- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06984809
- Original Trial
Evaluation of the Invest in Play Program - a New Parent Intervention for Children With Problem Behavior
The goal of this clinical trial is to test if the invest in Play (iiP) parent program can reduce problem behaviors in children and improve parenting practices in families with children who show challenging behaviors. The main questions it aims to answer is:
• Does the iiP program reduce children's problem behaviors?
Researchers will compare families in the iiP program to families in a control group to see if the program leads to better outcomes for children and parents.
Participants will be randomly assigned to either the iiP program group or the control group and complete surveys before and after the program to see if iiP is reducing children's problem behaviors.
Study Overview
Status
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Kurt Henrik Dalmo, Ph.d.
- Phone Number: +4777660306
- Email: kurt.h.dalmo@uit.no
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Geraldine Mabille, Ph.d.
- Phone Number: +4777645864
- Email: geraldine.mabille@uit.no
Study Locations
-
-
-
Bergen, Norway, 5021
- Recruiting
- Haukeland university hospital, department of mental health care for children and adolescents
-
Contact:
- Bjørn Brunborg
- Email: bjbr@norcereasearch.no
-
Haugesund, Norway
- Not yet recruiting
- Helse Fonna HF, BUP Stord
-
Contact:
- Ingvild Kaldråstøyl
- Phone Number: +4752732068
- Email: ingvild.kaldrastoyl@helse-fonna.no
-
Contact:
- Helge Børresen
- Phone Number: +4752732068
- Email: helge.borresen@helse-fonna.no
-
Namsos, Norway
- Enrolling by invitation
- Helse Nord-Trøndelag HF, Barne- og ungdomspsykiatrisk avdeling (BUP)
-
Oslo, Norway
- Not yet recruiting
- OUS/PHA/BUPA/BUP Oslo Nord
-
Contact:
- Gaute Skribekk, lic.jur
- Phone Number: +4723023900
- Email: gauski@ous-hf.no
-
Contact:
- Marianne Robertsen
- Phone Number: +4723023900
- Email: mrober@ous-hf.no
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Parents of children between 6-12 years of age referred to out-patient clinics for treatment of behavioural problems.
- Children scoring above a pre-defined mean cut off score (over the 90 percentile) on the Eyberg Child Behavior Inventory (ECBI; Eyberg & Ross, 1978) based on Norwegian norms (Reedtz et al., 2008), as reported by parents.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Severe developmental delay (in children or parents), autism spectrum disorder, inability to understand Norwegian, or other reasons why the parent(s) are not expected to benefit from group therapy.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
No Intervention: Control group
The control condition will receive usual care, e.g., further assessments, school meetings, individual care and/or psycho education.
|
|
|
Experimental: Invest in Play group
Intervention group receiving Invest in Play (iiP), a 12 session program provided weekly to parents with children with problem behavior.
|
The intervention group will receive Invest in Play (iiP), a 12 session group-based parent program, which is led by two trained group leaders.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in the Eyberg Child Behavior Inventory (ECBI) score at different time points (from baseline up to 12 weeks).
Time Frame: From baseline to the end of treatment at 12 weeks.
|
Child problem behavior will be measured using the Eyberg Child Behavior Inventory (ECBI), where the change score from baseline to 12 weeks post intervention is the primary outcome.
The measure consists of 36 items, which is scored on parents' notion about the intensity (1 = never to 7 = always), and whether child behavior is a problem (0 = no and 1 = yes, range 0-36).
A total score is calculated, ranging from range 36-252.
High intensity scores indicate more intense problems, and a high problem score indicate a higher frequency of problem behaviors.
The ECBI has demonstrated strong internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and discriminant validity and has been shown to be a sensitive indicator of intervention efficacy for child behavior problems.
|
From baseline to the end of treatment at 12 weeks.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in the Social Competence Scale-Parent (SCS-P) score at different time points (from baseline up to 12 weeks).
Time Frame: From baseline to the end of treatment at 12 weeks.
|
Social Competence Scale-Parent (SCS-P) is a 12-item measure for assessing two domains of children's social competence, namely prosocial skills ("Your child can give suggestions and opinions without being bossy") and emotion regulation (e.g., "Your child can calm down when excited or all wound up.").
The items are rated on a scale from 0 = "Not at all" to 4 = "Very well".
For this study, the emotion regulation skills subscale (6 items) will be used, and the subscale is scored as a mean of responses, where higher scores indicate better emotion regulation.
|
From baseline to the end of treatment at 12 weeks.
|
|
Change in the Kidscreen-10 score at different time points (from baseline up to 12 weeks).
Time Frame: From baseline to the end of treatment at 12 weeks.
|
Kidscreen-10 index parent version measures children's health related global quality of life (HRQoL).
The 10-item version is the short version of the KIDSCREEN-52 and KIDSCREEN-27 instrument and is rated on a scale from 1 = "Not at all" to 5 = "to a large extent".
A total score is calculated, where higher scores indicates better HRQoL.
|
From baseline to the end of treatment at 12 weeks.
|
|
Change in Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) score at different time points (from baseline up to 12 weeks).
Time Frame: From baseline to the end of treatment at 12 weeks.
|
The Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) is a brief behavioral screening questionnaire consisting of 25 items, divided by on 5 subscales (prosocial, hyperactivity, emotional symptoms, conduct problems and peer problems), scored from 0 = not true, 1 = somewhat true and 2 = certainly true.
The parent version will be used in this study.
A total score from each subscale is calculated.
In addition, the last four subscales are added together to generate a total difficulties score (based on 20 items), where a higher score indicate more difficulties.
|
From baseline to the end of treatment at 12 weeks.
|
|
Change in the Parenting and Family Adjustment Scales (PAFAS) score at different time points (from baseline up to 12 weeks).
Time Frame: From baseline to the end of treatment at 12 weeks.
|
Parenting and Family Adjustment Scales (PAFAS) is a 40-item measure assessing parent and family functioning through five domains (parenting practices, quality of parent-child relationship, parental emotional adjustment, positive family relationships, and parental teamwork), which are all considered to be important for child outcomes.
The items are rated on a 4-point scale from 0 = not true for me at all to 3 = true of me very much.
The scores are summed (some scores are reversed), where higher scores indicate a more dysfunctional family life.
|
From baseline to the end of treatment at 12 weeks.
|
|
Change in the Parent Stress Scale (PSS) scores at different time points (from baseline up to 12 weeks).
Time Frame: From baseline to the end of treatment at 12 weeks.
|
The Parent Stress Scale (PSS) is an 18-item questionnaire assessing parents' feelings about their parenting role, exploring both positive aspects (e.g.
emotional benefits, personal development) and negative aspects of parenthood (e.g.
demands on resources, feelings of stress).
The scale is rated on a 5-point scale from 1 = Strongly disagree to 5 = Strongly agree.
Some of the scores are reversed, and a total score is calculated.
A high score indicate high stress levels.
We will use the subscale with six items addressing parent stress and the more negative aspects of parenthood in this study.
|
From baseline to the end of treatment at 12 weeks.
|
|
Change in the Parent Cognition Scale (PCS) score at different time points (from baseline up to 12 weeks).
Time Frame: From baseline to the end of treatment at 12 weeks.
|
The Parent Cognition Scale (PCS) is a 16-item self-report measure of parental attributions of child behavior.
The scale consists of two subscales, which assesses child-responsible attributions (e.g., "I'm not structured enough with my child") and parent-causal attribution (e.g., "I'm not structured enough with my child").
The items are rated on a scale from 0 = always true to 5 = never true, all being reverse scored.
This means that higher scores indicate more negative attributions.
|
From baseline to the end of treatment at 12 weeks.
|
|
Change in the Me as parent - Short form (MaaPs-SF) score at different time points (from baseline up to 12 weeks).
Time Frame: From baseline to the end of treatment at 12 weeks.
|
Me as parent - Short form (MaaPs-SF) is a four-item measure to assess parent self-efficacy.
The scale is derived from the original 16-item version (Hamilton et al., 2014), developed to assess parenting self-regulation.
The MaaPs-SF is rated on a 5-point scale from 1 = Strongly disagree to 5 = Strongly agree.
The four items are added to provide a total score, where a higher score indicates better parenting self-efficacy.
|
From baseline to the end of treatment at 12 weeks.
|
|
Change in the Parental Emotion Regulation Inventory (PERI-2) score at different time points (from baseline up to 12 weeks).
Time Frame: From baseline to the end of treatment at 12 weeks.
|
The Parental Emotion Regulation Inventory (PERI-2) is a 23-item self-report measure to assess parents own self-regulation.
The items consist of different emotion regulation strategies which are rated on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (I never do this) to 7 (I very often do this), comprising four different subscales (Reappraisal, Suppression, Escape and Capitulation).
A score for each subscale is calculated, where a high score indicate that the strategies within that factor are more used.
|
From baseline to the end of treatment at 12 weeks.
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Eyberg Child Behavioral Inventory (ECBI) score from post-intervention to three months follow up.
Time Frame: From post-treatment to three months post intervention.
|
Investigators want to assess whether the scores changes in the Invest in Play intervention group three months post intervention. The Eyberg Child Behavioral Inventory (ECBI) is a well-validated measure for evaluating child problem behavior. The measure consists of 36 items, which is scored on parents' notion about the intensity (1 = never to 7 = always), and whether child behavior is a problem (0 = no and 1 = yes, range 0-36). A total score is calculated, ranging from range 36-252. High intensity scores indicate more intense problems, and a high problem score indicate a higher frequency of problem behaviors. |
From post-treatment to three months post intervention.
|
|
Change in the Social Competence Scale-Parent (SCS-P) score from post-intervention to three months follow up.
Time Frame: From post-treatment to three months post intervention.
|
Investigators want to assess whether the scores changes in the Invest in Play intervention group three months post intervention. The Social Competence Scale-Parent (SCS-P) is a 12-item measure for assessing two domains of children's social competence, namely prosocial skills ("Your child can give suggestions and opinions without being bossy") and emotion regulation (e.g., "Your child can calm down when excited or all wound up."). The items are rated on a scale from 0 = "Not at all" to 4 = "Very well". For this study, the emotion regulation skills subscale (6 items) will be used, and the subscale is scored as a mean of responses, where higher scores indicate better emotion regulation. |
From post-treatment to three months post intervention.
|
|
Change in Kidscreen-10 score from post-intervention to three months follow up.
Time Frame: From post-treatment to three months post intervention.
|
Investigators want to assess whether the scores changes in the Invest in Play intervention group three months post intervention. Kidscreen-10 index parent version measures children's health related global quality of life (HRQoL). The 10-item version is the short version of the KIDSCREEN-52 and KIDSCREEN-27 instrument and is rated on a scale from 1 = "Not at all" to 5 = "to a large extent". A total score is calculated, where higher scores indicates better HRQoL. |
From post-treatment to three months post intervention.
|
|
Change in Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) score from post-intervention to three months follow up.
Time Frame: From post-treatment to three months post intervention.
|
Investigators want to assess whether the scores changes in the Invest in Play intervention group three months post intervention. The Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) is a brief behavioral screening questionnaire consisting of 25 items, divided by on 5 subscales (prosocial, hyperactivity, emotional symptoms, conduct problems and peer problems), scored from 0 = not true, 1 = somewhat true and 2 = certainly true. The parent version will be used in this study. A total score from each subscale is calculated. In addition, the last four subscales are added together to generate a total difficulties score (based on 20 items), where a higher score indicate more difficulties. |
From post-treatment to three months post intervention.
|
|
Change in the Parenting and Family Adjustment Scales (PAFAS) from post-intervention to three months follow up.
Time Frame: From post-treatment to three months post intervention.
|
Investigators want to assess whether the scores changes in the Invest in Play intervention group three months post intervention. Parenting and Family Adjustment Scales (PAFAS) is a 40-item measure assessing parent and family functioning through five domains (parenting practices, quality of parent-child relationship, parental emotional adjustment, positive family relationships, and parental teamwork), which are all considered to be important for child outcomes. The items are rated on a 4-point scale from 0 = not true for me at all to 3 = true of me very much. The scores are summed (some scores are reversed), where higher scores indicate a more dysfunctional family life |
From post-treatment to three months post intervention.
|
|
Change in the Parent Stress Scale (PSS) from post-intervention to three months follow up.
Time Frame: From post-treatment to three months post intervention.
|
Investigators want to assess whether the scores changes in the Invest in Play intervention group three months post intervention. The Parent Stress Scale (PSS) is an 18-item questionnaire assessing parents' feelings about their parenting role, exploring both positive aspects (e.g. emotional benefits, personal development) and negative aspects of parenthood (e.g. demands on resources, feelings of stress). The scale is rated on a 5-point scale from 1 = Strongly disagree to 5 = Strongly agree. Some of the scores are reversed, and a total score is calculated. A high score indicate high stress levels. We will use the subscale with six items addressing parent stress and the more negative aspects of parenthood in this study. |
From post-treatment to three months post intervention.
|
|
Change in the Parent Cognition Scale (PCS) score from post-intervention to three months follow up.
Time Frame: From post-treatment to three months post intervention.
|
Investigators want to assess whether the scores changes in the Invest in Play intervention group three months post intervention. The Parent Cognition Scale (PCS) is a 16-item self-report measure of parental attributions of child behavior. The scale consists of two subscales, which assesses child-responsible attributions (e.g., "I'm not structured enough with my child") and parent-causal attribution (e.g., "I'm not structured enough with my child"). The items are rated on a scale from 0 = always true to 5 = never true, all being reverse scored. This means that higher scores indicate more negative attributions. |
From post-treatment to three months post intervention.
|
|
Change in the Me as parent - Short form (MaaPs-SF) score from post intervention to three months follow up.
Time Frame: From post-treatment to three months post intervention.
|
Investigators want to assess whether the scores changes in the Invest in Play intervention group three months post intervention. Me as parent - Short form (MaaPs-SF; Matthews, et al., 2022) is a four-item measure to assess parent self-efficacy. The scale is derived from the original 16-item version (Hamilton et al., 2014), developed to assess parenting self-regulation. The MaaPs-SF is rated on a 5-point scale from 1 = Strongly disagree to 5 = Strongly agree. The four items are added to provide a total score, where a higher score indicates better parenting self-efficacy. |
From post-treatment to three months post intervention.
|
|
Change in the Parental Emotion Regulation Inventory (PERI-2) from post intervention to three months follow up.
Time Frame: From post-treatment to three months post intervention.
|
Investigators want to assess whether the scores changes in the Invest in Play intervention group three months post intervention. The Parental Emotion Regulation Inventory (PERI-2) is a 23-item self-report measure to assess parents own self-regulation. The items consist of different emotion regulation strategies which are rated on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (I never do this) to 7 (I very often do this), comprising four subscales (Reappraisal, Suppression, Escape and Capitulation). A score for each subscale is calculated, where a high score indicate that the strategies within that factor are more used. |
From post-treatment to three months post intervention.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Lene-Mari P. Rasmussen, Ph.d, UiT The Arctic University of Norway
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2024/785387
- 2025-957314 (Other Identifier: Norwegian Agency for Shared Services in Education and Research (SIKT))
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
De-identified data (data where personal identifying characteristics have been removed) may be shared with national or international collaborators in Denmark and the Netherlands for use in comparative studies. This primarily applies to information related to the child's behavior, parental stress, and user satisfaction.
Data from the study can also be made available for other researchers upon request (see details below under access criteria).
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- ICF
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Problem Behavior
-
Kastamonu UniversityThe Scientific and Technological Research Council of TurkeyRecruiting
-
McMaster UniversityUniversity of Manitoba; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences; University... and other collaboratorsCompleted
-
University of CyprusUnknown
-
Imperial College LondonNational Institute for Health Research, United KingdomCompletedMental Health Disorder | Child Behavior Problem | Self Injurious Behavior | Adolescent Behavior ProblemUnited Kingdom
-
Children's Hospital Los AngelesNational Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS); AltaMed Health...TerminatedParenting | Child Behavior Problem | Child RearingUnited States
-
Helsinki University Central HospitalCompletedChild Behavior Problem
-
Sykehuset TelemarkEnrolling by invitationChild Behavior Problem | Psychiatric Problem | DDP | Child Neglect | MaltreatmentNorway
-
Muhammad IrfanUniversity of PeshawarCompletedBehavior Problem | Emotional ProblemPakistan
-
Boston University Charles River CampusNational Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH)RecruitingMental Health Wellness 1 | Adolescent Behavior ProblemUnited States
-
University of PennsylvaniaCompletedChild Behavior Problem | Interprofessional Relations | Multidisciplinary CommunicationUnited States
Clinical Trials on Intervention
-
Biolux Research Holdings, Inc.TerminatedOrthodontic Tooth MovementCanada
-
Nottingham Trent UniversityUnknownOverweight and ObesityUnited Kingdom
-
University of Southern DenmarkTrygFonden, DenmarkUnknownObesity | Overweight | Metabolic Syndrome | ChildrenDenmark
-
University of California, San FranciscoNational Cancer Institute (NCI)CompletedColorectal Carcinoma | Healthy Subject | Health Status UnknownUnited States
-
Roswell Park Cancer InstituteNational Cancer Institute (NCI)CompletedStage 0a Bladder Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage 0is Bladder Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage I Bladder Cancer AJCC v8United States
-
University of FloridaCompletedSensitivityUnited States
-
Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer CenterCompleted
-
Mayo ClinicNational Cancer Institute (NCI)WithdrawnCancer Survivor | Peripheral Sensory Neuropathy
-
Vanderbilt UniversityCompletedMath Learning Disability | Reading Learning DisabilityUnited States
-
Universidad de ExtremaduraDiputación Provincial de BadajozRecruitingHealth Education | Gamification in Health EducationSpain