The Impact of POCUS on Treatment Planning and Prognosis in the ICU

September 23, 2024 updated by: Döndü Genc Moralar

The Impact of Point-of-care Ultrasound on Treatment Planning and Prognosis in the Intensive Care Unit

This study aims to understand how using bedside ultrasound in the intensive care unit (ICU) can improve diagnosis and treatment for critically ill patients. When patients are admitted to the ICU, doctors usually rely on various tests and assessments, such as the APACHE-II score, to estimate the severity of their condition and predict their chances of survival. In addition to these tests, we will use bedside ultrasound to examine the lungs, heart, vena cava (a large vein), and optic nerve, which can give us important information about the patient's condition.

By using ultrasound, we can look for things like fluid in the lungs, heart function, or increased pressure in the brain. Based on what we find with the ultrasound, we may adjust treatments, such as changing the amount of fluids given or starting new medications.

We will also compare each patient's condition on the first day and the fifth day, using both ultrasound findings and their APACHE-II score, to see if the ultrasound results have influenced their care and outcomes. The study will include 40 patients, and we will track their progress, including how long they stay on mechanical ventilation, how long they are in the hospital, and their survival after 28 days.

This research will help us learn more about how ultrasound can help doctors make better decisions in the ICU, leading to improved care for critically ill patients.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

### Detailed Description for Clinical Trials

This prospective observational study focuses on the routine use of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) in the intensive care unit (ICU) and its impact on diagnosis, treatment decisions, and patient outcomes. Bedside ultrasound is increasingly recommended in ICU settings because it provides non-invasive, repeatable, and immediate diagnostic information that can guide the management of critically ill patients.

Upon admission, all ICU patients will undergo an initial assessment, including routine tests such as the APACHE-II score, which helps to estimate the severity of illness and predict the likelihood of survival. The goal of this study is to evaluate how POCUS, in addition to standard care, influences patient outcomes and whether it provides any additional diagnostic information that changes the treatment plan.

Key components of the study include:

  1. **Initial Evaluation:**

    • All patients will have their medical history taken, undergo a physical examination, and have blood tests performed, which are standard for ICU patients. These will be used to calculate the APACHE-II score.
    • In addition to routine care, each patient will be evaluated with POCUS, including:
    • **Lung Ultrasound (LUS):** The lungs will be divided into six regions (upper and lower parts of the anterior, lateral, and posterolateral thoracic walls) to check for conditions such as lung consolidation, edema, pleural effusion, or pneumothorax.
    • **Cardiac Ultrasound:** The heart will be examined for valvular pathologies, fractional shortening (FS), pericardial effusion, and inferior vena cava (IVC) diameter to assess volume status using the collapsibility and distensibility index.
    • **Optic Nerve Ultrasound:** The optic nerve sheath diameter will be measured to evaluate intracranial pressure.
  2. **Changes in Diagnosis and Treatment:**

    • Based on the findings from the ultrasound, the treatment plan may be modified. For example, if the ultrasound reveals fluid overload or inadequate volume, the amount of intravenous fluids may be adjusted. If lung ultrasound shows consolidations, adjustments to patient positioning or additional interventions may be made. Similarly, changes in cardiac ultrasound may result in modifying inotropic or vasodilator therapy, and optic nerve measurements may influence treatments for brain edema.
    • After 5 days, the patients will undergo another ultrasound, and their APACHE-II score will be recalculated to assess the effectiveness of the treatments and any changes in patient prognosis.
  3. **Outcome Measurement:**

    • The study will follow 40 patients over a 28-day period. Outcomes will be evaluated by comparing the initial and subsequent ultrasound findings, changes in treatment, and the predicted mortality rates based on the APACHE-II score.
    • Secondary outcomes will include the duration of mechanical ventilation, length of ICU stay, and 28-day mortality.
    • The study will also assess the impact of ultrasound on specific organ systems:
    • **Respiratory System:** LUS, PaO2/FiO2 ratio, and PaCO2 levels will be monitored to assess lung function.
    • **Cardiovascular System:** Intravascular volume will be evaluated using vena cava ultrasound, while heart failure will be assessed with FS and LUS scores.
    • **Intracranial Pressure:** The optic nerve sheath diameter will be used to monitor changes in intracranial pressure.

The primary objective of this study is to determine whether bedside ultrasound can provide additional diagnostic information that significantly impacts treatment decisions and improves patient outcomes in the ICU. The secondary aim is to evaluate the effect of ultrasound on the functionality of different organ systems and how it contributes to overall patient prognosis and survival.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Istanbul, Turkey, 34255
        • Gaziosmanpasa Training and Research Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients admitted to intensive care over the age of 18 and who have been in intensive care for more than 5 days

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients over the age of 18 who are admitted to intensive care
  • Patients who have been in intensive care for more than 5 days

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Being pregnant
  • Patients with head trauma
  • Acute renal failure

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
ICU patients
Patients over the age of 18 who are admitted to intensive care unit and who have been in intensive care for >5 days
The patients diagnoses will be confirmed though imaging methods like computed tomography chest x-ray and anamnesis

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
POCUS effectiveness
Time Frame: First 5 days
The primary goal of our study is to evaluate the effectiveness of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) in the diagnosis and treatment of patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). We aim to investigate how the use of ultrasound alters diagnostic clarity and treatment interventions compared to initial diagnoses made without ultrasound. Any new or additional diagnoses made following ultrasound will be considered supplemental findings, which may lead to changes in the treatment plan.
First 5 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 16, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 2, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

January 2, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 20, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 23, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

September 26, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 26, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 23, 2024

Last Verified

September 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 88

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe