Assessment of the Type I IFN Response in the Nasal Cavity During Respiratory Viral Infections in a Geriatric Department (RESPIGERIA)

May 15, 2026 updated by: Hospices Civils de Lyon

The diagnosis of respiratory viral infections is usually based on testing for pathogens suspected of causing the infection using PCR tests that target the pathogens' DNA or RNA. A specific PCR test is required for each pathogen. In most cases, testing is carried out primarily for three specific viruses (SARS-CoV-2, respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), influenza virus) is carried out as a first-line test. However, numerous viruses can cause these infections (adenovirus, metapneumovirus, rhinovirus, parainfluenza virus, bocavirus, etc.). Consequently, performing a specific PCR test for every virus that could cause respiratory symptoms is not feasible, and viral infections are often under-diagnosed because the screening for viruses is not exhaustive.

To address this issue, analysing the host response to determine the microbial aetiology of an infection may represent an innovative alternative for the diagnosis of infections. A common feature of all viruses is their ability to induce type I interferons (IFN-I). Thus, measuring this IFN-I response could help direct the diagnosis of respiratory infections towards a viral origin.

Furthermore, the detection of a virus via PCR in a respiratory sample may indicate an active or recent infection, but may also be detected following an infection that occurred several weeks or months earlier. The viral load in the sample is an important factor in distinguishing between these two scenarios but does not always allow for a definitive conclusion (some patients may have low viral loads whilst still having an active infection). It is therefore sometimes difficult to distinguish, using a PCR test that detects the viral genome, between the virus currently replicating and traces of viral genetic material from dead viruses. It is therefore necessary to have markers that can be associated with an active/replicating infection to aid interpretation in the event of a positive PCR result.

Using nasopharyngeal swabs collected for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection, we were able to demonstrate that it is possible to measure the IFN-I response. These proteins, which possess antiviral properties, are secreted by immune cells during infection to limit viral replication.

Thus, the combination of simultaneous testing for the pathogen and the IFN response has made it possible to link the replicative nature of the SARS-CoV-2 virus with IFN-I production.

Our latest research into SARS-CoV-2 has thus led to the identification of a marker of the IFN-I response associated with active viral replication, which we have confirmed using viral culture techniques that detect only live/infectious virus.

However, the IFN-I response may be compromised in older and very old individuals, particularly due to certain comorbidities or treatments, the prevalence of which increases with age.

The aim of this study is to assess the IFN-I response in the context of respiratory infections caused by various viruses, in a population admitted to a geriatric ward and a population from the REFIPA protocol (NCT07239830), a study designed to establish reference values for nasal and blood interferon scores in uninfected elderly subjects.

There is a need to improve the diagnosis of viral infections, particularly in geriatric wards where the burden of viral infections is very significant for patients, carers and the organisation of care. Rapid diagnosis of viral infections would enable the optimisation of isolation measures and hygiene protocols within these wards. Furthermore, it is important to validate new markers that could aid in the interpretation of a positive PCR result for respiratory viruses. Some PCR tests can indeed remain positive for several weeks or even months due to the detection of traces of viral genetic material.

Thus, new markers indicating an active or recent infection could be useful in facilitating interpretation, alongside other clinical and/or virological findings.

The aim is, by combining different results, to improve the diagnosis of viral infections and to avoid over-diagnosing respiratory viral infections due to a positive PCR result that may in fact correspond to a past infection.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

1140

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Lyon, France, 69310
        • Recruiting
        • Hopital Lyon Sud

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

This study focuses on nasopharyngeal swabs taken as part of clinical care to screen for respiratory viruses in patients admitted to geriatric wards, or as part of the REFIPA protocol (NCT07239830) in older, asymptomatic, non-hospitalised participants. For hospitalised patients, first-line microbiological tests (RSV, SARS-CoV-2 and influenza) as well as viral culture are carried out as part of routine diagnostic testing. For participants in the REFIPA protocol (NCT07239830), samples were collected as part of this study.

Thus, all samples are collected as part of standard care in hospitalised patients in geriatric wards presenting with signs of respiratory distress, or as part of the REFIPA protocol in asymptomatic, non-hospitalised elderly participants.

The IFN-I score and the results of second-line tests will not be disclosed to the patient's doctor. They will therefore have no impact on the patient's treatment.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients admitted to a geriatric ward or participants diagnosed with a PCR-positive infection based on a swab sample taken as part of the REFIPA study (NCT07239830). Nasopharyngeal swab taken for viral detection, where the viral test was carried out as part of standard clinical care (minimum 500 µL required)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The patient's objection to the use of their data in this study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Respiratory viral infection geriatric patients

Nasopharyngeal swabs taken from patients admitted to geriatric wards with suspected respiratory viral infection will be selected by the Regional Biological Reference Centres (CRBs). As part of clinical care, the detection of a respiratory virus relies on a first-line diagnostic test. The IFN-I response can be analysed using these same samples, without the need for additional collection.

Furthermore, the ability of the IFN-I response to detect replicating viruses can be tested using viral culture results.

The IFN-I score will be determined from samples tested for the viruses targeted in the first-line testing (influenza, SARS-CoV-2 and RSV) or from samples tested as part of the REFIPA protocol (NCT07239830). A positive score is defined as a threshold > 2.47.

The diagnosis of respiratory viral infection will be established based on a positive result from at least one of the three first-line PCR tests for viruses performed on nasopharyngeal swabs, considered as reference tests or as part of the REFIPA study (NCT07239830).

Respiratory viral infection geriatric patients from REFIPA study (NCT07239830)
Participants who were withdrawn from the REFIPA study (NCT07239830) following a diagnosis of infection based on a positive PCR result from a swab taken as part of the study

The IFN-I score will be determined from samples tested for the viruses targeted in the first-line testing (influenza, SARS-CoV-2 and RSV) or from samples tested as part of the REFIPA protocol (NCT07239830). A positive score is defined as a threshold > 2.47.

The diagnosis of respiratory viral infection will be established based on a positive result from at least one of the three first-line PCR tests for viruses performed on nasopharyngeal swabs, considered as reference tests or as part of the REFIPA study (NCT07239830).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluate the diagnostic performance of the IFN-I score for detecting respiratory viral infection vs first-line tests (influenza, SARS-CoV-2, RSV) in geriatric patients or REFIPA (NCT07239830) participants withdrawn due to PCR-confirmed infection on study
Time Frame: One time

The IFN-I score will be determined from samples tested for the viruses targeted in the first-line testing (influenza, SARS-CoV-2 and RSV) or from samples tested as part of the REFIPA protocol (NCT07239830). A positive score is defined as a threshold > 2.47.

The diagnosis of respiratory viral infection will be established based on a positive result from at least one of the three first-line PCR tests for viruses performed on nasopharyngeal swabs, considered as reference tests or as part of the REFIPA study (NCT07239830).

One time

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 4, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 31, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 15, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 15, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

May 22, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 22, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 15, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Respiratory Viral Infection

Subscribe