Mechanical Modalities vs. Standard Care for Edema and Pain Management After DRF Fixation

March 31, 2025 updated by: Al Hayah University In Cairo

A Two-Arm, Single-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating the Effectiveness of Mechanical Modalities Combined With Standard Therapy Versus Standard Therapy Alone for Edema and Pain Management After Distal Radius Fracture Fixation

This single-blinded, randomized controlled trial (RCT) will evaluate the added benefit of mechanical modalities (continuous passive motion (CPM) and intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC)) when integrated into standard therapy for managing postoperative edema and pain in patients undergoing distal radius fracture (DRF) fixation. The primary outcomes are edema volume (measured via volumeter) and pain intensity (Numeric Pain Rating Scale, NPRS) at 6 weeks post-operation. Secondary outcomes include wrist/forearm range of motion (ROM), grip strength, Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE), and adverse events.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Cairo, Egypt, 12311
        • Recruiting
        • Faculty of Physical Therapy, Al Hayah University
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Adults aged 18 years or older. Undergoing surgical treatment for distal radius fracture with stable internal fixation.

Able to initiate formal rehabilitation approximately 2 weeks postoperatively. Willing and able to attend in-clinic therapy sessions at the outpatient hand therapy center.

Exclusion Criteria:

Unstable fixation or need for further surgical intervention. Pre-existing conditions that would significantly affect upper limb function (e.g., severe arthritis, neurological disorders).

History of skin conditions or allergies that contraindicate the use of mechanical devices.

Any contraindication to mechanical modalities (for example, severe peripheral vascular disease).

Inability to comply with study procedures or follow-up visits. Pregnant or breastfeeding individuals.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Mechanical Modality Group (MMG)
Participants in the MMG will undergo a combined intervention that utilizes mechanical modalities in addition to a standard rehabilitation program.

Materials: A CPM device configured for wrist flexion-extension with an adjustable range of motion set between 0° and 30°.

Procedure:

The participant's wrist is gently secured in the device. The CPM device is programmed to deliver 20 minutes of continuous, passive motion through the set range.

Device settings (e.g., speed) may be modified if the participant reports pain >4/10 on the NPRS.

Materials: An IPC sleeve designed for the forearm-to-hand region with a baseline compression setting of approximately 30 mmHg.

Procedure:

After CPM treatment, the IPC device is applied to the affected limb. The sleeve provides 15 minutes of intermittent compression with programmed intervals of inflation and deflation.

Compression levels may be adjusted based on participant comfort and pain ratings.

Procedures:

Active/active-assisted wrist/forearm range of motion exercises led by a certified hand/physical therapist.

Progressive grip-strengthening exercises using resistance bands or putty. Manual edema management techniques, including gentle massage and manual lymphatic drainage, as well as scar mobilization if needed.

Active Comparator: Standard Care Group (SCG)
Participants in the SCG will receive the standard rehabilitation program alone without the application of mechanical devices.

Procedures:

Active/active-assisted wrist/forearm range of motion exercises led by a certified hand/physical therapist.

Progressive grip-strengthening exercises using resistance bands or putty. Manual edema management techniques, including gentle massage and manual lymphatic drainage, as well as scar mobilization if needed.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Edema Volume
Time Frame: Assessed at baseline (2 weeks postoperatively) and at 6 weeks post-operation.
Edema of the wrist/forearm will be quantitatively measured using a volumeter method. Lower volumes are indicative of reduced swelling.
Assessed at baseline (2 weeks postoperatively) and at 6 weeks post-operation.
Pain Intensity
Time Frame: Assessed at baseline (2 weeks postoperatively) and at 6 weeks post-operation.
Pain is measured using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), with scores ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable).
Assessed at baseline (2 weeks postoperatively) and at 6 weeks post-operation.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Wrist/Forearm Range of Motion (ROM)
Time Frame: Measured at baseline, 6 weeks, and 3 months postoperatively.
Active ROM is measured using a standard goniometer. Improvements in ROM indicate better recovery of function.
Measured at baseline, 6 weeks, and 3 months postoperatively.
Grip Strength
Time Frame: Assessed at baseline, 6 weeks, and 3 months postoperatively.
Evaluated using a calibrated dynamometer. Increased grip strength is suggestive of improved functional recovery.
Assessed at baseline, 6 weeks, and 3 months postoperatively.
Incidence of Adverse Events
Time Frame: Continuously monitored from baseline to the 3-month follow-up.
All adverse events, including skin irritation or device intolerance, will be monitored and recorded.
Continuously monitored from baseline to the 3-month follow-up.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

April 15, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 15, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 15, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 31, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 31, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

April 6, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 6, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 31, 2025

Last Verified

March 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • MMDRF2025-02

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe