- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07695519
SCARLET - Italian proSpeCtionAl obseRvationaL multicEntre Study on Treatment for recTal pT1 Cancer (SCARLET)
Study Overview
Status
Detailed Description
Background To date, the therapeutic management of patients with pathological T1 (pT1) rectal cancer after local surgical or endoscopic excision remains a subject of ongoing debate. Although traditional radical surgery has demonstrated proven advantages, discussion persists regarding the adequacy of less invasive techniques for specific subgroups of patients, particularly those with a low risk of disease progression. In these cases, local excision options through endoscopic or surgical interventions, including Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection (ESD), Transanal Minimally Invasive Surgery (TAMIS), and Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery (TEM), may represent a valid curative approach. These techniques, which generally carry a low risk of lymph node metastasis, offer important advantages in terms of organ preservation and reduction of postoperative complications, including anorectal, urinary, and sexual dysfunction, which may significantly impair quality of life.
Rationale The choice of a conservative approach must be carefully evaluated, especially when post-excision histopathological analysis reveals high-risk features. These include deep submucosal invasion greater than 1 mm, poor tumor differentiation, tumor budding, lymphovascular invasion, or positive or close resection margins. In these situations, radical surgery with Total Mesorectal Excision (TME) is considered the standard treatment strategy for reducing the risk of local and nodal recurrence, although available evidence is largely derived from retrospective studies. Because TME may substantially affect quality of life and functional outcomes, treatment decisions should be discussed within a multidisciplinary team. National and international guidelines suggest that patients with pT1 rectal cancer who present high-risk features and are either unwilling or unsuitable to undergo radical surgery may be considered for alternative organ-preserving strategies, including adjuvant radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy.
Study Objective This prospective, observational, multicenter study aims to evaluate the impact of adjuvant radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy on Disease-Free Survival (DFS) in patients with pT1 rectal cancer presenting at least one high-risk histopathological feature who have undergone local excision and declined treatment with TME. The study will also assess long-term oncologic outcomes, organ preservation, and quality of life in this patient population.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Giuditta Chiloiro, MD, Phd
- Phone Number: 06-30154981
- Email: giuditta.chiloiro@policlinicogemelli.it
Study Locations
-
-
RM
-
Roma, RM, Italy, 00168
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS
-
Contact:
- Giuditta Chiloiro, MD, Phd
- Phone Number: 06-30154981
- Email: giuditta.chiloiro@policlinicogemelli.it
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age 18 years or older.
- Good performance status (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group [ECOG] performance status 0 or 1).
- Primary tumor of the distal rectum (clinical T1) amenable to local endoscopic resection using Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection (ESD) or local surgical resection using Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery (TEM) or Transanal Minimally Invasive Surgery (TAMIS).
High-risk pathological T1 rectal cancer meeting at least one of the following conditions:
i) Poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma, mucinous adenocarcinoma, or signet ring cell carcinoma.
ii) Pathological submucosal invasion greater than 1000 micrometers. iii) Positive lymphatic invasion or positive venous invasion confirmed by immunohistochemistry.
iv) Tumor budding grade 2 or 3. v) Positive lateral or vertical resection margin (tumor within 1 mm of the surgical margin) or non-assessable resection margin.
- No lymph node or distant metastases confirmed by computed tomography of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis (clinical N0, M0 disease).
- Radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy initiated within 12 weeks after local endoscopic or surgical resection.
- No previous rectal resection (other than local excision) or pelvic irradiation for any malignancy.
- Adequate organ function as assessed by the treating physician.
- The treating surgeons have explained to the patient that the current standard of care is Total Mesorectal Excision (TME) with D2 lymph node dissection and the patient has declined this treatment.
- Candidate for adjuvant chemoradiotherapy according to routine clinical practice.
- Written informed consent provided.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Synchronous or metachronous malignancy diagnosed within the previous 5 years.
- Infection requiring systemic treatment.
- Requirement for continuous systemic treatment with corticosteroids or immunosuppressive agents.
- Diagnosis of a hereditary colorectal cancer syndrome, including familial adenomatous polyposis or Lynch syndrome, or diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease, including ulcerative colitis or Crohn disease.
- Squamous cell carcinoma, neuroendocrine neoplasm, or mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasm histology.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
3-year Disease-Free Survival (DFS)
Time Frame: 3-years
|
Percentage of patients who remain alive and free from rectal cancer recurrence (local, nodal, or distant metastases) at three years from the start of follow-up.
|
3-years
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Disease-free survival at 1 year
Time Frame: 1 year
|
Percentage of patients alive and free from rectal cancer recurrence (local, nodal, or distant metastases) at 1 year from follow-up.
|
1 year
|
|
Disease-free survival at 5 years
Time Frame: 5 years
|
Percentage of patients alive and free from rectal cancer recurrence (local, nodal, or distant metastases) at 5 years from follow-up.
|
5 years
|
|
Local recurrence-free survival at 1 year
Time Frame: 1 year
|
Time from the end of treatment to the documentation of local disease recurrence at 1 year.
|
1 year
|
|
Local recurrence-free survival at 3 years
Time Frame: 3 years
|
Time from the end of treatment to the documentation of local disease recurrence at 3 years.
|
3 years
|
|
Local recurrence-free survival at 5 years
Time Frame: 5 years
|
Time from the end of treatment to the documentation of local disease recurrence at 5 years.
|
5 years
|
|
Overall survival at 1 year
Time Frame: 1 year
|
Percentage of patients alive at 1 year from the start of follow-up.
|
1 year
|
|
Overall survival at 3 years
Time Frame: 3 years
|
Percentage of patients alive at 3 years from the start of follow-up.
|
3 years
|
|
Overall survival at 5 years
Time Frame: 5 years
|
Percentage of patients alive at 5 years from the start of follow-up.
|
5 years
|
|
Colostomy-free survival at 1 year
Time Frame: 1 year
|
Percentage of patients alive without the need for a temporary or permanent stoma/colostomy at 1 year.
|
1 year
|
|
Colostomy-free survival at 3 years
Time Frame: 3 years
|
Percentage of patients alive without the need for a temporary or permanent stoma/colostomy at 3 years.
|
3 years
|
|
Quality of life assessed by EORTC QLQ-C30 Global Health Status/Quality of Life score at 1 year
Time Frame: 1 year
|
Patient-reported quality of life assessed using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30).
The Global Health Status/Quality of Life score ranges from 0 to 100 after linear transformation.
Higher scores indicate better quality of life.
|
1 year
|
|
Colorectal cancer-specific quality of life assessed by EORTC QLQ-CR29 at 1 year
Time Frame: 1 year
|
Patient-reported colorectal cancer-specific quality of life assessed using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Colorectal Cancer Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-CR29).
Questionnaire scores are transformed to a 0-100 scale.
For functional scales, higher scores indicate better functioning; for symptom scales, higher scores indicate greater symptom burden.
Individual QLQ-CR29 scale scores will be analyzed separately.
|
1 year
|
|
Quality of life assessed by EORTC QLQ-C30 Global Health Status/Quality of Life score at 3 years
Time Frame: 3 years
|
Patient-reported quality of life assessed using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30).
The Global Health Status/Quality of Life score ranges from 0 to 100 after linear transformation.
Higher scores indicate better quality of life.
|
3 years
|
|
Colorectal cancer-specific quality of life assessed by EORTC QLQ-CR29 at 3 years
Time Frame: 3 years
|
Patient-reported colorectal cancer-specific quality of life assessed using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Colorectal Cancer Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-CR29).
Questionnaire scores are transformed to a 0-100 scale.
For functional scales, higher scores indicate better functioning; for symptom scales, higher scores indicate greater symptom burden.
Individual QLQ-CR29 scale scores will be analyzed separately.
|
3 years
|
|
Acute toxicity within 6 months from treatment
Time Frame: Within 6 months from the end of treatment
|
Incidence and severity of acute adverse events (genitourinary, gastrointestinal, and hematologic) scored according to CTCAE version 5.0.
|
Within 6 months from the end of treatment
|
|
Late toxicity at 2 years after the end of treatment
Time Frame: 2 years after the end of treatment
|
Incidence and severity of long-term treatment-related toxicities scored according to CTCAE version 5.0.
|
2 years after the end of treatment
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Nodal Recurrence Rate
Time Frame: Up to 5 years after completion of adjuvant treatment.
|
ercentage of patients who develop regional lymph node recurrence during the follow-up period, as assessed by imaging modalities.
|
Up to 5 years after completion of adjuvant treatment.
|
|
Distant Metastases Rate
Time Frame: Up to 5 years after completion of adjuvant treatment.
|
Percentage of patients who develop distant organ metastases (outside the pelvis) during the follow-up period, confirmed by contrast-enhanced chest-abdomen-pelvis CT scan.
|
Up to 5 years after completion of adjuvant treatment.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Giuditta Chiloiro, MD, PhD, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 27321
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Rectal Cancer
-
Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer CenterNovartis Pharmaceuticals; National Comprehensive Cancer NetworkCompletedStage IIA Rectal Cancer | Stage IIB Rectal Cancer | Stage IIC Rectal Cancer | Stage IIIA Rectal Cancer | Stage IIIB Rectal Cancer | Stage IIIC Rectal Cancer | Recurrent Rectal CancerUnited States
-
First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical UniversityCompletedRectal Cancer Stage | Rectal Cancer PatientsChina
-
M.D. Anderson Cancer CenterRecruitingEvaluation of Quality of Life and Utilities Following Surgical Treatment of Stage I-IV Rectal CancerStage III Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIA Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIB Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIC Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IV Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IVA Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IVB Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IVC Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Rectal Adenocarcinoma | Stage... and other conditionsUnited States
-
Roswell Park Cancer InstituteNational Cancer Institute (NCI)WithdrawnStage IIA Rectal Cancer | Stage IIB Rectal Cancer | Stage IIC Rectal Cancer | Stage IIIA Rectal Cancer | Stage IIIB Rectal Cancer | Rectal AdenocarcinomaUnited States
-
M.D. Anderson Cancer CenterActive, not recruitingMetastatic Rectal Adenocarcinoma | Stage III Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIA Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIB Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIC Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IV Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IVA Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IVB Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IVC Rectal Cancer AJCC... and other conditionsUnited States
-
OHSU Knight Cancer InstituteOregon Health and Science University; Taiho Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.Active, not recruitingStage III Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIA Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIB Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIC Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Rectal Adenocarcinoma | Stage IIA Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIB Rectal Cancer AJCC v8United States
-
Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer CenterNatera, Inc.; The Joseph Drown FoundationRecruitingStage III Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIA Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIB Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIC Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Rectal Adenocarcinoma | Stage IIA Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIB Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage II Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIC Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Locally...United States
-
OHSU Knight Cancer InstituteNatera, Inc.RecruitingEstablishing a ctDNA Biomarker to Improve Organ Preserving Strategies in Patients With Rectal CancerStage III Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIA Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIB Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIC Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Rectal Adenocarcinoma | Stage IIA Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIB Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage II Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIC Rectal Cancer AJCC v8United States
-
M.D. Anderson Cancer CenterNational Cancer Institute (NCI)RecruitingStage III Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIA Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIB Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIC Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Rectal Adenocarcinoma | Stage IIA Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIB Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage II Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIC Rectal Cancer AJCC v8United States
-
Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer CenterNational Cancer Institute (NCI)CompletedFatigue | Depressive Symptoms | Stage IIA Rectal Cancer | Stage IIB Rectal Cancer | Stage IIC Rectal Cancer | Stage IIIA Rectal Cancer | Stage IIIB Rectal Cancer | Stage IIIC Rectal Cancer | Psychosocial Effects of Cancer and Its Treatment | Stage IIIA Colon Cancer | Stage IIIB Colon Cancer | Stage IIIC Colon... and other conditionsUnited States