Improving the Diagnostic Accuracy of Children with DoC (IDeAl DesiRE) (IDeAl DesiRE)

December 11, 2024 updated by: IRCCS Eugenio Medea

Improving the Diagnostic Accuracy of Children with Disorders of Consciousness in the REhabilitation Process (IDeAl DesiRE)

The present study aims to investigate the clinical evolution of children with severe ABI and DoC both by using the traditional behavioral scales, namely the CRS-R, CRS-P and CNCS, and by trying to establish whether it is possible to identify any clinical markers of Emergency (E-Markers). E-Markers are behaviors that indicate a content of consciousness irrespective of the processes investigated by behavioral scales, thus they could be combined with the items of these scales to improve the diagnosis.

A particular focus will be given to the identification of specific E-Markers for children aged less than 12 months, for which the CRS-P scale cannot be used. In this case, the E-markers will be compared with the specific developmental stages of newborns, giving great importance to motor abilities.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Detailed Description

The assessment of the state of consciousness (CS) after an Acquired Brain Injury (ABI) is a complex and challenging process because of the clinical complexity of patients suffering from this condition. The most widely used measure to assess disturbance of consciousness (DoC) is the Coma Recovery Scale Revised (CRS-R), which is considered the gold standard for bedside assessments. This scale, even though validated for the adult population, has been recommended also for the pediatric population, considering the absence of tools designed to address children. In 2019, to fill this gap, Slomine and collaborators developed a pediatric form of the CRS, namely the Coma Recovery Scale for Pediatrics (CRS-P), but, up to now, it has been exclusively tested in typically developing children. Another tool frequently used to assess the DoC, even in pediatric age, is the Rappaport Coma Near Coma Scale (CNCS). In a recent study of our group, a statistically significant agreement between the CRS-R and the CNCS was found; however, the CNCS was found to better define patients' status in the emergency phase from minimally conscious state, while the CRS-R demonstrated to have lower DoC scoring ability in the presence of severe motor impairment. These results suggest new challenges for the diagnostic process, considering that the risk of misdiagnosis is still high.

The present study aims to investigate the clinical evolution of children with severe ABI and DoC both by using the traditional behavioral scales, namely the CRS-R, CRS-P and CNCS, and by trying to establish whether it is possible to identify any clinical markers of Emergency (E-Markers). E-Markers are behaviors that indicate a content of consciousness irrespective of the processes investigated by behavioral scales, thus they could be combined with the items of these scales to improve the diagnosis.

A particular focus will be given to the identification of specific E-Markers for children aged less than 12 months, for which the CRS-P scale cannot be used. In this case, the E-markers will be compared with the specific developmental stages of newborns, giving great importance to motor abilities; for this subgroup of children a small sample size is expected, which could not allow obtaining precise statistical data; however, results could lead to draw some relevant preliminary considerations.

For the whole sample, the effects of the various clinical, demographic and personal variables will be evaluated on functional outcome, intended as level of consciousness, disability degree and recovery level. Data based on neurophysiological and/or neuroimaging data will also be considered.

The investigators hypothesize that E-Markers may help clinicians to evaluate patients' clinical evolution earlier than behavioral scales.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

113

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Study population is composed of children and young adults suffering from an ABI admitted in the research timeframe to Scientifc Institute, IRCCS E. Medea, Bosisio Parini, Lecco, Italy.

A total of 113 patients is required for the study. The calculation of the sample size was based on the comparison of the diagnostic capacity of the CRS-R with addition of E-markers and CRS-R without the addition of E-markers. This comparison has been analyzed using the area under the ROC curve. Assuming a percentage of patients emerging from a disorder of consciousness within the first 3 months after the ABI of 40% and an AUC of the CRS-R scale without the addition of E-markers of 0.7 (internal historical data), to identify a difference in the AUC of 0.15, with a power of 80% and a type I error of 5%, it is necessary to enroll 113 subjects.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • suffering from an ABI due to: traumatic brain injury, hypoxic events/anoxia, cerebral infections, cerebrovascular accident;
  • age: 2 months-25.11 years;
  • having a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS; Teasdale & Jennett, 1974) at injury or onset ≤8);
  • being in vegetative state (VS) or minimally conscious state (MCS) at admission;
  • being in subacute or chronic phase.

Exclusion Criteria:

- ABI due to brain tumor or neurodegenerative disease.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R)
Time Frame: CRS-R is administered at the time of admission (T0) and at 2 months (T1), 3 months (T3) and 6 months after the event (T4).
The CRS-R is a behavioral scale used to assess level of consciousness in patients with disorders of consciousness. It consists of 6 subscales designed to assess auditory function, receptive and expressive language, visuoperception, communication ability, motor functions, and arousal level.
CRS-R is administered at the time of admission (T0) and at 2 months (T1), 3 months (T3) and 6 months after the event (T4).
Rappaport Coma/Near Coma Scale (CNCS)
Time Frame: CNCS is administered at the time of admission (T0) and at 2 months (T1), 3 months (T3) and 6 months after the event (T4).
The Rappaport Coma/Near Coma Scale is a behavioral scale designed to assess neurobehavioral status among patients who have sustained a severe brain injury, being in vegetative or near-vegetative state. It is composed of 11 items, assessing dysfunction in the sensory and perceptual domains, and describes the severity of primitive response deficits. Each item is scored on a 3-point rating scale (0, 2, and 4), with lower scores indicating better neurobehavioral functioning. A final level of Awareness/Responsivity is provided, ranging from 0 to 5, with lower scores indicating lower functioning.
CNCS is administered at the time of admission (T0) and at 2 months (T1), 3 months (T3) and 6 months after the event (T4).
Coma Recovery Scale for Pediatrics (CRS-P)
Time Frame: CRS-P is administered at the time of admission (T0) and at 2 months (T1), 3 months (T3) and 6 months after the event (T4).
The CRS-P is a modified version of the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R), developed by Slomine and colleagues in 2019 to better evaluate the population of children with disorders of consciousness compared to the original scale, which was designed for the adults. It consists of 6 subscales designed to assess auditory function, receptive and expressive language, visuoperception, communication ability, motor functions, and arousal level, as for the CRS-R. Modifications include stimuli used, administration guidelines and scoring criteria. The overall score ranges from 0 to 23. Lower scores indicate worse functioning.
CRS-P is administered at the time of admission (T0) and at 2 months (T1), 3 months (T3) and 6 months after the event (T4).

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 20, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 10, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 8, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

October 10, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 11, 2024

Last Verified

October 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Disorder of Consciousness

Subscribe