- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06924957
Influence of Body Position on the Defecation Model During Anorectal Manometry. (HRAMposition)
Influence of Body Position on the Defecation Model Measured During High Resolution Anorectal Manometry in Children- a Control Study.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Patients with the diagnosis of constipation will be enrolled in the study. Each patient will be investigated by anorectal manometry in both- sitted and lying position.
During anorectal manometry conventional manometric parameters will be recorded, such as resting pressure, squeeze pressure, bear down manoeuver, thresholds of sensation and threshold of recto anal inhibitory reflex. 3D picture of anal canal will be recorded.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Masovian Voivodeship
-
Warsaw, Masovian Voivodeship, Poland, 02-091
- The Department of Paediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Warsaw Medical University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Sampling Method
Study Population
The sample size was calculated to detect a 45% difference in the percentage of patients with a negative rectoanal gradient, assuming equal groups, alpha = 0.05, beta = 0.1, and a 30% drop out percentage. There should be 30 people in the constipation group and 30 healthy volunteers.
Due to possible differences depending on age, it was decided to conduct the study in two separate age groups (I. younger, i.e. 5-10 years old and II. older, 11-18 years old). The total number of patients in the study will therefore be 120 people.
Description
Inclusion criteria - the study group:
- age from 5 to 18 years old
- functional constipation diagnosed on the basis of Rome IV criteria
- parental or guardian written consent to the participation of the child in the study; in the case of a child ≥16 years old also the child's written consent
Inclusion criteria - the control group:
- age from 5 to 18 years old
- no lower gastrointestinal symptoms
- parental or guardian written consent to the participation of the child in the study; in the case of a child ≥16 years old also the child's written consent
Exclusion criteria - the study group and the control group:
- undergone surgeries due to congenital anomalies in the lower gastrointestinal tract
- inflammatory bowel diseases or inflammation of the large intestine with a different aetiology
- anal fissure, inflammation of the anal area or other conditions which, in the opinion of the researcher, could affect the functioning of the distal gastrointestinal tract
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Constipation group
Children that meet Rome IV criteria to diagnose functional constipation.
|
The test will be performed both in supine and sitting position successively, using 3D HR-ARM.
Resting, squeeze pressures, and bear down manoeuvre variables will be obtained.
Diagnosis of dyssynergic defecation requires < 20% relaxation of anal sphincter and/or intrarectal pressure>40 mmHg during bear down manoeuvre.
Other Names:
|
|
Healthy volounteers
Children without IBD, without chronic diseases of GI tract nor history of anorectal surgery
|
The test will be performed both in supine and sitting position successively, using 3D HR-ARM.
Resting, squeeze pressures, and bear down manoeuvre variables will be obtained.
Diagnosis of dyssynergic defecation requires < 20% relaxation of anal sphincter and/or intrarectal pressure>40 mmHg during bear down manoeuvre.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
DD frequency
Time Frame: 1 day
|
The difference in the number of patients with DD (defined as <20% relaxation of anal sphincter and/or intrarectal pressure >40 mmHg during bear down manoeuvre) in sitting and lying position.
|
1 day
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Values of pressures obtained during anorectal manometry
Time Frame: 1 day
|
Values of manometric parameters obtained in the lying and sitting position: mean resting pressure of the anal sphincter (mmHg), maximum squeeze pressure (mmHg), residual anal pressure (mmHg).
|
1 day
|
|
Values of mean anal canal length
Time Frame: 1 day
|
The mean anal canal length will be assessed in sitting and lying position in the two groups.
|
1 day
|
|
Percentage of anal relaxation rate
Time Frame: 1 day
|
the assessment of parameters of defecation dynamics during HR-ARM: rectoanal pressure gradient. All secondary end points will be assessed in sitting and lying position in the two groups. the assessment of parameters of defecation dynamics during HR-ARM: percentage of anal relaxation rate, rectoanal pressure gradient. All secondary |
1 day
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Barbara Skowrońska, MD, Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology Medical University of Warsaw
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Rao SS, Kavlock R, Rao S. Influence of body position and stool characteristics on defecation in humans. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006 Dec;101(12):2790-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00827.x. Epub 2006 Oct 6.
- Su H, Peng LH, Sun G, Yang YS, Wu J, Jiang GJ, Ge H. Effect of different body position on anorectal manometry for chronic constipation patients. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2019 Oct;23(19):8493-8500. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_201910_19162.
- Wu GJ, Xu F, Lin L, Pasricha PJ, Chen JDZ. Anorectal manometry: Should it be performed in a seated position? Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2017 May;29(5). doi: 10.1111/nmo.12997. Epub 2016 Dec 1.
- Coss-Adame E, Rao SS, Valestin J, Ali-Azamar A, Remes-Troche JM. Accuracy and Reproducibility of High-definition Anorectal Manometry and Pressure Topography Analyses in Healthy Subjects. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 Jun;13(6):1143-50.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2014.12.034. Epub 2015 Jan 20.
- Grossi U, Carrington EV, Bharucha AE, Horrocks EJ, Scott SM, Knowles CH. Diagnostic accuracy study of anorectal manometry for diagnosis of dyssynergic defecation. Gut. 2016 Mar;65(3):447-55. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-308835. Epub 2015 Mar 12.
- Skowronska B, Banaszkiewicz A, Banasiuk M. Influence of body position on defecation mechanics measured during high-resolution anorectal manometry in paediatric population: a protocol for case-control study. BMJ Open. 2025 Dec 31;15(12):e112928. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112928.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- Banasiuk2021B
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.