Application of FreeStyle Libre 2 for Evaluating Glycemic Variability Characteristics in Patients With Extreme Glucose Metabolism Phenotypes

May 31, 2026 updated by: Ren qian, Peking University People's Hospital
This cross-sectional study aims to further subdivide diabetes mellitus into more homogeneous subgroups by focusing on extreme glucose metabolism phenotypes, including monogenic diabetes with β cell dysfunction, hyperinsulinemia caused by excessive β cell secretion, and postprandial hypoglycemia phenotypes. By utilizing continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) technology and the FreeStyle Libre 2 glucose monitoring device, this study will evaluate glycemic variability patterns in patients with extreme glucose metabolism phenotypes and perform comparative analyses using existing CGM data from healthy populations and patients with type 2 diabetes in our center's database. The study aims to address current gaps in understanding glycemic variability characteristics under extreme β cell functional states, provide novel dynamic monitoring evidence to support early identification, precise classification, and personalized management of these special metabolic states, and simultaneously screen for biomarkers to enable more accurate disease identification, thereby offering potential avenues for improving personalized treatment of diabetes mellitus.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Detailed Description

Diabetes mellitus is one of the leading causes of death and disability worldwide, affecting individuals regardless of race, sex, or age. Over the past decade, the prevalence of diabetes mellitus in China has increased markedly. Statistics indicate that there were 140.9 million adults with diabetes mellitus in China in 2021, and this number is projected to rise to 174.4 million by 2045.

Monogenic diabetes refers to diabetes mellitus caused by mutations in a single gene and accounts for approximately 1%-5% of all diabetes mellitus cases. Monogenic diabetes results from a single pathogenic defect in one of more than 40 genes. Since the type 2 diabetes-like presentation in young individuals was termed maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY) by Fajans and characterized by an autosomal dominant inheritance pattern, understanding of the phenotypic and genetic heterogeneity of monogenic diabetes has continued to expand. The main categories of monogenic diabetes include MODY, neonatal diabetes mellitus (NDM), and syndromic diabetes. In monogenic diabetes, high-penetrance variants predominantly cause severe impairment of β cell development and insulin secretion, leading to diabetes mellitus independent of other risk factors. In recent years, substantial progress has been made in elucidating the genetic defects underlying monogenic diabetes, improving diagnostic accuracy for rare subtypes, deepening understanding of patients' clinical courses, and contributing to the identification of optimal treatment strategies through precision medicine approaches. However, many aspects of this disease remain insufficiently characterized, including characteristic glycemic profiles and objective, quantifiable indicators applicable to clinical differential diagnosis. Therefore, further research is urgently needed.

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a multifactorial disease resulting from the combined effects of genetic and environmental factors and accounts for approximately 96% of diabetes mellitus cases worldwide. The pathophysiology of T2DM is characterized by insulin resistance, pancreatic β cell dysfunction, and chronic inflammation. Hyperinsulinemia and insulin resistance may occur several years before the clinical onset of T2DM. Previous studies have demonstrated that more than 75% of individuals in the United States exhibit increased insulin secretion during oral glucose tolerance testing (OGTT) despite normal glucose clearance. This finding suggests that in a substantial proportion of the population, hyperinsulinemia may represent the earliest warning signal of metabolic disease risk, even in the presence of normal glucose tolerance. Targeted lifestyle interventions aimed at hyperinsulinemia, such as increased resistance training, nutritional strategies, and improved sleep, have been shown to produce immediate and sustained improvements in insulin resistance. However, within this gray zone spanning the progression from normal glucose tolerance to overt diabetes mellitus, characteristic glycemic profiles have not yet been clearly defined. Therefore, exploring glycemic variability characteristics is essential for elucidating the onset and progression of insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes mellitus, as well as for enabling early intervention.

The oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), as the most widely used diagnostic gold standard for assessing glycemic characteristics, employs a standardized 75 g glucose load to evaluate early-phase and second-phase β cell secretory capacity following glucose stimulation. As an artificially constructed experimental simulation, OGTT does not reflect daily physiological conditions and can capture only short-term, single-day glycemic variability, thus failing to represent true blood glucose trajectories. Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) can dynamically and continuously reflect interstitial fluid glucose levels in real time, providing critical information on the amplitude, frequency, and patterns of glycemic variability that cannot be obtained through traditional point blood glucose testing. CGM has become animportant tool for refined diabetes mellitus management. This technology provides technical support for delineating characteristic glycemic variability patterns under different insulin secretion states.

Accordingly, this study will use CGM to objectively and quantitatively compare glycemic variability parameters and patterns among four groups: patients with β cell dysfunction monogenic diabetes versus patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, and patients with hyperinsulinemia versus healthy controls. This approach will reveal the effects of extreme β cell function on diurnal glycemic variability patterns and characterize distinctive dynamic glycemic profiles. In addition, this study will screen for biomarkers to facilitate early identification, diagnosis, and treatment of this specific type of diabetes mellitus, while simultaneously deepening understanding of glycemic characteristics in the early stages of insulin resistance and providing a theoretical basis for subsequent precise prevention and intervention.

Primary study objective: To evaluate glycemic variability patterns in patients with extreme glucose metabolism phenotypes, including β-MND, hyperinsulinemia, and postprandial hypoglycemia phenotypes.

Secondary study objective:

  1. To assess differences in blood glucose profiles between individuals with extreme glucose metabolism phenotypes and healthy populations, as well as patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), particularly among comparable T2DM subgroups.
  2. To screen for biomarkers that enable more accurate identification of this disease.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

120

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

this study will use CGM to objectively and quantitatively compare glycemic variability parameters and patterns among four groups: patients with β cell dysfunction monogenic diabetes versus patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, and patients with hyperinsulinemia versus healthy controls. This approach will reveal the effects of extreme β cell function on diurnal glycemic variability patterns and characterize distinctive dynamic glycemic profiles.

60 patients with β cell dysfunction monogenic diabetes and 60 patients with hyperinsulinemia and normal glucose tolerance who meet the inclusion criteria outlined will be recruited from the endocrinology outpatient clinic of our hospital.

Groups A1 and A2, as well as Groups B1 and B2, will be matched at a 1:1 ratio by age, sex, and BMI. In addition, Groups A1 and A2 will be matched at a 1:1 ratio by HbA1c.

Description

  1. Inclusion Criteria:

    1. Group A1:

      • Age ≥ 18 years;
      • Patients with β cell dysfunction monogenic diabetes confirmed by DNA sequencing or other diagnostic testing.
    2. Group A2:

      • Age ≥ 18 years;
      • Patients with confirmed type 2 diabetes mellitus;
      • Derived from this center's existing continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) database.
    3. Group B1:

      • Age ≥ 18 years;
      • Normal fasting plasma glucose (≥ 3.6 and < 6.1 mmol/L) and normal 2-hour plasma glucose during OGTT (≥ 3 and < 7.8 mmol/L);
      • Fasting insulin ≥ 25 µU/mL and/or 2-hour insulin during OGTT greater than 10 times the fasting insulin level.
    4. Group B2:

      • Age ≥ 18 years;
      • Normal glucose tolerance meeting the 2024 ADA criteria: fasting plasma glucose < 5.6 mmol/L, 2-hour plasma glucose during OGTT < 7.8 mmol/L;
      • According to laboratory reference standards, fasting insulin ≥ 2.6 and < 25 µU/mL, and 2-hour insulin during OGTT 5-10 times the fasting insulin level.
      • Derived from this center's existing continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) database.
  2. Exclusion Criteria:

    1. Neonates younger than 4 months of age (congenital diabetes);
    2. Pregnancy;
    3. Patients with positive pancreatic autoantibody test results;
    4. Patients with severe cardiovascular or cerebrovascular diseases, hepatic disease, or renal disease;
    5. Patients who have participated in other clinical trials.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Group A : diabetes mellitus group
Group A1 (patients with β cell dysfunction monogenic diabetes): 60 cases; Group A2 (patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus): 60 cases
Group B : normal glucose tolerance group
Group B1 (normal glucose tolerance with fasting / postprandial hyperinsulinemia): 60 cases; Group B2 (normal glucose tolerance with normal insulin levels): 60 cases

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
mean blood glucose in mmol/L
Time Frame: The study is a cross-sectional study, patients wil wear a CGM for 14 days after enrollment, and will not wear it afterwards.
glycemic variability data
The study is a cross-sectional study, patients wil wear a CGM for 14 days after enrollment, and will not wear it afterwards.
glucose management indicator (GMI) in %
Time Frame: The study is a cross-sectional study, patients wil wear a CGM for 14 days after enrollment, and will not wear it afterwards.
glycemic variability data
The study is a cross-sectional study, patients wil wear a CGM for 14 days after enrollment, and will not wear it afterwards.
highest glucose values in mmol/L
Time Frame: The study is a cross-sectional study, patients wil wear a CGM for 14 days after enrollment, and will not wear it afterwards.
glycemic variability data
The study is a cross-sectional study, patients wil wear a CGM for 14 days after enrollment, and will not wear it afterwards.
lowest glucose values in mmol/L
Time Frame: The study is a cross-sectional study, patients wil wear a CGM for 14 days after enrollment, and will not wear it afterwards.
glycemic variability data
The study is a cross-sectional study, patients wil wear a CGM for 14 days after enrollment, and will not wear it afterwards.
coefficient of variation (CV)
Time Frame: The study is a cross-sectional study, patients wil wear a CGM for 14 days after enrollment, and will not wear it afterwards.
glycemic variability data
The study is a cross-sectional study, patients wil wear a CGM for 14 days after enrollment, and will not wear it afterwards.
mean amplitude of glycemic excursions (MAGE) in mmol/L
Time Frame: The study is a cross-sectional study, patients wil wear a CGM for 14 days after enrollment, and will not wear it afterwards.
glycemic variability data
The study is a cross-sectional study, patients wil wear a CGM for 14 days after enrollment, and will not wear it afterwards.
standard deviation of blood glucose (SDBG) in mmol/L
Time Frame: The study is a cross-sectional study, patients wil wear a CGM for 14 days after enrollment, and will not wear it afterwards.
glycemic variability data
The study is a cross-sectional study, patients wil wear a CGM for 14 days after enrollment, and will not wear it afterwards.
mean of daily differences (MODD) in mmol/L
Time Frame: The study is a cross-sectional study, patients wil wear a CGM for 14 days after enrollment, and will not wear it afterwards.
glycemic variability data
The study is a cross-sectional study, patients wil wear a CGM for 14 days after enrollment, and will not wear it afterwards.
average daily risk range (ADRR)
Time Frame: The study is a cross-sectional study, patients wil wear a CGM for 14 days after enrollment, and will not wear it afterwards.
glycemic variability data
The study is a cross-sectional study, patients wil wear a CGM for 14 days after enrollment, and will not wear it afterwards.
largest amplitude of glycemic excursions (LAGE) in mmol/L
Time Frame: The study is a cross-sectional study, patients wil wear a CGM for 14 days after enrollment, and will not wear it afterwards.
glycemic variability data
The study is a cross-sectional study, patients wil wear a CGM for 14 days after enrollment, and will not wear it afterwards.
high blood glucose index (HBGI)
Time Frame: The study is a cross-sectional study, patients wil wear a CGM for 14 days after enrollment, and will not wear it afterwards.
glycemic variability data
The study is a cross-sectional study, patients wil wear a CGM for 14 days after enrollment, and will not wear it afterwards.
low blood glucose index (LBGI)
Time Frame: The study is a cross-sectional study, patients wil wear a CGM for 14 days after enrollment, and will not wear it afterwards.
glycemic variability data
The study is a cross-sectional study, patients wil wear a CGM for 14 days after enrollment, and will not wear it afterwards.
time in range (TIR) in %
Time Frame: The study is a cross-sectional study, patients wil wear a CGM for 14 days after enrollment, and will not wear it afterwards.
glycemic variability data
The study is a cross-sectional study, patients wil wear a CGM for 14 days after enrollment, and will not wear it afterwards.
time above range (TAR) in %
Time Frame: The study is a cross-sectional study, patients wil wear a CGM for 14 days after enrollment, and will not wear it afterwards.
glycemic variability data
The study is a cross-sectional study, patients wil wear a CGM for 14 days after enrollment, and will not wear it afterwards.
time below range (TBR) in %
Time Frame: The study is a cross-sectional study, patients wil wear a CGM for 14 days after enrollment, and will not wear it afterwards.
glycemic variability data
The study is a cross-sectional study, patients wil wear a CGM for 14 days after enrollment, and will not wear it afterwards.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
weight in kilograms
Time Frame: The study is a cross-sectional study, and the above indicators were measured only once at the initial enrollment.
weight and height will be combined to report BMI in kg/m^2
The study is a cross-sectional study, and the above indicators were measured only once at the initial enrollment.
height in meters
Time Frame: The study is a cross-sectional study, and the above indicators were measured only once at the initial enrollment.
weight and height will be combined to report BMI in kg/m^2
The study is a cross-sectional study, and the above indicators were measured only once at the initial enrollment.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

May 25, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 25, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 9, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 14, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 26, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

May 4, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 2, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 31, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2026PHB206-001

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hyperinsulinemia

Subscribe