- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07667413
Topical TOR-582 Treatment of Epistaxis in HHT
A Phase I Trial of TOR-582, a Topical Sirolimus-based Treatment for Epistaxis in Adults With Hereditary Hemorrhagic Telangiectasia
Study Overview
Status
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
This is a Phase I single-center trial evaluating the safety, tolerability, and clinical activity of TOR-582 in adults with HHT-associated epistaxis. The study will include a Phase 1a Dose-Finding study and a preliminary Proof-of-Concept protocol. The study will employ a Bayesian Optimal Interval (BOIN) dose-finding design with accelerated titration. Phase 1a will commence with topical administration of the TOR-582 compound in the nasal cavity, starting with a 1% dose (.2mL, dose level 2) delivered twice daily for a 12-week dosing period.
Participants will complete a 1-week observational baseline period prior to initiation of treatment. The first 4 weeks of treatment will constitute the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) evaluation period. Participants who complete the DLT evaluation period will continue treatment for an additional 8 weeks, for a total treatment duration of 12 weeks.
The study will enroll up to 27 participants. Patients who fail to complete the dosing regimen for at least 80% of assigned dosages in their assigned cycle of treatment for reasons other than DLT will be excluded from DLT evaluation and may be replaced.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Phase 1
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Jonathan B Overdevest, MD, PhD
- Phone Number: 212-305-6130
- Email: jo2566@cumc.columbia.edu
Study Locations
-
-
New York
-
New York, New York, United States, 10032
- Recruiting
- Columbia University Irving Medical Center
-
Contact:
- Jonathan B Overdevest, MD, PhD
- Phone Number: 212-305-6130
- Email: jo2566@cumc.columbia.edu
-
Principal Investigator:
- Jonathan B Overdevest, MD, PhD
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age 18 years or older at the time of consent.
- Confirmed diagnosis of HHT, defined as meeting at least three of the four Curaçao criteria or preferably by genetic testing.
- Moderate nasal epistaxis represented by an Epistaxis Severity Score (ESS) between 3 and 8 at screening, average NOSE-HHT score of 1.01-2, with a self-reported history of at least four spontaneous nosebleeds per week and a cumulative weekly bleeding duration of at least 60 minutes.
- Stable nasal hygiene regimen and epistaxis-related medical management for at least 3 months prior to enrollment.
- Stable epistaxis pattern for at least 3 months prior to enrollment
Adequate bone marrow function defined as:
- Platelet count ≥ 100 × 10⁹/L (≥ 100,000/mm3)
- WBC count ≥ 2.5 × 10⁹/L at screening (≥ 2,500/mm3)
- Hgb ≥ 6g/dL with no transfusion in the prior 2 months
- INR ≤ 1.4 and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) within institutional normal limits.
- Willingness to avoid initiation of other investigational or targeted therapeutic agents for epistaxis (including antiangiogenic or mTOR-modulating therapies) from the time of enrollment through study completion.
- Female participants of childbearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test at screening and agree to use effective contraception during the study and for 28 days following the final dose.
- Ability to comply with study procedures and follow-up visits, and capacity to provide written informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Any medical contraindication to systemic sirolimus use.
- Prior use of any mTOR inhibitor within the past 3 months.
Endoscopic evaluation of nasal cavity (HES-based)
- Site: No numerical site exclusion
- Pattern: AVM-type vascular pattern (HES pattern score = 2).
- Crusting: Moderate to severe nasal crusting (HES crusting score ≥ 2).
- Location: Telangiectasias isolated to the middle or posterior turbinates (HES location score ≥ 2).
- Perforation: Presence of a nasal septal perforation
- Surgical cautery or sclerotherapy within the past 3 months prior to enrollment
- Vascular embolization of nasal vasculature within the past 3 months prior to enrollment
- Clinically significant peripheral vascular disease or circulatory compromise.
- Current use of strong CYP3A4 modulators, including inhibitors (e.g., ketoconazole, clarithromycin) or inducers (e.g., rifampin, phenytoin, carbamazepine, St. John's wort).
- Use of anti-angiogenic therapies within 30 days prior to screening (e.g., bevacizumab, pazopanib, thalidomide, lenalidomide).
- Use of illicit substances within the past 30 days, excluding marijuana.
- Use of anticoagulant, antiplatelet, or fibrinolytic medications within the past 30 days, except for low-dose aspirin (81 mg or less).
- Use of octreotide or systemic estrogen therapy within the past 30 days.
Clinical laboratory evaluation:
- Renal dysfunction, defined as a serum creatinine level greater than 2.0 mg/dL.
- Hepatic impairment, indicated by total bilirubin above 2.0 mg/dL (or above 4.0 mg/dL in patients with a known diagnosis of Gilbert's syndrome) or liver transaminases exceeding three times the upper limit of normal.
- Known SMAD4 mutation with a history of significant gastrointestinal polyposis, unless colonoscopy within the past 18 months demonstrated either no polyps or ≤5 polyps judged to be clinically insignificant by a gastroenterologist.
- History of unprovoked venous thromboembolism, confirmed by imaging.
- Diagnosis of peripheral neuropathy as confirmed by neurologic evaluation.
Documented hyperproliferative anemia (myelodysplastic syndrome, aplastic anemia, etc.).
a. Current pregnancy or planned pregnancy within the next 6 months, or active breastfeeding.
- Concurrent participation in another interventional research study.
- Any condition, circumstance, language, or literacy limitation, that in the judgment of the investigator, would interfere with study participation or completion.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Non-Randomized
- Interventional Model: Sequential Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Dose Level 1 - 5 mg/mL (0.5%)
|
The active formulation of TOR-582 incorporates sirolimus at concentrations of 5 mg/mL (0.5%), 10 mg/mL (1.0%), and 20 mg/mL (2.0%) along with other active ingredients in an oil-based carrier ointment. Ointment will be applied intranasally twice daily in 0.2mL applications using TC5-R - Topi-CLICK Micro® 5 mL devices, which dispense metered 0.05 mL doses. Dose finding will begin at a dose of 10 mg/mL (1.0%). Doses will escalate sequentially across planned dose levels (Level 1: 5 mg/mL, Level 2: 10 mg/mL, Level 3: 20 mg/mL) as guided by the BOIN-AT design until the Maximum Tolerated Dose is identified.
Other Names:
|
|
Experimental: Dose Level 2 - 10 mg/mL (1.0%)
|
The active formulation of TOR-582 incorporates sirolimus at concentrations of 5 mg/mL (0.5%), 10 mg/mL (1.0%), and 20 mg/mL (2.0%) along with other active ingredients in an oil-based carrier ointment. Ointment will be applied intranasally twice daily in 0.2mL applications using TC5-R - Topi-CLICK Micro® 5 mL devices, which dispense metered 0.05 mL doses. Dose finding will begin at a dose of 10 mg/mL (1.0%). Doses will escalate sequentially across planned dose levels (Level 1: 5 mg/mL, Level 2: 10 mg/mL, Level 3: 20 mg/mL) as guided by the BOIN-AT design until the Maximum Tolerated Dose is identified.
Other Names:
|
|
Experimental: Dose Level 3 - 20 mg/mL (2.0%)
|
The active formulation of TOR-582 incorporates sirolimus at concentrations of 5 mg/mL (0.5%), 10 mg/mL (1.0%), and 20 mg/mL (2.0%) along with other active ingredients in an oil-based carrier ointment. Ointment will be applied intranasally twice daily in 0.2mL applications using TC5-R - Topi-CLICK Micro® 5 mL devices, which dispense metered 0.05 mL doses. Dose finding will begin at a dose of 10 mg/mL (1.0%). Doses will escalate sequentially across planned dose levels (Level 1: 5 mg/mL, Level 2: 10 mg/mL, Level 3: 20 mg/mL) as guided by the BOIN-AT design until the Maximum Tolerated Dose is identified.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Incidence of dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs)
Time Frame: From enrollment through the first 4 weeks of treatment for each cohort (the DLT evaluation window)
|
The occurrence of protocol-defined DLTs during the active treatment at each dose level, used to guide escalation/de-escalation decisions and determine the recommended Phase 1b dose.
A DLT is defined as the occurrence of Grade 2 or higher AEs in greater than 25% of participants at a given dose level, or more than one Grade 3 or higher AE at any point in the trial.
|
From enrollment through the first 4 weeks of treatment for each cohort (the DLT evaluation window)
|
|
Number of participants with treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs)
Time Frame: From enrollment through end of treatment, typically at 12 weeks.
|
The aggregate count of participants experiencing AEs across the entire 12-week treatment period.
|
From enrollment through end of treatment, typically at 12 weeks.
|
|
Severity of treatment-emergent adverse events, graded according to the NCI CTCAE v6.0.
Time Frame: From enrollment through the first 4 weeks of treatment for each cohort (the DLT evaluation window)
|
The highest severity grade of clinical AEs experienced by each participant.
The CTCAE scale ranges from Grade 1 (Mild) to Grade 5 (Death), where higher grades indicate greater clinical severity.
|
From enrollment through the first 4 weeks of treatment for each cohort (the DLT evaluation window)
|
|
Whole blood sirolimus trough concentrations
Time Frame: Assessed at baseline, after 4 weeks of treatment, and at the end of treatment at 12 weeks
|
Assessed at baseline, after 4 weeks of treatment, and at the end of treatment at 12 weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Epistaxis severity, measured by the Epistaxis Severity Score (ESS)
Time Frame: Assessed at baseline, initiation of treatment, every 4 weeks during treatment, and at the end of treatment, typically at 12 weeks
|
Trends in the ESS at baseline and during and after treatment will quantify changes in bleeding burden.
The ESS ranges from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating greater severity.
|
Assessed at baseline, initiation of treatment, every 4 weeks during treatment, and at the end of treatment, typically at 12 weeks
|
|
Patient-reported frequency of epistaxis episodes
Time Frame: Recorded daily from beginning of screening period through end of treatment, typically at 12 weeks.
|
Recorded as frequency of entries in the Cure HHT Diary and averaged over 28-day periods to supplement the ESS.
|
Recorded daily from beginning of screening period through end of treatment, typically at 12 weeks.
|
|
Patient-reported duration of epistaxis episodes
Time Frame: Recorded daily from beginning of screening period through end of treatment, typically at 12 weeks.
|
Recorded via Cure HHT Diary on a six-tiered scale, with a minimum duration of <1 minute and a maximum of >60 minutes.
|
Recorded daily from beginning of screening period through end of treatment, typically at 12 weeks.
|
|
Patient-reported intensity of epistaxis episodes
Time Frame: Recorded daily from beginning of screening period through end of treatment, typically at 12 weeks.
|
Recorded via Cure HHT Diary on a scale ranging from 1 ("spotting") to 6 ("gushing") and averaged over 28-day periods to supplement the ESS.
Higher scores indicate greater intensity.
|
Recorded daily from beginning of screening period through end of treatment, typically at 12 weeks.
|
|
Patient-reported overall severity of epistaxis episodes
Time Frame: Recorded daily from beginning of screening period through end of treatment, typically at 12 weeks.
|
Recorded via Cure HHT Diary on a scale ranging from 1 to 10 and averaged over 28-day periods to supplement the ESS.
Higher scores indicate greater overall severity.
|
Recorded daily from beginning of screening period through end of treatment, typically at 12 weeks.
|
|
Clinical Global Impression - Severity (CGI-S) score, adapted for epistaxis
Time Frame: At baseline, initiation of treatment, every 4 weeks during treatment, and at end of treatment (typically at 12 weeks).
|
The subjective assessment of nosebleed severity, as measured using adapted items from the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) scale.
Participants will be asked: "Overall, how would you rate your nosebleeds now?", with response options ranging from 1 ("Excellent - no nosebleeds") to 6 ("Very Poor - nosebleeds are constant or severely disruptive").
Higher scores indicate greater severity.
|
At baseline, initiation of treatment, every 4 weeks during treatment, and at end of treatment (typically at 12 weeks).
|
|
Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) score, adapted for epistaxis.
Time Frame: Every 4 weeks during treatment, and at end of treatment (typically at 12 weeks)
|
Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) score, adapted for epistaxis.
The subjective assessment of treatment-related change in nosebleed severity, as measured using adapted items from the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) scale.
Participants will be asked: "Overall, how would you rate your nosebleeds since starting the treatment with this ointment?",
with response options ranging from 1 ("much better") to 7 ("much worse").
Higher scores indicate less improvement.
|
Every 4 weeks during treatment, and at end of treatment (typically at 12 weeks)
|
|
Clinical Global Impression - Quality of Life (CGI-QoL) score, adapted for epistaxis.
Time Frame: At baseline, initiation of treatment, every 4 weeks during treatment, and at end of treatment (typically at 12 weeks)
|
The subjective assessment of the impact of nosebleeds on quality of life, as measured using adapted items from the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) scale.
Participants will be asked: "Overall, how would you rate how much your nosebleeds affect your overall quality of life?", with response options ranging from 1 ("not at all") to 6 ("extreme").
Higher scores indicate greater impact on quality of life.
|
At baseline, initiation of treatment, every 4 weeks during treatment, and at end of treatment (typically at 12 weeks)
|
|
HHT-Specific Quality of Life (QoL)
Time Frame: At baseline, initiation of treatment, every 4 weeks during treatment, and at end of treatment (typically at 12 weeks)
|
Participants will complete a 4-item, validated HHT-specific QoL questionnaire designed to assess the functional impact of HHT-related epistaxis.
Each item is scored from 0 (never) to 4 (very often), yielding a total score ranging from 0 (no limitations) to 16 (severe limitations).
Higher scores indicate more severe limitations of quality of life.
|
At baseline, initiation of treatment, every 4 weeks during treatment, and at end of treatment (typically at 12 weeks)
|
|
Modified QoL-HHT score
Time Frame: At baseline, initiation of treatment, every 4 weeks during treatment, and at end of treatment (typically at 12 weeks)
|
The QoL-HHT is a 24-item, disease-specific questionnaire that quantifies multi-faceted impact of HHT on individual patient lives.
Each statement is scored on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 = "strongly disagree" to 5 = "strongly agree."
Items are categorized into six validated domains: physical limitations (PL), social relationships (SR), concern about bleeding (CAB), relationship with the medical profession (RMP), experience of symptoms (ES), and concern about disease evolution (ED).
This trial will use a modified 8-item QoL-HHT score by selecting specified items focused particularly on the overall burden of epistaxis in each participant's daily life, with higher scores indicating greater burden.
|
At baseline, initiation of treatment, every 4 weeks during treatment, and at end of treatment (typically at 12 weeks)
|
|
Satisfaction with Social Roles and Activities, measured by PROMIS® Short Form 8a v2.0
Time Frame: At baseline, initiation of treatment, every 4 weeks during treatment, and at end of treatment (typically at 12 weeks)
|
This is one of three short-form questionnaires from the NIH Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) which will be used to evaluate the impact of treatment on overall well-being and functioning.
Each form yields a standardized T-score generated via the PROMIS® scoring engine, allowing comparison to a normative population (mean = 50, SD = 10).
This 8-item measure evaluates satisfaction with social participation and daily responsibilities.
Items include statements such as: "I am satisfied with my ability to do regular daily activities."
Higher T-scores indicate greater satisfaction with social roles.
|
At baseline, initiation of treatment, every 4 weeks during treatment, and at end of treatment (typically at 12 weeks)
|
|
Depression, measured by PROMIS® Short Form 8b v1.0
Time Frame: At baseline, initiation of treatment, every 4 weeks during treatment, and at end of treatment (typically at 12 weeks)
|
This is one of three short-form questionnaires from the NIH Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) which will be used to evaluate the impact of treatment on overall well-being and functioning.
Each form yields a standardized T-score generated via the PROMIS® scoring engine, allowing comparison to a normative population (mean = 50, SD = 10).
This 8-item form assesses depressive symptoms experienced in the past 7 days, including feelings of sadness, hopelessness, and worthlessness.
Higher T-scores indicate more severe depressive symptoms.
|
At baseline, initiation of treatment, every 4 weeks during treatment, and at end of treatment (typically at 12 weeks)
|
|
Fatigue, measured by PROMIS® Short Form 6a v1.0
Time Frame: At baseline, initiation of treatment, every 4 weeks during treatment, and at end of treatment (typically at 12 weeks)
|
This is one of three short-form questionnaires from the NIH Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) which will be usde to evaluate the impact of treatment on overall well-being and functioning.
Each form yields a standardized T-score generated via the PROMIS® scoring engine, allowing comparison to a normative population (mean = 50, SD = 10).
This 6-item questionnaire measures fatigue severity and its interference with physical and social functioning.
Items include: "How fatigued were you on average?"
Higher T-scores reflect more severe fatigue.
|
At baseline, initiation of treatment, every 4 weeks during treatment, and at end of treatment (typically at 12 weeks)
|
|
EQ-5D Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS)
Time Frame: At baseline, initiation of treatment, every 4 weeks during treatment, and at end of treatment (typically at 12 weeks)
|
The EuroQol Visual Analogue Scale is a validated, standardized instrument developed by the EuroQol Group to capture a participant's self-rated health status.
Participants indicate their current overall health on a vertical scale ranging from 0 ("worst imaginable health") to 100 ("best imaginable health"), generating a single index value of health-related quality of life.
Higher scores indicate greater health-related quality of life.
|
At baseline, initiation of treatment, every 4 weeks during treatment, and at end of treatment (typically at 12 weeks)
|
|
Patient Satisfaction with Treatment
Time Frame: At end of treatment, typically at 12 weeks
|
Participants will be asked, "Overall, how satisfied are you with the ointment?",
with answer choices ranging from 1 ("completely dissatisfied") to 7 ("completely satisfied").
Higher scores indicate greater satisfaction.
|
At end of treatment, typically at 12 weeks
|
|
Perceived treatment benefit and satisfaction, measured by Modified TTAQ.
Time Frame: At end of treatment (typically at 12 weeks)
|
Topical Therapy Adherence Questionnaire (TTAQ) and companion Patient Preference Questionnaire (PPQ) were developed by Zschocke et al. to identify patient- and treatment-related factors that influence adherence to topical therapies.
This trial uses a modified 19-item version of the TTAQ, focusing specifically on the Treatment Satisfaction and Benefits to Patient domains and curated to minimize respondent burden and align with the use of topical sirolimus in the nasal mucosa.
Participants rate their agreement with each item on a 4-point Likert scale, ranging from 0 ("strongly disagree") to 3 ("strongly agree"), where higher scores indicate greater treatment satisfaction and benefit to patient.
|
At end of treatment (typically at 12 weeks)
|
|
Perceived treatment benefit and satisfaction, measured by Modified PPQ
Time Frame: At end of treatment (typically at 12 weeks)
|
The Topical Therapy Adherence Questionnaire (TTAQ) and companion Patient Preference Questionnaire (PPQ) were developed by Zschocke et al. to identify patient- and treatment-related factors that influence adherence to topical therapies.
This trial uses a modified, 6-item version of the PPQ, focusing specifically on the Treatment Satisfaction and Benefits to Patient domains and curated to minimize respondent burden and align with our use of topical sirolimus in the nasal mucosa.
Participants rate their agreement with each item on a 4-point Likert scale, ranging from 0 ("strongly disagree") to 3 ("strongly agree"), where higher scores indicate greater treatment satisfaction and benefit to patient.
|
At end of treatment (typically at 12 weeks)
|
|
Hematologic Support Score (HSS)
Time Frame: During screening and at end of treatment, typically at 12 weeks
|
The HSS is a composite measure that combines the assessment of red blood cell transfusion and iron infusion into a single endpoint, enabling evaluation over time.
A higher number indicates greater transfusion/infusion burden.
|
During screening and at end of treatment, typically at 12 weeks
|
|
Hematologic Impact Score (HIS)
Time Frame: During screening and at end of treatment, typically at 12 weeks
|
The HIS assesses the total hematologic impact over a reference time frame by accounting for changes in hemoglobin and HSS during that period (a higher number indicates greater improvement in hematologic status).
|
During screening and at end of treatment, typically at 12 weeks
|
|
Mean change in hemoglobin concentration from baseline
Time Frame: During screening and at the end of treatment, typically at 12 weeks
|
Measured via standard automated complete blood count (CBC).
|
During screening and at the end of treatment, typically at 12 weeks
|
|
Mean change in hematocrit from baseline
Time Frame: During screening and at the end of treatment, typically at 12 weeks
|
Measured via standard automated complete blood count (CBC).
|
During screening and at the end of treatment, typically at 12 weeks
|
|
Mean change in mean corpuscular volume (MCV) from baseline
Time Frame: During screening and at the end of treatment, typically at 12 weeks
|
Measured via standard automated complete blood count (CBC).
|
During screening and at the end of treatment, typically at 12 weeks
|
|
Mean change in serum ferritin from baseline
Time Frame: During screening and at the end of treatment, typically at 12 weeks
|
Measured via standard iron panel.
|
During screening and at the end of treatment, typically at 12 weeks
|
|
Mean change in transferrin saturation from baseline
Time Frame: During screening and at the end of treatment, typically at 12 weeks
|
Measured via standard iron panel.
|
During screening and at the end of treatment, typically at 12 weeks
|
|
Number of red blood cell transfusions and parenteral iron administrations during treatment period
Time Frame: Assessed during screening and at end of treatment, typically at 12 weeks
|
Measured via patient reporting.
|
Assessed during screening and at end of treatment, typically at 12 weeks
|
|
Endoscopic Disease Activity
Time Frame: Assessed during screening, after first 4 weeks of treatment (end of DLT evaluation period), and end of treatment (typically at 12 weeks)
|
Change in nasal telangiectasia severity, assessed by a modified HHT Endoscopy Score (HES).
The HES is a clinician-administered scoring system used to assess the severity of nasal telangiectasias during endoscopic evaluation.
For this study, five domains will be used: number of sites involved, vascular pattern, crusting, lesion location, and septal perforation.
Each is scored from 0 to 3, with higher scores indicating more extensive disease.
|
Assessed during screening, after first 4 weeks of treatment (end of DLT evaluation period), and end of treatment (typically at 12 weeks)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Vascular Diseases
- Cardiovascular Diseases
- Pathologic Processes
- Respiratory Tract Diseases
- Hemorrhage
- Hematologic Diseases
- Congenital Abnormalities
- Nose Diseases
- Otorhinolaryngologic Diseases
- Signs and Symptoms, Respiratory
- Cardiovascular Abnormalities
- Hemostatic Disorders
- Hemorrhagic Disorders
- Telangiectasis
- Congenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities
- Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms
- Signs and Symptoms
- Hemic and Lymphatic Diseases
- Epistaxis
- Telangiectasia, Hereditary Hemorrhagic
- Vascular Malformations
Other Study ID Numbers
- AAAV9649
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Epistaxis
-
Sheikh Zayed Federal Postgraduate Medical InstituteNot yet recruitingEpistaxis Nosebleed | Greater Palatine Foramen
-
Dr. Anne ConlinUniversity of OttawaRecruitingEpistaxis NosebleedCanada
-
Ankara Ataturk Sanatorium Training and Research...Not yet recruitingEpistaxis Nosebleed
-
NasaClipEmergency Medical Innovations, LLCRecruiting
-
Youssef ZakiFaculty of Medicine , Kafrelshiekh University, Egypt.Completed
-
Izmir Ataturk Training and Research HospitalCompletedTranexamic Acid | Anterior EpistaxisTurkey
-
Assiut UniversityNot yet recruiting
-
University of ZurichCompletedNosebleed (Epistaxis) - Posterior or AnteriorSwitzerland
-
Bezmialem Vakif UniversityCompleted
-
Saglik Bilimleri UniversitesiAnkara Etlik City HospitalRecruitingEpistaxis Nosebleed | Atmospheric Pressure; Adverse EffectTurkey
Clinical Trials on Topical sirolimus ointment
-
The University of Texas Health Science Center at...National Institute on Aging (NIA)CompletedAging | Epigenetics | Inflammatory MediatorsUnited States
-
Hovione Scientia LimitedCompletedMeibomian Gland Dysfunction | MGD-Meibomian Gland DysfunctionUnited States
-
PfizerCompletedDermatitis, AtopicAustralia, United States
-
Technoderma Medicines Inc.Therapeutics, Inc.Completed
-
Tufts Medical CenterPfizerWithdrawn
-
BioGaia ABCompletedAtopic DermatitisSouth Africa
-
PfizerCompletedDermatitis, AtopicUnited States
-
Dermavant Sciences GmbHUnknownAtopic DermatitisUnited States
-
Ahram Canadian UniversityTerminatedChronic Atopic DermatitisEgypt