Quantified Evaluation of Whole Face 8-points Supra-periosteum High Molecular Weight Hyaluronic Acid Injection in Asian

March 11, 2025 updated by: Chang Chang Cheng

Facial aging is a complex process characterized by skin atrophy, subcutaneous fat loss, and alterations in bone structure. The loss of volume, primarily due to bone resorption and loss of adjacent fat volume from different facial regions, leads to soft tissue flattening. Hyaluronic acid (HA) is a widely used biomaterial in clinical practice, known for its excellent tissue compatibility, low risk, and safety. Previous research and clinical practice have demonstrated that HA for facial lifting can help restore facial fullness, elasticity, and promote a more youthful appearance. Dermatologist previously utilized the supra-periosteum lift technique in high molecular weight hyaluronic acid injection. It was found that the material properties of high molecular weight hyaluronic acid not only made it suitable for filling but also provided lifting support, resulting in improvements in cheek fullness and facial aging. However, there has been no detailed quantitative study on the efficacy of high molecular weight hyaluronic acid for facial lifting.

To further investigate this effect, the investigators plan to conduct a prospective, open-label clinical trial. The investigators will recruit 25 adult and use an 8-point supra-periosteum facial lifting technique to inject high molecular weight hyaluronic acid. Assessments will be conducted preoperatively, postoperatively, and 4 weeks, 12 weeks and 24 weeks postoperatively to analyze the treatment efficacy. The eight injection points will be located at the brow peak, brow tail, pterion, lateral canthus, zygomatic ligament, mid-cheek, nasolabial fold, and mentalis. The investigators will use evaluation forms with four angles and six lengths, as well as the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale, to quantify the degree of improvement in facial aging. Additionally, The investigators will use a satisfaction survey to understand subjects' perceptions of postoperative lifting effects and overall improvement satisfaction. The investigators hypothesized this study to improve facial aging in Asian patients and provide long-lasting effects.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

25

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Men and women aged between 20 and 60.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Men and women aged between 20 and 60.
  2. Subjects who are capable of understanding and comply with the study procedures, instructions, and visit schedule.
  3. Subjects who voluntarily decide to participate in the entire course of the trial and provide written consent in the Informed Consent Form.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Subjects with a history of anaphylaxis, allergy hyaluronic acid products, or any component of devices.
  2. Subjects with autoimmune diseases/ received immune system and Subjects with diabetes mellitus.
  3. Subjects with a history of a hypertrophic scar.
  4. Pregnant or breastfeeding women.
  5. Subjects with epilepsy or underlying porphyria.
  6. When there is inactive disease (such as inflammation, infection or tumours) in or near the intended treatment site.
  7. Treatment procedure (e.g., bioresorbable fillers, laser/light therapies, botulinum toxin A injections, face lift, facial peels, excisional facial surgery, dermal photorejuvenation clinically significant oral or maxillofacial surgery, etc.) that may interfere with the treatment area or evaluation within 6 months prior to screening as determined by the Principal Investigator.
  8. The subject who received soft tissue augmentation as following at the investigational medical device injection site within 6 months prior to screening as determined by the Principal Investigator.
  9. The subject who received soft tissue augmentation near the injection site with any of the following at any time.
  10. Subjects with a scar or skin lesion at the investigational medical device injection site that may interfere with the judgment of the treatment effect.
  11. Subjects who participated in another clinical trial within 60 days prior to screening or plan to participate in another investigation during the course of this study.
  12. Subjects who plan to receive other wrinkle improvement treatment in the face during this trial.
  13. Subjects who are otherwise determined by the investigator as ineligible for this study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Eyebrow Peak angle
Time Frame: At Week 4, 12, and 24
The vertices of the Eyebrow Peak angles lie at the static point eyebrow head, measured against a horizontal line parallel to the ground.
At Week 4, 12, and 24
Eyebrow Tail angle
Time Frame: At Week 4, 12, and 24
The vertices of the Eyebrow Tail angles lie at the static point eyebrow head, measured against a horizontal line parallel to the ground.
At Week 4, 12, and 24
Pupil-Eyebrow Peak angle
Time Frame: At Week 4, 12, and 24
The Pupil-Eyebrow Peak angle is then measured between this line and another line connecting nasal to eyebrow peak.
At Week 4, 12, and 24
Canthus-Oral-Nasal angle
Time Frame: At Week 4, 12, and 24
The Canthus-Oral-Nasal angle is measured between a line connecting oral commissure to nasal and a line connecting oral commissure to lateral canthus.
At Week 4, 12, and 24
Eyebrow-Orbital length
Time Frame: At Week 4, 12, and 24
The linear distances from point superior orbital rim to the inferior border of eyebrow.
At Week 4, 12, and 24
Orbital-Upper Eyelid length
Time Frame: At Week 4, 12, and 24
The linear distances from point superior orbital rim to the superior border of palpebral fissure.
At Week 4, 12, and 24
Vertical Palpebral Fissure length
Time Frame: At Week 4, 12, and 24
The size of the palpebral fissure can be determined by measuring the vertical distance between the superior and inferior borders of palpebral fissure when the eyes are at rest.
At Week 4, 12, and 24
Eyebrow-Iris length
Time Frame: At Week 4, 12, and 24
The horizontal distance between the lateral limbus of the iris and the eyebrow peak .
At Week 4, 12, and 24
Tragus-Oral length
Time Frame: At Week 4, 12, and 24
The distances between the bilateral tragi passing through the oral commissure.
At Week 4, 12, and 24
Lower Facial Contouring length
Time Frame: At Week 4, 12, and 24
The distances between the bilateral tragi passing through the mental protuberance.
At Week 4, 12, and 24
Antiaging Scales for facial rejuvenation
Time Frame: At Week 4, 12, and 24
Index 5 is identified as "neutral" or "no significant changes". Total score for the whole face was 100; either lower or higher than 50 suggesting "aging" or "rejuvenation, respectively". °: degree; mm: millimeter.
At Week 4, 12, and 24

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale
Time Frame: At Week 4, 12, and 24

Subjects with Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) from baseline after injection will be evaluated by a subjects who will judge the severity score.

Score 0 (worse)~4 (Very much improved)

At Week 4, 12, and 24

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

March 20, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

February 27, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

February 27, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 5, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 11, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 11, 2025

Last Verified

February 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CMUH114-REC1-003

Drug and device information, study documents

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe