Longitudinal Cohort Study of Immune-Related Adverse Events in Solid Tumor Patients Treated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

January 26, 2026 updated by: Weidong Wang, Shantou University Medical College

Longitudinal Cohort Study of Immune-Related Adverse Events in Solid Tumor Patients Receiving Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors, With Deep Phenotyping and Multi-Omics Biomarker Discovery

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have transformed the treatment of solid tumors but are associated with immune-related adverse events (irAEs) that can affect virtually any organ system. While many irAEs are well recognized, neurological, neurocognitive, and psychiatric toxicities remain diagnostically challenging, potentially severe, and poorly understood, with limited predictive biomarkers.

This prospective longitudinal observational cohort study enrolls adult patients with solid tumors initiating a new course of ICI therapy. Participants undergo standardized baseline clinical assessments and biospecimen collection prior to ICI initiation, followed by longitudinal follow-up and event-driven sampling. Patients are dynamically assigned to organ-specific irAE cohorts based on the first clinically significant irAE that dictates management. Patients without grade ≥2 irAEs during follow-up serve as a comparator control cohort.

The primary objective is to characterize longitudinal immune and inflammatory biomarker trajectories associated with the development of irAEs and to identify predictive and prognostic biomarkers, with particular emphasis on neurological, neurocognitive, and psychiatric toxicities. Integrated clinical, imaging, and multi-omics data will be used to elucidate mechanisms of toxicity and inform future risk stratification and personalized management strategies.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting CTLA-4, PD-1, and PD-L1 pathways have demonstrated substantial clinical benefit across multiple solid malignancies. However, their mechanism of action can also lead to immune-related adverse events (irAEs), which may involve dermatologic, gastrointestinal, hepatic, pulmonary, endocrine, musculoskeletal, cardiovascular, renal, hematologic, neurological, and psychiatric systems. Neurological and neurocognitive irAEs, in particular, are uncommon but potentially devastating and remain poorly characterized.

This study is a hybrid prospective longitudinal observational cohort designed to move beyond reactive identification of irAEs toward proactive prediction and mechanistic understanding. Adult patients with solid tumors initiating a new ICI regimen are enrolled prior to treatment initiation. Longitudinal clinical data, imaging, and biospecimens are collected at predefined intervals and at the time of suspected irAE onset when feasible.

Participants are assigned to event-defined cohorts based on the first grade ≥2 irAE that drives clinical management, including neuro-sensory, gastrointestinal/hepatic, rheumatologic/musculoskeletal, vascular/renal, hematologic, multi-organ, or control (no significant irAE) cohorts. Deep phenotyping and multi-omics analyses-including immune cell profiling, proteomics, metabolomics, and microbiome analyses-are performed to identify biomarkers associated with irAE risk, severity, and outcomes.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

940

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Guangzhou, China
        • Recruiting
        • Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Ao Zhang, MD
      • Sanya, China
        • Recruiting
        • Hainan Hospital of Chinese PLA General Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Jiacai Lin, MD
      • Shantou, China
        • Recruiting
        • the First Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Jun Lu, MD
      • Shantou, China
        • Recruiting
        • Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Xinjia Wang, MD
      • Zhengzhou, China
        • Recruiting
        • The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Pengfei Zhu, MD
    • Fujian
      • Fuzhou, Fujian, China, 430074
        • Recruiting
        • First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Yifei Ma, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Adult patients (≥18 years) with histologically confirmed solid malignancies who are initiating a new immune checkpoint inhibitor regimen, either as standard of care or within an approved clinical trial. Participants are enrolled prior to the first immune checkpoint inhibitor dose and followed longitudinally to assess the development of immune-related adverse events and associated immune and inflammatory biomarker changes.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥18 years
  • Histologically confirmed solid malignancy
  • Planned initiation of a new immune checkpoint inhibitor regimen (monotherapy or combination) as standard of care or on an approved clinical trial
  • Ability to provide informed consent
  • Baseline study assessments and biospecimen collection completed prior to first ICI dose
  • Life expectancy of at least 6 months as determined by treating oncologist
  • Availability of archival tumor tissue or willingness to undergo biopsy if archival tissue is unavailable

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Uncontrolled medical, psychiatric, or social conditions that would interfere with study participation or data interpretation
  • Chronic systemic immunosuppression exceeding 10 mg/day prednisone equivalent within 14 days prior to enrollment (excluding inhaled, topical, or physiologic replacement doses)
  • Prior solid organ transplantation or allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
  • Untreated, symptomatic, or progressing brain metastases (treated and stable brain metastases allowed if off systemic steroids for at least 7 days)
  • Inability or unwillingness to provide required baseline biospecimens

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Neuro-Sensory irAE Cohort
Participants who develop a grade ≥2 neurological, neurocognitive, psychiatric, ocular inflammatory, or peripheral nervous system immune-related adverse event.
Gastrointestinal and Hepatic irAE Cohort
Participants who develop grade ≥2 immune-mediated colitis, hepatitis, pancreatitis, or related gastrointestinal toxicities.
Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal irAE Cohort
Participants who develop grade ≥2 inflammatory arthritis, myositis, polymyalgia rheumatica-like syndromes, or related musculoskeletal toxicities.
Vascular and Renal irAE Cohort
Participants who develop grade ≥2 myocarditis, vasculitis, nephritis, or other vascular or renal immune-mediated toxicities.
Hematologic irAE Cohort
Participants who develop grade ≥2 immune-mediated cytopenias or other hematologic toxicities.
Multi-Organ irAE Cohort
Participants who develop two or more distinct grade ≥2 immune-related adverse events involving different organ systems.
Control Cohort
Participants who do not develop any grade ≥2 immune-related adverse events during the defined follow-up period.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to Clinical Resolution of Immune-Related Adverse Events (Days)
Time Frame: From irAE diagnosis through up to 24 months of follow-up
Among participants who develop grade ≥2 immune-related adverse events (irAEs), the time from irAE diagnosis and initiation of organ-specific treatment (per institutional guidelines) to achievement of organ-specific clinical resolution will be recorded. Criteria for clinical resolution differ by organ system and are defined according to established consensus guidelines, as specified in the corresponding secondary outcome measures.
From irAE diagnosis through up to 24 months of follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Neuro-Sensory irAE Subgroup: Proportion of Participants with Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) Score ≤2
Time Frame: 12 weeks after irAE diagnosis
Among participants with immune-mediated neurological events (e.g., encephalitis, myelitis, plexopathy), functional status will be assessed using the Modified Rankin Scale. An mRS score ≤2 (slight disability, able to live independently) is a widely accepted threshold for favorable neurological outcome in neuroimmunology clinical trials.
12 weeks after irAE diagnosis
Neuro-Sensory irAE Subgroup:Proportion of Participants with Objective Improvement on Nerve Conduction Studies
Time Frame: 12 weeks after irAE diagnosis
Among participants with immune-mediated peripheral neuropathy, electrophysiologic improvement will be assessed using nerve conduction studies and electromyography. Objective improvement is defined as ≥20% improvement in motor or sensory nerve action potential amplitude or conduction velocity compared with the acute phase, according to EFNS/PNS criteria.
12 weeks after irAE diagnosis
Psychiatric and Cognitive irAE Subgroup:Proportion of Participants with Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) Score <10
Time Frame: 8 weeks after initiation of targeted treatment
Among participants with immune-mediated major depressive episodes, depressive symptoms will be assessed using the PHQ-9. A score <10 represents remission or mild symptoms and is an internationally accepted threshold distinguishing clinically significant depression from response/remission.
8 weeks after initiation of targeted treatment
Psychiatric and Cognitive irAE Subgroup:Proportion of Participants with ≥0.5 Standard Deviation Improvement on ≥2 Standardized Neuropsychological Tests
Time Frame: 12 weeks after irAE diagnosis
Among participants with immune-mediated cognitive impairment, standardized neuropsychological test batteries (including the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised and Trail Making Test Part B) will be administered. Clinically meaningful cognitive improvement is defined as ≥0.5 standard deviation improvement from the acute phase in at least two distinct cognitive domains.
12 weeks after irAE diagnosis
Gastrointestinal and Hepatic irAE Subgroup: Proportion of Participants with ≤3 Bowel Movements per Day and No Hematochezia
Time Frame: 2 weeks after initiation of immunosuppressive therapy
Among participants with immune-mediated colitis, clinical remission will be assessed. ≤3 bowel movements per day without hematochezia is a widely accepted clinical remission criterion in colitis clinical trials.
2 weeks after initiation of immunosuppressive therapy
Gastrointestinal and Hepatic irAE Subgroup: Proportion of Participants with Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) ≤1.5 × Upper Limit of Normal
Time Frame: 4 weeks after initiation of immunosuppressive therapy
Among participants with immune-mediated hepatitis, biochemical remission will be assessed. ALT ≤1.5 × ULN is a commonly accepted biochemical remission criterion in drug-induced liver injury trials.
4 weeks after initiation of immunosuppressive therapy
Rheumatologic and Musculoskeletal irAE Subgroup: Proportion of Participants with Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) ≤10
Time Frame: 12 weeks after initiation of immunosuppressive therapy
Among participants with immune-mediated inflammatory arthritis, disease activity will be assessed using the CDAI. A CDAI score ≤10 defines low disease activity and is an established rheumatologic threshold.
12 weeks after initiation of immunosuppressive therapy
Rheumatologic and Musculoskeletal irAE Subgroup: Proportion of Participants with ≥20% Improvement in Manual Muscle Testing (MMT-8) Score
Time Frame: 12 weeks after irAE diagnosis
Among participants with immune-mediated myositis, muscle strength will be assessed using the MMT-8 score. A ≥20% improvement from the acute phase is an established clinically meaningful threshold in myositis trials.
12 weeks after irAE diagnosis
Renal irAE Subgroup: Proportion of Participants with Serum Creatinine Recovery to Within 1.3 × Baseline
Time Frame: 12 weeks after irAE diagnosis
Among participants with immune-mediated nephritis, renal recovery will be assessed. Serum creatinine recovery to within 1.3 × baseline represents a stringent and clinically meaningful recovery criterion per KDIGO acute kidney injury guidelines.
12 weeks after irAE diagnosis
Hematologic irAE Subgroup: Proportion of Participants with Sustained Hematologic Response (CTCAE v5.0 Grade ≤1 for ≥4 Weeks)
Time Frame: Within 12 weeks after initiation of first-line immunosuppressive therapy
Among participants with immune-mediated cytopenias, hematologic remission is defined as maintenance of CTCAE v5.0 grade ≤1 blood counts (e.g., platelets ≥75 ×10⁹/L, absolute neutrophil count ≥1.5 ×10⁹/L) for at least 4 weeks without ongoing transfusion or growth factor support.
Within 12 weeks after initiation of first-line immunosuppressive therapy
Hematologic irAE Subgroup: Proportion of Participants with Normalized Lactate Dehydrogenase and Stable Hemoglobin
Time Frame: 2 weeks after initiation of treatment
Among participants with immune-mediated hemolytic anemia, hemolysis control is defined as normalization of lactate dehydrogenase with stable hemoglobin levels for ≥7 days without transfusion support.
2 weeks after initiation of treatment
Multi-Organ irAE Subgroup: Proportion of Participants without Any New or Worsening ≥Grade 3 Immune-Related Adverse Events Across Organ Systems
Time Frame: Within 4 weeks after initiation of combined immunosuppressive therapy
Among participants with multi-organ irAEs, overall toxicity control is defined as absence of any new or worsening grade ≥3 irAE in any organ system following initiation of treatment.
Within 4 weeks after initiation of combined immunosuppressive therapy
Multi-Organ irAE Subgroup: Proportion of Participants Requiring Intensive Care Unit Admission for Multi-Organ irAE
Time Frame: irAE diagnosis through resolution or up to 24 weeks
The proportion of participants requiring intensive care unit admission due to the severity of multi-organ immune-related adverse events will be recorded as an objective marker of disease severity.
irAE diagnosis through resolution or up to 24 weeks
Control Cohort (No Grade ≥2 irAE): Duration of Immunotherapy without Grade ≥2 Immune-Related Adverse Events (Months)
Time Frame: From ICI initiation through 90 days after last dose
Among participants who do not develop grade ≥2 irAEs, treatment tolerability will be assessed as the time from ICI initiation to first occurrence of grade ≥2 irAE, disease progression, death, or treatment discontinuation.
From ICI initiation through 90 days after last dose
Control Cohort (No Grade ≥2 irAE): Proportion of Participants Completing Planned Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Course per Protocol
Time Frame: From ICI initiation through 90 days after last dose
Among participants without grade ≥2 irAEs, the proportion completing the planned ICI treatment course as scheduled will be recorded as a complementary measure of treatment tolerability.
From ICI initiation through 90 days after last dose

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 10, 2019

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 10, 2029

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 10, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 16, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 20, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

January 22, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 28, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 26, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

  1. Baseline Characteristics & Demographics: Age, sex, race/ethnicity, baseline body weight and height, diagnosis, treatment history, relevant comorbidities, smoking/alcohol status.
  2. Exposure/Treatment Data: Specific checkpoint inhibitor(s) received, dosing regimen, treatment start and end dates, medications.
  3. Laboratory & Diagnostic Data: Serial laboratory test results, key imaging findings relevant to irAEs, pathology reports.
  4. Outcomes: CTCAE grades, date to primary outcomes, management strategies.
  5. Oncologic Outcomes: Tumor response assessments.
  6. Supporting Documents for Data Interpretation.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

2026.3 to 2029.1

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

The de-identified IPD and supporting documents will be made available to qualified researchers worldwide upon request. Researchers will have access to the fully de-identified individual participant data listed in the previous section, along with the supporting documents including: the final study protocol, statistical analysis plan, the annotated case report forms. The data dictionary.

All data will be anonymized in accordance with the HIPAA Safe Harbor method. Interested researchers must submit a formal research proposal outlining their study objectives, analysis plan, and ethical considerations via email for review by our Data Access Committee. Requestors will be required to sign a Data Use Agreement that legally binds them to use the data only for the approved purpose, maintain data security, and prevent re-identification or redistribution. Data will then be securely transferred via encrypted file sharing or made available through a controlled-access repository

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • ANALYTIC_CODE
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe