Probiotics and Biomarkers in Irritable Bowel Syndrome (BIO-IBS)

May 27, 2026 updated by: Magnus Simrén, Sahlgrenska University Hospital

The Impact of Probiotics on Biomarkers and Symptom Severity in Irritable Bowel Syndrome

The goal of this double-blind parallel-arm randomized controlled trial is to learn if a probiotic supplement (containing a new strain derived from L. reuteri) alters outcomes related to symptom severity and transit time in adults with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). The main question it aims to answer is:

Does the probiotic alter IBS symptom severity?

Researchers will compare the probiotic to a placebo (a lookalike substance that contains no probiotic) to see if the probiotic works to alter outcomes.

Participants will:

Be randomized to either take the probiotic supplement or placebo supplement daily for 12 weeks.

Visit the lab for 4 study visits (visit 1: screening and informed consent; visit 2: randomization, data collection, beginning the intervention; visit 3: end of intervention and data collection; visit 4: 3 month post intervention follow up and data collection).

Provide biological samples (blood, stool, saliva, urine) Complete questionnaires

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The BIO-IBS study is a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial investigating whether a combination probiotic improves symptoms in adults with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). The trial also explores biological mechanisms and predictors of treatment response.

Background & Rationale IBS is a common disorder of gut-brain interaction (~4% prevalence in Sweden). Current treatments include dietary, pharmacological, and psychological approaches. Increasing evidence suggests the gut microbiome plays a key role, prompting interest in probiotics.

Aims

1. Evaluate effect of probiotic combination on IBS symptoms. 2, Identify predictors of response. 3. Investigate IBS pathophysiology and biomarkers.

Study Design

Type: Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group Participants: 252 adults with IBS Randomization: 1:1 (probiotic vs placebo) Treatment duration: 12 weeks Follow-up: 3 months post-treatment Timeline: Recruitment starting April 2026 lasting ~3 years

Participants Inclusion Criteria

Adult (≥18 years), IBS (Rome IV criteria) IBS-SSS > 75 BMI 18.5-35 Able to consent and complete Swedish questionnaires

Key Exclusion Criteria

Significant gastrointestinal or systemic disease Recent antibiotics (within 3 months) or probiotics (within 2 weeks) Opioid use Pregnancy/breastfeeding Significant lab abnormalities (e.g., high fecal calprotectin) Major lifestyle/treatment changes

Intervention

Active treatment: Tablet containing both L. reuteri strains Placebo: Identical without bacteria Dose: 1 tablet twice daily Duration: 12 weeks Compliance ≥80% required for per-protocol analysis.

Outcomes Primary Outcome

Change in IBS symptom severity (IBS-SSS) from baseline to 12 weeks (intervention vs placebo)

Secondary Outcomes

Proportion achieving ≥50 or ≥100 point IBS-SSS reduction Gastrointestinal symptoms (GSRS-IBS) Pain reduction Quality of life (IBSQOL) Work productivity (WPAI:IBS) Transit time (gut motility) Adverse events Sustainability of effects (3-month follow-up)

Exploratory Outcomes

Stool consistency/frequency Biomarkers (microbiome, immune, metabolomics, etc.) Psychological and lifestyle factors Dietary influences Mechanistic insights into IBS

Study Procedures Visits Screening (2-8 weeks before randomization Consent, questionnaires, biological samples, diaries

Randomization (Day 0) Baseline assessments and start of treatment

During intervention Regular symptom tracking Phone follow-up at week 6

End of treatment (12 weeks) Repeat assessments and samples

Follow-up (3 months later) Long-term outcomes

Optional (Facultative) Assessments Rectal sensitivity (barostat) Sigmoidoscopy ± confocal endomicroscopy MRI (motility and colonic volume)

Measurements

Questionnaires: IBS-SSS, GSRS-IBS, HADS, PHQ-15, IBSQOL, stress, work productivity Biological samples: blood, stool, urine, saliva Gut function: transit time (radiopaque markers and sweetcorn method) Diet: food frequency and recall diaries

Statistical Considerations Sample size: 252 participants (powered to detect clinically meaningful IBS-SSS difference)

Populations:

Intention-to-treat (all randomized) Per-protocol (≥80% compliance, no major deviations) Analysis plan: Defined in a Statistical Analysis Plan No interim analysis

Safety Probiotics considered safe with minimal risk (mainly transient flatulence). Adverse events will be recorded and classified by severity and causality. IBS symptom fluctuations are not counted as adverse events unless worsened.

Ethics & Data Handling Conducted according to Declaration of Helsinki and ICH-GCP. Participants give informed consent and can withdraw anytime. Data are pseudonymized and securely stored (REDCap)

Risk-Benefit Assessment Low risk due to established safety of L. reuteri strains Moderate participant burden (questionnaires, sample collection) Optional procedures may cause discomfort but are controlled and voluntary Potential benefit: improved IBS symptoms and better understanding of disease mechanisms

Key Strengths Large sample size Rigorous randomized controlled design Comprehensive symptom, biological, and mechanistic assessment Long follow-up

Conclusion This study aims to determine whether a novel probiotic combination improves IBS symptoms and to identify biological and clinical predictors of response, contributing to more personalized treatment strategies in IBS.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

252

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Gothenburg, Sweden, 413 45
        • Recruiting
        • Mag-tarmlab, Sahlgrenska University Hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosed with IBS according to ROME V criteria
  • IBS-SSS greater than or equal to 75
  • Adult over 18 years old
  • BMI 18.5-35 kg/m2
  • Able to understand the participant information sheet and willing to comply with the study protocol
  • Able to give informed consent
  • Able to complete the Swedish questionnaires

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of any gastroenterology disease including coeliac disease, heart, liver, neurological, or current psychiatric disease, diabetes, any surgery to the abdomen that affects intestinal function (not including cholecystectomy, appendectomy, ceasarean section).
  • The use of opioids 1 month prior to screening and throughout the study
  • The use of probiotic supplements from 14days before randomization and during the study (not including foods with probiotic components)
  • Consumption of antibiotics 3 months prior to screening and throughout the study
  • The start of any new drugs that affect the gastrointestinal tract or symptoms within the last month before the start of the study. As well as the start of new diets of psychological therapy as treatment for IBS symptoms.
  • Participation in any medical research during the last month
  • Clinically relevant lab abnormalities at the time of screening (fecal calprotectin greater than or equal to 150 ug/g as absolute cutoff. If calprotectin is between 50 - 150ug/g the decision is made on clinical judgement)
  • Pregnancy, plan to become pregnant during the study, breastfeeding
  • alcohol consumption >14 units per week
  • Use of recreational active drugs during 1 month before screening or during the study
  • Use of medication that primarily affects bowel function, transit time, stool consistency 2 weeks before the intervention or during the 12 week intervention period

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention
Adults with IBS who have been randomized to receive the intervention
Probiotic using a new strain derived from L. reuteri.
Placebo Comparator: Control
Adults with IBS who have been randomized to receive the placebo
A placebo supplement that is identical to the probiotic in formulation and packaging except that the probiotic bacteria is not present.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
IBS symptom severity (IBS-Symptom-Severity-Score)
Time Frame: Screening (15-60 days pre-intervention), baseline (day 0 of intervention), during intervention (days 14, 28, 42, 56, 70), end of intervention (day 84), 3 month follow up post intervention
  • Between group differences (intervention vs control) in mean IBS-SSS scores from baseline to end of intervention.
  • Proportion of responders (decrease in IBS-SSS over greater than or equal to 50 points from baseline to end of intervention) between arms
  • Proportion of greater responders (decrease in IBS-SSS scores greater than or equal to 100 points from baseline to end of intervention) between arms
Screening (15-60 days pre-intervention), baseline (day 0 of intervention), during intervention (days 14, 28, 42, 56, 70), end of intervention (day 84), 3 month follow up post intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
General global assessment: satisfactory adequate relief of symptoms from baseline to end of intervention between arms
Time Frame: During intervention (days 14, 28, 42, 56, 70), end of intervention (day 84)
The proportion of individuals with greater or equal to 50% of assessments with an adequate relief of symptoms
During intervention (days 14, 28, 42, 56, 70), end of intervention (day 84)
General global assessment: worst pain over the last 24 hours, intervention group vs placebo group reduced between baseline and end of intervention between arms
Time Frame: During intervention (days 14, 28, 42, 56, 70), end of intervention (day 84)
The proportion of individuals with greater or equal to 50% of assessments between baseline and end of intervention, and a greater than or equal to 30% decrease in worst pain during the last 24 hours compared to baseline
During intervention (days 14, 28, 42, 56, 70), end of intervention (day 84)
Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale- IBS (GSRS-IBS)
Time Frame: Screening (15-60 days pre-intervention), baseline (day 0 of intervention), during intervention (days 14, 28, 42, 56, 70), end of intervention (day 84), 3 month follow up post intervention

Change in Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale- IBS (GSRS-IBS) scores over time between arms

The GSRS uses a 7- point Likert scale. Total scores can range from 15 - 105 with higher scores indicating worse symptom rating

Screening (15-60 days pre-intervention), baseline (day 0 of intervention), during intervention (days 14, 28, 42, 56, 70), end of intervention (day 84), 3 month follow up post intervention
IBS-quality of life (IBS-QoL)
Time Frame: Baseline (day 0 of intervention), during intervention (days 14, 28, 42, 56, 70), end of intervention (day 84), 3 month follow up post intervention

Change in IBS-quality of life (IBS-QoL) scores over time between arms

The IBS-QoL is a 34-item scale that uses a 5-point Likert scale with total scores ranging from 0-100, where higher scores indicate better quality of life

Baseline (day 0 of intervention), during intervention (days 14, 28, 42, 56, 70), end of intervention (day 84), 3 month follow up post intervention
Work Productivity and Activity Impairment:IBS (WPAI:IBS)
Time Frame: Baseline (day 0 of intervention), during intervention (days 14, 28, 42, 56, 70), end of intervention (day 84), 3 month follow up post intervention

Change in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment:IBS (WPAI:IBS) scores over time between arms

The WPAI:IBS consists of 6 items regarding employment status, hours of work missed because of IBS, hours missed because of other reasons, hours actually worked, how much IBS affected productivity of working (VAS of 0 to 10), how much IBS affected regular activities (VAS of 0 to 10). Total scores are expressed as percentage of impairment/productivity lost with higher scores indicating greater impairment

Baseline (day 0 of intervention), during intervention (days 14, 28, 42, 56, 70), end of intervention (day 84), 3 month follow up post intervention
Change in oro-anal transit time from baseline to end of intervention between groups: Radiopaque markers
Time Frame: Baseline (day 0 of intervention), during intervention (days 14, 28, 42, 56, 70), end of intervention (day 84)
Participants will take oral tablets that are radiopaque markers following a specific protocol beginning from 7 days prior to attending the study visit. Each day they will swallow one set of radiopaque markers with water, then on day 7 a nurse will conduct an X-ray of the abdomen to show the location of the markers in the bowel.
Baseline (day 0 of intervention), during intervention (days 14, 28, 42, 56, 70), end of intervention (day 84)
Change in oro-anal transit time from baseline to end of intervention between groups: sweetcorn
Time Frame: Baseline (day 0 of intervention), during intervention (days 14, 28, 42, 56, 70), end of intervention (day 84)
Sweetcorn oro-anal transit time will be measured using a specific protocol. 7 days before attending the study visit the participants will be advised to eat 100g of sweetcorn at 0800 with minimal chewing. Following this, each time they open their bowel for the next 6 days they will be advised to visually inspect the stool for sweetcorn and record whether or not they see the sweetcorn in a diary.
Baseline (day 0 of intervention), during intervention (days 14, 28, 42, 56, 70), end of intervention (day 84)
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)
Time Frame: Baseline (day 0 of intervention), during intervention (days 14, 28, 42, 56, 70), end of intervention (day 84), 3 month follow up post intervention

Change in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) scores over time between groups.

The HADS is a 14-item questionnaire (with 2 subscales: HADS-Depression (7 items) and HADS-Anxiety (7 items), with each item rated on a 4 point Likert scale. Total scores range from 0 - 21. Higher scores indicate worse symptoms for anxiety and depression

Baseline (day 0 of intervention), during intervention (days 14, 28, 42, 56, 70), end of intervention (day 84), 3 month follow up post intervention
Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)
Time Frame: Baseline (day 0 of intervention), during intervention (days 14, 28, 42, 56, 70), end of intervention (day 84), 3 month follow up post intervention

Change in Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ) scores over time between groups

The PHQ is a 15-item questionnaire with each item rated on a 3-point Likert scale. Total scores range from 0-30 with higher scores indicating greater somatic symptom burden

Baseline (day 0 of intervention), during intervention (days 14, 28, 42, 56, 70), end of intervention (day 84), 3 month follow up post intervention

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Validation of the measurement of oro-anal transit time using sweetcorn vs radiopaque markers
Time Frame: Baseline to end of intervention (12 weeks)
Baseline to end of intervention (12 weeks)
Fecal samples
Time Frame: Baseline (day 0 of intervention), during intervention (days 14, 28, 42, 56, 70), end of intervention (day 84), 3 month follow up post intervention
Fecal samples will be analysed in relation to factors regarding predictors of IBS symptoms and response to intervention (including gut microbiome and fecal metabolites)
Baseline (day 0 of intervention), during intervention (days 14, 28, 42, 56, 70), end of intervention (day 84), 3 month follow up post intervention
Urine samples
Time Frame: Baseline (day 0 of intervention)
Urine samples will be analysed in relation to factors regarding predictors of IBS symptoms (including urinary metabolites)
Baseline (day 0 of intervention)
Saliva samples
Time Frame: Baseline (day 0 of intervention)
Saliva samples will be analysed in relation to factors regarding predictors of IBS symptoms (including salivary protease)
Baseline (day 0 of intervention)
Dietary intake - 3 day diet diaries
Time Frame: Screening (15-60 days pre-intervention), baseline (day 0 of intervention), during intervention (days 14, 28, 42, 56, 70), end of intervention (day 84), 3 month follow up post intervention
Dietary intake will be recorded prior to and throughout the study period in seven 3-day diet diaries and analysed in relation to predictors of IBS symptoms and response to intervention
Screening (15-60 days pre-intervention), baseline (day 0 of intervention), during intervention (days 14, 28, 42, 56, 70), end of intervention (day 84), 3 month follow up post intervention
Unprepared sigmoidoscopy (+ biopsy and blood serum to measure permeability) with confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE)
Time Frame: After screening, but pre-randomization (60 - 15 days pre-randomization)
This is an opt-in outcome for participants to ascertain gut permeability in relation to IBS symptom predictors
After screening, but pre-randomization (60 - 15 days pre-randomization)
MRI colon to measure colonic gas volumes
Time Frame: After screening, but pre-randomization (60 - 15 days pre-randomization)
This is an opt-in outcome for participants to ascertain colonic gas volumes in relation to IBS symptom predictors
After screening, but pre-randomization (60 - 15 days pre-randomization)
Small bowel motility MRI
Time Frame: After screening, but pre-randomization (60 - 15 days pre-randomization)
This is an opt-in outcome for participants to ascertain small bowel motility in relation to IBS symptom predictors
After screening, but pre-randomization (60 - 15 days pre-randomization)
ROME V
Time Frame: Baseline (day 0 of intervention), during intervention (days 14, 28, 42, 56, 70), end of intervention (day 84), 3 month follow up post intervention

Changes in stool consistency and frequency measured using the ROME V questionnaire

The ROME V is a diagnostic questionnaire for disorders of the gut-brain interaction. Changes in stool consistency and frequency are related to a subset of questions in the Rome V (Q54 - 60). Items are rated on a 10-point Likert scale rated as a percentage of 0 - 100% regarding frequency of symptoms in the last 3 months, including: abdominal pain/ discomfort, how often abdominal pain happened close in time to a bowel movement, how often stools were harder than usual, how often stools were softer than usual, how often stools were more frequent than usual, and how often stools were less frequent than usual.

Baseline (day 0 of intervention), during intervention (days 14, 28, 42, 56, 70), end of intervention (day 84), 3 month follow up post intervention
Rectal sensitivity barostat
Time Frame: After screening, but pre-randomization (60 - 15 days pre-randomization)

This is an opt-in outcome for participants to ascertain rectal sensitivity in relation to IBS symptom predictors.

A balloon is inserted and inflated in the rectum in a controlled setting. The patient indicates when defined sensory thresholds are reached (first feeling of the balloon, urge to empty bowel, discomfort or pain). When the patient indicates discomfort or pain, or another reason to stop, the balloon inflation will be stopped.

After screening, but pre-randomization (60 - 15 days pre-randomization)
Rectal sensitivity with Physical Reactions to Emotions Scale (PRES)
Time Frame: After screening, but pre-randomization (60 - 15 days pre-randomization)

This is an opt-in outcome for participants to ascertain rectal sensitivity in relation to IBS symptom predictors

Alongside the rectal barostat, participants will complete the PRES, a 9-item questionnaire measured on a 4-item Likert scale. Total scores can range from 0 = 27 with higher scores indicating more frequent physical reactions to the rectal barostat

After screening, but pre-randomization (60 - 15 days pre-randomization)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Magnus Simren, MD PHD, Göteborg University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 28, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

April 1, 2031

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2031

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 22, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 6, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

May 13, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 1, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 27, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS)

Clinical Trials on Probiotic Supplementation (Lactobacillus Reuteri)

Subscribe