Group-based ACT for Psychological Distress of Young People (ACT-YOUNG)

May 22, 2026 updated by: Sorlandet Hospital HF

This clinical study investigates the effectiveness of two psychological treatment formats for young people aged 16-25 with symptoms of depression, anxiety, stress, or interpersonal difficulties. The study compares group-based Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) with treatment as usual (TAU), most frequent that would be individual psychotherapy, both of which are established treatment approaches.

The study uses a randomized controlled design (RCT), in which participants are randomly assigned to one of the two treatment conditions. This allows for a systematic comparison of treatment outcomes between ACT delivered in a group format and standard individual therapy.

The ACT group intervention consists of a structured program in which participants meet regularly over a defined treatment period. The treatment focuses on processes such as psychological flexibility, acceptance of internal experiences, and engagement in actions aligned with personal values.

The individual therapy condition consists of one-to-one sessions with a clinician, following standard therapeutic practice. Treatment content and duration are tailored to the participant's clinical presentation and therapeutic needs.

Outcome measures include standardized assessments of mental health symptoms, functioning, and psychological processes. These assessments are conducted at baseline, during the treatment period, at post-treatment, and at follow-up time points. Data collected from these measures will be used to evaluate changes over time and differences between the two treatment conditions.

The primary aim of the study is to determine whether group-based ACT is as effective as, or more effective than, individual psychotherapy for young people receiving mental health services. The results are expected to contribute to improved knowledge about treatment options for this age group and inform future clinical practice.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Background and Rationale Mental health problems among adolescents and young adults represent a significant and increasing public health concern. A substantial proportion of young people experience symptoms of depression, anxiety, and related psychological distress during a developmental period characterized by major psychological, social, and biological transitions. These challenges may interfere with identity development, educational attainment, and social functioning, with potential long-term consequences for health and well-being .

At the same time, mental health services face increasing demand and limited capacity, resulting in prolonged waiting times and restricted access to timely care. Traditional outpatient treatment is primarily delivered as individual psychotherapy, which limits the number of patients that can be treated. There is therefore a need to evaluate alternative and potentially more scalable treatment formats that can maintain or improve clinical outcomes while increasing accessibility.

Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) is a transdiagnostic behavioral intervention that aims to improve psychological functioning by enhancing psychological flexibility. The ability to act in accordance with personal values while remaining in contact with difficult internal experiences. Rather than focusing solely on symptom reduction, ACT targets core processes such as acceptance, cognitive defusion, present-moment awareness, values clarification, and committed action.

Although ACT has a substantial evidence base in adult populations, research on its effectiveness for young people remains more limited, particularly in routine clinical settings and in comparison with standard care. Group-based formats may represent an efficient way of delivering ACT, while also offering therapeutic benefits such as peer support, normalization, and shared learning. The present study addresses important gaps in the literature by evaluating a structured group-based ACT intervention tailored for young people, compared with treatment as usual (TAU), within specialized mental health services.

Study Objectives The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the effectiveness of group-based ACT compared with treatment as usual in reducing symptoms of depression and anxiety among young people aged 16-25.

Secondary objectives include:

  • Evaluating the impact of the intervention on psychological well-being, quality of life, and functional outcomes
  • Assessing whether group-based ACT leads to comparable or improved remission rates relative to TAU
  • Investigating mechanisms of change, particularly the role of psychological flexibility related to the ACT processes
  • Exploring potential moderators of treatment outcome, including demographic and clinical characteristics

Study Design

This study is a randomized controlled trial (RCT) with two parallel treatment arms:

  1. Group-based Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT)
  2. Treatment as usual (TAU), typically consisting of individual psychotherapy Participants meeting eligibility criteria will be randomly allocated to one of the two conditions. The study is conducted in routine clinical settings across child/adolescent (BUP) and adult (DPS) mental health services, as well as in collaboration with primary care services, to enhance ecological validity and generalizability .

The target sample size is 212 participants, accounting for expected attrition and ensuring adequate statistical power for both outcome and process analyses .

Participants

Inclusion criteria:

Age 16-25 years Moderate symptoms of depression, score of 14 and above in the DASS 21 questionnaire

Exclusion criteria:

Severe psychiatric conditions requiring alternative treatment (e.g., psychosis, bipolar disorder) Active substance dependence Acute suicidal ideation or behavior Eating disorders or developmental disorders requiring specialized interventions Participants with specific disorders for which established evidence-based treatments are indicated (e.g., OCD) will be offered those treatments outside the study.

Interventions:

Group-based ACT

The experimental intervention is a structured group program based on Acceptance and Commitment Therapy, adapted for young people using the DNA-V framework. The intervention focuses on developing skills in:

  • Awareness of internal experiences
  • Acceptance and willingness
  • Cognitive defusion
  • Values clarification
  • Committed action The group format aims to promote experiential learning and peer interaction. The intervention consists of multiple sessions delivered over a defined treatment period, with each group including up to 10 participants and led by trained therapists. Sessions are manualized to ensure consistency and fidelity, and adherence will be monitored through supervision and video recordings .

Treatment as Usual (TAU) Participants allocated to TAU will receive standard care within mental health services. This typically involves individual psychotherapy delivered by a clinician. The content, frequency, and duration of treatment are determined by clinical needs and routine practice, reflecting real-world conditions.

Procedures and Assessments:

Participants will undergo a baseline assessment prior to randomization, including diagnostic evaluation using structured clinical interviews. Follow-up assessments will be conducted at multiple time points:

  • Baseline (pre-treatment)
  • During treatment (6 weeks)
  • Post-treatment (12 weeks)
  • 6-month follow-up
  • 12-month follow-up

Outcome data will be collected using a combination of clinician-administered interviews and validated self-report measures assessing:

  • Depression and anxiety symptoms
  • General psychological distress
  • Quality of life
  • Functional impairment
  • Psychological processes relevant to ACT (e.g., flexibility, mindfulness, values-based action) In addition to these scheduled assessments, ecological momentary assessment (EMA) will be conducted using a digital platform. Participants will complete brief daily measures during the treatment period and periodic follow-up assessments thereafter. This approach allows for detailed analysis of temporal changes and treatment processes in real-world contexts .

Outcomes

Primary outcomes:

• Changes in symptoms of depression and anxiety

Secondary outcomes:

  • Psychological well-being
  • Quality of life
  • Functional impairment
  • Remission rates

Process outcomes:

  • Psychological flexibility
  • Emotional regulation
  • Mindfulness
  • Self-compassion
  • Values-consistent behavior

Statistical Analysis Data will be analyzed using appropriate statistical methods for longitudinal and randomized designs. Primary analyses will compare changes in outcome measures between treatment conditions over time.

Secondary analyses will examine:

  • Mediation effects to identify mechanisms of change
  • Moderation effects to identify subgroups for whom the treatment is particularly effective Missing data will be handled using established statistical techniques appropriate for repeated measures designs.

Ethical Considerations Participation in the study is voluntary, and all participants will provide informed consent prior to inclusion. Participants may withdraw at any time without consequences for their access to treatment.

The interventions evaluated in this study are based on established therapeutic approaches and are not expected to pose significant risk. However, participation in group-based treatment may be experienced as challenging for some individuals. Measures are in place to monitor and address adverse reactions, including the presence of trained therapists and access to follow-up support .

The study will be conducted in accordance with ethical guidelines and has been approved by the regional ethics committee.

Significance This study will contribute to the evidencebase for psychological treatments for young people by evaluating a scalable, group-based intervention within routine clinical practice. The findings may inform service development and improve access to effective mental health care for this population. Additionally, the study will provide insight into the mechanisms underlying therapeutic change, supporting further refinement of interventions based on ACT principles.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

212

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Agder
      • Arendal, Agder, Norway, 4824
        • Recruiting
        • Sørlandet Hospital
        • Contact:
      • Kristiansand, Agder, Norway, 4624
        • Recruiting
        • Sorlandet hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Score on DASS-21 depression scale ≤ 14

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Psychosis

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Group based Acceptance and Commitment Therapy
Participants assigned to this arm will receive a structured, manualized group-based Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) intervention delivered by trained clinicians.
Group-Based Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) consists of a structured, manualized group intervention delivered according to established ACT principles and tailored for young people. The intervention is provided in a group format within specialized mental health services and focuses on enhancing psychological flexibility through core ACT processes. Treatment is delivered by trained clinicians, and the group format emphasizes experiential exercises, mindfulness practices, values-based work, and peer interaction. The frequency and duration of sessions follow the study protocol.
Active Comparator: Treatment as usual TAU
Participants assigned to this arm will receive treatment as usual consisting of standard mental health care delivered according to routine clinical practice within hospital-based specialized mental health services and, when applicable, municipal health services or student health services. The type, format, frequency, and duration of care are determined by clinical need and may vary between participants.
Treatment as Usual (TAU) consists of standard mental health care provided according to routine clinical practice within hospital-based specialized mental health services, as well as through municipal health services and student health services when applicable. The type, format (e.g., individual or group-based), frequency, and duration of care are determined by clinical need and may vary between participants.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Depression, Anxiety, Stress Scale
Time Frame: From enrollment to 1 year
Measures depression, anxiety and stress
From enrollment to 1 year
Hamilton Rating Scale Depression HDRS
Time Frame: From enrollment to 1 year
Measures level of depression
From enrollment to 1 year
The Psychological Flexibility Questionnaire PSY-Flex
Time Frame: From enrollment to 1 year
Questionnaire measuring Psychological Flexibility
From enrollment to 1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The Structural Clinical Interview for DSM-5 Clinician Version (SCID-5-CV
Time Frame: Enrollemnt of study and after 12 months
Diagnostic interview SCID 5 CV
Enrollemnt of study and after 12 months
Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation (CORE-OM)
Time Frame: From enrollment to 1 year
Self report about psychological symptoms
From enrollment to 1 year
The PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 PCL-5
Time Frame: From enrollment to 1 year
PCL-5 questionnaire, symptoms of PTSD
From enrollment to 1 year
The Level of Personality Functioning Scale brief, LPFS-BF2.0
Time Frame: From enrollment to 1 year
The Level of Personality Functioning Scale brief form, Alternative Model for Personality disorders DSM-5, section iii LPFS-BF2.0 questionnaire. Screening tool for personality disorders
From enrollment to 1 year
The Mental Health Continuum short form MHC-SF
Time Frame: From enrollment to 1 year
questionnaire that measure positive mental health and well-being
From enrollment to 1 year
Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test, AUDIT
Time Frame: From enrollment to 1 year
Questionnaire screening for alcohol harmful use and dependence
From enrollment to 1 year
The drug use disorders identification test DUDIT
Time Frame: From enrollment to 1 year
Questionnaire screening for harmful use and dependence of drugs
From enrollment to 1 year
Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale short form DERS SF
Time Frame: From enrollment to 1 year
Questionnaire measuring problems with emotion regulations
From enrollment to 1 year
The Cognitive Fusion Questionnaire CFQ
Time Frame: From enrollment to 1 year
Questionnaire about cognitive fusion. Cognitive fusion refers to becoming so entangled with thoughts that they strongly dominate behavior, emotions, and perception.
From enrollment to 1 year
The Bulls Eyes Values Survey scale BEVS
Time Frame: From enrollment to 1 year
Questionnaire about value congruent behavior. Examening peoples values and how much they are satisfied with reaching those values
From enrollment to 1 year
The Process-Based Assessment Tool PBAT
Time Frame: From enrollment to 1 year
Questionnaire measuring processes and clinical interventions in therapy
From enrollment to 1 year
The Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire FFMQ
Time Frame: From enrollment to 1 year
Questionnaire measuring components and structure of mindfulness
From enrollment to 1 year
The Self Compassion Scale short form SCS SF
Time Frame: From enrollment to 1 year
Questionnaire measuring self compassion. Measures of how compassionately a person relates to themselves during periods of difficulty, failure, suffering, or inadequacy.
From enrollment to 1 year
EQ-5D-5L
Time Frame: From enrollment to 1 year
EQ EuroQol 5 D 5 Dimensions 5L 5 Levels. Questionnaire used to measure health-related quality of life (HRQoL).
From enrollment to 1 year
The Work and Social Adjustment Scale, WSAS
Time Frame: From enrollment to 1 year
Questionnaire that measures how much a person's mental or physical health problems are interfering with their ability to function in everyday life
From enrollment to 1 year
The Bergen Insomnia Scale, BIS
Time Frame: From enrollment to 1 year
Questionnaire for measuring insomnia
From enrollment to 1 year
The metacognitions questionnaire, MCQ-30
Time Frame: From enrollment to 1 year
Questionnaire about metacognitive beliefs. The beliefs people have about their own thinking
From enrollment to 1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 9, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 22, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 22, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

June 1, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 1, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 22, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Anxiety

Clinical Trials on Group-based Acceptance and Commitment Therapy

Subscribe