Bowel Dysfunction and HoLEP Outcomes

April 26, 2026 updated by: Amy Krambeck, Northwestern University
The objective of this prospective study is to examine the correlation and effects of bowel dysfunction on outcomes for patients undergoing holmium laser enucleation of prostate (HoLEP) for lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).The investigator hypothesizes that patients who have more bowel dysfunction based on higher severity scores on patient-reported validated questionnaires will experience more symptoms in the immediate post-operative period and may have slower recovery of urinary control. Assessment of pre, peri, and post-procedural bowel dysfunction via the Constipation Severity Score (CSS) and Vaizey Incontinence Questionnaire will aid the analysis.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

120

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60611
        • Northwestern Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Male patients 18-89 years old undergoing HoLEP

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Males18-89 undergoing HoLEP
  • Able to read, understand, and complete patient questionnaires
  • Willing to sign the informed consent form

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with bowel diversion (colostomy, ileostomy)
  • Patients with known neurogenic bowel
  • Patients having concurrent ureteroscopy+/-laser lithotripsy, percutaneous nephrolithotomy, or non-urologic surgery at time of HoLEP
  • Anticipated need for perineal urethrostomy at time of HoLEP
  • Prior pelvic radiation or patients with history of bladder cancer with or without Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) therapy
  • Patients who lack decisional capacity

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Difference in American Urologic Association Symptom Score (AUASS)
Time Frame: 3 months
Identifying differences in AUASS scores pre-operatively versus post-operatively. An AUA symptom score of 0-7 is considered mild, 8-19 is moderate, and 20-35 is severe. This will be used in combination with the other measures to come up with total severity of overall condition.
3 months
Collecting preoperative bowel dysfunction scores via Constipation Severity Scale (CSS) and Vaizey Incontinence questionnaires
Time Frame: 3 months
Identifying differences in CSS/Vaizey Incontinence questionnaires at pre-op 3- month clinic follow-up. Minimum score of 0 indicates perfect continence versus 24 which indicates total incontinence. This will be used in combination with the other measures to come up with total severity of overall condition.
3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change between pre-operative and post-operative bowel dysfunction scores and symptoms
Time Frame: 6 months
Identifying changes in symptom management/resolve: post-op retention, time with catheter, gross hematuria, Urinary Tract Infection, Emergency Department visits and any other complications. This will be used in combination with the other measures to come up with total severity of overall condition.
6 months
Monitoring efficacy of procedure
Time Frame: 1 year
Identifying changes with post void residual, Michigan Incontinence Score Index (MISI). With a score range of 0-32, identifying severity and total bother. This will be used in combination with the other measures to come up with total severity of overall condition.
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 5, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 20, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 26, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 12, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

November 14, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 30, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 26, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • STU00220105

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe