Liver-First, Bowel-First, or Simultaneous Resection for Synchronous Colorectal Liver Metastases: Outcomes, Quality of Life, and Cost-Effectiveness (OPTIMAL)

April 27, 2026 updated by: Jennie Engstrand, Karolinska Institutet

Optimizing Treatment of Synchronous Colorectal Liver Metastases - Creation of a Treatment Algorithm

The goal of this observational study is to learn about treatment outcomes, quality of life, and healthcare costs in patients with colorectal cancer who have liver metastases detected at the same time as their primary tumor (synchronous colorectal liver metastases, CRLM). The main questions it aims to answer are:

Do patients who undergo simultaneous removal of both the bowel tumor and liver metastases in one operation differ in their ability to complete the intended treatment compared to patients who undergo staged operations (bowel first or liver first)? Does the choice of surgical strategy affect quality of life and healthcare costs?

Patients with synchronous CRLM discussed at a multidisciplinary team meeting at participating Swedish university hospitals will be followed prospectively for up to 5 years. Treatment is not influenced by the study - all surgical decisions are made as part of routine clinical care. Patients in the quality-of-life sub-study will complete validated questionnaires (EORTC QLQ-C30, QLQ-LM21, and QLQ-CR29) at multiple time points from diagnosis through 36 months. Healthcare costs and health literacy will also be assessed in parallel sub-studies.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Detailed Description

Background Patients with colorectal cancer who have liver metastases detected at the time of diagnosis (synchronous colorectal liver metastases, CRLM) require removal of both the bowel tumor and the liver metastases to achieve cure. Three surgical strategies are available: removing the bowel tumor first (bowel-first), removing the liver metastases first (liver-first), or removing both in a single operation (simultaneous resection). There is currently no consensus on which strategy is best, and practice varies considerably between hospitals and surgeons.

Study 1: Treatment Completion and Survival (Primary Study)

This prospective observational study enrolls all patients with synchronous CRLM discussed at a multidisciplinary team (MDT) meeting at participating Swedish university hospitals, where curative treatment of both the primary tumor and liver metastases is considered possible. Enrollment runs from May 2025 to May 2027, with follow-up continuing for up to 5 years.

Participation does not influence treatment in any way - all surgical and oncological decisions are made entirely according to routine clinical practice. Because the study is observational and involves no change to clinical care, an opt-out consent procedure is applied: patients are informed about the study and data collection, and are given four weeks to decline participation. If no objection is received, prospective data collection begins. Patients may withdraw at any time, and all their data will be deleted upon withdrawal.

The primary outcome is failure to Return to Intended Oncological Treatment (RIOT) - that is, the proportion of patients who do not complete their planned surgical treatment and the reasons for this. In a staged approach, this most commonly occurs when disease progression during the interval between the first and second operation renders the second operation unfeasible. Secondary outcomes include 3- and 5-year overall survival, recurrence-free survival, 90-day mortality, 30-day readmission, and complication severity assessed by the Comprehensive Complication Index and Clavien-Dindo classification.

Study 2: Health-Related Quality of Life Nested within the Study 1 cohort, this sub-study examines how the three surgical strategies affect patients' health-related quality of life (HRQoL) over time. Patients provide active informed consent to participate. Quality of life is measured using three validated questionnaires - the EORTC QLQ-C30 (general cancer), QLQ-LM21 (liver metastases-specific), and QLQ-CR29 (colorectal cancer-specific) - at multiple time points from diagnosis through 36 months after completion of surgical treatment. The time points vary according to whether the patient undergoes simultaneous or staged resection, and whether chemotherapy is administered before or after surgery. A total of 200 patients (100 undergoing simultaneous resection, 100 undergoing staged resection) are needed to detect a clinically meaningful difference in quality of life between groups.

Study 3: Healthcare Costs and Cost-Effectiveness All patients consenting to Study 2 are also included in this health economic sub-study. Direct and indirect healthcare costs are collected over the 12 months following diagnosis, covering hospital admissions, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, imaging, and multidisciplinary team meetings. Costs are obtained using Diagnosis-Related Group (DRG) and Cost Per Patient (CPP) measures and will be presented in multiple currencies. The primary endpoint is the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), expressed as cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained, comparing the three surgical strategies.

Study 4: Health Literacy Also nested within the Study 2 consent framework, this sub-study assesses patients' ability to access, understand, and apply health information - referred to as health literacy - using the validated Swedish version of the European Health Literacy Survey Questionnaire (HLS-EU-Q16). Questionnaires are administered at three time points: at inclusion before any treatment, at 6 months, and at 12 months. The study examines whether health literacy levels are associated with treatment outcomes and quality of life, which may inform how clinical teams communicate with and support patients through complex treatment decisions.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

200

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with synchronous colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) discussed at a hepatobiliary and/or colorectal multidisciplinary team (MDT) meeting at participating Swedish university hospitals. The population includes all patients in whom curative treatment of both the primary colorectal tumor and liver metastases is considered feasible by the MDT, irrespective of WHO performance status, suitability for chemotherapy, prior history of malignancy, or the presence of treatable extrahepatic disease. Patients are identified consecutively at MDT meetings.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age over 18 years
  • Histologically proven colorectal cancer
  • Radiological evidence of liver metastases (contrast-enhanced CT or MRI), detected prior to resection of the primary colorectal tumor
  • Primary colorectal tumor (colon or rectum) in situ at time of inclusion
  • Discussed at a hepatobiliary and/or colorectal multidisciplinary team (MDT) meeting
  • Planned curative treatment of both the primary colorectal tumor AND the liver metastases (by resection, ablation, or transplantation)
  • Planned curative treatment of any extrahepatic disease, if present

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unable to give informed consent (Studies 4-6 only; opt-out applies to Study 3)
  • Untreatable extrahepatic metastases at the discretion of the MDT
  • Not scheduled for curative resection of both the primary tumor and liver metastases
  • Emergency resection of the primary tumor performed prior to MDT referral

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Synchronous colorectal liver metastases
Simultaneous Resection, Bowel-First Staged Resection, Liver-First Staged Resection

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Failure to Return to Intended Oncological Treatment (RIOT)
Time Frame: From date of MDT discussion to completion of intended treatment, assessed up to 24 months.
The proportion of patients who do not complete their planned surgical treatment pathway, and the reasons for failure. In staged resections, this most commonly occurs when disease progression during the interval between operations renders the second operation unfeasible.
From date of MDT discussion to completion of intended treatment, assessed up to 24 months.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall Survival
Time Frame: Time frame: 3 and 5 years from diagnosis
Survival assessed from the date of diagnosis of the primary colorectal tumor
Time frame: 3 and 5 years from diagnosis
Recurrence-Free Survival
Time Frame: 3 and 5 years from completion of treatment.
Defined as the absence of tumor or metastases on a CT scan undertaken after completion of all intended treatment (both liver and primary tumor resection).
3 and 5 years from completion of treatment.
90-Day Mortality
Time Frame: 90 days from first surgery.
Death from any cause within 90 days of the first surgical procedure.
90 days from first surgery.
30-Day Readmission
Time Frame: 30 days from each surgical procedure.
Unplanned hospital readmission within 30 days of any surgical procedure.
30 days from each surgical procedure.
Major complications
Time Frame: 30 and 90 days from each surgical procedure
Severity of postoperative complications assessed using the Clavien-Dindo classification (grade ≥3 defined as major) and the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI).
30 and 90 days from each surgical procedure
Full Treatment Completion
Time Frame: From MDT discussion to completion of intended treatment, assessed up to 24 months.
The proportion of patients who complete all intended oncological and surgical treatment as planned at the initial MDT meeting
From MDT discussion to completion of intended treatment, assessed up to 24 months.
Health-Related Quality of Life (Study 2)
Time Frame: At inclusion, then at multiple time points through 36 months after completion of surgical treatment, varying by treatment scenario.
Measured using three validated EORTC questionnaires - the QLQ-C30 (general cancer), QLQ-LM21 (liver metastases-specific), and QLQ-CR29 (colorectal cancer-specific). A mean difference of more than 10 points between groups on a 0-100 scale is considered clinically meaningful
At inclusion, then at multiple time points through 36 months after completion of surgical treatment, varying by treatment scenario.
Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (Study 3)
Time Frame: Time frame: 12 months from diagnosis.
Cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained, comparing the three surgical strategies. Direct and indirect healthcare costs collected over 12 months from diagnosis including hospital admissions, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, imaging, and MDT meetings.
Time frame: 12 months from diagnosis.
Health Literacy (Study 4)
Time Frame: At inclusion before any treatment, at 6 months, and at 12 months from inclusion.
Level of health literacy assessed using the validated Swedish version of the European Health Literacy Survey Questionnaire (HLS-EU-Q16), and its correlation with treatment outcomes, quality of life and education level.
At inclusion before any treatment, at 6 months, and at 12 months from inclusion.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

May 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 27, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 27, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

May 4, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 4, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 27, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

Individual participant data will not be openly shared due to Swedish data protection legislation and GDPR restrictions. Aggregated, anonymized data may be shared with researchers following appropriate ethical approval and execution of data and research collaboration agreements. Requests for data access can be directed to the principal investigator.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Liver Metastases From Colorectal Cancer

Subscribe