ICU Background Early Awareness for Critical deterioratiON (BEACON)

June 12, 2026 updated by: ETH Zurich

ICU Background Early Awareness for Critical deterioratiON (BEACON)

The study will compare ICU sub-units, those with additional support of a clinician awareness system, ICU Beacon, and those receiving the standard of care. The win-ratio composite outcome will be assessed by comparing patients by study group and stratified by APACHE score at admission.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Single-center, stratified, cluster-randomized (the ICU units will be randomized) crossover analysis with outcome-assessor blinding. The analysis will be conducted in the adult intensive care units (ICUs) of Inselspital, Bern, comprising two distinct ICU units: the Blue and the Yellow ICU Unit. Each unit contains two sub-units, which will serve as the clustering units for randomization. The study follows a two-phase design. In the initial phase, sub-units within each ICU unit will be randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to either the additional BEACON scoring group or control group. Patients admitted to sub-units allocated to the BEACON group will receive standard care plus BEACON scores, while those admitted to control group will receive standard care only. After predefined cluster periods, allocations will be swapped between the BEACON and control groups. A wash-out period of two weeks will be observed between swaps to minimize carryover effects. During the wash-out period, no new study patients will be enrolled. Once the swap is complete, only newly admitted patients will be enrolled under the sub-unit's new allocation. Patients still occupying sub-units from the preceding period will be censored from the study at the time of the swap and excluded from outcome analysis beyond that point. The same approach will be applied for patients who will be transferred from one unit to a different unit during the ICU admission for logistical/organizational reasons. Importantly, individual patients will only be exposed to one analysis condition-either the BEACON or control-based on the bed allocation at the time of their admission. Only the sub-units themselves undergo crossover, ensuring temporal balance while maintaining patient-level exposure to a single condition.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

1962

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Gunnar Rätsch, Dr. rer. nat.
  • Phone Number: +41 44 632 2036
  • Email: raetsch@ethz.ch

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Bern, Switzerland, 3010
        • Recruiting
        • Inselspital - Universitätsspital Bern
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Martin Faltys, Dr. med.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

The study population includes all patients admitted to the Inselspital Bern ICU, not fulfilling any of the exclusion criteria.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • admission to intensive care unit

Exclusion Criteria:

  • age < 18 years
  • presence of documented refused general consent form (at database closure)
  • admission for the sole purpose of dying/organ donation or evaluation of such

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Control Group
Patients are admitted to the ICU and received the standard of care without the availability of Beacon
Study Group
Patients are admitted to the ICU and received the standard of care with the additional availability of Beacon by treating clinicians.
Availability of a proprietary clinician awareness for potential organ deterioration software to treating clinicians (ICU Beacon) in addition to the standard of care.
Other Names:
  • Beacon

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The primary objective is to determine whether BEACON improves ICU sub-unit performance, i.e. reduces total mortality and/or mitigates severity of organ failures in an adult university ICU setting.
Time Frame: Patient data up to 28 days post admission will be collected to support analysis.

Determined by a stratified clustered hierarchical win ratio. Patient data is clustered by ICU sub-unit and stratified by APACHE score. For each stratum, each patient in the study group is compared with all patients in the control group within that same stratum. Levels are assessed up to 28 days after admission. The hierarchical levels are:

  1. All-cause mortality;
  2. Number of organ systems failed (respiratory, cardiovascular, coagulation, liver, renal) with SOFA scores newly increasing to 3 points during the ICU stay; and
  3. Sum of highest circulatory and respiratory SOFA scores during the ICU stay, independently assessed and subsequently summed.

If one patient "wins" at the first level (i.e., is alive while the other is dead), the comparison is decided. If a tie occurs (both alive or both dead at at 28 days), the next level is compared, and so forth. This approach prioritizes the most clinically serious outcome (mortality), while capturing organ dysfunction at different levels.

Patient data up to 28 days post admission will be collected to support analysis.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time free of circulatory failure and alive at 28 days
Time Frame: Patient data up to 28 days post admission will be collected to support analysis.
Described by the total number of days the patient was alive and free of circulatory failure within the first 28 days after admission. Circulatory failure is defined as: lactate >= 2 mmol/L and MAP <= 65 mmHg or receipt of vasopressors/inotropes.
Patient data up to 28 days post admission will be collected to support analysis.
Time free of respiratory failure and alive at 28 days
Time Frame: Patient data up to 28 days post admission will be collected to support analysis.
Described by the total number of days the patient was alive and free of respiratory failure within the first 28 days after admission. Respiratory failure is defined as: (PaO2/FiO2 ratio < 150 mmHg).
Patient data up to 28 days post admission will be collected to support analysis.
All cause mortality at 28 days
Time Frame: Patient data up to 28 days post admission will be collected to support analysis.
Mortality from any cause within 28 days following ICU admission.
Patient data up to 28 days post admission will be collected to support analysis.
Mean total SOFA score over ICU stay
Time Frame: Patient data up to 28 days post admission will be collected to support analysis.
The mean SOFA score including all organ systems through the duration of the ICU admission.
Patient data up to 28 days post admission will be collected to support analysis.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

November 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 16, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 5, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

August 13, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 15, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 12, 2026

Last Verified

June 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe