- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06617910
Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Sinonasal Malignancy
September 26, 2024 updated by: Taichung Veterans General Hospital
Treatment Outcomes and Dosimetric Analysis Comparison Between CyberKnife and VMAT Based Methods of Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Sinonasal Malignancy
Sinonasal Tumors are a rare type of head and neck tumor, accounting for approximately 3% of head and neck cancers.
Treatment primarily involves surgical intervention, with radiation therapy as an adjunct.
Due to the tumor's anatomical location near critical structures such as the eyes, optic nerves, optic chiasm, brainstem, and oral cavity, if the tumor cannot be completely resected, postoperative radiation therapy is often necessary.
Given the complexity of the tumor's anatomical position, subsequent radiation therapy planning becomes more challenging, as it must balance tumor control and organ preservation.
This study retrospectively analyzes patients with sinonasal tumors who received stereotactic radiosurgery (CyberKnife) at our hospital, comparing the dosimetric advantages, treatment efficacy, survival analysis, and side effects with those of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT).
Study Overview
Status
Active, not recruiting
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Observational
Enrollment (Actual)
16
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Taichung, Taiwan
- Taichung Veterans General Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Sampling Method
Non-Probability Sample
Study Population
The sixth-generation computer-assisted radiotherapy system was introduced at this hospital in 2019.
This study will attempt to analyze the dose differences between treatment plans using traditional linear accelerators and those using the computer-assisted system for patients who received stereotactic radiotherapy at this hospital over the past five years.
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- The pathological tissue report from the endoscopic surgery at this hospital confirmed a diagnosis of malignant sinus tumor.
- Received radical stereotactic radiotherapy at this hospital.
- Pre-treatment baseline imaging (CT or MRI) was performed.
- Received radical radiotherapy at this hospital and has been under long-term follow-up with complete medical records at this hospital.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Local lymphatic metastasis and distant metastasis have been excluded by imaging examinations (cN >=1, M =1).
- Not treated with radical radiotherapy at this hospital and has been under long-term follow-up at this hospital with incomplete medical records.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Sinonasal malignancy patients received post-operative cyberknife
Sinonasal malignancy patients in our hospital receive curative surgery.
These patients received post-operative radiotheray of SBRT by cyberknife.
|
The patients with sinonasal maliganacy receive curative surgery then receive adjuvant RT by the method of SBRT by Cyberknife.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Survival, OS
Time Frame: Data within five years after treatment.
|
Determine the start dates of surgery and radiotherapy from the hospital's medical record system, and collect data on death events, regardless of whether they are tumor-related.
|
Data within five years after treatment.
|
|
Disease-Free Survival, DFS
Time Frame: Data within five years after treatment
|
Determine the treatment start date from the hospital's medical record system, and confirm whether there is any disease recurrence or progression through follow-up data or imaging examination results.
|
Data within five years after treatment
|
|
Local Control, LC
Time Frame: The observation periods are 1 year, 3 years, and 5 years after treatment.
|
Measure the proportion of no recurrence in the local tumor area after treatment.
Researchers determine the treatment start date from the hospital's medical record system and confirm the presence or absence of local tumor recurrence through follow-up data, imaging examinations, and pathology results.
|
The observation periods are 1 year, 3 years, and 5 years after treatment.
|
|
Distant Metastasis-Free Survival, DMFS
Time Frame: The observation periods are 1 year, 3 years,and 5 years after treatment.
|
Measure the time until the occurrence of distant metastasis after treatment.
Researchers first determine the treatment start date, and then assess distant metastasis through data, imaging examinations, and clinical evaluations.
|
The observation periods are 1 year, 3 years,and 5 years after treatment.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
treatment-related side effects
Time Frame: complications related to treatment within 30 days
|
Acute or chronic side effects caused by treatment can include radiation dermatitis, dry mouth, vision impairment, and so on.
|
complications related to treatment within 30 days
|
|
Dosimetric Outcomes
Time Frame: Data for five years after treatment.
|
The quality of a radiation therapy plan can be assessed through dose uniformity and dose constraints for adjacent critical organs (such as the optic nerve and brainstem).
Researchers first collect dose distribution data from the treatment planning system and use dose calculation software to analyze dose uniformity indices (such as the homogeneity index) to evaluate the distribution of doses.
At the same time, dose constraint standards for adjacent critical organs are established to ensure that the doses to these organs remain within safe limits during treatment.
These indicators reflect the quality of the radiation therapy plan and can help researchers assess the safety and efficacy of the treatment.
|
Data for five years after treatment.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
September 1, 2023
Primary Completion (Actual)
August 31, 2024
Study Completion (Estimated)
August 31, 2025
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
September 22, 2024
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
September 26, 2024
First Posted (Actual)
October 1, 2024
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
October 1, 2024
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
September 26, 2024
Last Verified
September 1, 2024
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- CE23395C
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.