Characterizing the Effects of Platelet-Rich Fibrin (PRF) as a Palatal Wound Dressing on Quality of Life and Sleep Following Mucogingival Surgery. Study Was Conducted at the Air Force Post Graduate Dental School. All HIPPA Consents and Research Informed Consents Are Located at JBSA-Lackland.

June 4, 2026 updated by: David Seiler, 59th Medical Wing

Characterizing the Effects of Leukocyte-Platelet-Rich Fibrin on Sleep and Perceived Quality of Life on Mucogingival Periodontal Surgery Healing. Arm 1: Influence of Platelet-rich Fibrin on Quality of Life Following Mucogingival Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

The goal of this clinical trial (2-arm) is to determine if the application of platelet rich fibrin (PRF) to palatal donor sites influence patients quality of life, sleep efficiency, and healing following mucogingival surgery. All patients were enrolled in the Air Force Post Graduate Dental School periodontics program and each patient required mucogingival surgery. The main question[s] it aims to answer [is/are]:

  • Does the application of PRF to palatal donor sites influence patient's quality of life following mucogingival surgery. [outcome measure 1]
  • Does the application of PRF to palatal donor sites influence patient's sleep quality following mucogingival surgery. [outcome measure 2]
  • Does the application of PRF to palatal donor sites influence palatal healing following mucogingival surgery. [outcome measure 3] Researchers will compare the application of PRF (test) as a palatal dressing to a commercially available product (control; oxidized cellulose membrane or collagen dressing) to determine the difference of effects.

Participants will be randomly assigned to either receiving PRF or a commercially available product on the day of surgery. A survey response will be conducted at five time points (pre-operative, 24-hours, 72 hours, 1 week, 2 week) to obtain a quality of life metric. Sleep data was collected via a wearable device one week pre-surgical intervention and two weeks postoperatively. Finally, a clinical healing index was performed at 1 and 2 weeks post-operatively to obtain a healing score.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

78

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Texas
      • San Antonio, Texas, United States, 78236
        • Air Force Post Graduate Dental School

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • age > 18 or < 99
  • required a mucogingival surgery
  • had not taken an antibiotic for one month
  • planned for a non-emergent periodontal procedure

Exclusion Criteria:

  • pregnant or within 6 months post-partum
  • female subjects who are nursing
  • subjects who are decisionally challenged
  • patients who have undergone antibiotic therapy in the past month
  • ASA IV or higher status
  • patients who have undergone chronic therapy with medications that could affect periodontal status or healing
  • incompatible mobile phone devices.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Quality of Life
The Qualtrics survey tool sent out automated emails at 24 hours, 72 hours, 1-week and 2-week time points from the time of pre-surgery survey completion. Surveys included: (1) OHIP-14 questionnaire, which includes 14 questions related to seven different patient domains; (2) What is your pain at the palatal harvest site on a scale of 0-10? (NRS-11); and (3) Did you take any mediation today to relieve pain or swelling? (yes/no).
The test group had approximately 40 ml of whole venous blood collected from their antecubital fossa (R/L) prior to surgical start for the fabrication of PRF. Tubes were placed immediately into a US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved horizontal centrifuge (Horizon 6 Drucker Diagnostics; Port Matilda, PA), and spun at 2300 rpm (700 g) for 16 min. After the centrifugation was complete, the PRF matrices were compressed into membranes. At the completion of surgery, PRF membranes (1-3) were used as a wound dressing at the harvest site. A palatal stent was used to secure the PRF via compression only, and no sutures were utilized for fixation at the harvest sites. Patients were instructed not to remove the palatal stent for 48 hours.
On the day of surgery, subjects randomized into the control group had a commercially available product of the surgeons choice (collagen matrices or oxidized cellulose membrane) placed at the palatal donor site. The matrix was compressed with a palatal stent and subjects were instructed to not remove the stent for 48 hours.
Experimental: Sleep Quality
After informed consent is obtained at the pre-op appointment, subjects undergoing mucogingival surgery will be given a sleep monitoring device (SleepImage® Ring 2019, SleepImage, Denver, CO) and will complete a baseline QoL (Qualtrics XM®, 2002, Qualtrics, Seattle WA). The sleep monitoring app will be downloaded on subjects' phones and each subject will be briefed on the function of the application. Subjects will be instructed to wear the device nightly throughout the study. The subject will be instructed to complete the same QoL questionnaire at 24 hours, and 72 hours, as well as at the one-week and two-week post-operative appointments.
The test group had approximately 40 ml of whole venous blood collected from their antecubital fossa (R/L) prior to surgical start for the fabrication of PRF. Tubes were placed immediately into a US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved horizontal centrifuge (Horizon 6 Drucker Diagnostics; Port Matilda, PA), and spun at 2300 rpm (700 g) for 16 min. After the centrifugation was complete, the PRF matrices were compressed into membranes. At the completion of surgery, PRF membranes (1-3) were used as a wound dressing at the harvest site. A palatal stent was used to secure the PRF via compression only, and no sutures were utilized for fixation at the harvest sites. Patients were instructed not to remove the palatal stent for 48 hours.
On the day of surgery, subjects randomized into the control group had a commercially available product of the surgeons choice (collagen matrices or oxidized cellulose membrane) placed at the palatal donor site. The matrix was compressed with a palatal stent and subjects were instructed to not remove the stent for 48 hours.
Experimental: Healing
At 1- and 2- weeks, patients returned for post-operative appointments. At the follow-up appointment the surgeons were asked to document the presence of suppuration or bleeding at the palatal wound site. A standardized photograph was then taken with the following parameters (F-stop: 29, ISO: 200, Shutter Speed: 125). Three calibrated, blinded examiners then assessed the palatal wound based on the Landry et al palatal healing index.
The test group had approximately 40 ml of whole venous blood collected from their antecubital fossa (R/L) prior to surgical start for the fabrication of PRF. Tubes were placed immediately into a US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved horizontal centrifuge (Horizon 6 Drucker Diagnostics; Port Matilda, PA), and spun at 2300 rpm (700 g) for 16 min. After the centrifugation was complete, the PRF matrices were compressed into membranes. At the completion of surgery, PRF membranes (1-3) were used as a wound dressing at the harvest site. A palatal stent was used to secure the PRF via compression only, and no sutures were utilized for fixation at the harvest sites. Patients were instructed not to remove the palatal stent for 48 hours.
On the day of surgery, subjects randomized into the control group had a commercially available product of the surgeons choice (collagen matrices or oxidized cellulose membrane) placed at the palatal donor site. The matrix was compressed with a palatal stent and subjects were instructed to not remove the stent for 48 hours.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quality of Life: OHIP-14 summative scores utilized as a quality of life metric at five different time points. These scores were compared between the test and control group.
Time Frame: Pre-surgical survey to 2 weeks following surgical intervention.

The Qualtrics survey tool sent out automated emails at 24 hours, 72 hours, 1-week and 2-week time points from the time of pre-surgery survey completion. Surveys included: (1) OHIP-14 questionnaire, which includes 14 questions related to seven different patient domains; (2) What is your pain at the palatal harvest site on a scale of 0-10? (NRS-11); and (3) Did you take any mediation today to relieve pain or swelling? (yes/no).

The additive OHIP-14 score served as the primary outcome variable. The quality of life survey was completed pre-surgically, 24 hours, 72 hours, 1 week, and 2 weeks.

Pre-surgical survey to 2 weeks following surgical intervention.
Sleep Quality: sleep efficiency index obtained from wearable device.
Time Frame: 1 week pre-surgery to 2-weeks following surgical intervention.
A sleep monitoring device was issued to patients following informed consent (SleepImage® Ring 2019, SleepImage, Denver, CO). The sleep monitoring app will be downloaded on subjects' phones and each subject will be briefed on the function of the application. Subjects will be instructed to wear the device nightly throughout the study.
1 week pre-surgery to 2-weeks following surgical intervention.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain: a numeric pain scale (0-10) was used to document site specific palatal harvest pain.
Time Frame: From pre-surgery survey, final survey was 2 weeks post surgical intervention.
The Qualtrics survey tool sent out automated emails at 24 hours, 72 hours, 1-week and 2-week time points from the time of pre-surgery survey completion. Survey question: What is your pain at the palatal harvest site on a scale of 0-10? (NRS-11)
From pre-surgery survey, final survey was 2 weeks post surgical intervention.
Analgesic Consumption: a survey tool was used to document patients medication use post-surgery.
Time Frame: From pre-surgery survey to two weeks post surgical intervention.
The Qualtrics survey tool sent out automated emails at 24 hours, 72 hours, 1-week and 2-week time points from the time of pre-surgery survey completion. Survey question: Did you take any mediation today to relieve pain or swelling? (yes/no).
From pre-surgery survey to two weeks post surgical intervention.
Physiologic Healing at Palatal Donor Site: 5-point healing scale
Time Frame: Healing was assessed at 1-week and 2-weeks post surgical intervention.
At the follow-up appointment the surgeons were asked to document the presence of suppuration or bleeding at the palatal wound site. A standardized photograph was then taken with the following parameters (F-stop: 29, ISO: 200, Shutter Speed: 125). Three calibrated, blinded examiners then assessed the palatal wound based on the Landry et al palatal healing index.
Healing was assessed at 1-week and 2-weeks post surgical intervention.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 24, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 18, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

March 18, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 26, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 4, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

June 10, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 10, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 4, 2026

Last Verified

June 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

All de-identified participant date sets are to be shared upon request.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Beginning 3 months and ending 3 years after the publication of results.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

The Air Force Post Graduate Dental School will be in charge of allowing access to IPD upon request.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • ANALYTIC_CODE

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain

Clinical Trials on Platelet rich fibrin

Subscribe