Exteroceptive Stimulation for Facial Palsy After Stroke (ES-FP)

June 1, 2026 updated by: Dr. Marium Zafar, University of Faisalabad

Effect of Exteroceptive Stimulation Combined With Conventional Physiotherapy on Lip Angle Deviation and Facial Function in Patients With Post-Stroke Facial Palsy: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial

Stroke is a leading cause of long-term disability worldwide and frequently results in central facial palsy, which manifests as facial asymmetry, impaired muscle control, and reduced functional ability. These impairments can affect speech, emotional expression, and overall quality of life. Conventional physiotherapy is commonly used to manage post-stroke facial palsy; however, the additional benefit of sensory-based rehabilitation approaches remains insufficiently explored, particularly in clinical settings with limited resources.

This study was conducted to evaluate whether the addition of exteroceptive stimulation to conventional physiotherapy leads to greater improvement in facial symmetry and functional outcomes compared to conventional physiotherapy alone. Exteroceptive stimulation aims to enhance sensory input and facilitate neuromuscular activation, potentially improving motor recovery in affected facial muscles.

In this double-blind randomized controlled trial, a total of 36 participants diagnosed with post-stroke facial palsy were recruited and randomly allocated into two groups. The experimental group received exteroceptive stimulation in addition to conventional physiotherapy, while the control group received conventional physiotherapy alone. Both interventions were administered over a period of four weeks.

Outcome measures were assessed at baseline and at the end of the intervention period. The primary outcome was lip angle deviation, used as an indicator of facial symmetry. Secondary outcomes included facial function and disability assessed using standardized tools such as the Facial Disability Index and the Synkinesis Assessment Questionnaire.

The findings of this study aim to provide evidence on the effectiveness of integrating sensory-based techniques into routine rehabilitation programs for post-stroke facial palsy. The results may support the development of more comprehensive and effective rehabilitation strategies to improve patient outcomes.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Post-stroke facial palsy is a frequent neurological complication resulting from upper motor neuron lesions affecting facial nerve pathways. It commonly presents with facial asymmetry, impaired voluntary muscle control, and altered emotional expression. These deficits can interfere with communication, oral competence, and social interaction, ultimately impacting functional independence and quality of life. Despite its clinical importance, rehabilitation strategies targeting facial motor recovery remain relatively underdeveloped compared to limb rehabilitation.

Conventional physiotherapy approaches for facial palsy typically focus on facial muscle exercises, facilitation techniques, and functional retraining aimed at improving motor control and symmetry. While these approaches are widely used in clinical practice, their outcomes are often variable, and recovery may be incomplete. In recent years, there has been increasing interest in integrating sensory-based interventions into neurorehabilitation, based on the premise that sensory input plays a critical role in motor relearning and cortical reorganization.

Exteroceptive stimulation is a sensory-based intervention designed to enhance afferent input through external stimuli applied to the skin and underlying tissues. By increasing sensory feedback, it may facilitate neuromuscular activation, improve motor coordination, and support adaptive neuroplastic changes. Although such approaches have shown promise in broader neurorehabilitation contexts, their role in the management of post-stroke facial palsy has not been sufficiently investigated through controlled clinical trials.

This study was designed as a double-blind randomized controlled trial to examine the additional benefit of exteroceptive stimulation when combined with conventional physiotherapy. Participants diagnosed with post-stroke facial palsy were recruited from tertiary care settings and randomly assigned to one of two intervention groups using a computer-generated randomization process. Measures were taken to ensure blinding of participants and outcome assessors to minimize bias.

The intervention was delivered over a defined treatment period, with both groups receiving standardized conventional physiotherapy to ensure consistency of baseline care. The experimental group received an additional structured program of exteroceptive stimulation targeting affected facial regions. The protocol was designed to be feasible within routine clinical practice and reproducible in similar healthcare settings.

Outcome assessments were conducted at predefined time points using validated clinical instruments to capture changes in facial symmetry, functional ability, and associated complications such as synkinesis. The selection of these measures was based on their relevance to clinical presentation and their use in prior rehabilitation research.

Statistical analysis was performed to evaluate changes over time within each group and to compare differences between groups following the intervention period. Appropriate parametric tests were applied after assessment of data distribution. A threshold for statistical significance was established a priori.

This study aims to contribute to the existing body of evidence by providing controlled clinical data on the role of sensory-based adjunct therapies in facial rehabilitation following stroke. The findings are expected to inform clinical practice by clarifying whether the addition of exteroceptive stimulation offers meaningful benefits beyond conventional physiotherapy alone. Furthermore, the study may serve as a basis for future research exploring optimized rehabilitation protocols, longer follow-up durations, and larger multi-center trials.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

36

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Punjab Province
      • Faisalābad, Punjab Province, Pakistan, 3800
        • Tertiary Care Hospitals, Faisalabad, Pakistan

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients diagnosed with post-stroke facial palsy
  • Age between 40 and 55 years
  • Both male and female participants
  • Acute onset of facial weakness within 1-3 weeks
  • Non-traumatic onset of disease
  • Commitment to comply with electrical stimulation treatment

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participation in other therapies for facial nerve
  • Presence of neoplastic tumor, Pregnancy, Cardiac, Excessive perspiration, Psychiatric illness or Mental impairment, Neurotmesis, Post-surgical cases of heart and brain surgery
  • Bilateral facial palsy due to demyelinating disease e.g. motor neuron disease, trigeminal neuralgia, Open wounds/ulcers, ENT impairment/Otitis Media, Repetitive previous history of stroke
  • Invasive cardiac instrumentation such as endarterectomy or stent placement within 30 days prior to admission in ICU were excluded

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Exteroceptive Stimulation
Exteroceptive stimulation was applied to the affected side of the face using structured sensory techniques, including light touch, stroking, tapping, and graded pressure over the perioral, cheek, and nasolabial regions. The intervention was delivered by a trained physiotherapist in a standardized sequence to enhance sensory input and facilitate neuromuscular activation.
Exteroceptive stimulation was applied to the affected side of the face using structured sensory techniques, including light touch, stroking, tapping, and graded pressure over the perioral, cheek, and nasolabial regions. The intervention was delivered by a trained physiotherapist in a standardized sequence to enhance sensory input and facilitate neuromuscular activation. Each session lasted approximately 30-40 minutes and was administered 5 days per week for 4 weeks in a clinical setting. This intervention was provided in combination with conventional physiotherapy.
Conventional physiotherapy included a structured facial rehabilitation program comprising facial muscle exercises, facilitation techniques, and functional retraining to improve symmetry and coordination. Sessions were delivered by a qualified physiotherapist, lasting approximately 30-40 minutes, 5 days per week for 4 weeks. This intervention was provided alone in the control group and in combination with exteroceptive stimulation in the experimental group.
Active Comparator: Conventional Physiotherapy
Conventional physiotherapy included a structured facial rehabilitation program comprising facial muscle exercises, facilitation techniques, and functional retraining aimed at improving symmetry and muscle coordination.
Conventional physiotherapy included a structured facial rehabilitation program comprising facial muscle exercises, facilitation techniques, and functional retraining to improve symmetry and coordination. Sessions were delivered by a qualified physiotherapist, lasting approximately 30-40 minutes, 5 days per week for 4 weeks. This intervention was provided alone in the control group and in combination with exteroceptive stimulation in the experimental group.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Lip Angle Deviation
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 4
Lip angle deviation was measured using standardized facial symmetry assessment techniques to evaluate improvement in facial alignment.
Baseline and Week 4

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Facial Disability Index (FDI)
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 4
Assessment of physical and social function using validated scoring system (FDI-P, FDI-S, FDI-T). The Facial Disability Index is a validated scale used to assess functional limitations and social well-being in patients with facial disorders. It consists of two subscales: Physical Function and Social Function, which are combined to generate a total score. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better functional status and improved quality of life.
Baseline and Week 4
Synkinesis Assessment Questionnaire (SAQ)
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 4
Measurement of synkinesis severity using a structured questionnaire. The Synkinesis Assessment Questionnaire is a patient-reported outcome measure used to evaluate the severity of synkinesis. The total score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater severity of synkinesis and worse clinical condition.
Baseline and Week 4

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Dr Muhammad Ateeb, PhD Public Health, Research Associate, The University of Faisalabad, Faisalabad 38000, Pakistan

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

  • 1. Albaret G, Domergue H. Stroke and stroke rehabilitation. Pathy's Princ Pract Geriatr Med. Published online February 18, 2022:619-634. doi:10.1002/9781119484288.CH48 2. Unnithan AKA, Das JM, Mehta P. Hemorrhagic Stroke. In Statpearls. Published online December 13, 2025:1-12. 3. Fulk GD., Chui KK. O'Sullivan & Schmitz's physical rehabilitation. Published online 2024:1337. 4. Choi JH, Kim BR, Han EY, Kim SM. The Effect of Dual-Task Training on Balance and Cognition in Patients With Subacute Post-Stroke. Ann Rehabil Med. 2015;39(1):81. doi:10.5535/ARM.2015.39.1.81 5. Junior VA dos S, Santos M de S, Ribeiro NM da S, Maldonado IL. Combining Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation and Virtual Reality for Improving Sensorimotor Function in Stroke Survivors: A Randomized Clinical Trial. J Cent Nerv Syst Dis. 2019;11. doi:10.1177/1179573519863826 6. Hashmi M, Khan M, Wasay M. Growing Burden of Stroke in Pakistan: A Review of Progress and Limitations. Int J Stroke. 2013;8(7):575-581. doi:10.1111/J.1747-4949.2012.00827.X 7. Schimmel M, Voegeli G, Duvernay E, Leemann B, Müller F. Oral tactile sensitivity and masticatory performance are impaired in stroke patients. J Oral Rehabil. 2017;44(3):163-171. doi:10.1111/JOOR.12482 8. Schimmel M, Ono T, Lam OLT, Müller F. Oro-facial impairment in stroke patients. J Oral Rehabil. 2017;44(4):313-326. doi:10.1111/JOOR.12486 9. Johal A, Dunne B, Bolooki H, Sandler C. Oral Health-Related Quality of Life (OHRQoL), Pain and Side Effects in Adults Undergoing Different Orthodontic Treatment Modalities: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Healthc 2025, Vol 13,. 2025;13(24). doi:10.3390/HEALTHCARE13243317 10. Taj F, Zahid R, Syeda UER, Murtaza M, Ahmed S, Kamal AK. Risk Factors of Stroke in Pakistan: A Dedicated Stroke Clinic Experience. Can J Neurol Sci. 2010;37(2):252-257. doi:10.1017/S0317167100010015 11. Walcott BP, Miller JC, Kwon CS, et al. Outcomes in severe middle cerebral artery ischemic stroke. Neurocrit Care. 2014;21(1)

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 24, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

December 24, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 28, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 28, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

May 6, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 3, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 1, 2026

Last Verified

June 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on Exteroceptive Stimulation

Subscribe