TENS as an Adjunct to Local Anaesthesia During Transperineal Prostate Biopsy: A Randomized Sham-Controlled Trial (TENS 2)

May 5, 2026 updated by: Bartłomiej Marczak, Medical University of Gdansk

Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation as an Adjunct to Local Anaesthesia During Transperineal MRI-Ultrasound Fusion-Guided Prostate Biopsy: A Randomized Triple-Blind Sham-Controlled Trial

Transperineal prostate biopsy is a safe and effective method of diagnosing prostate cancer. When performed under local anaesthesia in an outpatient setting, it can cause significant pain, particularly during the periprostatic nerve block - the injection of local anaesthetic around the prostate. Better pain management during this procedure may improve patient comfort and encourage wider use of the transperineal approach.

Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) is a non-invasive, low-cost method of pain relief that works by delivering mild electrical impulses through the skin. A preceding pilot study at our centre (n=84) found that TENS used alongside local anaesthesia was associated with significantly lower pain scores during periprostatic nerve block and biopsy sampling, with no device-related complications.

This study aims to confirm these findings in a larger, formally powered, triple-blind, randomized controlled trial. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either active TENS or sham TENS (electrodes applied but no electrical current delivered) in addition to standard local anaesthesia. Neither the participant, the operating urologist, nor the nurse recording pain scores will know which group the participant is in.

Pain intensity will be assessed at four stages of the procedure using a 0-10 numeric rating scale. Participants will be followed up at 30 days after the biopsy.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This is a single-centre, prospective, randomized, triple-blind, sham-controlled, two-parallel-group superiority trial. The study builds on a preceding pilot study (TENS 1, n=84) which demonstrated large effect sizes for TENS-associated pain reduction during transperineal prostate biopsy under local anaesthesia.

Triple-blinding is achieved through a three-component procedure: amplitude titration is completed before the operating urologist enters the procedure room; a physical opaque screen is placed between the TENS device and the operative field; and participants are instructed not to verbalise device-related sensations during the procedure.

The primary outcome is NRS pain score during periprostatic nerve block, assessed within 30 seconds of completion of bilateral periprostatic infiltration by an independent outcome assessor blinded to allocation.

Exploratory outcomes include preoperative pain catastrophizing, preoperative anxiety (STAI-S), and the effect of prior biopsy experience on procedural pain.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

140

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Pomeranian Voivodeship
      • Gdansk, Pomeranian Voivodeship, Poland, 80-214
        • Department of Urology, Medical University of Gdansk
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male patients aged 40 years or older
  • Indication for prostate biopsy: elevated serum PSA (as per institutional protocol and EAU guidelines) or abnormal digital rectal examination (DRE)
  • Suspicious lesion on multiparametric MRI classified as PI-RADS score 3 or higher (version 2.1)
  • Scheduled for transperineal MRI-ultrasound fusion-guided prostate biopsy under local anaesthesia
  • Ability to provide written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior treatment for prostate cancer (surgical, radiotherapy, hormonal or focal therapy)
  • Contraindications to TENS: cutaneous damage or dermatologic conditions at electrode application sites; cardiac pacemaker or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD); uncontrolled cardiac arrhythmia or congestive heart failure; history of epilepsy or seizure disorder; metallic implants near the stimulation site; malignancy at or near the stimulation site
  • Contraindications to transperineal biopsy: active urinary tract infection; bleeding disorder or ongoing anticoagulation not amendable to bridging; anatomical abnormalities preventing safe prostatic access
  • Known allergy or intolerance to local anaesthetic agents or biopsy-related materials
  • Severe comorbidities or unstable medical condition compromising procedural safety
  • Inability to complete questionnaires
  • Participation in another interventional clinical trial within 30 days prior to enrolment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Active TENS
Participants receive active transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) initiated 3-5 minutes before local anaesthesia, using Cefar Rehab X2 device (Class II, Type BF). Parameters: symmetrical biphasic compensated pulse, 80 Hz, 180 µs pulse duration, amplitude individually titrated to highest comfortably tolerable level. Two pairs of 5x5 cm electrodes placed in the perineal region. TENS continued throughout all procedural stages and discontinued after biopsy sampling. Standard local anaesthesia administered to all participants: 10 mL 2% lignocaine gel transrectally, followed by 20 mL 1% lignocaine using full needle-path infiltration technique.
Cefar Rehab X2 device (Class II, Type BF). Symmetrical biphasic compensated pulse; 80 Hz; 180 µs pulse duration; amplitude individually titrated. Two pairs of 5x5 cm electrodes in perineal region. Initiated 3-5 minutes before local anaesthesia, continued throughout procedure.
Sham Comparator: Sham TENS
Participants receive sham TENS. Electrodes placed identically to the active group. Device activated in identical manner but delivers no electrical current. Device display not visible to participant; device produces no sound. Standard local anaesthesia identical to active group.
Identical electrode placement to active group. Device activated without delivering electrical current. Indistinguishable from active TENS by participant, operator, and outcome assessor.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
NRS Pain Score During Periprostatic Nerve Block
Time Frame: Immediately after completion of periprostatic nerve block (intraoperative)
Patient-reported pain intensity during periprostatic nerve block (PNB), assessed using a Numeric Rating Scale (NRS, 0-10, where 0 = no pain and 10 = worst imaginable pain). PNB consists of periprostatic infiltration ( 10 mL 1% lignocaine under real-time ultrasound guidance). NRS assessed verbally by an independent outcome assessor (Nurse B) within 30 seconds of completion of the PNB injection, before the next procedural stage begins. Standardised verbal NRS explanation provided to all participants before the procedure.
Immediately after completion of periprostatic nerve block (intraoperative)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
NRS Pain Score During Ultrasound Probe Insertion
Time Frame: Immediately after ultrasound probe insertion (intraoperative)
NRS (0-10) assessed within 30 seconds of probe placement, before local anaesthesia administration begins.
Immediately after ultrasound probe insertion (intraoperative)
NRS Pain Score During Perineal Infiltration
Time Frame: Immediately after perineal infiltration (intraoperative)
NRS (0-10) assessed within 30 seconds of completion of perineal skin and subcutaneous tissue local anaesthetic infiltration.
Immediately after perineal infiltration (intraoperative)
NRS Pain Score During Biopsy Sampling
Time Frame: Immediately after fusion-targeted biopsy sampling (intraoperative)
NRS (0-10) assessed within 30 seconds of the last biopsy core being obtained.
Immediately after fusion-targeted biopsy sampling (intraoperative)
Procedural Safety and Tolerability
Time Frame: Through 30-day follow-up
Incidence and severity of adverse events classified per Clavien-Dindo grading system.
Through 30-day follow-up
Willingness to Repeat the Procedure
Time Frame: 30-day follow-up visit
Single question (yes/no/unsure) assessing patient willingness to undergo the same procedure in the future.
30-day follow-up visit
Blinding Integrity - James Blinding Index
Time Frame: Immediately after biopsy sampling, before unblinding
Participant blinding assessed by single question posed by independent outcome assessor immediately after biopsy sampling: which group the participant believes they were assigned to (active/sham/no opinion), plus certainty rating (1-5).
Immediately after biopsy sampling, before unblinding
Operator Satisfaction
Time Frame: Immediately after procedure
Single-item Likert scale (1-5, where 1 = very dissatisfied and 5 = very satisfied with procedural conditions), recorded by the operating urologist immediately after the procedure, assessing overall satisfaction with procedural conditions during the biopsy.
Immediately after procedure
Patient Satisfaction
Time Frame: Immediately after procedure
Single-item Likert scale (1-5, where 1 = very dissatisfied and 5 = very satisfied), recorded immediately after procedure by independent outcome assessor.
Immediately after procedure
Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale
Time Frame: Administered before the procedure.
Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale (APAIS; 6 items; Moerman et al., Anesth Analg 1996;82: 445-451; Polish forward-backward translation). Administered before the procedure. Association with primary outcome assessed by Spearman correlation as covariate.
Administered before the procedure.
NRS-Anxiety
Time Frame: Administered before the procedure and immediately after biopsy sampling to assess pre-to-post procedural anxiety change.
NRS-Anxiety (0-10; single item: "How anxious are you right now?"). Administered before the procedure and immediately after biopsy sampling to assess pre-to-post procedural anxiety change. Pre-to-post delta reported as exploratory outcome.
Administered before the procedure and immediately after biopsy sampling to assess pre-to-post procedural anxiety change.
TENS Amplitude vs Pain Reduction
Time Frame: Intraoperative (active group only)
Actual TENS amplitude used (mA) recorded for each participant in the active group. Spearman correlation between amplitude and NRS reduction during PNB.
Intraoperative (active group only)
Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS-13)
Time Frame: Before the procedure
Pain Catastrophizing Scale (Sullivan et al., Psychol Assess 1995;7:524-532). 13-item self-report questionnaire, score 0-52. Three subscales: rumination, magnification, helplessness. Polish version available. Administered before the procedure as covariate for primary outcome analysis.
Before the procedure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

June 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

February 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 3, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 5, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

May 11, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 11, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 5, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

De-identified individual participant data underlying the results reported in the primary publication will be made publicly available at the Open Science Framework (OSF) at the time of publication.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Beginning at time of publication, no end date.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Publicly available without restriction via Open Science Framework (OSF).

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • ANALYTIC_CODE

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain, Procedural

Clinical Trials on Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS)

Subscribe