Salivary Gland Massage and Olfactory Stimulation for Relieving Feeding Difficulty and Triggering Oral Intake Among People With Dementia

June 28, 2026 updated by: Shu-Ying Li, National Cheng Kung University

SMART-program:Dual Sensory-Stimulation for Relieving Feeding Difficulty and Triggering Oral Intake Among People With Dementia

Feeding difficulties are a common issue among individuals with dementia during moderate to advanced stages, particularly those in long-term care (LTC) facilities. Due to severe cognitive and communicative impairment, these residents often have a high dependency on feeding assistance. Consequently, caregivers manage not only refusal to eat and prolonged mealtimes but also the resulting nutritional problems among these patients. The eating process includes the anticipatory phase, during which food is identified via sensory triggers, thereby stimulating saliva secretion. This process facilitates bolus formation and ensures a smooth transition to the swallowing phase. Accordingly, this study aims to investigate the efficacy of a dual-sensory intervention, combining salivary gland massage and olfactory stimulation, in improving feeding difficulties and food intake among individuals with moderate-to-severe dementia.

This study will employ a randomized controlled trial (RCT) design. The experimental group will receive an intervention comprising salivary gland massage combined with aromatherapy for a total of 20 days. Simultaneously, baseline characteristics, including sociodemographic data, health status, and oral moisture, will be collected. Data for the 'Dementia Mealtime Nonverbal Cues' and two-meal intake will be monitored daily on weekdays for two weeks; all other variables will be assessed once. During the intervention period, the experimental procedure will be performed twice daily, prior to lunch and dinner. The control group will receive only a palm massage prior to meals. Throughout the intervention, participants will be assessed for "The Dementia Mealtime Nonverbal Cues" and oral intake during lunch and dinner every weekday. Additionally, oral moisture will be evaluated once weekly (T1-T4). Data will be analyzed using Linear Mixed Models (LMM) to examine the differences and longitudinal changes in outcome measures between the two groups. The findings of this study will contribute to the establishment of a safe, feasible, and culturally appropriate feeding care model for institutionalized individuals with dementia.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Tainan, Taiwan
        • Yueh-Rong Nursing Home

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Resided in a long-term care (LTC) facility for more than three months.
  2. Diagnosed with any type of dementia, with either a Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) of 2 or higher, a Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score below 20, or a Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire (SPMSQ) score greater than or equal to 3 errors (indicating moderate to severe impairment).
  3. A feeding item score of below 5 on the Barthel Index (indicating the participant needs assistance with cutting food, spreading butter, etc., or requires a modified diet or is unable to feed themselves). DOCX

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Absence of observable expression, behavioral, or response to olfactory stimuli.
  2. Current use of a nasogastric tube (NG tube) or a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG).
  3. Diagnosis of hyperphagia or pica.
  4. Inability to cooperate with the required salivary gland massage.
  5. Uncontrolled epilepsy, severe or unstable cardiovascular disease, severe asthma, severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), or gastrointestinal bleeding.
  6. Known allergy to essential oils.
  7. Undergone surgery related to oral, tongue, or thyroid cancer.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Control
Participants in the control group will receive a placebo intervention consisting of a hand massage, accompanied by general greetings and caring interactions, in their daily activity area. This will be conducted before lunch and dinner for four consecutive weeks on weekdays only. To minimize confounding effects, participants will be restricted from exposure to any olfactory or other extraneous sensory stimuli during this 30-minute pre-meal period.
Experimental: Experimental Group
Participants in the experimental group will receive a dual-sensory intervention before lunch and dinner for four consecutive weeks (weekdays only). This consists of a 2-minute salivary gland massage combined with 30 minutes of olfactory stimulation, using 100% lemon essential oil dispersed via a waterless ultrasonic nebulizer.
The experimental group will receive an intervention comprising salivary gland massage combined with aromatherapy for a total of 20 days.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Dementia Feeding Difficulty Cues
Time Frame: Every lunch and dinner from baseline up to 6 weeks
Feeding difficulty is assessed using the unabbreviated scale title: Dementia Mealtime Nonverbal Cues checklist. This adapted checklist consists of 21 items categorized into negative behaviors (chewing/swallowing difficulty and resistive behaviors; 16 items) and positive/neutral behaviors (5 items). Assuming each item is scored as Yes=1 and No=0, the minimum score is 0 and the maximum is 16 for negative behaviors, where higher scores indicate worse feeding difficulties. For positive behaviors, the score ranges from 0 to 5, where higher scores indicate better feeding performance.
Every lunch and dinner from baseline up to 6 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Oral Intake
Time Frame: Every lunch and dinner from baseline up to 6 weeks
Dietary intake at lunch and dinner will be determined using the plate waste method. Food consumption will be quantitatively assessed by measuring and recording food weights in grams (g) to one decimal place before and after meals using the same electronic weighing scale throughout the study to ensure measurement consistency.
Every lunch and dinner from baseline up to 6 weeks
Duration
Time Frame: Every lunch and dinner from baseline up to 6 weeks
Feeding duration is measured continuously using a timer, from the moment the first bite of food is offered until the meal is completed or terminated. The measurement value is recorded precisely in minutes and seconds (analyzed as total seconds). The minimum value is 0 seconds, with no strict maximum limit. A higher value (longer duration) indicates worse feeding efficiency and greater feeding difficulty.
Every lunch and dinner from baseline up to 6 weeks
Oral moisture
Time Frame: Once weekly from baseline up to 6 weeks
Oral moisture is evaluated using the Mucus® device. The measurement values range from a minimum of 0.0 to a maximum of 99.9. Higher scores indicate better outcomes (normal oral humidity is defined as ≥ 29.6, while ≤ 27.9 indicates dry mouth.
Once weekly from baseline up to 6 weeks
Body weight
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 4 (end of intervention), Week 8 (1 month post-intervention)
Body weight is measured using a standardized weighing scale, with values recorded in kilograms (kg). To ensure consistency, measurements will be taken at a unified time each month across all participating facilities. The theoretical minimum value is >0 kg, with no strict maximum limit. Because unintentional weight loss is a common complication of feeding difficulties in dementia, weight maintenance or a higher value (weight gain) generally indicates a better nutritional outcome.
Baseline, Week 4 (end of intervention), Week 8 (1 month post-intervention)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 16, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 27, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 27, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 2, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 28, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

July 1, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 1, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 28, 2026

Last Verified

June 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Dementia

3
Subscribe