- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07479914
Art of Memory for Cognitive Enhancement in the Monza Brain Health Service (MEMO)
The goal of this pilot interventional clinical trial (non-drug study) is to learn whether memory techniques (mnemonics) can improve cognitive performance in adults over 50 years old with subjective cognitive decline who are followed at the Brain Health Service of Monza. The study will also evaluate the feasibility of this intervention and explore which biological or clinical factors may influence its effects.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Do memory techniques improve overall cognitive performance, measured by a composite score from a neuropsychological test battery, after 6 months?
- Are any cognitive benefits maintained over time (up to 9 months)?
- Do biomarkers (such as blood p-tau217 levels, APOE genotype, or brain atrophy on MRI) influence the response to memory training?
- Do memory techniques improve subjective cognitive complaints and performance on sensitive memory and cognitive-motor tests?
Researchers will compare a memory training group to a control group receiving information only to see whether structured mnemonic training leads to greater improvement in cognitive outcomes.
Participants will be randomly assigned to either the memory training group or the control group. Both groups will undergo complete cognitive assessments at baseline, 6 months, and 9 months.
If assigned to the training group, participants will attend two in-person group sessions to learn basic and advanced memory techniques, participate in two additional online group meetings, access online video materials, and practice memory exercises on a dedicated online platform for about 20 minutes per day.
If assigned to the control group, participants will receive general information about memory techniques but no structured training or platform access.
A total of 80 participants (40 per group) will be enrolled. This pilot study will help estimate the size of the effect and determine whether a larger future study is feasible.
Study Overview
Status
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Lombardy
-
Monza, Lombardy, Italy, 20900
- Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Diagnosis of Subjective Cognitive Decline (SCD) according to Jessen et al., 2014 criteria
- Evaluation at the Brain Health Service (BHS) of Monza
- Prior brain MRI performed at Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori
- Prior blood sampling for measurement of biomarkers of cerebral amyloidosis
- Age > 50 years
- Adequate digital literacy (ability to access websites and participate in video calls)
- Ability and willingness to provide written informed consent before study participation
Exclusion Criteria:
- Severe visual and/or hearing impairment interfering with participation
- Inability to participate in online training activities or attend in-person group sessions
- Enrollment in another interventional study with an expected effect on cognition
- Refusal or withdrawal of consent to participate
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Art of memory
The art of memory group will attend two in-person group sessions to learn basic and advanced memory techniques, participate in two additional online group meetings, access online video materials and practice memory exercises on a dedicated online platform for about 20 minutes per day
|
The intervention will consist of:
Other Names:
|
|
Other: Control
The control group will receive general information about memory techniques but no structured training or platform access
|
The control group will receive general information about memory techniques but no structured training or platform access
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change from baseline to 6 months in composite neuropsychological test battery (NTB) z-score (range: - infinity, infinity; higher scores mean better outcomes)
Time Frame: Baseline to 6 months
|
Difference between the active mnemonic training group and the control group in the longitudinal change of the composite z-score derived from a standardized neuropsychological test battery (NTB).
The composite score reflects global cognitive performance.
|
Baseline to 6 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Drop-out rate
Time Frame: From randomization to 9 months
|
Difference in study drop-out rates between the active mnemonic training group and the control group, used as a measure of feasibility and acceptability of the intervention.
|
From randomization to 9 months
|
|
Change from baseline to 9 months in composite NTB z-score (range: - infinity, infinity; higher scores mean better outcomes)
Time Frame: Baseline to 9 months
|
Difference between the active and control groups in the longitudinal change of the composite z-score derived from the neuropsychological test battery (NTB), evaluating the persistence of cognitive effects.
|
Baseline to 9 months
|
|
Influence of biological markers on cognitive change
Time Frame: Baseline biomarkers with cognitive change from baseline to 6 and 9 months
|
Association between baseline plasma p-tau217 levels, APOE genotype, and MRI-based brain atrophy measures with longitudinal change in composite NTB z-score, to explore predictors of response to mnemonic training.
|
Baseline biomarkers with cognitive change from baseline to 6 and 9 months
|
|
Change in Subjective Cognitive Decline Questionnaire (SCD-Q) scores (range: 0-24, higher scores mean worse outcomes)
Time Frame: Baseline to 6 and 9 months
|
Difference between the active and control groups in longitudinal change in total and subscale scores of the Subjective Cognitive Decline Questionnaire (SCD-Q), assessing subjective cognitive complaints.
|
Baseline to 6 and 9 months
|
|
Change in face-name association test z-score (range: - infinity, infinity; higher scores mean better outcomes)
Time Frame: Baseline to 6 and 9 months
|
Difference between the active and control groups in longitudinal change in the z-score of the face-name association test, which is sensitive to early cognitive changes in subjective cognitive decline.
|
Baseline to 6 and 9 months
|
|
Change in 1-week memory battery z-score (range: - infinity, infinity; higher scores mean better outcomes)
Time Frame: Baseline to 6 and 9 months
|
Difference between the active and control groups in longitudinal change in the z-score of the 1-week delayed memory test, which is sensitive to early cognitive changes in subjective cognitive decline.
|
Baseline to 6 and 9 months
|
|
Change in cognitive-motor performance (Timed Up and Go test)
Time Frame: Baseline to 6 and 9 months
|
Difference between the active and control groups in longitudinal change in Timed Up and Go test performance, evaluating combined cognitive-motor function.
|
Baseline to 6 and 9 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Lucio Tremolizzo, MD, PhD, Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- MEMO
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- ANALYTIC_CODE
- CSR
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.