Evaluating the Feasibility of Prehabilitation Delivery Models for Patients Preparing for Ovarian Cancer Surgery (ADAPT-OC)

May 19, 2026 updated by: Jordan Leitch

Assessing Delivery Approaches for Prehabilitation Trials in Ovarian Cancer: A Pilot Feasibility Patient-Preference Trial

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether high-dose multimodal prehabilitation, delivered either in person or remotely with coaching and web application support, is feasible and acceptable for women preparing for ovarian cancer surgery. It will also examine which delivery model patients prefer and the factors influencing patient preferences.

The main questions ADAPT-OC aims to answer are:

  1. Can participants achieve the prescribed aerobic exercise target of at least 10 MET-hours per week before surgery?
  2. Do patients prefer in-person prehabilitation, remote prehabilitation, or education-only care, and what factors influence that preference?

The researchers will compare in-person prehabilitation, remote prehabilitation, and education-only care to see which delivery approach is most feasible, acceptable, and practical for patients with suspected ovarian cancer.

Participants will:

  • Choose their preferred study group, or be randomly assigned if they have no preference
  • Complete physical assessments, questionnaires, and interviews at baseline, 1-3 days before surgery, and 4 weeks after surgery
  • If assigned to a prehabilitation group, complete aerobic exercise, protein supplementation, and daily breathing exercises before surgery
  • Attend weekly coaching sessions with a trained prehabilitation coach
  • Use the KingstonPrehab web application to track exercise, nutrition, breathing practice, and progress toward activity goals

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Assessing Delivery Approaches for Prehabilitation Trials in Ovarian Cancer (ADAPT-OC) is a single-centre, three-arm, partially randomized patient-preference pilot feasibility trial designed to evaluate whether high-dose multimodal prehabilitation can be delivered with sufficient adherence in women preparing for ovarian cancer surgery. The study compares in-person prehabilitation, remote prehabilitation, and education-only to determine which delivery approach is most feasible and acceptable among women undergoing primary cytoreductive surgery for an ovarian mass. Findings from this pilot study will inform future work.

Postoperative complications remain common after gynecologic oncology surgery, and ovarian cancer surgery is associated with particularly high rates of morbidity. Low cardiorespiratory fitness, reduced muscle mass, poor nutritional status, and psychological distress contribute to reduced physiological reserve and increase vulnerability to surgical stress. Prehabilitation aims to improve physiological reserve before surgery through exercise, nutritional optimization, and psychological support. Although previous studies suggest prehabilitation may improve recovery and postoperative outcomes, recent trials have reported inconsistent findings, likely due to low exercise dose and poor adherence. Evidence suggests that achieving sufficient aerobic exercise volume is critical for improving cardiorespiratory fitness and surgical outcomes.

Barriers such as travel, scheduling, financial burden, fatigue, and limited access to hospital-based programs often reduce participation in traditional in-person prehabilitation. Remote delivery models may improve access, particularly for patients living outside major centres, but maintaining adherence without supervision remains challenging. Behaviour change strategies, including goal setting, self-monitoring, action planning, and personalized coaching, may improve adherence when integrated into digitally supported home-based programs. However, the feasibility of delivering a high-dose, application-supported, and behaviour change informed prehabilitation intervention in ovarian cancer patients is unknown.

Participants will be women aged 18 years or older undergoing surgery for an ovarian mass suspicious for malignancy at Kingston Health Sciences Centre, with at least 3 weeks until surgery. Following baseline assessments and informed consent, participants will be presented with 3 study options: in-person prehabilitation, remote prehabilitation, or education-only. Participants with a strong preference may choose their preferred group, while those without a preference will be randomized equally to one of the groups.

The intervention includes progressive aerobic exercise targeting at least 10 MET-hours per week above baseline, nutritional support through protein supplementation and dietary guidance, daily box breathing for stress management, weekly one-on-one coaching sessions, and use of the KingstonPrehab web application for tracking exercise, nutrition, breathing practice, and progress toward individualized goals. Coaching is guided by the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation-Behaviour (COM-B) framework and delivered by kinesiology-educated coaches. Participants in the control arm will receive standardized educational materials on prehabilitation concepts and postoperative recovery optimization only.

The primary feasibility outcomes are adherence to the aerobic exercise prescription, defined as achieving at least 10 MET-hours per week, and patient preference for program delivery model. Secondary outcomes include recruitment, retention, adherence to intervention components, application engagement, and adverse events. Exploratory clinical outcomes include body composition, functional capacity, quality of life, nutritional status, anxiety and depression, disability, postoperative complications, hospital length of stay, and time to chemotherapy.

Semi-structured interviews conducted at baseline and preoperative assessments will explore participant expectations, experiences, barriers, facilitators, and perceptions of program structure, coaching strategies, and delivery format. These findings will support refinement of the intervention and future trial design.

Analyses will focus primarily on feasibility outcomes using descriptive statistics and predefined progression criteria based on recruitment, retention, and adherence. Qualitative data will be analyzed using thematic analysis to identify key barriers and facilitators influencing participation and intervention success.

The study will be conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, Good Clinical Practice guidelines, and all applicable Canadian regulations. Results from this pilot trial will inform the development of a larger effectiveness trial and help determine whether remote and in-person high-dose prehabilitation can be implemented successfully in women undergoing ovarian cancer surgery.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

36

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Female
  • Aged ≥18 years
  • Scheduled for cytoreductive surgery for an ovarian mass suspected or confirmed of cancer
  • Surgery planned ≥3 weeks from time of booking
  • No contraindications to exercise on the CSEP Get Active Questionnaire
  • Able to provide written informed consent
  • Able to understand and communicate in English

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy
  • Surgery scheduled <3 weeks from booking
  • Receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy
  • Positive contraindications to exercise on the CSEP Get Active Questionnaire
  • End-stage or advanced renal disease limiting safe protein supplementation
  • Malnutrition as assessed by a registered dietician

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: In-Person Prehabilitation
Participants will complete a multimodal prehabilitation program delivered in-person at the School of Kinesiology and Health Studies. The intervention consists of supervised aerobic exercise (≥10 MET-hours/week above baseline), daily protein supplementation, daily box breathing, weekly one-on-one behavioural coaching, use of the KingstonPrehab web application, and standardized educational materials.
The multimodal prehabilitation program consists of progressive aerobic exercise targeting at least 10 MET-hours/week above baseline via 3-5 sessions per week, daily protein supplementation (BOOST Carb Smart; Nestlé Canada Inc.; North York, Ontario, Canada), daily box breathing for stress management, weekly one-on-one behavioural coaching sessions with a trained prehabilitation coach, and use of the KingstonPrehab web application for self-monitoring and progress tracking. Aerobic exercise sessions will be supervised on site. This intervention is delivered either in-person or remotely depending on study arm allocation.
Participants receive standardized educational materials describing the principles of prehabilitation, including aerobic exercise, resistance exercise, nutrition focusing on perioperative protein intake, and stress management strategies. Participants will also receive a postoperative recovery handbook adapted from the Montreal General Hospital Prehabilitation Clinic that provides guidance on nutrition, pain and constipation management, mobilization, in-hospital exercise, and a progressive return-to-activity plan for the first 8 weeks after surgery.
Experimental: Remote Prehabilitation
Participants will complete the same multimodal prehabilitation program as the in-person arm, but remotely at home or in community facilities. The intervention consists of independent aerobic exercise (≥10 MET-hours/week above baseline), daily protein supplementation, daily box breathing, weekly virtual one-on-one behavioural coaching, use of the KingstonPrehab web application, and standardized educational materials.
The multimodal prehabilitation program consists of progressive aerobic exercise targeting at least 10 MET-hours/week above baseline via 3-5 sessions per week, daily protein supplementation (BOOST Carb Smart; Nestlé Canada Inc.; North York, Ontario, Canada), daily box breathing for stress management, weekly one-on-one behavioural coaching sessions with a trained prehabilitation coach, and use of the KingstonPrehab web application for self-monitoring and progress tracking. Aerobic exercise sessions will be supervised on site. This intervention is delivered either in-person or remotely depending on study arm allocation.
Participants receive standardized educational materials describing the principles of prehabilitation, including aerobic exercise, resistance exercise, nutrition focusing on perioperative protein intake, and stress management strategies. Participants will also receive a postoperative recovery handbook adapted from the Montreal General Hospital Prehabilitation Clinic that provides guidance on nutrition, pain and constipation management, mobilization, in-hospital exercise, and a progressive return-to-activity plan for the first 8 weeks after surgery.
Active Comparator: Education Only
Participants will receive standardized educational materials describing prehabilitation, including aerobic exercise, resistance training, nutrition, and stress management strategies. They will continue with usual preoperative care provided by their healthcare team and will not receive coaching sessions, protein supplementation, or access to the KingstonPrehab web application.
Participants receive standardized educational materials describing the principles of prehabilitation, including aerobic exercise, resistance exercise, nutrition focusing on perioperative protein intake, and stress management strategies. Participants will also receive a postoperative recovery handbook adapted from the Montreal General Hospital Prehabilitation Clinic that provides guidance on nutrition, pain and constipation management, mobilization, in-hospital exercise, and a progressive return-to-activity plan for the first 8 weeks after surgery.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Behavioural adherence to exercise target (≥10 MET-hours/week)
Time Frame: Enrolment to preoperative assessment (3-6 weeks)
Individual aerobic exercise adherence, expressed as a percentage of the minimum prescribed target (≥10 MET-hours/week above baseline), capped at 100%. (Go ≥75%, Amend 61-74%, Stop <60%)
Enrolment to preoperative assessment (3-6 weeks)
Patient preference for delivery model
Time Frame: Quantitative: Enrolment to preoperative assessment (3-6 weeks). Qualitative: baseline and 4-week postoperative interviews.
Proportion selecting in-person, remote, or education-only arms. Qualitative exploration of reasons for preference.
Quantitative: Enrolment to preoperative assessment (3-6 weeks). Qualitative: baseline and 4-week postoperative interviews.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Recruitment rate
Time Frame: 12-month recruitment period
Proportion of eligible patients approached who consent and enroll.
12-month recruitment period
Retention rate
Time Frame: Enrolment to 4-week postoperative assessment
Proportion of enrolled participants completing all study assessments through 4-week postoperative follow-up.
Enrolment to 4-week postoperative assessment
Intervention adherence
Time Frame: Enrolment to preoperative assessment
Separate adherence to aerobic exercise, protein supplementation, breathing practice, and coaching attendance. Expressed as a percentage of completed / prescribed. Summarized individually per component, and as composite score.
Enrolment to preoperative assessment
Adverse events
Time Frame: Enrolment to 4-week postoperative assessment
Any medical events potentially related to exercise, nutrition, or behavioural intervention components.
Enrolment to 4-week postoperative assessment
Semi-structured interviews
Time Frame: Enrolment and 1-3 days preoperative
Qualitative assessment of acceptability, barriers, facilitators, coaching experience, and web application usability; analysed via thematic analysis.
Enrolment and 1-3 days preoperative
Cardiorespiratory Fitness (VO2max)
Time Frame: Baseline, preoperative, 4 weeks postoperative
Incremental shuttle walk test (ISWT): total distance (m) until volitional exhaustion or failure to complete shuttle in time is used to compute an estimated VO2max (ml/kg/min). Higher number indicates greater cardiorespiratory fitness.
Baseline, preoperative, 4 weeks postoperative
Handgrip strength (kg)
Time Frame: Baseline, preoperative, 4 weeks postoperative

Handheld dynamometer: average of 3 trials in dominant hand.

Higher number indicates greater forearm strength.

Baseline, preoperative, 4 weeks postoperative
30sec Sit to Stand
Time Frame: Baseline, preoperative, 4 weeks postoperative

Completed repetitions of unassisted sitting to and standing up from a chair.

Higher repetitions indicate greater lower body strength capacity.

Baseline, preoperative, 4 weeks postoperative
30sec Arm Curl
Time Frame: Baseline, preoperative, 4 weeks postoperative
Maximum repetitions of seated arm curls using 5lb dumbbell in dominant hand. Higher number indicates greater upper body strength capacity.
Baseline, preoperative, 4 weeks postoperative
BMI (kg/m^2)
Time Frame: Baseline, preoperative, 4 weeks postoperative
Height (m) and weight (kg) used to compute BMI (kg/m^2)
Baseline, preoperative, 4 weeks postoperative
Body Fat Percentage
Time Frame: Baseline, preoperative, 4 weeks postoperative
Bioelectrical impedance (Tanita Segmental Body Composition Analyser Model BC-418; Tanita Corp of America, Arlington Heights, Illinois, USA) used to estimate body fat percentage.
Baseline, preoperative, 4 weeks postoperative
Quality of Life (FACT-G)
Time Frame: Baseline, preoperative, 4 weeks postoperative
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy, General (FACT-G) to measure cancer-related quality of life across physical, social/family, emotional, and functional well-being. Range: 0-108, higher scores indicate better quality of life.
Baseline, preoperative, 4 weeks postoperative
Nutritional Status (PG-SGA SF)
Time Frame: Baseline, preoperative, 4 weeks postoperative
Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment, Short Form (PG-SGA SF) to measure nutritional status and nutrition-related symptom burden. Range: 0-36, higher scores indicate worse nutritional status and greater risk of malnutrition.
Baseline, preoperative, 4 weeks postoperative
Anxiety & Depression (HADS)
Time Frame: Baseline, preoperative, 4 weeks postoperative
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) to measure symptoms of anxiety and depression. Total range: 0-42, higher scores indicate worse psychological distress.
Baseline, preoperative, 4 weeks postoperative
Functional Impairment / Disability (WHODAS 2.0)
Time Frame: Baseline, preoperative, 4 weeks postoperative
World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) to measure disability and functional impairment across daily life domains. Range: 0-180, higher scores indicate greater disability.
Baseline, preoperative, 4 weeks postoperative

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jordan Leitch, MSc, MD, FRCPC, Queen's University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

May 14, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 14, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 14, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 7, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 19, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

May 27, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 27, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 19, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Ovarian Cancer

Clinical Trials on Multimodal Prehabilitation Program

Subscribe