Point of Care Lung Ultrasound Examination in Patients With Shortness of Breath

September 29, 2025 updated by: GE Healthcare
This is a prospective, non-randomized clinical validation research study. Subjects will consent and have two ultrasounds as part of the study.

Study Overview

Status

Enrolling by invitation

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This study is to collect data to validate the performance of Caption Lung AI in enabling trained healthcare professionals to perform LUS to obtain diagnostic-quality Lung Ultrasound Studies.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

150

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Connecticut
      • New Haven, Connecticut, United States, 06511
        • Yale University School of Medicine
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60612-3833
        • Rush University Medical Center
      • Evanston, Illinois, United States, 60208
        • Northwestern University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 1. Patients over the age of 22; AND
  • 2. Patients with known lung pathology or patients with no known lung pathology in the hospital or presenting to the hospital or outpatient setting with shortness of breath.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • 1. Patients in extremis and/or patients in whom a lung ultrasound would not normally be performed;
  • 2. Patients who are unable to consent;
  • 3. Patients who are prisoners; AND
  • 4. Patients who do not speak English fluently.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Cohort 1 -Device 1

Cohort 1 will utilize the Vscan Air CL (curvilinear and linear probes) and SL (sector probe) handheld ultrasound to perform an 8-zone lung ultrasound (LUS) exam.

The Trained HCP will be required to capture at least 2 clips per zone using an ultrasound with Caption AI before moving onto the next zone. The scanner can capture multiple clips per zone, via-auto-capture or Save Best Clip (Study Exam).

The Expert LUS user will use the same ultrasound system but without Caption Lung AI (Control Exam).

Lung ultrasound software.
Other Names:
  • SaMD
Experimental: Cohort 2 -Device 2

Cohort 2 will utilize the Venue GO ultrasound system to perform a 12-zone lung ultrasound (LUS) exam.

All Qualified users using Caption Lung AI will be required to capture at least 2 clips per zone before moving onto the next zone. The scanner can capture multiple clips per zone, via-auto-capture or Save Best Clip (Study Exam).

The Qualified user will use the same ultrasound system but without Caption Lung AI (Control Exam).

Lung ultrasound software.
Other Names:
  • SaMD
Active Comparator: Cohort 0 - Vscan (no AI)
Cohort 0 will utilize the Vscan Air CL (curvilinear and linear probes) and SL (sector probe) handheld ultrasound to perform the following lung ultrasound (LUS) exams.: Each patient will undergo 2 8-zone lung examinations which will be a combination of the enrollment distribution listed below equating to up to 30 subjects with 2 scans per subject (60 scans).
Lung ultrasound software.
Other Names:
  • SaMD

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cohort 1: % of patient studies composed of images acquired by the THCPs with sufficient quality to make a clinical assessment
Time Frame: 7 months
The primary endpoint will be based on the majority assessment of the independent expert readers qualitatively assessment of the LUS exam (study level) as being of diagnostic quality.
7 months
Cohort 2: % of patient studies composed of images acquired by the Qualified user to make a clinical assessment
Time Frame: 7 months
The primary endpoint will be based on the majority assessment of the independent expert readers qualitatively assessment of the LUS exam (study level) as being of diagnostic quality.
7 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cohort 1:
Time Frame: 7 months
Sub-group analyses will be performed on the diagnostic image quality performance, with descriptive statistics reported based on age (< 65, ≥ 65), BMI group (< 25, 25 ≤ BMI < 30, ≥ 30), gender (Male / Female), site location, THCP, and zone of the image (1 - 8). The statistical analysis procedure and all applicable performance metrics that were used on the whole sample (i.e., the Primary Outcome Measures) will be repeated for each sub-group level. This will be conducted to ensure that there is no inherent bias where a specific sub-group level has a greater impact on the overall whole-sample performance compared to other levels.
7 months
Cohort 2:
Time Frame: 7 months
Sub-group analyses will be performed on the diagnostic image quality performance, with descriptive statistics reported based on age (< 65, ≥ 65), BMI group (< 25, 25 ≤ BMI < 30, ≥ 30), gender (Male / Female), site location, THCP, and zone of the image (1 -12). The statistical analysis procedure and all applicable performance metrics that were used on the whole sample (i.e., the Primary Outcome Measures) will be repeated for each sub-group level. This will be conducted to ensure that there is no inherent bias where a specific sub-group level has a greater impact on the overall whole-sample performance compared to other levels.
7 months
Cohort 1:
Time Frame: 7 months

Task-based comparison of the study and control exams:

o Aided non-experts (i.e., THCP) and unaided experts (i.e., Expert LUS user) clips will be reviewed by expert readers for "normal" and "abnormal" ultrasound assessment at the zone level (B-lines, Pleural effusion, Non-aerated Lung / Consolidation, Lung Sliding).

7 months
Cohort 2:
Time Frame: 7 months

Task-based comparison of the study and control exams:

o Aided user and unaided user (i.e., Qualified user) clips will be reviewed by expert readers for "normal" and "abnormal" ultrasound assessment at the zone level (B-lines, Pleural effusion, Non-aerated Lung / Consolidation, Lung Sliding).

7 months
Cohort 1 and 2:
Time Frame: 7 months
Recording mode (% of clips acquired with auto-capture rate versus save best clip).
7 months
Cohort 1:
Time Frame: 7 months
Acquisition time to complete the LUS exam and for each view (1 - 8).
7 months
Cohort 2:
Time Frame: 7 months
Acquisition time to complete the LUS exam and for each view (1 - 12).
7 months
Cohort 1 and 2:
Time Frame: 7 months
Inter-rater (physician image-interpretation) variability.
7 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 19, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 6, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 23, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

July 1, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

October 3, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 29, 2025

Last Verified

September 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • SA-000147

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lung Disease

Clinical Trials on Lung ultrasound

Subscribe