Inferior Mesenteric Artery First Combined With Complete Medial Approach for Laparoscopic Splenic Flexure Mobilization in Left Sided Colorectal Cancer

June 13, 2026 updated by: Omar Mohamed Mokbel, Assiut University
The aim of the study to compare surgical outcomes between inferior mesenteric artery first with complete medial approach and other traditional techniques in laparoscopic left sided colorectal cancer .

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Detailed Description

Laparoscopic left-sided colon cancer radical resection is primarily employed for the treatment of tumors located in distal transverse colon , splenic flexure of colon, descending colon, and proximal segment of the sigmoid colon. Numerous factors impact the difficulty of surgery, with research suggesting that mobilization of the splenic flexure independently predicts longer operative times in laparoscopic left-sided colon cancer radical resection . Splenic flexure mobilization is independently associated with an increased risk of splenic injury, which contributes to elevated short-term and long-term mortality risks in patients. The crucial aspect of radical surgery is complete mesocolic excision (CME) with central vascular ligation and the Japanese D3 lymphadenectomy. For tumors located in descending colon and sigmoid-descending junction, the lymph node dissection range includes the central lymph node group (No.253) at the root of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) . In cases of cancer in the left half of the transverse colon or in the splenic flexure of colon, in addition to IMA root lymph node dissection, it is imperative to perform dissection of lymph nodes (No.223) at the root of the middle colic artery (MCA).Therefore, for laparoscopic left-sided colon cancer radical resection, ensuring the safety of splenic flexure mobilization and maintaining the quality of lymph nodes dissection are both crucial.

Currently, traditional surgical approaches for laparoscopic left-sided colon cancer radical resection include the medial approach, lateral approach, anterior approach, and various combinations of these methods. Due to variations in anatomical understanding, many teams propose the combined application of multiple approaches, each demonstrating a certain level of safety and feasibility.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

68

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Patients aged 18-70 years old with confirmed colorectal cancer diagnosis by histopathology with obligatory splenic flexure mobilization and had laparoscopic surgery with curative intent were included.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Those younger than 18 years or older than 70 years.
  • Those undergoing non-cancer resections, or completion surgery or palliative procedures.
  • Those with locally advanced ( extra colonic extension ) or metastatic tumors.
  • Those with advanced comorbidities ( laparoscopy is contraindicated )

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: inferior mesenteric artery first with complete medial approach

The patient was positioned in the modified lithotomy position with the main surgeon standing in between the abducted legs. The patient's head is lowered by 15° (Trendelenburg position), and table was 20° right-tilted. The position was adjusted at the time of splenic flexure mobilization to head elevation by 20° to let the small bowel go down toward the pelvis.

Five ports were introduced [Figure 1]: a 10-mm port in the midline 4 cm above the umbilicus to increase the field of view, a second 5 mm port in the right midclavicular line just below the umbilicus, a third 10-12-mm port at the right midclavicular line in the right iliac fossa, a fourth 5-mm port in the left midclavicular line 2 cm above the level of the umbilicus, and a last 5-mm port in the midline 4 cm above the pubic bone.

Port sites for laparoscopic left colectomy. The tumor was localized by either visual inspection or intraoperative colonoscopy. The summit of sigmoid colon was then pulled anteriorly with a grasper toward

Active Comparator: lateral approach

The patient was positioned in the modified lithotomy position with the main surgeon standing in between the abducted legs. The patient's head is lowered by 15° (Trendelenburg position), and table was 20° right-tilted. The position was adjusted at the time of splenic flexure mobilization to head elevation by 20° to let the small bowel go down toward the pelvis.

Five ports were introduced [Figure 1]: a 10-mm port in the midline 4 cm above the umbilicus to increase the field of view, a second 5 mm port in the right midclavicular line just below the umbilicus, a third 10-12-mm port at the right midclavicular line in the right iliac fossa, a fourth 5-mm port in the left midclavicular line 2 cm above the level of the umbilicus, and a last 5-mm port in the midline 4 cm above the pubic bone.

Port sites for laparoscopic left colectomy. The tumor was localized by either visual inspection or intraoperative colonoscopy. The summit of sigmoid colon was then pulled anteriorly with a grasper toward

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
evaluation of safety and effectiveness of inferior mesenteric artery first in combination with complete medial approach in splenic mobilization in left sided colorectal cancer .
Time Frame: 6 month
number of harvested lymph nodes
6 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

July 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2029

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 24, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 13, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

June 18, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 18, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 13, 2026

Last Verified

June 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • laparoscopic colorectal cancer

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Laparoscopic Splenic Flexure Mobilization

Clinical Trials on laparscopic splenic flexure mobilization

Subscribe