PollenVax Subcutaneous Immunotherapy for Mugwort Pollen-Induced Allergic Rhinitis

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase II Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of PollenVax, Emulsion for Subcutaneous Injection, in Patients With Allergic Rhinitis Induced by Mugwort (Artemisia Vulgaris) Pollen

This study evaluates the effectiveness and safety of PollenVax, a subcutaneous allergen immunotherapy (SCIT) drug developed for the treatment of allergic rhinitis and asthma caused by mugwort (Artemisia vulgaris) pollen. PollenVax contains a recombinant form of Art v 1 - the major mugwort pollen allergen - combined with the adjuvant Montanide ISA-51. It is the first-in-class product of this type designed for an ultra-short treatment course.

This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase II study. Participants will be adults aged 18-65 years diagnosed with moderate-to-severe mugwort pollen-induced allergic rhinitis confirmed by skin prick test and/or specific IgE testing. A total of 138 participants will be randomly assigned to one of three groups: placebo, PollenVax at a cumulative dose of 22 µg of recombinant Art v 1, or PollenVax at 44 µg, administered as four weekly subcutaneous injections.

The primary efficacy outcome is the Combined Symptom and Medication Score (CSMS) during the peak mugwort pollen period (PGPP). Safety and tolerability outcomes are co-primary endpoints, assessed throughout the study. Secondary outcomes include daily symptom scores, quality of life (RQLQ/AQLQ), visual analogue scale for rhinoconjunctivitis discomfort, skin prick test reactivity, and immunological markers (Art v 1-specific IgE and IgG).

The study is conducted at a single clinical center (Medcenter-Rakhat, Almaty, Kazakhstan). Sponsor: Kazakh National Agrarian Research University (KazNARU).

Study Overview

• Status: Not yet recruiting
• Conditions: Rhinitis Allergic
• Intervention / Treatment: Biological: Montanide ISA-51 placebo emulsion; Biological: Recombinant Artemisia vulgaris allergen Art v 1 with Montanide ISA-51 adjuvant

Detailed Description

Background and Rationale IgE-mediated allergic diseases affect approximately 35% of the population in industrialized countries, with prevalence continuing to rise. Mugwort (Artemisia vulgaris) pollen is among the top ten global aeroallergens responsible for seasonal allergic rhinitis and allergic asthma. In Kazakhstan, mugwort pollen is the causative allergen in 68% of children and adolescents diagnosed with allergic rhinitis and asthma. Allergen-specific immunotherapy (ASIT) remains the only disease-modifying treatment for IgE-mediated allergy, capable of inducing long-term tolerance by shifting immune responses from Th2 toward Th1 and regulatory T-cell (Treg) profiles. Conventional subcutaneous ASIT (SCIT) requires 3-5 years of treatment with frequent injections, leading to low patient compliance. There is a clear unmet need for shorter, effective SCIT regimens.

Investigational Product PollenVax is an original subcutaneous allergen immunotherapy product developed by Kazakh National Agrarian Research University (KazNARU). It consists of recombinant major mugwort pollen allergen Art v 1 combined with the oil-in-water adjuvant Montanide ISA-51 (Seppic, France). The Montanide ISA-51 adjuvant forms a depot at the injection site, enabling sustained antigen release and prolonged immune stimulation. PollenVax is the first recombinant Art v 1 product formulated with Montanide ISA-51 for subcutaneous ASIT of mugwort pollen-induced allergic disease. It is designed for an ultra-short treatment course of four weekly subcutaneous injections, with the aim of improving patient compliance and reducing the number of required clinic visits compared to conventional SCIT regimens.

Preclinical Evidence Preclinical studies in mouse and guinea pig models of mugwort pollen sensitization demonstrated that PollenVax (recombinant Art v 1 + Montanide ISA-51) produced a superior immunological profile compared to other tested formulations. Key findings included: significant reduction of total and allergen-specific IgE; marked increase in protective IgG antibodies; shift from Th2-dominant to Th1-dominant immune response; and reduction of lung eosinophilic inflammation superior to sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT)-based approaches. Efficacy was demonstrated in both pre-seasonal and co-seasonal (during active pollen exposure) administration paradigms. Safety studies in guinea pigs, mice, and rats showed no anaphylactic reactions and no delayed-type hypersensitivity responses. Acute and subchronic toxicity studies in rats classified PollenVax in Hodge-Sterner Class 5 (practically non-toxic), with the No Observed Adverse Effect Level (NOAEL) established at the maximum tested dose of 0.4 mL per injection.

Phase I Clinical Evidence A completed Phase I randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study enrolled 30 adults with confirmed mugwort pollen-induced allergic rhinitis. Participants received PollenVax in the ultra-short SCIT regimen of four weekly subcutaneous injections at cumulative doses of 22 µg or 44 µg recombinant Art v 1, or placebo. Primary Phase I objectives were safety and tolerability.

Safety outcomes: No deaths, serious adverse events (SAEs), anaphylaxis, or high-grade systemic allergic reactions were observed. Adverse events were predominantly mild-to-moderate local injection site reactions (redness, induration, pruritus) that were transient and self-resolving without specific treatment.

Immunological outcomes: Phase I demonstrated marked induction of Art v 1-specific IgG4, minimal IgE induction, statistically significant reduction in skin prick test reactivity, and dose-dependent Th1/regulatory T-cell immune modulation - consistent with the expected mechanism of action of effective ASIT.

These Phase I results supported the safety profile and immunological activity of PollenVax and provided the basis for proceeding to this Phase II efficacy and safety study.

Statistical Approach The primary efficacy analysis will use Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) with the Combined Symptom and Medication Score (CSMS) as the dependent variable, treatment group as the fixed factor, and baseline sensitization measures (Art v 1-specific IgE, SPT wheal area, ALEX² molecular allergy test result) as covariates, applied to the Intent-to-Treat/Full Analysis Set (ITT/FAS) population. A linear mixed model (LMM) will additionally adjust for potential co-sensitization to Chenopodiaceae and Ambrosia pollen as confounders. The significance level is α = 0.05 (two-sided). The sample size of 46 participants per group (138 total) provides 80% power to detect a Minimum Clinically Important Difference (MCID) of 0.33 CSMS units (assumed SD = 0.7), with a 10% dropout allowance incorporated.

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Estimated): 138
• Phase: Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

• Study Contact: Name: Kaissar Tabynov, PhD; Phone Number: +77016096869; Email: kaissar.tabynov@kaznaru.edu.kz
• Study Contact Backup: Name: Tair Nurpeissov, MD, PhD; Email: doctortair@gmail.com

Study Locations

• Kazakhstan
  • Almaty
    • Almaty, Almaty, Kazakhstan, 050010
      • Limited Liability Partnership "Medcenter-Rakhat"
      • Contact: Tair Nurpeissov, MD, PhD; Phone Number: +77017040008; Email: doctortair@gmail.com
      • Sub-Investigator: Temyrzhan Nurpeissov, MD
      • Sub-Investigator: Ainagul Zhubanturlieva, MD, PhD
      • Sub-Investigator: Viktoriya Khan, MD
      • Sub-Investigator: Baktygul Yessimova, MD
      • Sub-Investigator: Rimma Akpeisova, MD, PhD
      • Sub-Investigator: Aizhan Avdugaliyeva, MD
      • Sub-Investigator: Arailym Abilbayeva, MD, PhD

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: Adult; Older Adult
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

1. Signed and dated written informed consent prior to any study-related procedures.
2. Age 18 to 65 years (inclusive) at the time of signing informed consent.
3. Ability and willingness to comply with all protocol requirements, including attendance at all scheduled visits, completion of study procedures, and maintenance of a patient diary.
4. Clinically significant symptoms of allergic rhinitis during the mugwort pollen season, for which allergen-specific immunotherapy (ASIT) is indicated in the investigator's judgment.
5. Diagnosis of allergic rhinitis as the primary condition caused by sensitization to mugwort pollen (Artemisia vulgaris), of moderate or severe intensity, with a duration of at least 2 years, per ARIA guidelines. Comorbid mild-to-moderate well-controlled bronchial asthma (per current GINA guidelines) is permitted (ICD-10: J30.1 and/or J45.0).

6. Confirmed sensitization to Artemisia vulgaris pollen and/or its major component Art v 1, established by at least one of the following:

   • Positive skin prick test (SPT) with wheal diameter ≥3 mm compared to negative control, with adequate positive control; co-sensitization to other inhalant allergens (including ragweed) is permitted provided the mugwort reaction is the largest wheal in the tested panel and corresponds to the seasonal pattern of symptoms; AND/OR
   • Specific IgE to the above allergens by ImmunoCAP: positive result (≥Class 1), i.e., above the positivity threshold per manufacturer instructions.
7. Physical examination findings (including body temperature, blood pressure, heart rate), laboratory and instrumental parameters without clinically significant abnormalities per investigator assessment.
8. Negative urine pregnancy test at screening (for women of childbearing potential).
9. Agreement to use adequate contraception from screening until 90 days after completion of study participation (for women of childbearing potential and their partners).
10. Participants who received placebo in the Phase I PollenVax study may be enrolled if they meet all inclusion criteria of this study and had no serious adverse events related to Phase I participation.

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Prior allergen-specific immunotherapy (ASIT) to Artemisia vulgaris pollen or any other allergen within the last 3 years.
2. Sensitization and clinically significant symptoms caused by another inhalant allergen that, per medical history and investigator's clinical assessment, dominate over mugwort-related symptoms and may substantially confound efficacy assessment during the observation period.

3. Severe or uncontrolled bronchial asthma, including any of the following:

   • Forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) < 70% of predicted value at screening;
   • Clinically significant asthma symptoms despite baseline therapy;
   • Asthma exacerbation requiring systemic corticosteroids, hospitalization, or emergency care within the last 6 months.
4. History of life-threatening allergic reactions (including anaphylaxis, airway edema, bronchospasm, Stevens-Johnson syndrome, Lyell syndrome) or any allergic reaction to allergen-specific immunotherapy.
5. Chronic or acute ENT disorders at screening that may substantially affect symptom assessment or safety of study participation, including active bacterial rhinosinusitis, severe polypous rhinosinusitis, or significant anatomical nasal obstruction requiring surgical treatment.
6. Immunoglobulin therapy within 6 months prior to screening or planned during the study period.
7. Treatment with biological agents targeting the immune system (including anti-IgE antibodies such as omalizumab, other monoclonal antibodies, or immune checkpoint inhibitors) within the last 12 months prior to screening or planned during the study.
8. Immune system disorders, including autoimmune diseases and primary or secondary immunodeficiencies, except well-controlled autoimmune thyroiditis and uncomplicated type 1 diabetes mellitus.
9. Severe acute or chronic inflammatory or infectious diseases in the active phase at screening.

10. Severe, decompensated, or unstable comorbid conditions, including but not limited to:

    • Severe chronic respiratory failure;
    • Liver cirrhosis Child-Pugh class B or C;
    • Unstable angina or clinically significant ischemic heart disease;
    • Chronic heart failure NYHA class III-IV or decompensated stage;
    • Uncontrolled arterial hypertension (systolic BP ≥160 mmHg and/or diastolic BP ≥100 mmHg) despite treatment;
    • Clinically significant cardiac arrhythmias, including high-grade ventricular arrhythmias (Lown classification);
    • Myocardial infarction, acute stroke, transient ischemic attack, or pulmonary embolism within 6 months prior to Visit 0, or aortic aneurysm >6 cm;
    • Less than 3 months after coronary artery bypass grafting or coronary stenting;
    • Any other condition that, in the investigator's judgment, may affect patient safety or interpretation of study results;
    • Active malignancy of any location or malignancy within the last 5 years, except fully treated carcinoma in situ;
    • Severe renal failure;
    • Severe hepatic failure.
11. Serologically confirmed infection with HIV, hepatitis B, or hepatitis C virus.
12. Exacerbation of chronic allergic skin disease (including atopic dermatitis or generalized urticaria) at screening that may confound assessment of allergic symptoms.
13. Clinically significant abnormalities in routine laboratory tests per investigator assessment.
14. Alcohol, drug, or substance dependence within the past year per investigator assessment.
15. Pregnancy or breastfeeding.
16. Inability to discontinue beta-blocker therapy (systemic or topical) and/or presence of a condition where epinephrine use for anaphylaxis management is substantially limited per investigator's clinical assessment.
17. Use of immunosuppressive agents or other medications that cannot be discontinued during the study period and may affect patient safety or efficacy assessment.
18. Severe psychiatric or neurological disorders impairing the ability to provide informed consent or comply with protocol requirements.
19. Legal incapacity or limited legal capacity.
20. Factors indicating high risk of non-compliance with study procedures, including inability to attend regular visits, maintain a patient diary, or follow protocol requirements per investigator assessment.

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Treatment
• Allocation: Randomized
• Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
• Masking: Quadruple

Number of Arms

3

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Placebo; Participants receive four subcutaneous injections of placebo (Montanide ISA-51 oil-in-water emulsion without active substance), administered once weekly at intervals of 7 days (Days 0, 7, 14, 21) in the pre-seasonal period. The placebo is identical to PollenVax in appearance, texture, and volume. Injections are administered into the outer surface of the upper arm, alternating sides. Participants are observed for 2 hours post-injection at the clinical site.	Biological: Montanide ISA-51 placebo emulsion; Placebo emulsion composed of Montanide ISA-51 (Seppic, France) without the active recombinant allergen Art v 1. Formulated to be identical to PollenVax in appearance, color, texture, and injection volume, ensuring maintenance of double-blind conditions. Administered as four weekly subcutaneous injections following the same schedule as the active treatment arms (Days 0, 7, 14, 21) in the pre-seasonal period. Assigned to Arm 1 (Placebo Comparator).; Other Names: Placebo; ISA-51 emulsion without active substance
Experimental: PollenVax Low Dose; Participants receive four subcutaneous injections of PollenVax (recombinant Art v 1 + Montanide ISA-51 adjuvant) at escalating doses: 2 µg → 4 µg → 8 µg → 8 µg rArt v 1, administered once weekly (Days 0, 7, 14, 21) in the pre-seasonal period. Cumulative dose: 22 µg rArt v 1. Injections are administered into the outer surface of the upper arm, alternating sides. Participants are observed for 2 hours post-injection at the clinical site.	Biological: Recombinant Artemisia vulgaris allergen Art v 1 with Montanide ISA-51 adjuvant; PollenVax is a subcutaneous allergen-specific immunotherapy (SCIT) emulsion consisting of recombinant major mugwort pollen allergen Art v 1 combined with oil-in-water adjuvant Montanide ISA-51 (Seppic, France). Montanide ISA-51 forms a depot at the injection site enabling sustained antigen release and prolonged immune stimulation. Administered as four weekly subcutaneous injections in an ultra-short pre-seasonal regimen. Two dose levels: cumulative 22 µg rArt v 1 (doses: 2-4-8-8 µg) assigned to Arm 2, and cumulative 44 µg rArt v 1 (doses: 4-8-16-16 µg) assigned to Arm 3. Sponsor: Kazakh National Agrarian Research University (KazNARU), Kazakhstan.; Other Names: PollenVax; POL-II-2026 active treatment
Experimental: PollenVax High Dose; Participants receive four subcutaneous injections of PollenVax (recombinant Art v 1 + Montanide ISA-51 adjuvant) at escalating doses: 4 µg → 8 µg → 16 µg → 16 µg rArt v 1, administered once weekly (Days 0, 7, 14, 21) in the pre-seasonal period. Cumulative dose: 44 µg rArt v 1. Injections are administered into the outer surface of the upper arm, alternating sides. Participants are observed for 2 hours post-injection at the clinical site.	Biological: Recombinant Artemisia vulgaris allergen Art v 1 with Montanide ISA-51 adjuvant; PollenVax is a subcutaneous allergen-specific immunotherapy (SCIT) emulsion consisting of recombinant major mugwort pollen allergen Art v 1 combined with oil-in-water adjuvant Montanide ISA-51 (Seppic, France). Montanide ISA-51 forms a depot at the injection site enabling sustained antigen release and prolonged immune stimulation. Administered as four weekly subcutaneous injections in an ultra-short pre-seasonal regimen. Two dose levels: cumulative 22 µg rArt v 1 (doses: 2-4-8-8 µg) assigned to Arm 2, and cumulative 44 µg rArt v 1 (doses: 4-8-16-16 µg) assigned to Arm 3. Sponsor: Kazakh National Agrarian Research University (KazNARU), Kazakhstan.; Other Names: PollenVax; POL-II-2026 active treatment

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Combined Symptom and Medication Score (CSMS) during Peak Pollen Period	Absolute difference in mean CSMS between each active treatment group and placebo during the Peak Mugwort Pollen Period (PGPP). CSMS is the sum of the daily Symptom Score (dSS) and daily Medication Score (dMS), each ranging from 0 to 3, yielding a total range of 0-6. dSS covers 4 nasal symptoms (nasal itch, sneezing, rhinorrhea, nasal congestion) and 2 ocular symptoms (eye itch, lacrimation), each scored 0-3 and averaged. dMS scores rescue medication use: 0 = none; 1 = oral/ocular/nasal antihistamine; 2 = intranasal corticosteroid ± antihistamine; 3 = oral corticosteroid ± other. PGPP is defined as 15±5 consecutive days with highest mugwort pollen concentrations exceeding 250 grains/m³, determined post-hoc from aerobiological monitoring data. Minimum clinically important difference (MCID): 0.33 CSMS units.	Up to 20 days during the Peak Mugwort Pollen Period (approximately Week 18-22 after randomization)
Incidence and Severity of Adverse Events	Frequency, severity, seriousness, and relationship to study drug of all adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs), classified per MedDRA. Includes local injection site reactions (redness, swelling, induration, pruritus) and systemic reactions assessed within 7 days after each injection. Safety parameters include: vital signs (blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, body temperature); physical examination findings; laboratory tests (CBC, urinalysis, blood biochemistry including ALT, AST, total bilirubin, creatinine, glucose); ECG. Assessed at each study visit from Day 1 through end-of-study follow-up.	From first injection (Day 1) through end-of-study follow-up visit, approximately 26 weeks after randomization

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
CSMS during General Pollen Season (GPS)	Absolute and relative difference in mean CSMS between each active treatment group and placebo during the full General Pollen Season (GPS), defined as the period during which mugwort pollen concentrations consistently exceed 51 grains/m³. Assessed using the same EAACI methodology as the primary endpoint.	During the General Pollen Season, approximately Week 9 through Week 26 after randomization
Daily Symptom Score (dSS) during PGPP and GPS	Absolute and relative difference in mean daily Symptom Score (dSS) between each active treatment group and placebo during PGPP and GPS. dSS is the average of 6 individual symptom scores (4 nasal + 2 ocular), each rated 0-3 by the participant in a daily diary, yielding a range of 0-3.	Approximately from Week 9 through Week 26 after randomization
Daily Medication Score (dMS) during PGPP and GPS	Absolute and relative difference in mean daily Medication Score (dMS) between each active treatment group and placebo during PGPP and GPS. dMS reflects the highest level of rescue medication used on a given day, scored 0-3 per EAACI methodology.	Approximately from Week 9 through Week 26 after randomization
Rhinoconjunctivitis Discomfort - Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)	Change in overall rhinoconjunctivitis discomfort assessed by a 10-cm horizontal VAS (range 0-100 mm; 0 = no symptoms, fully comfortable; 100 = maximum possible symptoms, severe discomfort). Participants mark their current-day level of rhinoconjunctivitis discomfort. The score is measured in millimeters from the left edge to the participant's mark. Minimum Clinically Important Difference (MCID): reduction of ≥23 mm compared to previous assessment (per EAACI/ARIA guidelines). Assessed at least twice: before onset of peak pollen period and during the peak season, at 2-week intervals.	At a minimum of 2 assessments: before onset of PGPP (approximately Week 16 after randomization) and during the Peak Mugwort Pollen Period, approximately at Week 20 after randomization
Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ)	Change from pre-season baseline in RQLQ total and domain scores between each active treatment group and placebo. RQLQ is a validated 28-item instrument covering 7 domains (activities, sleep, non-nasal/eye symptoms, practical problems, nasal symptoms, eye symptoms, emotional function), scored 0-6 per item. Total score is expressed as the mean of all 28 items, ranging from 0 to 6, where higher scores indicate worse rhinoconjunctivitis-related quality of life. Minimum Clinically Important Difference (MCID): 0.5 points.	Baseline (Day 1, pre-season) and follow-up at end of pollen season, approximately 26 weeks after randomization
Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) in Participants with Comorbid Asthma	AQLQ scores in participants with comorbid mild-to-moderate well-controlled asthma (ICD-10: J45.0), comparing active treatment groups to placebo. Instrument includes 15 items across 4 domains (asthma symptoms, activity limitations, emotional consequences, environmental stimuli), scored 1-7 per item (1 = not troubled; 7 = extremely troubled). Mean total and domain scores calculated. Analysis by ANCOVA. MCID: reduction of ≥0.5 points in mean score (per international recommendations).	Single assessment during the Peak Mugwort Pollen Period (up to 20 days), approximately at Weeks 18-22 after randomization; in participants with comorbid asthma only
Proportion of Well-Controlled, Symptomatic, and Symptom-Free Days	Three categories assessed during PGPP and GPS: (1) Well-controlled day: dMS = 0 AND dSS < 0.34; (2) Symptom-free day: dSS = 0 AND dMS = 0; (3) Severe day: any of 6 individual symptoms (nasal itch, sneezing, rhinorrhea, nasal congestion, eye itch, lacrimation) scored at maximum = 3. For each participant, percentage of days in each category = (number of qualifying days ÷ total days in PGPP or GPS) × 100%. Comparison between active and placebo groups using parametric or non-parametric methods depending on data distribution.	During the Peak Mugwort Pollen Period (up to 20 days) and the General Pollen Season, approximately from Week 9 through Week 26 after randomization, based on daily patient diary
Skin Prick Test (SPT) Reactivity to Artemisia vulgaris and Art v 1	Change in SPT wheal area (mm²) calculated as ellipse area: S = (π × D_max × D_perp) / 4, corrected for background reaction (wheal of 3 mm negative control, S_background ≈ 7.07 mm²). Percentage reduction in skin sensitivity: [(S_pre - S_background) - (S_post - S_background)] / (S_pre - S_background) × 100%. Assessed with Artemisia vulgaris pollen extract and recombinant Art v 1. Analysis by mean percentage reduction per group; comparison between active and placebo groups by t-test/ANCOVA or non-parametric methods.	3 timepoints: Baseline (Day 1), Week 5 (Day 36±3, approximately 2 weeks after completion of the immunotherapy course), and end-of-season follow-up at approximately Week 26 after randomization
Art v 1-Specific Immunoglobulin Levels (IgE, IgG1-4) and Allergen-Blocking Antibodies	Serum levels of Art v 1-specific IgE (kU/L), IgG4 (mg/L) and total IgE (kU/L) measured by fluorescence enzyme immunoassay on Phadia™ 250 analyzer (ThermoFisher Scientific). Serum levels of Art v 1-specific IgG subclasses (IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, IgG4) measured by in-house indirect ELISA, expressed as optical density (OD) at 450 nm or endpoint antibody titers. Capacity of serum antibodies to inhibit IgE-Art v 1 allergen binding, assessed by inhibition ELISA and expressed as percent inhibition (%). Changes from baseline assessed at each timepoint; comparison between active and placebo groups. Key marker of immune shift toward protective IgG response and IgE-blocking activity.	3 timepoints: Baseline (Day 1), Week 5 (Day 36±3, approximately 2 weeks after completion of the immunotherapy course), and end-of-season follow-up at approximately Week 26 after randomization

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: Kazakh National Agrarian University
• Investigators: Principal Investigator: Tair Nurpeissov, MD, PhD, Limited Liability Partnership "Medcenter-Rakhat"

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start (Estimated): May 1, 2026
• Primary Completion (Estimated): September 1, 2026
• Study Completion (Estimated): November 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: April 20, 2026
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: April 25, 2026
• First Posted (Actual): May 4, 2026

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): May 4, 2026
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: April 25, 2026
• Last Verified: April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Keywords: Montanide ISA-51; SCIT; Combined Symptom and Medication Score; Kazakhstan; Subcutaneous immunotherapy; Phase II clinical trial; PollenVax; Allergen-specific immunotherapy; Mugwort pollen allergy; Artemisia vulgaris; Art v 1; Recombinant allergen; Ultra-short immunotherapy; Allergic rhinitis treatment
• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Immune System Diseases; Respiratory Tract Diseases; Respiratory Hypersensitivity; Hypersensitivity, Immediate; Hypersensitivity; Nose Diseases; Otorhinolaryngologic Diseases; Rhinitis; Rhinitis, Allergic; Rhinitis, Allergic, Perennial
• Other Study ID Numbers: POL-II-2026; BR25293305 (Other Grant/Funding Number: The Ministry of Health of the Republic of Kazakhstan)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

• Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?: NO
• IPD Plan Description: Individual participant data will not be shared publicly due to confidentiality obligations under the study protocol and applicable data protection regulations of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Aggregated summary data will be available upon publication of study results.

Drug and device information, study documents

• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product: No
• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product: No