Effects on In-Game Decision Making Processes

February 10, 2025 updated by: hazal genc, Istanbul Medipol University Hospital

Evaluation of Analytical Thinking Skills and Reaction Tests of Female Football Players on Performance: Effects on In-Game Decision Making Processes

This study aims to investigate the effects of analytical thinking skills and reaction speed on performance in female football players.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

This study aims to investigate the effects of analytical thinking skills and reaction speed on performance in female football players.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Istanbul, Turkey
        • Bahçehir University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The footballers who will take part in the study will be selected from players between the ages of 18-30, who are actively playing in professional football teams and have at least two years of experience.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Accepting the voluntary basis
  • To be between the ages of 18-35
  • To take part in professional football clubs
  • Not having suffered any serious injury in the last 6 months
  • To be able to participate in the Tampa Kinesiophobia Scale
  • To be able to actively participate in technology-based tests such as decision-making simulations and Blazepod

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Not accepting the voluntary basis
  • Individuals who have had a surgical procedure in the last six months
  • Use of NSAIDs and similar disease modifying drugs in the last month (Diaserein, Glucosamine etc.)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
football player

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Assessment of Analytical Thinking and Decision-Making Processes
Time Frame: day 1
Female football players' analytical thinking skills will be evaluated through decision-making simulations and video-based training (VBT).
day 1
Assessment of Analytical Thinking and Decision-Making Processes-Accuracy
Time Frame: day 1
Female football players' analytical thinking skills will be evaluated through decision-making simulations and video-based training (VBT).
day 1
Assessment of Analytical Thinking and Decision-Making Processes-Error Rates
Time Frame: day 1
Female football players' analytical thinking skills will be evaluated through decision-making simulations and video-based training (VBT).
day 1
Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia-Reaction Times
Time Frame: day 1
The Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia is a 17-item scale developed to assess fear of movement and reinjury. It includes parameters related to work activities, injury/reinjury, and fear-avoidance behaviors. The scale uses a 4-point Likert scoring system (1 = Strongly Disagree, 4 = Strongly Agree). After reversing the scores of items 4, 8, 12, and 16, a total score is calculated, ranging from 17 to 68, where higher scores indicate greater kinesiophobia.
day 1
Reaction Time Measurement (Using Blazepod)
Time Frame: day 1
Blazepod devices will be used to measure the reaction speed and agility of female football players. Pods will be randomly placed and programmed to flash at specific intervals. Participants will be required to respond quickly to the flashing pods, with their reaction times recorded in milliseconds. Statistical data such as correct and incorrect response rates will also be obtained.
day 1
Y-Balance Test
Time Frame: day 1
Evaluates balance by measuring reach distances in anterior, posteromedial, and posterolateral directions.
day 1
Push-Up Test
Time Frame: day 1
Assesses upper body strength and endurance based on the number of push-ups performed.
day 1
Seated Ball Throw Test
Time Frame: day 1
Measures upper body power by recording the distance a seated participant can throw a ball.
day 1

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 6, 2025

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 6, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

February 2, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 21, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 3, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 10, 2025

Last Verified

February 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • E-85646034-604.01-93402

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe