ipsilateral supraclavicular lymph node metastasis breast cancer patients.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

For newly diagnosed ISLNM breast cancer, on the basis of effective treatment of the new auxiliary system, the optimal local treatment of the supraclavicular region remains controversial. Although guidelines such as NCCN recommend simple clavicular radiation therapy, there are studies suggesting that supraclavicular lymph node dissection can improve prognosis, and many hospitals in China are still accustomed to performing supraclavicular lymph node dissection. Therefore, ipsilateral supraclavicular lymph node dissection is the first time to diagnose ipsilateral supraclavicular lymph node metastasis of breast cancer. The effectiveness and safety of (stage IIIc) treatment still require prospective research to confirm.This project is a prospective, multicenter, non-interference real world study. In the real world study, the investigators evaluated the efficacy and safety of ipsilateral supraclavicular lymph node dissection in the treatment of initially diagnosed ipsilateral supraclavicular lymph node metastasis breast cancer patients.

The main endpoint of the study was recurrence free survival on the ipsilateral clavicle. The secondary study endpoint is disease-free survival; Ipsilateral supraclavicular relapse-free survival; Rregional lymph node relapse-free survival; Overall survival; Security; The incidence of upper limb lymphedema; Patient's quality of life.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

300

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Henan
      • Zhengzhou, Henan, China, 450000

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

cT1-4N3M0 breast cancer

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Female patients aged ≤ 80 years old.
  2. ECOG score 0-1 points;
  3. Breast cancer meets the following criteria: histologically diagnosed as invasive breast cancer, known ER, PR, HER2, KI67 status, pathologically diagnosed as ipsilateral supraclavicular lymph node metastasis (both cytology and histopathology);
  4. Estimated patient survival time exceeding three months;
  5. No obvious contraindications for surgery or radiotherapy;
  6. The researcher judged that they were able to comply with the research protocol.
  7. Those who participate in other clinical trials (including intervention or non intervention studies) at the same time and are judged by the researchers not to affect the research protocol can be enrolled normally.
  8. Voluntarily participate in this study and sign an informed consent form.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Stage IV (metastatic) breast cancer;
  2. Bilateral breast cancer;
  3. Received radiotherapy and surgical treatment (excluding local puncture) for ipsilateral supraclavicular metastatic lymph nodes before enrollment;
  4. History of breast cancer or other malignant tumors, but excluding cured cervical carcinoma in situ, skin basal cell carcinoma or skin squamous cell carcinoma;
  5. Individuals with severe primary diseases such as cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, liver, and kidney that are difficult to tolerate surgery or radiation therapy;
  6. Having a history of immunodeficiency, including HIV testing positive, or having other acquired or congenital immunodeficiency diseases, or having a history of organ transplantation;
  7. Suffering from severe comorbidities or other comorbidities that may interfere with the planned treatment, or any other circumstances in which the researcher deems the patient unsuitable to participate in this study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Subclavian lymph node dissection+radiotherapy group
Subclavian lymph node dissection+radiotherapy
The patient grouping is determined jointly by the researchers and participants, and patients in Group A are selected for supraclavicular lymph node dissection and radiotherapy.
Other Names:
  • experimental group
Simple clavicular region radiotherapy group
Simple clavicular region radiotherapy
If the patient chooses Group B treatment plan, they will receive simple clavicle area radiotherapy.
Other Names:
  • control group

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Intraclavicular recurrence free survival in group A patients
Time Frame: 5th year after surgery
The time from surgery to ipsilateral supraclavicular fossa recurrence or last follow-up.
5th year after surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Disease-Free Survival
Time Frame: 5th year after surgery
The time from surgery to the occurrence of recurrence, metastasis, or last follow-up.
5th year after surgery
Intraclavicular recurrence free survival in group B patients
Time Frame: 5th year after surgery
The time from surgery to ipsilateral supraclavicular fossa recurrence or last follow-up
5th year after surgery
Regional lymph node recurrence free survival in group A/B patients
Time Frame: 5th year after surgery
The time from surgery to the occurrence of regional lymph node recurrence, metastasis, or last follow-up
5th year after surgery
Overall survival of patients in Group A/B
Time Frame: 5th year after surgery
The time from surgery to patient death or last follow-up
5th year after surgery
Number of adverse events
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 2 year
Complications related to surgery and radiotherapy
through study completion, an average of 2 year
The incidence of upper limb lymphedema in group A/B patients at 2 years after surgery
Time Frame: 2th year after surgery
Measure the circumference using the circumference method, with the styloid process of the ulna as the starting point, spaced 10cm apart and measured up to 40cm.
2th year after surgery
Patient's quality of life
Time Frame: 2th year after surgery
Evaluate using the EORTC-QLQ-C30 V3 (European Organization of Research and treatment of Cancer-Questionnaire of Life Quality-C30 Version 3)scale.EORTC-QLQ-C30 V3 is the core scale of the quality of life measurement system developed by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) for cancer patients. The original scores of each item in the scale need to be converted into standardized scores ranging from 0 to 100 using linear formulas. The higher the scores of each functional dimension, the better the functional status; The higher the score of the symptom scale and individual items, the more obvious the symptoms and the poorer the quality of life.
2th year after surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: xiuchun Chen, Henan Cancer Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 4, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

April 4, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

April 4, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 6, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 18, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

September 20, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 20, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 18, 2024

Last Verified

February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2023-122

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe