Assessing Suzetrigine for Pain Reduction Following Ureteroscopic Surgery

June 12, 2026 updated by: Daniel A. Wollin, MD, Brigham and Women's Hospital

Multimodal Analgesia Pathway Assessing Role of Suzetrigine for the Reduction of Opioid Use Following Ureteroscopic Surgery

Urologic surgery has advanced with new technologies to allow less invasive management of common afflictions such as kidney stones, these procedures are notoriously painful as the ureter must be dilated to accommodate any instruments, and a ureteral stent is often left following surgery to allow for adequate healing. Unfortunately, stents are poorly tolerated by a significant number of patients, with up to 100% complaining of bothersome pain and 10% of patients with unplanned healthcare visits. Further complicating kidney stone management is the frequency of concurrent chronic kidney disease (CKD) or acute kidney injury (AKI) that prohibits many patients from taking NSAIDs which limits pain management options. There is now a push to treat these patients with multimodal analgesia to provide better care and reduce opioid use. Suzetrigine is a new a first-in-class selective inhibitor of the NaV1.8 sodium channel that functions as a non-opioid analgesic developed to treat acute pain and neuropathic pain. This study assesses the addition of suzetrigine to standard-of-care multimodal analgesia. We hypothesize a demonstrated decrease in opioid use, decrease Emergency Room visits within 30 days, decrease the number of unplanned care encounters.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Urologic surgery has advanced with new technologies to allow less invasive management of common afflictions such as kidney stones, these procedures are notoriously painful as the ureter must be dilated to accommodate any instruments, and a ureteral stent is often left following surgery to allow for adequate healing. Unfortunately, stents are poorly tolerated by a significant number of patients, with up to 100% complaining of bothersome pain and 10% of patients with unplanned healthcare visits. Further complicating kidney stone management is the frequency of concurrent chronic kidney disease (CKD) or acute kidney injury (AKI) that prohibits many patients from taking NSAIDs which limits pain management options. There is now a push to treat these patients with multimodal analgesia to provide better care and reduce opioid use. Suzetrigine is a new a first-in-class selective inhibitor of the NaV1.8 sodium channel that functions as a non-opioid analgesic developed to treat acute pain and neuropathic pain. This study assesses the addition of suzetrigine to standard-of-care multimodal analgesia. We hypothesize a demonstrated decrease in opioid use, decrease Emergency Room visits within 30 days, decrease the number of unplanned care encounters. This prospective open-label interventional single-center study will compare 30-day postoperative patient reported outcomes and pain medication use between a pre-implementation cohort of patients managed with standard-of-care multimodal analgesia after ureteroscopy with a post-implementation cohort of patient with this regimen and addition of suzetrigine. The primary outcome will be opioid usage after discharge with standard of care multimodal analgesia (historical control) vs opioid usage after discharge with suzetrigine included with the standard of care

multimodal analgesia regimen (intervention). Secondary outcomes will include unplanned care encounters within 30 days (Emergency Room, unplanned clinic visits) and surveyed patient reported outcomes measured on a post-operative survey including PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) questions as well as an end of study administration of WISQOL (The Wisconsin Stone Quality of Life Questionnaire). The study will be conducted within a single academic institution including the primary hospital (Brigham and Women's Hospital) and satellite sites (Brigham and Women's Faulkner Hospital).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

100

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Daniel A Wollin, MD, MS
  • Phone Number: 617 732 6354
  • Email: dwollin@mgb.org

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02115
        • Brigham and Women's Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Daniel A Wollin, MD, MS
          • Phone Number: 617 732 6354
          • Email: dwollin@mgb.org
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02130
        • Brigham and Women's Faulkner Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Daniel A Wollin, MD, MS
          • Phone Number: 617 732 6354
          • Email: dwollin@mgb.org

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients undergoing ureteroscopy between ages 21 to 80 at BWFH (Brigham & Women's Faulkner Hospital) by one of the department's high volume endoscopic surgeons. Patient who are or not pre-stented prior to surgery will be included (these will be assessed via stratification within a secondary analysis).
  • Patients able to consent for their own medical care (i.e. consent able to be obtained directly from patient and does not require a healthcare proxy or guardian)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Regular opioid use prior to surgery or significant substance abuse concerns.
  • Inability of patient to provide their own consent (i.e. lack capacity).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: multimodal analgesia pathway (standard, no suzetrigine)
multimodal analgesia pathway without suzetrigine
multimodal analgesia regimen
Experimental: suzetrigine with multimodal analgesia pathway
addition of suzetrigine to multimodal analgesia pathway
suzetrigine with multimodal analgesia regimen

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Post-discharge opioid consumption (MME)
Time Frame: 1-2 weeks
assessed at post-operative visit
1-2 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Post-discharge opioid consumption (MME)
Time Frame: 30 days
assessed at 30 days after surgery
30 days
Rate of unplanned care encounters
Time Frame: 30 days
Emergency Room visits
30 days
patient reported outcomes: pain score
Time Frame: 2 weeks
measured on a 0 to 10 analog scale on post-operative survey
2 weeks
patient reported outcomes: pain score
Time Frame: 30 days
measured on a 0 to 10 analog scale on post-operative survey
30 days
patient reported outcomes: PROMIS composite score
Time Frame: 2 weeks

total score where each of the following is rated from 0 to 4 then aggregated into a total value:

  1. How much did pain interfere with your day-to-day activities?
  2. How much did pain interfere with work around the home?
  3. How much did pain interfere with your ability to participate in social activities?
  4. How much did pain interfere with your household chores?
  5. How much did pain interfere with things you usually do for fun?
  6. How much did pain interfere with your enjoyment of social activities?
2 weeks
patient reported outcomes: PROMIS composite score
Time Frame: 30 days

total score where each of the following is rated from 0 to 4 then aggregated into a total value:

  1. How much did pain interfere with your day-to-day activities?
  2. How much did pain interfere with work around the home?
  3. How much did pain interfere with your ability to participate in social activities?
  4. How much did pain interfere with your household chores?
  5. How much did pain interfere with things you usually do for fun?
  6. How much did pain interfere with your enjoyment of social activities?
30 days
patient reported outcomes (PROMIS) pain interfere with your day-to-day activities
Time Frame: 2 weeks
rated from 0 to 4
2 weeks
patient reported outcomes (PROMIS) pain interfere with your day-to-day activities
Time Frame: 30 days
rated from 0 to 4
30 days
patient reported outcomes (PROMIS) pain interfere with work around the home
Time Frame: 2 weeks
rated from 0 to 4
2 weeks
patient reported outcomes (PROMIS) pain interfere with work around the home
Time Frame: 30 days
rated from 0 to 4
30 days
patient reported outcomes (PROMIS) pain interfere with your ability to participate in social activities
Time Frame: 2 weeks
rated from 0 to 4
2 weeks
patient reported outcomes (PROMIS) pain interfere with your ability to participate in social activities
Time Frame: 30 days
rated from 0 to 4
30 days
patient reported outcomes (PROMIS) pain interfere with your household chores
Time Frame: 2 weeks
rated from 0 to 4
2 weeks
patient reported outcomes (PROMIS) pain interfere with your household chores
Time Frame: 30 days
rated from 0 to 4
30 days
patient reported outcomes (PROMIS) pain interfere with things you usually do for fun
Time Frame: 2 weeks
rated from 0 to 4
2 weeks
patient reported outcomes (PROMIS) pain interfere with things you usually do for fun
Time Frame: 30 days
rated from 0 to 4
30 days
patient reported outcomes (PROMIS) pain interfere with your enjoyment of social activities
Time Frame: 2 weeks
rated from 0 to 4
2 weeks
patient reported outcomes (PROMIS) pain interfere with your enjoyment of social activities
Time Frame: 30 days
rated from 0 to 4
30 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

August 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 31, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 3, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 12, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

June 17, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 17, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 12, 2026

Last Verified

June 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

This trial is being performed at within a single institution (Mass General Brigham) at two of it's constituent sites (BWH and BWFH), as part of IRB approval of the study decision was for privacy policy that only aggregated data would be intended to be shared outside the institutions system and any IPD would be solely stored on HIPAA compliant servers at the facility. De-identified or aggregated data would be permitted to be shared so long as subjects could not be identified.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Multimodal Analgesia

Clinical Trials on multimodal analgesia regimen without suzetrigine

Subscribe