Enrichment of Human Milk with Human and Bovine Milk-based Fortifiers for Very Preterm Infants: a Meta-analysis

March 5, 2025 updated by: Deborah O'Connor, The Hospital for Sick Children

Nutrient Enrichment of Human Milk with Human and Bovine Milk-based Fortifiers for Very Preterm Infants: an Individual Participant Data Meta-analysis

Research has shown that provision of mother's milk is the optimal way to feed very low birthweight (VLBW) infants. Many infants will require a supplement to mother's milk, pasteurized donor human milk (PDHM) compared to preterm formula is the most appropriate supplement as it has been shown to reduce the risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC).

Most available evidence suggests neither mother's milk nor PDHM will meet the elevated nutritional requirements of VLBW infants without multi-nutrient fortification. Globally, the current standard of care is to use bovine protein-based nutrient fortifiers to meet these elevated nutrient requirements. Given the known benefits of mother's milk, the reduction in the risk of NEC with use of PDHM as a supplement, and the availability of human milk-based multi-nutrient fortifiers (HMBF), there has been considerable interest in the efficacy of HMBF over the less costly bovine milk-based fortifiers (BMBF).

This study is an analysis of individual participant data merged from randomized control trials that examined the efficacy of HMBF compared to BMBF during hospitalization, on the risk of death and severe morbidity or major feeding interruption. Participants of the trials included in the analyses were fed exclusively with human milk or a supplement of pasteurized donor human milk (PDHM).

Only two RCTs met this criteria -OptiMoM and the N-forte trial. In both studies the intervention aligned to commence upon randomization into the HMBF or BMBF groups. The difference between the OptiMoM and N-forte feeding protocols was that the later allowed for individualized fortification based on milk analysis whereas OptiMoM used standard fortification, predominant in Canada and globally.

For OptiMoM, the feeding intervention continued until infants were 84 days of age, discharge, or when the infant consumed ≥2 complete oral feeds daily. For N-forte trial, the feeding intervention ended when babies reached 34 weeks (zero days). Both studies followed participants and continued data collection if transferred to a level II NICU for convalescence (OptiMoM) or home care service followed closely by NICU nurses (N-forte) until discharge.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

355

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5G 0A4
        • The Hospital for Sick Children
      • Umeå, Sweden, SE-901 87
        • Umeå University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Participants of the OptiMoM and N-Forte trial are VLBW infants fed exclusively Human Milk.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• Infant is a participant of the OptiMoM or the N-Forte trial.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Human milk-based multi-nutrient fortifiers (HMBF) group
Infants born VLBW fed exclusively with Human Milk (parent milk or pasteurized donor milk) fortified with HMBF
OptiMoM-NForte is meta-analysis study (observational secondary use of data), the investigators will analyze data from the OptiMoM and NForte trials. No interventions form part of this study.
Bovine milk-based fortifiers (BMBF) group
Infants born VLBW fed exclusively with Human Milk (parent milk or pasteurized donor milk) fortified with BMBF
OptiMoM-NForte is meta-analysis study (observational secondary use of data), the investigators will analyze data from the OptiMoM and NForte trials. No interventions form part of this study.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of participants with composite of NEC (NEC II-III), culture-proven late-onset sepsis and mortality.
Time Frame: From study day 1 through hospitalization, approximately 60 days.
The first primary outcome is a binary (yes/no) composite of NEC (NEC II-III), culture-proven late-onset sepsis and mortality.
From study day 1 through hospitalization, approximately 60 days.
Percentage of infants with an interruption in enteral feeding.
Time Frame: Through feeding intervention, approximately 50 days.
The second primary outcome is the percentage of infants with an interruption in enteral feeding after commencement of the intervention (e.g. Study Day 1), unrelated to a clinical procedure, that lasted for ≥12 h or a >50% reduction in volume over the same time-frame.
Through feeding intervention, approximately 50 days.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Days from birth to full enteral feeding.
Time Frame: Approximately 10 days.
Full enteral feeding (defined as 150 ml/kg/d).
Approximately 10 days.
Number of participants with NEC II-III.
Time Frame: From study day 1 through hospitalization, approximately 60 days.
NEC II-III defined using Bell's staging criteria with Bell Stage >II classification consisting of clinical symptoms and evidence of septic shock, pneumatosis, bowel perforation, or histologic evidence of bowel ischemia consistent with NEC on bowel resection.
From study day 1 through hospitalization, approximately 60 days.
Number of participants with late onset-sepsis.
Time Frame: From study day 1 through hospitalization, approximately 60 days.
Late-onset sepsis was defined as clinical symptoms and a positive culture in blood, cerebrospinal fluid, or suprapubic or catheter urine ≥5 days post-partum.
From study day 1 through hospitalization, approximately 60 days.
Total deaths prior to discharge.
Time Frame: From study day 1 through hospitalization, approximately 60 days.
Total deaths prior to hospital discharge or discharge from home-care in Sweden.
From study day 1 through hospitalization, approximately 60 days.
Number of participants with bronchopulmonary dysplasia.
Time Frame: Assessed at 36 weeks 0 days post-conceptional age.
Bronchopulmonary dysplasia defined as a need for oxygen support at 36 weeks 0 days.
Assessed at 36 weeks 0 days post-conceptional age.
Number of participants with severe retinopathy of prematurity (ROP).
Time Frame: From study day 1 through hospitalization, approximately 60 days.
Severe retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) that was treated (e.g. laser or intraocular antivascular injection).
From study day 1 through hospitalization, approximately 60 days.

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cause of death prior to discharge.
Time Frame: From study day 1 through hospitalization, approximately 60 days.
Cause of death prior to hospital discharge or discharge from home-care in Sweden (exploratory outcome).
From study day 1 through hospitalization, approximately 60 days.
Number of participants with surgical NEC.
Time Frame: From study day 1 through hospitalization, approximately 60 days.
NEC requiring surgical intervention (exploratory outcome).
From study day 1 through hospitalization, approximately 60 days.
Mortality and morbidity index.
Time Frame: From study day 1 through hospitalization, approximately 60 days.
A composite of death, NEC Bell´s II-III, culture-proven sepsis, treated ROP and BPD. (deemed exploratory given a similar composite used as the primary outcome)
From study day 1 through hospitalization, approximately 60 days.
Number of withdrawals.
Time Frame: From study day 1 through hospitalization, approximately 60 days.
Number of infants withdrawn from the intervention for any reason (exploratory outcome).
From study day 1 through hospitalization, approximately 60 days.
Days on parenteral nutrition.
Time Frame: Through feeding intervention, approximately 50 days.
Number of days on parenteral nutrition from birth/from Study Day 1. Defined as receiving amino acids and/or fat intravenously, not just a source of carbohydrate (exploratory outcome).
Through feeding intervention, approximately 50 days.
Percentage of enteral feeds fed as mother's versus PDHM.
Time Frame: Through feeding intervention, approximately 50 days.
Exploratory outcome.
Through feeding intervention, approximately 50 days.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Deborah L O'Connor, PhD, RN, The Hospital for Sick Children
  • Principal Investigator: Magnus Domellöf, MD, PhD, Umeå University, Umeå (UMU)

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 3, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 5, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 5, 2025

Last Verified

March 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Data transfer will take place via Secure File Transfer Protocol (SFTP). A sub-agreement which covers data sharing and confidentiality is in place.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

February 2025 to February 2027

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

The Hospital for Sick Children (Lead Dr. Deborah L. O'Connor PhD, RD): Data analysis.

Umeå University - (Lead Dr. Magnus Domellöf MD, PhD): Data analysis.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ANALYTIC_CODE

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe