A Study on the Effects of Breathing Exercises and Aerobic Exercise on the Health of Men in Drug Rehabilitation

May 11, 2026 updated by: Yongting Li, Southwest Medical University

A Study on the Effects of 8 Weeks of Resistance and Respiratory Training Combined With Aerobic Exercise on Physical Health and Quality of Life in Male Drug Rehabilitation Patients

This study aims to investigate the effects of an 8-week combined exercise program on male individuals in drug rehabilitation. The program integrates resistance-based breathing training with aerobic exercise. The investigators seek to determine whether this combined exercise program is more effective than a single form of exercise in improving participants' physical health and quality of life. The primary research questions to be addressed include: Does this combined exercise program produce better results than single-form training (resistance-based breathing training or aerobic exercise performed separately) in improving physiological indicators such as cardiopulmonary function and muscle strength in male individuals in drug rehabilitation? Does this combined exercise program yield greater benefits than single-form training in reducing anxiety and depression and improving quality of life among men in drug rehabilitation? This study will conduct a randomized controlled trial. Researchers will compare three different intervention groups-the combined training group, the resistance-breathing training group, and the aerobic exercise group-to verify the potential advantages of the combined program over single-form exercise. Participants will: Complete an 8-week exercise intervention, consisting of three sessions per week, each lasting approximately 40 minutes, under professional guidance and supervision. Undergo comprehensive assessments before and after the intervention, including cardiopulmonary function tests, body composition analysis, and questionnaires on mental health and quality of life.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

  1. Exploration and Standardization of a Combined Exercise Program Tailored for Drug Rehabilitation Facilities. This section forms the foundation of the study and aims to develop an 8-week combined exercise program that is safe, effective, and easy to implement, specifically tailored to the environment and characteristics of residents in compulsory isolation drug rehabilitation centers. The content not only covers specific methods for integrating resistance-based breathing exercises with aerobic exercises (such as sequence, frequency, intensity, and duration) but also focuses on designing standardized operating procedures. These include concise instructions for participants, demonstration videos, key safety monitoring points (such as using the Borg Subjective Fatigue Scale or heart rate monitoring), and contingency plans for addressing common issues. The goal is to produce a "ready-to-use" guidebook that lays a solid foundation for subsequent implementation.
  2. Empirical Validation and Comparison of the Combined Exercise Program's Efficacy. This section constitutes the core of the study, aiming to empirically validate the actual effectiveness of this combined program for male individuals in the drug rehabilitation phase through a randomized controlled trial. Effectiveness evaluation will be entirely centered on the application objectives. It will primarily include: ① Physical Health: Focusing on verifying its effectiveness in improving areas of weakness among drug rehabilitation participants, such as cardiopulmonary function, muscle strength, and body composition; ② Mental Health and Quality of Life: Focusing on its positive impact on core rehabilitation goals such as anxiety and depression, sleep quality, and drug craving. The investigators will employ a controlled design with a combined-training group and a single-training group to address a key practical question: Does this combined program produce a "1+1>2" synergistic effect compared with single-modality resistance-breathing training or aerobic exercise, thereby offering greater practical value?

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

90

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Luzhou, China, 646000
        • Recruiting
        • Yongtingli
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male, aged 18 to 50 years, able to understand and comply with the study protocol
  • Meets the DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for substance use disorder; in rehabilitation for ≥1 month; withdrawal symptoms are stable (confirmed by medical staff)
  • No severe cardiovascular/cerebrovascular disease, respiratory disease, musculoskeletal injury, or other contraindications to physical activity
  • Basic reading and writing ability to independently complete questionnaire assessments
  • Voluntarily signed informed consent and committed to complying with the 8-week training program

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of contraindications to exercise (e.g., recent fracture, severe arrhythmia, uncontrolled hypertension)
  • Concurrent severe mental disorders (e.g., schizophrenia, acute depressive episode) or currently receiving unstable psychiatric medication
  • Currently participating in other intervention studies or clinical trials
  • Expected training compliance rate <70% (e.g., unable to complete the 8-week intervention due to transfer or disciplinary action)
  • Unable to continue participation for personal reasons (e.g., early discharge, serious disciplinary violation)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Resistance Breathing Training Group
Use a resistance breathing trainer and follow a progressive resistance training regimen, starting with low resistance and gradually increasing the intensity based on individual tolerance.
Warm-up (5 minutes) → Threshold resistance breathing trainer (30 minutes) → Cool-down stretches (5 minutes).During joint training, each session lasts 15 minutes.
Other Names:
  • Three-Ball Breathing Trainer
  • Patent Number:2021212828371
Experimental: Aerobic Exercise Group
This session features moderate-intensity aerobic exercise, with intensity maintained at 60-70% of maximum heart rate, and includes a warm-up, main workout, and cool-down.
Warm-up (5 minutes) → Main exercise (30 minutes, at 65%-85% of maximum heart rate or a Borg RPE score of 12-14) → Cool-down and stretching (5 minutes).During joint training sessions, each training session lasts 15 minutes.
Other Names:
  • Audio
Experimental: Joint Training Group
After the warm-up, start with 15 minutes of resistance breathing exercises, followed by 15 minutes of aerobic exercise, and then five minutes of stretching.
Warm-up (5 minutes) → Threshold resistance breathing trainer (30 minutes) → Cool-down stretches (5 minutes).During joint training, each session lasts 15 minutes.
Other Names:
  • Three-Ball Breathing Trainer
  • Patent Number:2021212828371
Warm-up (5 minutes) → Main exercise (30 minutes, at 65%-85% of maximum heart rate or a Borg RPE score of 12-14) → Cool-down and stretching (5 minutes).During joint training sessions, each training session lasts 15 minutes.
Other Names:
  • Audio

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quality of Life Scale for Drug Addicts
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0), after the intervention (Week 9)
Minimum score: 41, Maximum score: 205.Higher scores indicate worse quality of life and more severe impairment in physical, psychological, social, and withdrawal-related symptoms.
Baseline (Week 0), after the intervention (Week 9)
6-Minute Walk Test
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0), after the intervention (Week 9)
The maximum distance a subject can cover in 6 minutes while walking at maximum speed along a 30-meter flat corridor. This test is used to assess cardiopulmonary function and exercise endurance during submaximal exercise.
Baseline (Week 0), after the intervention (Week 9)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
BMI
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0), after the intervention (Week 9)
Weight (kg) and height (m) will be combined and reported as BMI, expressed in kg/m²
Baseline (Week 0), after the intervention (Week 9)
Body Composition
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0), after the intervention (Week 9)
Data was measured and analyzed using bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) with a body composition analyzer (MC-780MA, TANITA), including: body fat mass, skeletal muscle mass, body water, visceral fat, and basal metabolic rate.
Baseline (Week 0), after the intervention (Week 9)
Symptom Checklist-90
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0), after the intervention (Week 9)
Symptom Checklist-90 (SCL-90); range 90-450; higher scores = worse mental health. Dimensions: somatization, obsessive-compulsive, interpersonal sensitivity, depression, anxiety, hostility, phobic anxiety, paranoid ideation, psychoticism, sleep and eating.
Baseline (Week 0), after the intervention (Week 9)
Vital Capacity
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0), after the intervention (Week 9)
A spirometer is used to measure the maximum volume of air a subject can exhale after taking a deep breath. This measurement is used to assess lung ventilation function. The unit of measurement is milliliters (mL).
Baseline (Week 0), after the intervention (Week 9)

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Blood pressure
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0), after the intervention (Week 9)
Unit: mmHg; Abnormal value = Poor cardiovascular health
Baseline (Week 0), after the intervention (Week 9)
Oxygen Saturation
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0), after the intervention (Week 9)
The percentage of peripheral blood oxygen saturation measured using a pulse oximeter at rest. Used to assess the body's oxygenation status and respiratory efficiency. Unit: %
Baseline (Week 0), after the intervention (Week 9)
Resting heart rate
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0), after the intervention (Week 9)
The unit is "beats per minute (bpm)"; measurements are taken using standard heart rate monitoring equipment while the subject is at rest, and are used to assess baseline cardiovascular function.
Baseline (Week 0), after the intervention (Week 9)
Peak expiratory flow
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0), after the intervention (Week 9)
The peak expiratory flow rate, measured in liters per minute using a spirometer during a forced exhalation, directly reflects airway patency and respiratory muscle strength; a higher value indicates better respiratory function.
Baseline (Week 0), after the intervention (Week 9)
Visual Analogue Scale for Drug Craving
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0), after the intervention (Week 9)
Visual Analogue Scale for Drug Craving (VAS)Minimum score: 0, Maximum score: 10.Higher scores indicate more severe drug craving.
Baseline (Week 0), after the intervention (Week 9)
Grip strength
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0), after the intervention (Week 9)
Grip strength (kg): The maximum grip force measured using a handheld dynamometer, used to assess upper body strength.
Baseline (Week 0), after the intervention (Week 9)
Back Scratch Test
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0), after the intervention (Week 9)
Shoulder joint range of motion and upper limb flexibility are assessed by measuring the distance between the middle fingers when the hands are placed as close together as possible behind the back. The unit is centimeters (cm); a negative value indicates that the fingers overlap, while a positive value indicates that they do not overlap.
Baseline (Week 0), after the intervention (Week 9)
Number of repetitions in the 30-second chair stand test
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0), after the intervention (Week 9)
The maximum number of times a person can stand up completely from a standard chair and sit back down within 30 seconds, used to assess lower limb function
Baseline (Week 0), after the intervention (Week 9)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 10, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 28, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 11, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

May 18, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 18, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 11, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Disorders, Substance Related

Clinical Trials on Resistance Breathing Training

Subscribe