Feasibility Study of a Digital Interactive Life-style Platform for Individuals After Rehabilitation (Feas Platf)

May 18, 2026 updated by: Matthias Wilhelm, MD

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the feasibility and usability of a digital lifestyle platform designed to support patients after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation. It will also assess patient engagement and the potential of the platform to support long-term self-management and healthy lifestyle behaviors in an outpatient setting.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

Is the platform feasible and acceptable for patients after rehabilitation? Do patients engage with and regularly use the platform over time? Can personalized digital recommendations support adherence to healthy behaviors and self-management?

Researchers will evaluate a telemedicine platform that delivers individualized suggestions, including lifestyle applications, educational content, and advice from healthcare professionals. The content is tailored to patient needs and continuously adapted based on patient feedback.

Participants will:

Use the digital platform after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation for a defined follow-up period Receive personalized recommendations through the platform Rate the usefulness of recommendations to enable continuous adaptation Attend study visits or remote assessments to evaluate usability, engagement, and outcomes Continue standard outpatient care alongside the intervention

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The number of patients in need of inpatient rehabilitation programs is constantly rising due to demographic changes, increasing prevalence of cardiovascular, respiratory, neurological, and musculoskeletal disorders, and multimorbidity. The patient journey typically starts with acute care (Phase I), followed by either in- or outpatient rehabilitation (Phase II), and then ambulatory long-term care in the community (Phase III). Phase II inpatient rehabilitation is usually of short duration, and outpatient rehabilitation is often difficult to access and time-consuming for healthcare professionals (HCPs). No structured health support exists in Phase III, and patients often fall off the "rehabilitation cliff," meaning that rehabilitation stops abruptly after discharge. As a result, patients often struggle in the long term to adhere to therapies, to self-manage their clinical condition, and to maintain healthy habits, ultimately leading to relapses. Patient support through the internet, mobile communication, and other online platforms-also known as telemedicine-has the potential to prevent disease progression and re-hospitalization by promoting healthy lifestyle behaviors. In addition, telemedicine interventions may reduce costs for the healthcare system compared to traditional care. Nevertheless, despite these potential benefits, their implementation in clinical practice remains challenging.

The stupy is embedded in the project "Co-creation and evaluation of a sensor-based closed-loop telecare programme for multimorbid patients after inpatient rehabilitation." funded by the SF-Board of the University of Bern, Switzerland. One of the main aims of COPAIN is to co-create and evaluate a telemedicine-based solution to enhance patients' health literacy, self-management skills, and monitoring of their health status in Phase III. To achieve this, a digital lifestyle platform was developed. The platform has two interfaces: one for healthcare professionals and one for patients. Healthcare professionals provide patients with personalized suggestions tailored to their individual health needs. These suggestions may include existing lifestyle applications, educational content such as videos or articles, and direct advice from healthcare professionals. The list of suggestions is regularly reviewed and updated to ensure suitability. After using a suggestion, patients are asked to rate it, allowing healthcare professionals to adapt future recommendations accordingly. At present, it is unknown how well this platform will be received by patients discharged from cardiopulmonary, neurological, or musculoskeletal rehabilitation.

The primary objective of the present project is to evaluate the feasibility of implementing the platform in the patient journey following discharge from Phase II inpatient rehabilitation. The secondary objective is to explore its overall effectiveness. To achieve these aims, 240 participants will be recruited prior to discharge and assigned either to the platform group or to a control group receiving standard care. The study will include participants across four clinical cohorts: acute coronary syndrome or ischemic heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, fragility fractures, and minor stroke, with 60 participants in each group. This project has the potential to support future research aimed at improving care for patient populations that currently receive limited support after rehabilitation.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

240

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Canton of Bern
      • Bern, Canton of Bern, Switzerland, 3010
    • Heiligenschwendi
      • Schwendi, Heiligenschwendi, Switzerland, 3625
        • Recruiting
        • Center for Rehabilitation & Sports Medicine, Berner Reha Zentrum
        • Contact:
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults (≥18 years)
  • 10 or less days before discharge from inpatient rehabilitation at the Bern Rehab Center in Heiligenschwendi or the Insel Hospital (both belonging to the Insel Group)
  • Belonging to one of the following clinical cohorts: acute coronary syndrome or ischemic heart failure; chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) - clinically diagnosed and confirmed by pulmonary specialist; fragility fracture - e.g., hip fracture or other low-energy fractures; minor stroke, clinically confirmed ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke with mild neurological deficits.
  • Able to provide informed consent.
  • Access to and ability to use a device that has internet access (e.g., tablet, smartphone, laptop, etc.).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Cognitive or psychiatric condition interfering with consent or use of the app.
  • Physical disability preventing digital device use without support.
  • Heavy language production or comprehension impairments.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Platform group
In the Platform group, participants will use a digital lifestyle platform for six months after discharge, accessible via personal devices (e.g., smartphone, tablet, laptop). Based on a baseline assessment at discharge, trained study personnel identify relevant impaired domains and select tailored recommendations from a predefined list, which are delivered via the platform. Content includes lifestyle applications, educational materials (e.g., videos, articles), and healthcare professional advice, provided in accessible visual formats. Participants can organize suggestions into daily or weekly plans. After each use, participants rate the recommendations, allowing iterative adaptation by the study team. All content is reviewed for quality and suitability. A chat function enables communication with study personnel. The platform is continuously refined based on user feedback.
Patients are going to use the Digital Lifestyle Platform for six months.
Active Comparator: Usual Care group
Patients follow their usual post-rehabilitation care program without the access to the platform.
Patients are going to follow their post-rehabilitation care plan without access to the platform

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Implementation measure - Feasibility
Time Frame: Collected once a month for the whole six months.
Feasibility refers to the extent to which the intervention can be successfully implemented in a given setting and will be measured using the Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM). Higher scores indicate greater perceived feasibility of the intervention. Minimum score = 4; Maximum score = 20.
Collected once a month for the whole six months.
Implementation measure - Acceptability
Time Frame: Collected once a month for the whole six months.
Acceptability reflects how satisfactory or agreeable the intervention is perceived by patients and will be assessed with the Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM). Higher scores indicate greater perceived acceptability of the intervention. Minimum score = 4; Maximum score = 20.
Collected once a month for the whole six months.
Implementation measure - Appropriateness
Time Frame: Collected once a month for the whole six months.
Appropriateness refers to the perceived fit, relevance, and compatibility of the intervention for patients' post-discharge context and will be measured using the Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM). Higher scores indicate greater perceived appropriateness of the intervention. Minimum score = 4; Maximum score = 20.
Collected once a month for the whole six months.
Implementation measure - Fidelity
Time Frame: Continuosly for the whole six months.
Fidelity refers to the extent to which the intervention is used as intended and will be assessed based on platform usage over time. Minimum and maximum scores = N/A.
Continuosly for the whole six months.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Global health-related quality of life
Time Frame: Collected at three time points namely (T0) at discharge, (T1) three months after discharge, and (T2) six months after discharge.
Measured with the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Global Health 10 (PROMIS-10). Higher scores indicate better global health / better health-related quality of life. The raw scores are converted to T-score. Thus, minimum and maximum scores vary.
Collected at three time points namely (T0) at discharge, (T1) three months after discharge, and (T2) six months after discharge.
Global functioning
Time Frame: Collected at three time points namely (T0) at discharge, (T1) three months after discharge, and (T2) six months after discharge.
Measured with a speech-based instrument. Specifically, the transcribed, de-identified speech recordings are analyzed by an existing Large Language Model (LLM) that recognizes which domain/s according to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) is/are impaired. The LLM is developed within the COPAIN project as well but outside of the present feasibility study.
Collected at three time points namely (T0) at discharge, (T1) three months after discharge, and (T2) six months after discharge.
Steps per day
Time Frame: Collected continuously for six months
Measured with a step counting device of patient's choice after a shared decision making (Fitbit wearable, Omron pedometer).
Collected continuously for six months
Users' perceived usability
Time Frame: PPSQ will be collected at (T1) three months after discharge and (T2) six months after discharge, respectively.
Only the patients randomized in the Platform group, will be asked to complete the Post Study System Usability Questionnaire (PSSUQ), The PSSUQ is a standardized questionnaire developed to assess users' perceived usability of a technological system, including system usefulness, information quality, and interface quality. Lower scores indicate better perceived usability and user satisfaction (i.e., less difficulty using the system). Minimum score = 16; Maximum score = 112.
PPSQ will be collected at (T1) three months after discharge and (T2) six months after discharge, respectively.
Users' acceptance of telehealth or digital health technologies
Time Frame: SUTAQ will be collected at (T1) three months after discharge and (T2) six months after discharge, respectively.
Only the patients randomized in the Platform group, will be asked to complete the Service User Technology Acceptability Questionnaire (SUTAQ). The SUTAQ evaluates users' acceptance of telehealth or digital health technologies, including perceived benefit, privacy concerns, accessibility, and satisfaction. Higher scores generally indicate greater acceptability of the technology. Minimum score = 22; Maximum score = 132.
SUTAQ will be collected at (T1) three months after discharge and (T2) six months after discharge, respectively.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Matthias Wilhelm, Prof. Dr. med., Center for Rehabilitation & Sports Medicine, Berner Reha Zentrum and Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern
  • Principal Investigator: Thimo Marcin, PhD, Center for Rehabilitation & Sports Medicine, Berner Reha Zentrum and Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

May 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

February 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

February 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 28, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 18, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

May 19, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 19, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 18, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acute Coronary Syndrome

Clinical Trials on Digital Lifestyle Platform

Subscribe