Monitoring MRD in Multiple Myeloma in Serum by Mass Spectrometry

Monitoring Minimal Residual Disease in Multiple Myeloma in Serum by Mass Spectrometry

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a severe plasma cell cancer caused by proliferation and accumulation of malignant plasma cells in the bone marrow. Novel therapies have improved responses and survival considerably. Recently, it was shown that achieved and sustained minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity is the best predictor for long-term disease-free and overall survival. Achieving and maintaining MRD negativity will therefore be the new treatment goal for patients with MM. Two methods are established for MRD analysis; next-generation flowcytometry (NGF), e.g., the Euro-MRD flow assay, and next-generation sequencing (NGS), e.g., the ClonoSeq assay. Both methods are highly sensitive, with 10^-5 as the standard goal, and currently reaching for 10^-6. Both methods are based on bone marrow sampling, which is inconvenient and painful for the patients, particularly for serial analyses.

Blood-based MRD analyses of high sensitivity would allow more frequent sampling and monitoring. Methods based on circulating free tumor DNA are found to have rather low sensitivity. Mass spectrometry (MS) based analysis of patient-specific M-protein is another potential candidate for sensitive and specific monitoring of patients in deep remission. This method is under development, e.g., at the Mayo Clinic, USA, but is not fully standardized. No commercial assays have been approved.

The investigators will assess and validate the sensitivity of MS-based MRD analyses in monitoring patients with MM in remission. Reproducibility and quality controls will be performed in collaboration with an international partner. The investigators will compare the sensitivity of MS-based analysis with Euro-flow MRD assay and NGS LymphoTrack assay, both performed on bone marrow aspirates. Prospectively, the investigators will monitor a cohort of 40 patients in stringent, complete remission. Imaging by FDG-PET/CT (fluoro-deoxyglucose (FDG) positron-emission tomography (PET) combined with computerized tomography (CT)) is part of MRD assessment according to the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) and will be included in our studies.

Establishing a blood based MRD analysis will potentially not only be more convenient, it may, in some patients, be more sensitive. The blood reflects disease status in the whole body, whereas bone marrow sampling only allows examining what is present at this particular site. MRD in MM may be patchily located in the skeleton, highlighting the relevance of including FDG PET/CT in the assessment.

Study Overview

• Status: Not yet recruiting
• Conditions: Multiple Myeloma; Minimal Residual Disease
• Intervention / Treatment: Diagnostic test: Mass spectrometry

Detailed Description

Background

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a severe plasma cell cancer caused by malignant proliferation and accumulation of clonal plasma cells in the bone marrow. It is the second most common hematological malignancy. The malignant plasma cells produce either intact but abnormal immunoglobulins or free light kappa or lambda chains - called M-protein. These secreted abnormal proteins have, for decades, been used as biomarkers to monitor MM, assess response to treatment, and to diagnose relapse of the disease. The M-protein is measured by serum protein electrophoresis and protein immunofixation, and the free light chains are measured by immunoassays. International consensus criteria for treatment response assessment are based on the degree of suppression of the M-protein, involved free light chain and the number of clonal plasma cells in the bone marrow. The best defined response, stringent complete response (sCR) is defined as disappearance of M-protein in serum by immunofixation, normalized kappa/lambda ratio in serum, and absence of clonal plasma cells in bone marrow biopsy by immunohistochemistry or flowcytometry.

Novel treatments have considerably improved observed responses and survival, and deep suppression of the clonal cells is the key factor to improve survival. More sensitive analyses to assess residual disease have been established, and the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) has defined the concept "minimal residual disease" (MRD) negativity as the absence of clonal plasma cells in the bone marrow with a minimum sensitivity of 1 in 100,000 nucleated cells. "Sustained MRD-negativity" defines MRD-negativity confirmed minimum 1 year apart. Moreover, "imaging plus MRD negativity" further requires a normal bone marrow tracer uptake by FDG PET/CT. Imaging is included as MM residual disease may be patchy or heterogeneously located in the body.

The impact of achieving MRD negativity at 1 in 100,000 or lower has consistently been reported to be so important that MRD negativity rate is proposed as primary objective in clinical trials and is under consideration by FDA as an accepted surrogate marker for long-term survival in the drug approval process. To achieve and maintain MRD negativity will therefore become the new goal for treating patients with MM. Further, serial MRD analyses will enable guidance during continued or maintenance therapy

Two methods have been established for MRD analysis, next-generation flowcytometry (NGF), e.g., the EuroFlow MRD assay, and next-generation sequencing (NGS), e.g., the ClonoSeq assay. Both methods are highly sensitive; 1 in 100,000 as standard goal, and currently reaching for 1 in 1,000,000. However, both methods require bone marrow sampling, which particularly for serial analysis is inconvenient and painful for the patients.

Blood-based MRD analyses of high sensitivity would be desirable for the patients and would allow more frequent sampling and monitoring. However, methods based on circulating cell-free tumor DNA have been found to have rather low sensitivity compared to bone marrow analysis. Mass spectrometry (MS) based analysis of patient-specific M-protein is another potential candidate for sensitive and specific monitoring of patients in deep remission. The literature proposes two distinct methods: a clonotypic peptide method and an intact protein method. These methods are under development in some centers, e.g. at the Mayo Clinic, USA, but are not fully standardized, and no commercial assays have been approved for MRD monitoring.

The investigators will assess and validate the sensitivity of a MS-based MRD analysis of blood in patients with MM in remission. The investigators will compare the sensitivity of MS-based analysis with Euro-flow MRD NGF analysis and NGS LymphoTrack analysis, both performed on bone marrow aspirates. Establishing a blood-based MRD analysis will potentially not only be more convenient, it may, in some patients, also be more sensitive. The blood reflects disease status in the whole body, whereas bone marrow sampling specifically examines what is present at this particular site. In addition, MRD in MM may be patchily located in the skeleton, highlighting the relevance of including FDG PET/CT in assessments.

Design

The investigators will prospectively examine and monitor a cohort of 40 patients in sCR. The study will include patients that have been in sCR for more than six months; this to minimize the risk that low-level circulating M-protein, due to a long half-live, will still be present in some patients in otherwise cellular MRD negativity. Furthermore, the investigators will perform retrospective analyses based on an established biobank where possible.

Samples from bone marrow and/or CD138+ isolated plasma cells from diagnosis must be present to identify the patient-specific Ig heavy chain and Ig light chain re-arrangement for NGS and MS assay establishment.

At base-line (time of inclusion), after 12 and 24 months, all subjects are examined using blood for MS, bone marrow for NGS-MRD and NGF-MRD, and FDG-PET/CT.

Every three months, blood is sampled for MS. If MS turns from negative to positive, all base-line assessments will be repeated. If quantitative MS doubles, e.g. from 5 ng/ml to 10 ng/ml, all base-line assessment will be repeated.

The sensitivity of the MS-based analysis will be compared with NGF-MRD, NGS-MRD and FDG-PET/CT findings. Moreover, the study will compare the sensitivity and prognostic value to predict biochemical and clinical progression of all four methods.

At 24 months, all subjects will be end of study, but will be followed for time to progression.

Experimental methods

Mass spectrometry For intact protein measurements, sample preparation methods for the purification and intact protein measurements of lambda and kappa light chains and corresponding Ig heavy chains is already under developpment. Moreover, strategies for the identification of clonotypic amino acid sequences of the M-protein and kappa/lambda proteins will be done either through de novo peptide sequencing by proteolytic M-protein cleavage, using multiple proteases combined with LC-MSMS analysis and bioinformatics, or through NGS sequencing of clonal Ig rearrangements. Clonotypic peptide sequences will then be used as surrogate markers for the M-protein levels in serum. Specifically, disease-specific immunoglobulins will be isolated from patient samples using affinity enrichment strategies virtually as previously described. For the de novo sequencing strategy, isolated immunoglobulins will be proteolytically cleaved by several proteases including, but not exclusively, trypsin, Lysozyme C, and proteinase K. Proteolytic digests will be analyzed by LC-MSMS using data-dependent acquisition. Resulting tandem mass spectra with amino acid sequence information will be de novo sequenced for the identification of clone-specific amino acid sequences using bioinformatics tools.

For intact protein measurements, the isolated disease-specific immunoglobulins will be analyzed using a novel multidimensional separation approach based on reversed-phase LC combined with FAIMS (Field asymmetric ion mobility spectrometry) and MS detection by high resolution Orbitrap MS. Samples will be analyzed using both MS-methods for increased sensitivity and selectivity.

Identified clone specific immunoglobulins and derived clone specific peptides will then be used for disease monitoring during treatment and relapse.

Patient samples for method/assay development and equipment/instrumentations are already available at OUH for method comparison with gold standard method. Serum and plasma cell samples along with clinical data are already available for assay/method development. For clinical studies, patient samples collected at baseline (time of diagnosis), remission and relapse are also available for the present project.

Next generation sequencing of clonal rearrangements Clonal B cell rearrangements will be identified by NGS sequencing on the in-house Illumina MiSeq sequencing platform using the established LymphoTrack kit (Invivoscribe) for IgH and IgL kappa rearrangements and in-house developed assay for IgL lambda rearrangements. The method identifies plasma cell clones in CD138+ cells at diagnosis by the unique sequences of their antibody immunoglobulin repertoire, where each cell expansion will display its own genomic fingerprint. Clonal plasma cell populations will be quantified to a sensitivity of 10^-5 to 10^-6 for MRD assessment. These methods are established in the study lab which have a long and increasing experience in supporting clinical trials with NGS-MRD analyses.

Flowcytometry MM MRD assessment by flow cytometry using the standardized approach for sample processing and data analysis developed by the EuroFlow Consortium achieve high sensitivity (10^-5) by processing a large number of cells (10 x 10^6). EuroFlow standard operating protocol (SOP) for Bulk lysis, staining and Instrument set-up for BD FACS Lyric™ is used and data analyzed by experienced chief physicians using the Infinicyte™ Software program allowing identification of both normal and abnormal plasma cells in the sample.

FDG PET/CT Standardized FDG PET/CT scans will be performed at the Department of Nuclear Medicine, OUH.

Statistics The study will include 40 patients in sCR defined by IMWG criteria. Sample cohort size estimation is based on power calculations using a dichotomous endpoint of MRD negativity or positivity between two methods (80% power, significance threshold of 0.05, comparing proportions). Using estimated parameters of 2/3 flow-MRD negative patients in sCR, with 3/4 of these obtaining sustained MRD negativity throughout follow-up (i.e., 50% MRD+/-), 70% MRD positive rate by mass spectrometry, and three evaluations for each patient, the study will include 40 patients in sCR defined by IMWG criteria (120 samplings for blinded, unpaired assessment).

• Study Type: Observational
• Enrollment (Estimated): 40

Contacts and Locations

• Study Contact: Name: Niels Abildgaard, MD, professor; Phone Number: +45 2322 1584; Email: niels.abildgaard@rsyd.dk
• Study Contact Backup: Name: Charlotte Toftmann Hansen, MD, ass. professor; Phone Number: +45 3053 5733; Email: charlotte.toftmann.hansen1@rsyd.dk

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: Adult; Older Adult
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No

• Sampling Method: Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Multiple Myeloma patients in stringent complete remission for for than six months

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• Multiple Myeloma patients in sCR for more than 6 months
• Diagnostic bone marrow and blood/serum material biobanked at diagnosis according to established diagnostic biobank
• Informed, written consent

Exclusion Criteria:

• Phychiatric disease or other condition where the subject may be non-compliant
• Not able to read and understand Danish language
• Bleeding disorder, thrombocyte counts below 20 mia/L

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Number of groups / cohorts

1

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Intervention / Treatment

Patients with multiple myeloma in stringent complete remission (sCR); sCR must have been present for more than 6 months

Diagnostic test: Mass spectrometry; M-protein/Kappa/Lambda in serum will be measured by Mass Spectrometry (MS) using two different methods: 1) a clonotypic method based on sequencing of clonal Ig rearrangement, and 2) an intact protein measurement based reversed-phase liquide chromatography and detection by high resolution Orbitrap MS. Samples will be analyzed using both methods for increased sensitivity and specificity and the finding will be compared by minimal residual disease measurements by high sensitive flowcytometry, next generation sequencing, and FDG-PET/CT; Other Names: Next Generation Sequencing; Flowcytometry

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Sensitivity of employed methods	The sensitivity of the MS-based analysis will be determined. The sensitivity of "high sensitivity flowcytometry" (NGF-MRD) will be determined. The sensitivity of "next generation sequencing" (NGS-MRD) will be determined. The sensitivity of FDG-PET/CT will be determined. Comparison of the sensitivity of the different methods	From enrollment until 24 months after enrollment of the last patient

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Progression free survival	Prognostic value to predict biochemical and clinical progression of all four methods (MS, NGF, NGS and PET/CT)	From enrolment until 5 years after last included subject

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Feasibility of Mass Spect methods	The two methods for MS analysis are new and experimental. Applicability of the two methods will be established	From enrollment until 24 months after last patient enrolled

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: Odense University Hospital
• Investigators: Principal Investigator: Niels Abildgaard, MD, professor, Department Hematology, Odense University Hospital & Department Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start (Estimated): August 4, 2026
• Primary Completion (Estimated): January 1, 2029
• Study Completion (Estimated): June 1, 2035

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: June 23, 2026
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: July 6, 2026
• First Posted (Actual): July 8, 2026

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): July 8, 2026
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: July 6, 2026
• Last Verified: July 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Keywords: Remission; Next Generation Sequencing; Minimal Residual Disease; Mass Spectrometry; Flowcytometry
• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Vascular Diseases; Cardiovascular Diseases; Pathologic Processes; Neoplasms; Immune System Diseases; Neoplasms by Histologic Type; Hematologic Diseases; Neoplastic Processes; Lymphoproliferative Disorders; Immunoproliferative Disorders; Neoplasms, Plasma Cell; Hemostatic Disorders; Paraproteinemias; Blood Protein Disorders; Hemorrhagic Disorders; Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms; Hemic and Lymphatic Diseases; Neoplasm, Residual; Multiple Myeloma
• Other Study ID Numbers: ID S-20240028 (Other Identifier: Scientific Etics Committee the Region of Southern Denmark); Acadra no 24/23555 (Other Identifier: The Health Region of Southern Denmark)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

• Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?: NO

Drug and device information, study documents

• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product: No
• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product: No