Probiotic Intake and Perimenopausal Psychological Assessments (PIPPA)

May 12, 2026 updated by: University of Oxford

The Effects of a Probiotic on Emotional Processing, Cognition, and the Gut Microbiome in Perimenopausal Women

Recent evidence suggests multi-strain probiotics containing Lactobacillus rhamnosus and Bifidobacterium longum have been found to enhance emotional processing and reduce salience to negative cues in studies involving people with mood disorders, as well as improve cognitive functions, such as memory and concentration, in healthy participants. By administering computer-based tasks, questionnaires and checking biological measures (cortisol, immune markers, blood metabolites, gut microbiota) using blood and faecal samples, this experimental medicine study aims to investigate whether a probiotic supplement has an effect on emotional processing and cognition in perimenopausal women. We also aim to study changes in gut bacteria from stool samples before and after taking the supplement to see if any microbiome changes are associated with any effects in emotional processing, cognitive function, and biological markers.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Perimenopause, the transition period leading up to menopause, involves fluctuating levels of oestrogen and other hormones, contributing to a variety of physical and metabolic changes. It is also a period associated with an increased risk of depression and a decline in cognitive functioning. When compared to the pre-perimenopausal period, perimenopausal women are two to five times more susceptible to experiencing depressive episodes. Cognitive decline, including memory and concentration issues, is also prevalent, with an estimated 44-62% of individuals reporting challenges with memory.

Research often highlights the role of the gut-brain axis, where the gut microbiota influences cognitive function and emotional processing via neurotransmitters, inflammatory markers, and stress response pathways. Recent evidence suggests that multi-strain probiotics containing Lactobacillus rhamnosus and Bifidobacterium longum enhance emotional processing and reduce salience to negative cues in studies involving people with mood disorders, as well as improving cognitive functions, such as memory and concentration, in healthy participants. One 8-week study also found preliminary evidence supporting the potential of probiotics as a safe and effective adjunctive treatment for major depressive disorder in individuals with incomplete responses to antidepressant medication. Given these observed benefits, the investigation into the effects of multi-strain probiotics to address emotional processing and cognitive disturbances and perturbations in a perimenopausal population is lacking. With the increasing demand for natural, non-pharmacological therapeutic interventions to manage perimenopausal symptoms, this project could provide valuable evidence supporting the use of probiotics as a beneficial adjunct therapy in perimenopausal health management.

The current proposal will assess the effects of a commercial probiotic on emotional processing and cognitive function in perimenopausal women, alongside changes in gut microbial composition that may mediate any observed metabolic changes and effects on inflammatory markers and metabolites. This is an important next step in elucidating the role probiotics may play in perimenopause and in generating data to guide future clinical applications of probiotics in managing perimenopausal symptoms.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

106

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • England
      • Oxford, England, United Kingdom, OX3 7JX
        • Recruiting
        • University of Oxford, Department of Psychiatry
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Phil Burnet, Professor
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Susannah Murphy, Professor
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Aimiomode Anetor

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Female at birth
  • You are aged 45-60 years and in perimenopause (determined by changes in menstrual bleeding patterns (such as changes in cycle length of 7 days or longer in either direction from what is normal for you), AND vasomotor symptoms (e.g., hot flushes and sweats) AND mild to moderate mood or cognitive disturbances, or joint and muscle pain over the previous 12 months)
  • You are willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the study
  • You are sufficiently fluent in English to understand and complete tasks
  • You are at least 12 months post-natal
  • Willing to withhold from having grapefruit juice

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Currently receive or seek treatment for any mental health condition
  • Have a BMI >=30 OR <=18.5
  • Have lost or gained more than 10% of body weight in a short period (e.g., 6 months), as this can affect mood and cognition
  • Currently using hormonal contraception or have used hormonal contraception in the last 6 months
  • Have had gender reassignment surgery or gender-affirming hormone therapy
  • Had a head injury causing concussion or unconsciousness in the past 6 months
  • Participated in other studies that may influence mood, cognition, or gut health in the last three months
  • Are currently diagnosed with and/or treated for psychiatric or neurological disorders
  • Are on perimenopausal hormone replacement therapy (HRT) (e.g., estrogen, progesterone, testosterone) or other hormone-modulating medications (e.g., GLP-1 agonists, thyroxine replacement), as these can impact mood and cognitive functions
  • Currently use statins or have used statins in the last 6 months, as these may impact mood and cognitive functions
  • Participated in any other study with the same tasks in the last year
  • Currently use medications that influence cognition or mood, such as antidepressants, anxiolytics, antipsychotics, stimulants, mood-stabilizers, or cognitive-enhancing drugs
  • Have chronic or severe gastrointestinal diseases (e.g., inflammatory bowel disease, Crohn's disease, celiac disease, or severe acid reflux; treatment with e.g., corticosteroids, antacids), as these conditions and treatments can affect the gut microbiota and immune responses differently from healthy individuals
  • Have a compromised immune system
  • Currently smoke, vape, or use any other nicotine products
  • Have a current diagnosis of cognitive impairment or neurodegenerative disorders (e.g., mild cognitive impairment, dementia), as these conditions could confound cognitive assessments.
  • Have severe medical conditions requiring ongoing medication that may independently affect cognition or mood (e.g., diabetes)
  • Currently or recently used antibiotics (last 3 months), as antibiotics may alter gut microbiota and interfere with probiotic effects
  • Currently or recently used probiotics or prebiotics or consumed fermented products (e.g., kimchi, kombucha, sauerkraut, kefir, etc.) on a regular basis (last 3 months), which might interfere with the study intervention
  • Have known allergies or intolerances to probiotics or components in the probiotic supplement.
  • Have substance abuse or dependence (e.g., alcohol, recreational drugs) that may affect mood and cognition.
  • Have Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (Long COVID)
  • Have had a hysterectomy
  • Are pregnant or lactating, as hormonal changes associated with these states could confound results.
  • Score of 20 or above on PHQ-9 depression questionnaire, indicating severe depression
  • Score of >1 on PHQ-9 suicidality item, indicating significant suicidality (as assessed by medical on-site professionals

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Patient Group
Participants randomised to the Placebo condition will be taking four microcrystalline cellulose powder placebo capsules daily for 60 days.
A microcrystalline cellulose-based capsule.
Experimental: Interventional/Treatment
Participants randomised to the Probiotic condition will be taking four multi-strain probiotic capsules daily for 60 days.
A commercially available probiotic known to support gut health and is generally well-tolerated.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Facial Expression Recognition Task (FERT)
Time Frame: End of the 60-day intervention
Accuracy, reaction time and misclassifications on the FERT compared between probiotic and placebo groups.
End of the 60-day intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Emotional Categorisation Task
Time Frame: End of the 60-day intervention
Accuracy and reaction time performance on emotional word categorization task compared between probiotic and placebo groups.
End of the 60-day intervention
Emotional word recall/recognition task
Time Frame: End of the 60-day intervention
Performance on emotional word recall (hits and false alarms) and recogntion (hits, false alarms and reaction time) compared between probiotic and placebo groups
End of the 60-day intervention
Digit Span Task
Time Frame: End of the 60-day intervention
Maximum span length compared between probiotic and placebo groups
End of the 60-day intervention
Emotional Go/No-Go (EGNG)
Time Frame: Post-intervention (end of 60-day intervention)
Cognitive control and inhibitory control assessed using the EGNG task, including commission errors, omission errors, and reaction time to emotionally valenced stimuli. Performance will be compared between probiotic and placebo groups at post-intervention.
Post-intervention (end of 60-day intervention)
Probabilistic Reversal Learning (PRL) Task
Time Frame: Post-intervention (end of 60-day intervention)
Cognitive flexibility and reward-based learning assessed using the PRL task, including measures such as response accuracy, reversal errors, and sensitivity to reward and punishment. Performance will be compared between probiotic and placebo groups at post-intervention.
Post-intervention (end of 60-day intervention)
N-back Task
Time Frame: Post-intervention (end of 60-day intervention)
Working memory performance assessed using the n-back task, including accuracy and reaction time across task conditions. Performance will be compared between probiotic and placebo groups at post-intervention.
Post-intervention (end of 60-day intervention)
Auditory Verbal Learning Test (AVLT)
Time Frame: Post-intervention (end of 60-day intervention)
Verbal learning and memory assessed using the AVLT, including measures of immediate recall, delayed recall, and recognition memory. Performance will be compared between probiotic and placebo groups at post-intervention.
Post-intervention (end of 60-day intervention)
Serum cortisol
Time Frame: Baseline and end of 60-day intervention
Serum cortisol concentration assessed using ELISA compared between the placebo and probiotic groups
Baseline and end of 60-day intervention
Inflammatory markers
Time Frame: Baseline and end of 60-day intervention
Inflammatory marker concentrations (CRP, IL-1b, TNF-alpha, IL-6) assessed using ELISA compared between placebo and probiotic groups
Baseline and end of 60-day intervention
Serum metabolites
Time Frame: Baseline and end of 60-day intervention
Serum metabolite profiles assessed using ELISA compared between placebo and probiotic groups
Baseline and end of 60-day intervention
Gut microbiome composition
Time Frame: Baseline and end of 60-day intervention
Gut microbiome composition assessed using stool samples, including measures of alpha diversity, beta diversity, and relative abundance of microbial taxa, compared between placebo and probiotic groups.
Baseline and end of 60-day intervention

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Subjective measures of affective state
Time Frame: Baseline, Day 14, Day 30, Day 44, Day 60
Questionnaire measures of affect (PANAS) compared between placebo and probiotic groups
Baseline, Day 14, Day 30, Day 44, Day 60
Subjective measures of mood
Time Frame: Baseline, Day 14, Day 30, Day 44, Day 60
Questionnaire measures of mood (PANAS) compared between placebo and probiotic groups
Baseline, Day 14, Day 30, Day 44, Day 60
Subjective measures of menopausal symptom severity
Time Frame: Baseline, Day 14, Day 30, Day 44, Day 60
Questionnaire measures of menopausal symptom severity (MRS) compared between placebo and probiotic groups
Baseline, Day 14, Day 30, Day 44, Day 60
Subjective measures of cognitive state
Time Frame: Baseline, Day 14, Day 30, Day 44, Day 60
Questionnaire measures of subjective cognitive difficulties (PDQ) compared between placebo and probiotic groups
Baseline, Day 14, Day 30, Day 44, Day 60
Subjective measures of anxiety
Time Frame: Baseline, Day 14, Day 30, Day 44, Day 60
Questionnaire measures of anxiety (GAD-7) compared between placebo and probiotic groups
Baseline, Day 14, Day 30, Day 44, Day 60
Subjective measures of anhedonia
Time Frame: Baseline, Day 14, Day 30, Day 44, Day 60
Questionnaire measures of anhedonia (SHAPS) compared between placebo and probiotic groups
Baseline, Day 14, Day 30, Day 44, Day 60

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Phil Burnet, Professor, University of Oxford

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 12, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 12, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 12, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

May 15, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 15, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 12, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Perimenopause

Clinical Trials on Placebo

Subscribe