- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07607457
Development and Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Patient Gowns for Patients Undergoing Abdominal Surgery
Traditional hospital gowns fail to protect patient privacy due to their design features, restrict freedom of movement and are incompatible with medical equipment. This situation negatively affects both patient satisfaction and the quality of care. The limited number of studies addressing this issue in the literature highlights the unique value of the topic. This project will be conducted with a randomized controlled design to develop a functional and ergonomic hospital gown suitable for clinical requirements for patients undergoing abdominal surgery and to evaluate its effectiveness. During the design process, priority will be given to privacy, ease of mobilization and integration with medical devices.
The study first plans to produce a prototype of a cotton fabric apron. Technical modeling will be conducted in collaboration with the Department of Textile and Fashion Design at Bahçeşehir University; the prototype will then be evaluated for clinical suitability. In the second phase, an experimental study will be conducted at Medicana Hospital in Ataşehir, Istanbul, to assess the apron's effectiveness. The sample size was determined using power analysis to include 86 patients in each of the control and intervention groups, for a total of 172 patients, and 14 healthcare professionals will participate in the study. Patient and healthcare professional identification forms, along with patient apron evaluation questionnaires, will be used as data collection tools.
The study consists of five main work packages: (1) obtaining the necessary permits and registering the research, (2) selecting materials and determining fabric properties, (3) technical modeling and design work, (4) patient trials, and (5) data analysis. Interdisciplinary collaboration will be maintained throughout the process, and the final model will be developed through iterative prototyping and pilot trials.
The widespread impact of the project is expected to increase the quality of clinical care by enhancing the comfort and safety of surgical patients, facilitating the workflow of healthcare professionals and promoting sustainable textile usage. In addition, the commercialization of the developed product has the potential to make an economic contribution to the domestic textile sector.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The use of a hospital gown begins with the patient's admission to the hospital and continues until discharge. The traditional hospital gowns used today were designed in the early 1900s. These gowns feature a design that ties at the back and has no opening at the front. Although there have been many innovations and changes in patient care over the years, patient gowns have remained one of the few elements that have remained unchanged in the treatment and care process. Since patient gowns are provided by the hospital, it is common for them not to be tailored to the patient and to fail to meet individual needs.
The negative effects of current hospital gowns are addressed in the literature from various perspectives. The first of these is a loss of control and emotional distress. It has been reported that wearing a hospital gown creates a distinct sense of loss of control in patients, increases stress levels, and reinforces feelings of exclusion.
Another significant area of concern is violations of privacy and dignity. Because the design of the traditional hospital gown does not adequately protect privacy, it leads to feelings of shame and a sense of being exposed and vulnerable among patients.
Physical discomfort and restricted mobility are also among the frequently criticized aspects of current gowns. The literature indicates that the lacing systems of gowns are difficult to use, do not fit the body properly, and restrict patients' movements. Additionally, the need for assistance when putting on or taking off a gown makes patients dependent on family members or healthcare professionals. It is noted that these functional limitations lead to more serious problems, particularly in elderly, obese, or mobility-impaired individuals.
All these factors lead to dissatisfaction among both patients and healthcare workers. Studies indicate that current patient gowns are not only impractical but also undermine patient identity and self-confidence, which negatively impacts the care process. For example, following surgical treatment, patients are advised to spend at least two hours out of bed on the day of surgery and six hours on subsequent days. However, the open back of the traditional patient gown prevents patients from safely leaving their room and walking around.
In light of these findings, the need for innovative and patient-centered design in healthcare has become inevitable. The literature emphasizes that alternative scrubs models to be developed must not only enhance patients' psychological and physical comfort but also meet healthcare professionals' needs for functionality and ease of use.
In this context, the development of new patient gown designs that protect privacy, fit the body well, and facilitate functional, patient-centered care is among the top priorities of modern healthcare. The aim of this study is to develop a new gown tailored to the needs of patients undergoing abdominal surgery and to evaluate the effectiveness of the developed patient gown. This study is unique due to the limited number of studies on this topic in the literature.
In this context, the following hypotheses have been constructed. H1: The developed patient gown increases the patient's physical comfort. H2: The developed patient gown increases the patient's independence. H3: The developed patient gown ensures the patient's privacy. H4: The developed patient gown facilitates easy access to medical equipment on the patient's body.
H5: The developed patient gown ensures the patient's safety. H6: The developed patient gown reduces the workload of healthcare professionals.
H7: The developed patient gown facilitates treatment and care processes for healthcare professionals.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Melis M CETINKAYA
- Phone Number: +905354159839
- Email: melis.cetinkaya@fbu.edu.tr
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Patient Inclusion Criteria for the Study:
- Be 18 years of age or older
- Have undergone major abdominal surgery performed on an elective basis in a general surgery clinic (e.g., colorectal surgery, gastric surgery, hepatobiliary surgery, etc.)
- Currently receiving care and treatment with medical devices (e.g., drains, Foley catheters, etc.)
- Willing to participate in the study
Patient Inclusion Criteria for the Study:
- The participant refuses to wear a hospital gown
- The participant has an allergy to the specified fabric Patients who are unable to mobilize for any reason (paralysis, general health impairment, history of stroke, etc.)
- Patients with difficulty speaking and understanding Turkish
- Patients lacking cognitive competence
- Patients who develop complications within the first 24 hours after surgery and require revision surgery
- Patients with prolonged intensive care unit (ICU) stays during the postoperative period
- Since both the standard-sized traditional patient gown and the newly developed patient gown (available in sizes M-L) will be used in the study, patients whose body measurements do not fit within this size range will not be included in the study. This approach was adopted to prevent differences in comfort, mobility, and safety resulting from size mismatch from influencing the results, to ensure standardization in measurements, and to maintain comparability between the intervention and control groups.
Inclusion Criteria for Healthcare Professionals in the Study:
- Providing care to patients who have undergone abdominal surgery
- Having worked in the field for more than one year
- Volunteering to participate in the study
Exclusion Criteria for Healthcare Professionals in the Study:
• Being on leave or on sick leave during the study period.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
No Intervention: Control Group
Patients in the control group will be dressed in a traditional hospital gown.
|
|
|
Experimental: Experimental Group
Patients in this group will use the redesigned 100% cotton patient gown developed for abdominal surgery patients.
|
As part of the study, patients wearing the enhanced surgical gown will continue to wear the designated gown for at least 24 hours after achieving postoperative clinical stability (i.e., hemodynamically stable, awake, and able to move).
The assessment will be conducted on the first postoperative day, within 24-48 hours after surgery.
Following the completion of the enrollment period, data collection instruments will be administered to the patients.
The opinions of healthcare professionals involved in the care and treatment of the enrolled patients (surgeons and surgical nurses) regarding the patient gown will be collected using the Patient Gown Evaluation Questionnaire for Healthcare Professionals.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
The ease of putting on and taking off the patient gown
Time Frame: Postoperative day 1 (24-48 hours after surgery)
|
Patients' ability to wear and remove the patient gown independently will be evaluated using a 10-point Visual Analog Scale (VAS), where 0 indicates "not satisfied at all" and 10 indicates "very satisfied."
|
Postoperative day 1 (24-48 hours after surgery)
|
|
Comfort During Mobilization With the Patient Gown
Time Frame: Postoperative day 1 (24-48 hours after surgery)
|
Patients' comfort while performing movements such as getting out of bed and walking while wearing the patient gown will be assessed using a 10-point Visual Analog Scale (VAS).
|
Postoperative day 1 (24-48 hours after surgery)
|
|
Perceived Workload During Patient Care While Using the Patient Gown
Time Frame: Postoperative day 1 (24-48 hours after surgery)
|
Healthcare professionals' perceptions regarding whether the patient gown increased workload during patient care procedures will be evaluated using a 10-point Visual Analog Scale (VAS), where 0 indicates "not satisfied at all" and 10 indicates "very satisfied."
|
Postoperative day 1 (24-48 hours after surgery)
|
|
Accessibility During Emergency Interventions While Using the Patient Gown
Time Frame: Postoperative day 1 (24-48 hours after surgery)
|
Healthcare professionals' perceptions regarding whether the patient gown interfered with emergency interventions and rapid access during urgent clinical situations will be evaluated using a 10-point Visual Analog Scale (VAS), where 0 indicates "not satisfied at all" and 10 indicates "very satisfied."
|
Postoperative day 1 (24-48 hours after surgery)
|
|
Suitability of the Patient Gown for Clinical Use
Time Frame: Postoperative day 1 (24-48 hours after surgery)
|
Healthcare professionals' perceptions regarding the suitability of the patient gown for routine clinical use in surgical patient care will be evaluated using a 10-point Visual Analog Scale (VAS), where 0 indicates "not satisfied at all" and 10 indicates "very satisfied."
|
Postoperative day 1 (24-48 hours after surgery)
|
|
Perceived Privacy Protection Provided by the Patient Gown
Time Frame: Postoperative day 1 (24-48 hours after surgery)
|
Patients' perception regarding the adequacy of privacy protection provided by the patient gown will be evaluated using a 10-point Visual Analog Scale (VAS), ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates "not satisfied at all" and 10 indicates "very satisfied."
Higher scores indicate better perceived privacy protection.
|
Postoperative day 1 (24-48 hours after surgery)
|
|
Ease of Access to Medical Devices and Dressing Areas
Time Frame: Postoperative day 1 (24-48 hours after surgery)
|
The extent to which the patient gown facilitates access to drains, catheters, and dressing areas during clinical care will be assessed using a 10-point Visual Analog Scale (VAS), ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates "not satisfied at all" and 10 indicates "very satisfied."
Higher scores indicate better accessibility during clinical care.
|
Postoperative day 1 (24-48 hours after surgery)
|
|
Overall Comfort While Wearing the Patient Gown
Time Frame: Postoperative day 1 (24-48 hours after surgery)
|
Patients' overall comfort while wearing the patient gown will be evaluated using a 10-point Visual Analog Scale (VAS), ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates "not comfortable at all" and 10 indicates "extremely comfortable."
Higher scores indicate greater patient comfort.
|
Postoperative day 1 (24-48 hours after surgery)
|
|
The sense of security felt when wearing a patient gown
Time Frame: Postoperative day 1 (24-48 hours after surgery)
|
Patients' sense of safety while using the patient gown will be assessed using a 10-point Visual Analog Scale (VAS), ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates "not safe at all" and 10 indicates "completely safe."
Higher scores indicate a greater sense of safety while using the patient gown.
|
Postoperative day 1 (24-48 hours after surgery)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Ease of Clinical Assessment While Using the Patient Gown
Time Frame: Postoperative day 1 (24-48 hours after surgery)
|
Healthcare professionals' perceptions regarding the ease of performing clinical assessments, such as vital sign monitoring and physical examination, while patients were wearing the patient gown will be evaluated using a 10-point Visual Analog Scale (VAS), where 0 indicates "not satisfied at all" and 10 indicates "very satisfied."
|
Postoperative day 1 (24-48 hours after surgery)
|
|
Perceived Body Fit of the Patient Gown
Time Frame: Postoperative day 1 (24-48 hours after surgery)
|
Patients' perception regarding the compatibility of the patient gown with their body structure, including height, weight, and body shape, will be assessed using a 10-point Visual Analog Scale (VAS), ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates "not compatible at all" and 10 indicates "completely compatible."
Higher scores indicate better compatibility of the patient gown with the patient's body structure.
|
Postoperative day 1 (24-48 hours after surgery)
|
|
The skin compatibility of the patient gown
Time Frame: Postoperative day 1 (24-48 hours after surgery)
|
Patients' perception regarding skin irritation associated with the patient gown will be evaluated using a 10-point Visual Analog Scale (VAS), ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates "severe skin irritation" and 10 indicates "no skin irritation."
Higher scores indicate better skin compatibility and lower levels of skin irritation associated with the patient gown.
|
Postoperative day 1 (24-48 hours after surgery)
|
|
Comfort of the Gown Fastening System
Time Frame: Postoperative day 1 (24-48 hours after surgery)
|
Patients' comfort related to the fastening and tying structure of the patient gown will be assessed using a 10-point Visual Analog Scale (VAS), ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates "not comfortable at all" and 10 indicates "extremely comfortable."
Higher scores indicate greater comfort related to the fastening and tying structure of the patient gown.
|
Postoperative day 1 (24-48 hours after surgery)
|
|
Thermal Comfort Provided by the Patient Gown
Time Frame: Postoperative day 1 (24-48 hours after surgery)
|
Patients' perception of thermal comfort, including the absence of excessive sweating or feeling cold while using the patient gown, will be evaluated using a 10-point Visual Analog Scale (VAS), ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates "not comfortable at all" and 10 indicates "extremely comfortable."
Higher scores indicate greater thermal comfort while using the patient gown.
|
Postoperative day 1 (24-48 hours after surgery)
|
|
Satisfaction With the Appearance of the Patient Gown
Time Frame: Postoperative day 1 (24-48 hours after surgery)
|
Patients' satisfaction with the appearance of the patient gown, including its color, model, and design features, will be assessed using a 10-point Visual Analog Scale (VAS), ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates "not satisfied at all" and 10 indicates "very satisfied."
Higher scores indicate greater satisfaction with the appearance of the patient gown.
|
Postoperative day 1 (24-48 hours after surgery)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Tazreean R, Nelson G, Twomey R. Early mobilization in enhanced recovery after surgery pathways: current evidence and recent advancements. J Comp Eff Res. 2022 Feb;11(2):121-129. doi: 10.2217/cer-2021-0258. Epub 2022 Jan 20.
- Edgman-Levitan S, Schoenbaum SC. Patient-centered care: achieving higher quality by designing care through the patient's eyes. Isr J Health Policy Res. 2021 Mar 5;10(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s13584-021-00459-9.
- Morton L, Cogan N, Kornfalt S, Porter Z, Georgiadis E. Baring all: The impact of the hospital gown on patient well-being. Br J Health Psychol. 2020 Sep;25(3):452-473. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12416. Epub 2020 Apr 20.
- Syed S, Stilwell P, Chevrier J, Adair C, Markle G, Rockwood K. Comprehensive design considerations for a new hospital gown: a patient-oriented qualitative study. CMAJ Open. 2022 Dec 20;10(4):E1079-E1087. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20210271. Print 2022 Oct-Dec.
- Frankel R, Peyser A, Farner K, Rabin JM. Healing by Leaps and Gowns: A Novel Patient Gowning System to the Rescue. J Patient Exp. 2021 Jul 21;8:23743735211033152. doi: 10.1177/23743735211033152. eCollection 2021.
- Wang, L., Luu, S., Li, R., Song, G. 2022. "Thermal Comfort Evaluation of Medical Gowns Using Sweating Thermal Manikin", International Textile and Apparel Association Annual Conference Proceedings, 78(1). https://doi.org/10.31274/itaa.13497
- Xu Q, Wang X, Zhang Y. Green and sustainable fabrication of a durable superhydrophobic cotton fabric with self-cleaning properties. Int J Biol Macromol. 2023 Jul 1;242(Pt 1):124731. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.124731. Epub 2023 May 5.
- Zhao, Y., Zhou, F., Zhao, Y., Zou, Y., Wei, X. 2024. "Development of an Emotional Response Model for Hospital Gown Design Using Structural Equation Modeling", AUTEX Research Journal, 24(1), 20230010. https://doi.org/10.1515/aut-2023-0010
- Oyediran, O. O., Animasahun, T. R., Fawole, I. O., Solanke, B. L., Suleiman, A. A. 2024. "Prevalence and Clinical Outcomes of Abdominal Surgeries in a South Western Nigerian University Teaching Hospital Between March 2017-October 2021", Tropical Journal of Health Sciences, 31(4), 31-37. https://doi.org/10.4314/tjhc.v31i4.5
- Hwang, C., McCoy, L., Shaw, M. 2020. "Redesigning Maternity Hospital Gowns", Fashion Practice, 14, 79-98. https://doi.org/10.1080/17569370.2020.1794317
- Gün, A. D., Bodur, A. 2014. "Kumaşların Su Buharı Geçirgenliği", Electronic Journal of Vehicle Technologies / Taşıt Teknolojileri Elektronik Dergisi, 8(3).
- Chen H, Dong P, Zhong P. The effect of a new design of patient gowns for prone position patients after vitrectomy: A non-randomized, concurrent, controlled study. Technol Health Care. 2024;32(1):55-62. doi: 10.3233/THC-220455.
- Midha, V. K., Joshi, S., & Dakuri, A. (2022). Surgical gown fabrics in infection control and comfort measures at hospitals. Indian Journal of Fibre & Textile Research (IJFTR), 47(1), 96-104.
- Lucas, C., & Dellasega, C. (2020). Finding common threads: How patients, physicians and nurses perceive the patient gown. Patient Experience Journal. https://doi.org/10.35680/2372-0247.1387
- Kam S, Yoo Y. Patient Clothing as a Healing Environment: A Qualitative Interview Study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 18;18(10):5357. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18105357.
- Joliat GR, Kobayashi K, Hasegawa K, Thomson JE, Padbury R, Scott M, Brustia R, Scatton O, Tran Cao HS, Vauthey JN, Dincler S, Clavien PA, Wigmore SJ, Demartines N, Melloul E. Guidelines for Perioperative Care for Liver Surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society Recommendations 2022. World J Surg. 2023 Jan;47(1):11-34. doi: 10.1007/s00268-022-06732-5. Epub 2022 Oct 30.
- Hwang, C., McCoy, L., & Shaw, M. (2020). Redesigning Maternity Hospital Gowns. Fashion Practice, 14, 79 - 98. https://doi.org/10.1080/17569370.2020.1794317
- Gabay G, Ornoy H. Revisiting the hospital-issued gown in hospitalizations from a locus of control and patient-centered care perspectives: a call for design thinking. Front Public Health. 2024 Sep 16;12:1420919. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1420919. eCollection 2024.
- Eti Aslan, F. (2004). Ameliyat sonrası ağrı değerlendirmesinde görsel kıyaslama ölçeğiyle basit tanımlayıcı ölçeğin duyarlılık ve seçiciliği. Yoğun Bakım Hemşireliği Dergisi, 8(1), 1-6
- Dinsdale, P. (2004). Revealing patient gowns overdue for a redesign. Nursing Standard, 18, 7. https://research.ebsco.com/linkprocessor/plink?id=8997fd97-f131-3fba-a70b-2e628d9f4841
- Delialioğlu Ünsal, S.(2022). Erken mobilizasyon ve postoperatif rehabilitasyon. R. H. Gündoğdu & N. Alkış (Eds.). İçinde: Eras Kitabı-Kanıta Dayalı Cerrahi. BAYT, Ankara: 149-156
- Cogan, N., Morton, L., Johnstone, J., Fleck, V., & Butler, S. (2023). When patients wear backless gowns, they take on the" sick role" and become dependent': exploring the perspectives of healthcare professionals. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/9kv3g
- Cogan, N., Morton, L., & Georgiadis, E. (2019). Exploring the effect of the hospital gown on wellbeing: a mixed methods study. The Lancet, 394, S32. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32829-6
- Cogan, N. (2024). Exploring the Perspectives of Healthcare Professionals Concerning the Use and Utility of the Hospital Gown to Develop Theoretically Informed Behaviour Change Interventions. Public Health Open Access. https://doi.org/10.23880/phoa-16000265
- Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
- Cho HS, Paek JU, Davis G, Fedric T. Expanding the comfort of postmastectomy patients using the Papilla Gown. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2008;40(1):26-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2007.00202.x.
- Black, S., & Torlei, K. (2013). Designing a New Type of Hospital Gown: A User-centered Design Approach Case Study. Fashion Practice, 5, 153-160. https://doi.org/10.2752/175693813X13559997789005
- Arunachalam, P., & D'Souza, B. (2022). Patient-Centered Hospital Gowns: A Novel Redesign of Inpatient Attire to Improve Both the Patient and Provider Experience. 2022 Design of Medical Devices Conference. https://doi.org/10.1115/dmd2022-1058
- Akter, H., & Goncu-Berk, G. (2024). A Study on Human-centered Design of Toddler Hospital Gowns. Bridging the Divide. https://doi.org/10.31274/itaa.17445
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- 03.2026fbu
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Abdominal Surgery Patients
-
National Taiwan University HospitalNational Taiwan University Hospital Hsin-Chu BranchRecruitingPatients Undergoing Major Abdominal SurgeryTaiwan
-
Mayo ClinicEnrolling by invitationAbdominal Surgery Patients | Drains | Surgical DrainUnited States
-
First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen UniversityRecruitingPatients Undergoing Major Laparoscopic Abdominal SurgeryChina
-
Gachon University Gil Medical CenterCompletedFemale Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Abdominal SurgeryKorea, Republic of
-
University of Texas Southwestern Medical CenterWithdrawn
-
Weill Medical College of Cornell UniversityRecruitingBariatric Surgery Patients | Bariatric or General Abdominal SurgeriesUnited States
-
Cairo UniversityRecruitingValidity and Reliability of the Arabic Version of De Morton Mobility Index After Abdominal SurgeriesMobility Limitation | Abdominal Surgery Patients | Mobility Difficulty | Abdominal SurgeriesEgypt
-
RWTH Aachen UniversityCompletedCardiac Surgery Patients | Elderly Patients | Neurosurgical Patients | Obese Patients | Abdominal Surgery PatientsGermany
-
Minia UniversityCompletedUnilateral TAP Block in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Lower Abdominal SurgeryEgypt
-
Haute Ecole ARC SanteRecruitingThoracic Surgery | Hospital Mobility | Mobility Limitation | Abdominal Surgery PatientsSwitzerland
Clinical Trials on Enhanced patient gown
-
More FoundationEnrolling by invitationAnxiety | Orthopedic DisorderUnited States
-
Solventum US LLC3MCompleted
-
The Cleveland ClinicNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)Completed
-
Cook County HealthAgency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)CompletedMultiple Co-morbiditiesUnited States
-
University of Maryland, BaltimoreCompleted
-
University of Maryland, BaltimoreTerminatedStaphylococcus Aureus | Carbapenem Resistant Gram Negative BacteriaUnited States
-
Boston Medical CenterBoston University Clinical Translational Science InstituteCompleted
-
Ascension Genesys Hospital3MCompleted
-
ayşegül musluCompletedGynecology | Gynecology/Obstetrics ConditionsTurkey