- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06929533
Pharmacogenomics-Supported Psychotropic Prescribing Trial (PGx-SUPPORT)
Pharmacogenomics-Supported Psychotropic Prescribing Trial (PGx-SUPPORT): A Pilot Implementation Study in Manitoba
Study Overview
Status
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Background and Rationale: Pharmacogenomic (PGx) testing utilizes genetic information as a surrogate marker of a person's ability to process and react to drugs. This information can be used to inform medication selection and dosing, reducing the number of trials needed to choose a suitable medicine. For Manitoba healthcare providers, the only access to psychiatric PGx testing is through commercial providers, costing patients $200 to $2,300. To the best of our knowledge, no study in Manitoba has previously evaluated the feasibility of PGx testing in adult patients seeking care for mental illness.
RESEARCH OBJECTIVES: We aim to investigate the feasibility and utility of implementing PGx testing in Manitoba for adult patients seeking care for mental illness.
Primary Outcome and Measures: Feasibility will be measured along four dimensions:
- Acceptability (satisfaction surveys - patient & clinician)
- Practicality (testing turnaround time)
- Implementation (clinicians' self-reported use of testing results in the prescribing decision-making process)
- Demand (number of referrals, clinicians' self-reported intent to use testing in the future)
Secondary Outcomes and Measures:
- Changes in global functioning and symptom severity [Clinical Global Impression (CGI) - Severity and Improvement; Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS); DSM-5-TR Self-Rated Level 1 Cross-Cutting Symptom Measure; Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9); General Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7); Altman Self-Rating Mania Scale (ASRM); Early Psychosis Screener (EPS-26)]
- Adverse drug experience [Frequency, Intensity, Burden of Side Effects Rating (FIBSER)]
- Impact of PGx testing [Changes in medication prescribing and dispensing patterns; changes in healthcare utilization (e.g., inpatient length of stay, mental health resource use, and utilization of healthcare services)
Expected Outcomes: The findings from the proposed study will inform policymakers and facilitate decision-making and priority-setting related to implementing PGx-based psychotropic prescribing policies in Manitoba
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Abdullah Al Maruf, BPharm, MPharm, PhD
- Phone Number: 204-318-2575
- Email: abdullah.maruf@umanitoba.ca
Study Locations
-
-
Manitoba
-
Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada, R3E 0T5
- Recruiting
- University of Manitoba College of Pharmacy
-
Contact:
- Abdullah Al Maruf, PhD, M.Pharm, B.Pharm
- Phone Number: 204-318-2575
- Email: abdullah.maruf@umanitoba.ca
-
Contact:
- Mahin Hasan, MSc, BSc
- Email: hasanm33@myumanitoba.ca
-
Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada, R3C 3H8
- Not yet recruiting
- Shared Health Facilities
-
Contact:
- Abdullah Al Maruf, PhD, M.Pharm, B.Pharm
- Phone Number: 204-318-2575
- Email: abdullah.maruf@umanitoba.ca
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Aged 18 years or older
- The initiation, change, dose adjustment, or augmentation of psychotropic medication(s) is indicated
- The treating clinician thinks PGx testing can benefit and refers the patient to the study
Exclusion Criteria:
- Unwillingness to donate saliva samples for genetic analysis
- History of liver or bone marrow (hematopoietic cell) transplantation
- PGx testing results are already available
- No personal health identification number (PHIN) is available
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Pharmacogenetic Testing
Pharmacogenetic testing panel (CYP2C19, CYP2D6, CYP2B6, CYP3A4, CYP3A5, CYP2C9, CYP4F2, DPYD, HLA-A, HLA-B, NUDT15, SLCO1B1, TPMT, VKORC1, 2C Cluster, UGT1A1)
|
Participants will donate a 1ml (one-fifth of a teaspoon) sample of saliva.
DNA extracted from the saliva sample will be used for genotyping.
Genotyping results will be translated into an interpretative clinical report using evidence-based software (Sequence2Script) and delivered to the treating physician for use in their clinical decision-making.
The report will contain genotyping results, predicted phenotype, and evidence-based drug selection and dosing recommendations relevant to the patient's current and future care.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Testing Acceptibility
Time Frame: 3 months after after baseline.
|
Acceptability will be measured via a four-item patient satisfaction survey three months after the testing and a two-item clinician satisfaction survey after discharge.
Responses will be recorded on a five-point Likert scale (1 = very dissatisfied to 5 = very satisfied).
|
3 months after after baseline.
|
|
Implementation Practicality
Time Frame: Up to 3 Months
|
Practicality will be measured by the mean and median testing turnaround time (i.e., test ordering to return of results).
|
Up to 3 Months
|
|
Implementation Feasibility
Time Frame: Patient discharge date [within 3 months of baseline].
|
Implementation will be measured using a two-item clinician self-report questionnaire that asks about using testing results in the prescribing decision-making process.
These will be Yes/No questions, with more "yes" responses indicating higher usefulness and interest in using the test in clinical practice.
|
Patient discharge date [within 3 months of baseline].
|
|
Test Demands
Time Frame: Patient discharge date [within 3 months of baseline].
|
Demand will be measured by the total number of referrals to the study and by a one-item clinician self-report questionnaire asking about intent to use the testing in the future.
Responses will be recorded on a five-point Likert scale (1 = very unlikely to 5 = very likely).
|
Patient discharge date [within 3 months of baseline].
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI) - Severity
Time Frame: Baseline
|
1 = normal, 7 = among the most extremely ill
|
Baseline
|
|
Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI) - Improvement
Time Frame: 3 months after baseline.
|
Assesses the overall change in the patient's condition compared to baseline, on a 7-point scale (1 = very much improved, 7 = very much worse).
|
3 months after baseline.
|
|
Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS)
Time Frame: Baseline and patient discharge date, within 3 months.
|
The rater enters a number for each symptom construct, ranging from 1 (not present) to 7 (extremely severe).
|
Baseline and patient discharge date, within 3 months.
|
|
DSM-5-TR Self-Rated Level 1 Cross-Cutting Symptom Measure - Adult
Time Frame: Baseline and 3 months after baseline.
|
This adult version of the measure consists of 23 questions that assess 13 psychiatric domains, including depression, anger, mania, anxiety, somatic symptoms, suicidal ideation, psychosis, sleep problems, memory, repetitive thoughts and behaviors, dissociation, personality functioning, and substance use.
Each item on the measure is rated on a 5-point scale (0=none or not at all; 1=slight or rare, less than a day or two; 2=mild or several days; 3=moderate or more than half the days; and 4=severe or nearly every day).
|
Baseline and 3 months after baseline.
|
|
General Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7)
Time Frame: Baseline and 3 months after baseline.
|
This is calculated by assigning scores of 0, 1, 2, and 3 to the response categories, respectively, of "not at all," "several days," "more than half the days," and "nearly every day." GAD-7 total score for the seven items ranges from 0 to 21. 0-4: minimal anxiety 5-9: mild anxiety 10-14: moderate anxiety 15-21: severe anxiety |
Baseline and 3 months after baseline.
|
|
Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)
Time Frame: Baseline and 3 months after baseline.
|
The PHQ-9 asks patients about the frequency with which they have experienced certain symptoms over the past two weeks, using a four-point scale (0 = "not at all" to 3 = "nearly every day"). The total score, ranging from 0 to 27, indicates the severity of depression, with higher scores suggesting more severe symptoms. Scoring: 0-4: Minimal or no symptoms 5-9: Mild depression 10-14: Moderate depression 15-19: Moderately severe depression 20 or higher: Severe depression |
Baseline and 3 months after baseline.
|
|
Altman Self-Rating Mania Scale (ASRM) - Adult
Time Frame: Baseline and 3 months after baseline.
|
Each item on the measure is rated on a 5-point scale (i.e., 1 to 5) with the response categories having different anchors depending on the item.
The ASRM score range from 5 to 25 with higher scores indicating greater severity of manic symptoms.
|
Baseline and 3 months after baseline.
|
|
The Early Psychosis Screener (EPS-26)
Time Frame: Baseline and 3 months after baseline.
|
The EPS-26 consists of 26 questions that assess for symptoms and experiences associated with psychosis.
A higher score on the EPS-26 suggests a greater likelihood of being at risk for psychosis.
|
Baseline and 3 months after baseline.
|
|
Frequency, Intensity, Burden of Side Effects Rating (FIBSER)
Time Frame: Baseline (if applicable) and 3 months after baseline.
|
It measures three dimensions: the frequency of side effects, the intensity of these side effects, and the burden they impose on daily functioning.
Each dimension is rated on a Likert scale, ranging from 0 to 6, where higher scores indicate greater severity and difficulty caused by side effects.
|
Baseline (if applicable) and 3 months after baseline.
|
|
Healthcare Utlization
Time Frame: 1 year
|
Changes in healthcare utilization (including inpatient length of stay) will be measured using a ten-item patient self-report mental health resource use questionnaire, medical charts, and administrative data records six months before and after the participant enrolled in the study.
|
1 year
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Abdullah Al Maruf, PhD, M.Pharm., B.Pharm, University of Manitoba
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Bipolar and Related Disorders
- Schizophrenia Spectrum and Other Psychotic Disorders
- Behavioral Symptoms
- Chemically-Induced Disorders
- Mood Disorders
- Behavior
- Personal Satisfaction
- Psychotic Disorders
- Anxiety Disorders
- Depression
- Bipolar Disorder
- Mental Disorders
- Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions
- Psychological Well-Being
- Investigative Techniques
- Clinical Laboratory Techniques
- Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures
- Diagnosis
- Health Services
- Health Care Facilities Workforce and Services
- Preventive Health Services
- Genetic Testing
- Genetic Techniques
- Genetic Services
- Diagnostic Services
- Pharmacogenomic Testing
Other Study ID Numbers
- HS26637 (HS2024:279)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.