Long-term Health and Economic Effects of an Individualized Lifestyle Intervention (LI-PAD-Extended) (LI-PAD-EXTENDE)

May 19, 2026 updated by: Vastra Gotaland Region

Long-term Follow-up of Individualized Lifestyle Intervention Focused on Physical Activity and Diet: Effects on Weight Loss, Dietary Habits, Cardiovascular Health, Motivation, Health-related Quality of Life, and Health Economics (LI-PAD-Extended)

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if an individualized lifestyle intervention works to improve weight, diet, physical activity, cardiovascular health, health-related quality of life, and cost-effectiveness in overweight and obese adults aged 45-65 years.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

Does the intervention lead to sustained weight loss after 18 months?

Does the intervention improve cardiovascular risk factors, metabolic markers, and health-related quality of life compared to general written advice?

Is the intervention cost-effective?

Researchers will compare the individualized lifestyle intervention to a control group that receives general written advice on physical activity and diet to see if the intervention provides greater long-term health and economic benefits.

Participants will:

Attend counseling sessions with a health promoter Take part in supervised aerobic and resistance training with a physiotherapist Use swimming facilities and participate in the Lifestyle School Access a digital health coach and the online Lifestyle Tool Complete measurements of body weight, diet, physical activity, and cardiovascular health markers (waist-to-hip ratio, blood pressure, blood lipids, fasting glucose, HbA1c, CRP, and liver enzymes) Complete assessments of resting energy expenditure, aerobic fitness, muscle strength, motivation, and health-related quality of life Provide blood samples at baseline, 6 months, and 18 months for dietary biomarker analysis Contribute data for health economic evaluation to assess cost-effectiveness

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Background Overweight and obese adults, especially those with type 2 diabetes, have increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Lifestyle interventions with physical activity (PA) and diet improve CVD risk factors, but long-term behavior change is challenging. Individualized approaches are recommended, yet rarely implemented for both PA and diet in clinical practice.

Objectives

The study evaluates whether an individualized precision health intervention:

Produces greater weight loss at 6 months (short-term) and 18 months (long-term)

Improves cardiovascular risk factors, metabolic markers, diet, PA behaviors, fitness, and psychosocial outcomes

Is feasible and cost-effective compared to standard lifestyle advice

Study Design

Randomized controlled trial with two arms:

Intervention group: Individualized precision health program

Control group: Standard lifestyle advice

Total participants: 120 (60 per group), aged 45-65 years, BMI 28-34

Exclusion: known coronary artery disease, inability to participate in lifestyle interventions, or language barriers

Intervention (LI-PAD Precision Health):

Step 1: Individual Adaptation

Adjust recommendations for medical conditions, comorbidities, medications, psychosocial factors, preferences, readiness to change, and barriers/facilitators

Step 2: Individualized Advice

PA prescription based on accelerometry, VO₂max, and muscle strength

Dietary guidance based on food intake diaries and measured resting energy expenditure (REE)

Step 3: Support for Goal Achievement

Education and skill training

Behavioral support: health promoters, group sessions, face-to-face and online coaching, apps for diet and PA, nudging

Control Group:

Standard lifestyle advice: healthy diet, ≥300 min/week moderate-intensity aerobic PA, 2 sessions/week strength training

Outcome Measures:

Primary Outcome:

Change in body weight from baseline to 6 months and 18 months

Secondary Outcomes:

BMI, waist and hip circumference

Blood pressure

Blood markers: cardiometabolic (lipids, HbA1c, cholesterol, HDL, LDL; ASAT, ALAT, ALP, GGT, hs-CRP) and dietary intake biomarkers

Cardiorespiratory fitness and muscle strength

Behavioral measures: PA (accelerometry, SGPALS), diet (MiniMeal-Q, REE)

Psychosocial outcomes: health-related quality of life (EQ5D-3L, RAND-36), motivation, self-efficacy

Cost-effectiveness analysis based on BMI and secondary outcomes

Additional Outcomes (Intervention Group):

Feasibility: attendance, compliance, participant evaluation

Barriers and facilitators to behavioral change

GPS tracking of PA and dietary behavior

Assessments:

Baseline, 6-month, and 18-month follow-ups

Anthropometry, REE, blood pressure, blood markers, fitness tests, accelerometry, questionnaires, and dietary logs

Statistical Analysis:

Multilevel mixed models for repeated measures

Linear and logistic regression for continuous and categorical variables

Structural equation modeling and partial least squares regression to explore relationships between intervention components and outcomes

Collaborators:

Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Östra: health promoters, physiotherapists, biomedical analysts

University of Gothenburg: Food and Nutrition, Sport Science, metabolomics, health economics

National and international collaborators with expertise in PA, diet, and cardiovascular health

Summary:

LI-PAD-Extended is an 18-month follow-up evaluating individualized precision health interventions. The study combines objective PA and dietary assessments with behavioral support and cost-effectiveness evaluation. This long-term follow-up allows assessment of sustained effects of precision lifestyle interventions on weight, cardiovascular risk, fitness, psychosocial outcomes, and economic efficiency.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

103

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Västra Götaland County
      • Gothenburg, Västra Götaland County, Sweden, 416 85
        • Recruiting
        • Centre for Lifestyle Intervention
        • Contact:
          • Carina U Persson, study coordinator, research leader, Associate Professor
          • Phone Number: +46 706 14 25 60
          • Email: carina.persson@vgregion.se

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults aged 45-65 years at baseline of the original LI-PAD study
  • Body mass index (BMI) ≥28 and ≤34
  • Completed the original LI-PAD study
  • Able and willing to attend follow-up assessments and provide necessary data
  • Able and willing to provide informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known coronary artery disease (clinical symptoms or earlier event)
  • Inability to understand the language used in the study
  • Inability to complete follow-up assessments at 18 months
  • Severe illness or medical condition that, in the investigator's opinion, precludes participation in follow-up assessments

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Standard of care
The control group will receive (be offered) usual care defined as written lifestyle advices based on the general recommendations for diet (Nordic Nutrition Recommendations, 2012. Integrating nutrition and physical activity. Copenhagen: Nordic Council of Ministers, 2014) and PA (World Health Organization. World Health Organization guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behavior, 2020), including a healthy and varied diet, aiming at 300 mins/week of medium intensity aerobic PA and strength training two times per week.
Experimental: Individualized Lifestyle Program
The intervention group will receive (offered) an optimal prescription of physical activity and diet based on medical (comorbidities, risk profile, medications, symptoms) and psycho-social (preferences for physical activities and diet, barriers-facilitators, social support, readiness to change, accelerometry and predicted VO2-max data (Ekblom Bak ergometer test), resting energy expenditure and knowledge and skills (lifestyle education school for achieving knowledge and skills in handling change in diet and physical activity in daily life) and support (health promotors, behavioral change app, food diary app, face-to-face, phone/online coaching, physical activity (aerobic training, strength training) in group and nudging.
Precision health

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Body Weight Change
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months, 18 months
Change from baseline in body weight measured using calibrated scales and standardized protocols.
Baseline, 6 months, 18 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Body Mass Index (BMI)
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months, 18 months.
Change from baseline in body mass index (BMI) measured using standard protocols.
Baseline, 6 months, 18 months.
Change in Systolic Blood Pressure
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months, 18 months
Change from baseline in systolic blood pressure measured using standardized sphygmomanometer protocols.
Baseline, 6 months, 18 months
Change in Waist Circumference
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months, 18 months
Change from baseline in waist circumference (cm) measured using standard protocols.
Baseline, 6 months, 18 months
Change in Hip Circumference
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months, 18 months
Change from baseline in hip circumference measured using standard protocols.
Baseline, 6 months, 18 months
Change in Total Cholesterol
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months, 18 months
Change from baseline in total cholesterol.
Baseline, 6 months, 18 months
Change in HDL Cholesterol
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months, 18 months
Change from baseline in high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol.
Baseline, 6 months, 18 months
Change in LDL Cholesterol
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months, 18 months
Change from baseline in low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol.
Baseline, 6 months, 18 months
Change in Triglycerides
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months, 18 months
Change from baseline in triglycerides
Baseline, 6 months, 18 months
Change in HbA1c
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months, 18 months
Change from baseline in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c)
Baseline, 6 months, 18 months
Change in Aspartate Aminotransferase (ASAT)
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months, 18 months
Change from baseline in aspartate aminotransferase (ASAT)
Baseline, 6 months, 18 months
Change in Alanine Aminotransferase (ALAT)
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months, 18 months
Change from baseline in alanine aminotransferase (ALAT).
Baseline, 6 months, 18 months
Change in High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (hs-CRP)
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months, 18 months
Change from baseline in high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP).
Baseline, 6 months, 18 months
Change in Dietary Biomarkers (Metabolomics)
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months, 18 months
Change from baseline in dietary biomarkers assessed using metabolomics. Biomarkers reflect intake of selected food groups (e.g., whole grains, dairy products, legumes, and sugars) and are quantified using validated analytical methods and expressed as relative concentrations or standardized scores.
Baseline, 6 months, 18 months
Change in Cardiorespiratory Fitness (VO₂max)
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months, 18 months
Change from baseline in cardiorespiratory fitness (VO₂max) (mL/kg/min) assessed using the Ekblom-Bak cycle test.
Baseline, 6 months, 18 months
Change in Muscle Strength (Handgrip Strength)
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months, 18 months
Change from baseline in muscle strength (kg) assessed by handgrip strength using a Jamar hand dynamometer.
Baseline, 6 months, 18 months
Change in Mean Daily Physical Activity Counts as Assessed by Accelerometry
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months, 18 months
Change from baseline in physical activity assessed using accelerometry, summarized as mean daily activity counts at 6 and 18 months.
Baseline, 6 months, 18 months
Change in Self-Reported Physical Activity (Saltin-Grimby Physical Activity Level Scale, SGPALS)
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months, 18 months
Change from baseline in physical activity assessed using the Saltin-Grimby Physical Activity Level Scale (SGPALS).
Baseline, 6 months, 18 months
Change in Resting Energy Expenditure (REE)
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months, 18 months
Change from baseline in resting energy expenditure (REE) (kcal/day).
Baseline, 6 months, 18 months
Change in Dietary Intake (MiniMeal-Q questionnaire)
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months, 18 months
Change from baseline in dietary intake assessed using the MiniMeal-Q questionnaire.
Baseline, 6 months, 18 months
Change in Health-Related Quality of Life (EQ-5D-3L)
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months, 18 months
Change from baseline in health-related quality of life assessed using the EQ-5D-3L index.
Baseline, 6 months, 18 months
Motivation for Lifestyle Change
Time Frame: 18 months
Motivation assessed at 18 months using a standardized questionnaire. The assessment reflects the preceding 12 months (i.e., the period between the 6-month and 18-month follow-up).
18 months
Perceived Self-Efficacy
Time Frame: 18 months
Self-efficacy assessed at 18 months using a standardized questionnaire. The assessment reflects the preceding 12 months (i.e., the period between the 6-month and 18-month follow-up).
18 months
Cost-Effectiveness (Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio, ICER)
Time Frame: 18 months
Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) comparing individualized lifestyle intervention to standard advice, expressed as cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained.
18 months
Motivation for Maintaining Lifestyle Change
Time Frame: 18 months
Motivation for maintaining lifestyle change, assessed at 18 months using a single-item question rated on a scale from 0 (not at all important) to 10 (extremely important). Higher scores indicate greater motivation. The assessment reflects the preceding 12 months (i.e., the period between the 6-month and 18-month follow-up).
18 months
Perceived Autonomous Motivation for Weight Management
Time Frame: 18 months
Autonomous motivation for weight management, assessed at 18 months using a study-specific multi-item questionnaire. Items reflecting intrinsic motivation are rated on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = not at all true to 5 = completely true) and aggregated into a mean score. Higher scores indicate greater autonomous motivation. The assessment reflects the preceding 12 months (i.e., the period between the 6-month and 18-month follow-up).
18 months
Perceived Controlled Motivation for Weight Management
Time Frame: 18 months
Controlled motivation for weight management, assessed at 18 months using a study-specific multi-item questionnaire. Items reflecting external and introjected regulation are rated on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = not at all true to 5 = completely true) and aggregated into a mean score. Higher scores indicate greater controlled motivation. The assessment reflects the preceding 12 months (i.e., the period between the 6-month and 18-month follow-up).
18 months
Perceived Importance of Individualization in Lifestyle Intervention
Time Frame: 18 months
Participant-reported perceived importance of individualized components of the lifestyle intervention for maintaining weight stability or weight loss, assessed at 18 months using a study-specific single-item question rated on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = not at all to 5 = completely). Higher scores indicate greater perceived importance. The assessment reflects the preceding 12 months (i.e., the period between the 6-month and 18-month follow-up).
18 months
Perceived Appropriateness of Study Duration
Time Frame: 18 months
Participant-reported perception of study duration in relation to achieving sustainable lifestyle change, assessed at 18 months using a single-item categorical question with response options: "too short," "somewhat short," "appropriate," "somewhat long," and "too long." The assessment reflects the preceding 12 months (i.e., the period between the 6-month and 18-month follow-up).
18 months
Perceived Importance of Lifestyle Intervention Components
Time Frame: 18 months
Participant-reported perceived importance of different components of the lifestyle intervention (e.g., counseling sessions, mobile application, gym access, supervised exercise, and educational sessions) for maintaining weight stability or weight loss. Each component is rated on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = not at all to 5 = completely). Items are aggregated into a mean score based on available responses. Higher scores indicate greater perceived importance of the intervention components. Participants who did not engage in a specific component are excluded from that item in the score calculation.
18 months
Perceived Psychological Capabilities for Lifestyle Change
Time Frame: 18 months
Psychological capabilities for lifestyle change, assessed at 18 months using a study-specific multi-item questionnaire. Items related to self-efficacy, stress management, behavioral awareness, and ability to initiate and maintain behavior change are rated on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = not at all to 5 = completely) and aggregated into a mean score. Higher scores indicate greater perceived capability for lifestyle change. The assessment reflects the preceding 12 months (i.e., the period between the 6-month and 18-month follow-up).
18 months
Importance of Behavioral Strategies for Weight Management
Time Frame: 18 months
Participant-reported importance of behavioral strategies for weight management, assessed at 18 months using a study-specific multi-item questionnaire. Items related to dietary awareness, meal planning, portion control, weight monitoring, and self-monitoring behaviors are rated on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = not at all important to 5 = very important) and aggregated into a mean score. Higher scores indicate greater perceived importance of behavioral strategies. The assessment reflects the preceding 12 months (i.e., the period between the 6-month and 18-month follow-up).
18 months
Perceived Positive Social Support for Weight Management
Time Frame: 18 months
Perceived positive social support for weight management, assessed at 18 months using a study-specific multi-item questionnaire. Items related to emotional and practical support from close contacts and external support services are rated on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = not at all to 5 = completely) and aggregated into a mean score. Higher scores indicate greater perceived positive social support. The assessment reflects the preceding 12 months (i.e., the period between the 6-month and 18-month follow-up).
18 months
Perceived Negative Social Influence on Weight Management
Time Frame: 18 months
Perceived negative social influence on weight management, assessed at 18 months using a study-specific multi-item questionnaire. Items related to negative comments and social norms are rated on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = not at all to 5 = completely) and aggregated into a mean score. Higher scores indicate greater negative social influence. The assessment reflects the preceding 12 months (i.e., the period between the 6-month and 18-month follow-up).
18 months
Perceived Environmental Support for Healthy Lifestyle
Time Frame: 18 months
Perceived environmental support for maintaining a healthy lifestyle, assessed at 18 months using a study-specific multi-item questionnaire. Items related to home environment, workplace environment, and commuting environment in relation to physical activity and healthy eating are rated on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = not at all to 5 = completely) and aggregated into a mean score. Higher scores indicate greater perceived environmental support for healthy lifestyle behaviors. The assessment reflects the preceding 12 months (i.e., the period between the 6-month and 18-month follow-up).
18 months
Perceived Financial Support for Healthy Lifestyle
Time Frame: 18 months
Perceived financial support for maintaining a healthy lifestyle, assessed at 18 months using a study-specific multi-item questionnaire. Items related to financial ability to engage in physical activity and maintain a healthy diet are rated on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = not at all to 5 = completely) and aggregated into a mean score. Higher scores indicate greater perceived financial support for healthy lifestyle behaviors. The assessment reflects the preceding 12 months (i.e., the period between the 6-month and 18-month follow-up).
18 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Mats Börjesson, Professor, University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 11, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 16, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 19, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

May 22, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 22, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 19, 2026

Last Verified

February 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Individual participant data will not be shared publicly. Data from LI-PAD-Extended will be used solely for analysis by the study team.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Obesity

Clinical Trials on Individualized physical activity and diet

Subscribe