- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07698548
Fuyang Jiedu Granules Plus Antiretroviral Therapy for HIV Immune Non-Responders With Spleen-Kidney Yang Deficiency (FYJD-INR-pRCT)
A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial of Fuyang Jiedu Granules Combined With Antiretroviral Therapy for Immune Reconstitution Failure in People With HIV and Spleen-Kidney Yang Deficiency Syndrome
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Mei Han, phD
- Phone Number: +86 13401131731
- Email: hanmeizoujin@163.com
Study Locations
-
-
Beijing Municipality
-
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China, 100029
- Beijing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine
-
Contact:
- Mei Han, phD
- Phone Number: +86 13401131731
- Email: hanmeizoujin@163.com
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:Aged 18 to 60 years, male or female. CD4+ T lymphocyte count <350 cells/uL. Meets diagnostic criteria for HIV-1 infection according to the Chinese Guidelines for Diagnosis and Treatment of HIV/AIDS (2024 edition).
Meets diagnostic criteria for incomplete immune reconstitution: ART for more than 4 years; peripheral blood viral load below the lower limit of detection (<50 copies/mL) for more than 3 years; persistent CD4+ T-cell count <350 cells/uL; and exclusion of other causes of long-term low CD4+ T-cell count.
Meets the Traditional Chinese Medicine diagnostic criteria for spleen-kidney yang deficiency syndrome, supported by the designated four-diagnostic instrument (model SZY-ZM-1) where applicable.
Voluntarily agrees to participate and signs informed consent. -
Exclusion Criteria:Uncontrolled acute or chronic physical or mental illness. Poor adherence to ART. WBC <2 x 10^9/L, neutrophils <1.0 x 10^9/L, hemoglobin <90 g/L, platelets <75 x 10^9/L, or abnormal hepatic/renal function. Hepatic abnormality is defined as AST, ALT, or total bilirubin >=2 times the upper limit of normal; renal abnormality is defined as creatinine clearance below the normal value.
Other serious comorbid disease, such as tumor, cirrhosis, or cardiovascular/cerebrovascular disease.
Pregnancy, lactation, or recent plan for pregnancy/childbearing. Use of immunosuppressants or immunomodulators within 6 months before screening. Any other condition judged by the investigator to make the participant unsuitable for the study.
-
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: ART alone
Participants continue ART according to applicable domestic and international ART guidelines
|
Background ART regimen according to applicable domestic and international ART guidelines.
|
|
Experimental: Fuyang Jiedu Granules plus ART
Participants receive Fuyang Jiedu Granules orally in addition to their background ART regimen for 48 weeks.
|
Fuyang Jiedu Granules are provided by Quantaitang Group Co., Ltd.
(Chinese invention patent No. ZL201210251214.7).
The main components include Polygonatum, Epimedium, deer antler, Codonopsis, Scutellaria baicalensis, Scutellaria barbata, and related components.
Dose: 1 sachet (9 g) orally twice daily, 30 minutes after morning and evening meals, with warm water for 48 weeks.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Absolute CD4+ T-cell count
Time Frame: Week 48.
|
Change in absolute CD4+ T-cell count, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
|
Week 48.
|
|
Immune reconstitution response rate
Time Frame: Week 48.
|
Response is defined as CD4+ T-cell count >350 cells/uL or a >=30% increase from baseline; non-response is defined as a <30% increase from baseline.
|
Week 48.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
CD4+ T-cell proportion
Time Frame: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
Change in CD4+ T-cell proportion, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
|
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
|
CD4+/CD8+ ratio
Time Frame: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
Change in CD4+/CD8+ ratio, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
|
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
|
CD8+ T-cell proportion
Time Frame: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
Change in CD8+ T-cell proportion, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
|
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
|
CD45RO+ T-cell proportion
Time Frame: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
Change in CD45RO+ T-cell proportion, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
|
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
|
CD4+CD28+ T-cell proportion
Time Frame: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
Change in CD4+CD28+ T-cell proportion, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
|
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
|
CD8+CD38+ T-cell proportion
Time Frame: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
Change in CD8+CD38+ T-cell proportion, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
|
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
|
CD4+CD38+ T-cell proportion
Time Frame: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
Change in CD4+CD38+ T-cell proportion, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
|
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
|
CD38+/HLA-DR+ T-cell activation marker
Time Frame: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
Change in CD38+/HLA-DR+ T-cell activation marker, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
|
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
|
Treg proportion
Time Frame: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
Change in regulatory T-cell proportion, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
|
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
|
TRECs level
Time Frame: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
Change in T-cell receptor excision circles level, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
|
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
|
CD3+ T-cell level
Time Frame: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
Change in CD3+ T-cell level, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
|
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
|
CD31+ T-cell level
Time Frame: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
Change in CD31+ T-cell level, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
|
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
|
IL-2 level
Time Frame: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
Change in interleukin-2 level, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
|
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
|
IL-4 level
Time Frame: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
Change in interleukin-4 level, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
|
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
|
IL-6 level
Time Frame: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
Change in interleukin-6 level, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
|
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
|
IL-10 level
Time Frame: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
Change in interleukin-10 level, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
|
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
|
IL-17A level
Time Frame: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
Change in interleukin-17A level, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
|
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
|
TNF-alpha level
Time Frame: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
Change in tumor necrosis factor-alpha level, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
|
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
|
IFN-gamma level
Time Frame: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
Change in interferon-gamma level, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
|
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
|
HIV RNA viral load
Time Frame: Baseline; Weeks 48 and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
Change in HIV RNA viral load, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
|
Baseline; Weeks 48 and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
|
Quality of life score
Time Frame: Baseline; Weeks 48, 60, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
Change in quality of life score assessed using the WHOQOL-HIV-BREF questionnaire, compared between the two randomized groups.
|
Baseline; Weeks 48, 60, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
|
TCM syndrome response rate
Time Frame: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
Response is defined as a >=30% decrease in TCM syndrome score from baseline; non-response is defined as a <30% decrease from baseline.
|
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
|
All-cause mortality rate
Time Frame: From randomization through Week 96.
|
Death from any cause during the study period, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
|
From randomization through Week 96.
|
|
Red blood cell count
Time Frame: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
|
Change in red blood cell count as a blood routine safety laboratory indicator, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
|
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
|
|
White blood cell count
Time Frame: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
|
Change in white blood cell count as a blood routine safety laboratory indicator, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
|
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
|
|
Hemoglobin level
Time Frame: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
|
Change in hemoglobin level as a blood routine safety laboratory indicator, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
|
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
|
|
Platelet count
Time Frame: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
|
Change in platelet count as a blood routine safety laboratory indicator, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
|
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
|
|
Absolute neutrophil count
Time Frame: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
|
Change in absolute neutrophil count as a blood routine safety laboratory indicator, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
|
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
|
|
Absolute lymphocyte count
Time Frame: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
|
Change in absolute lymphocyte count as a blood routine safety laboratory indicator, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
|
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
|
|
Aspartate aminotransferase level
Time Frame: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
|
Change in aspartate aminotransferase level as a liver function safety laboratory indicator, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
|
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
|
|
Alanine aminotransferase level
Time Frame: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
|
Change in alanine aminotransferase level as a liver function safety laboratory indicator, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
|
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
|
|
Gamma-glutamyl transferase level
Time Frame: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
|
Change in gamma-glutamyl transferase level as a liver function safety laboratory indicator, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
|
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
|
|
Serum creatinine level
Time Frame: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
|
Change in serum creatinine level as a renal function safety laboratory indicator, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
|
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
|
|
Urinary red blood cell result
Time Frame: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
|
Change in urinary red blood cell result as a urinalysis safety laboratory indicator, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
|
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
|
|
Urinary protein result
Time Frame: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
|
Change in urinary protein result as a urinalysis safety laboratory indicator, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
|
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
|
|
Urinary white blood cell result
Time Frame: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
|
Change in urinary white blood cell result as a urinalysis safety laboratory indicator, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
|
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
|
|
Urinary glucose result
Time Frame: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
|
Change in urinary glucose result as a urinalysis safety laboratory indicator, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
|
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
|
|
Incidence of adverse events
Time Frame: Adverse events were monitored from randomization through Week 96.
|
Incidence of adverse events during the 48-week treatment period and the post-treatment follow-up period, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
|
Adverse events were monitored from randomization through Week 96.
|
|
Incidence of serious adverse events
Time Frame: Serious adverse events were monitored from randomization through Week 96.
|
Incidence of serious adverse events during the 48-week treatment period and the post-treatment follow-up period, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
|
Serious adverse events were monitored from randomization through Week 96.
|
|
Treatment interruption rate
Time Frame: Treatment interruption was monitored from randomization through Week 48.
|
Proportion of participants with interruption of the assigned study treatment during the 48-week treatment period, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
|
Treatment interruption was monitored from randomization through Week 48.
|
|
Concomitant medication use
Time Frame: Concomitant medication use was recorded from randomization through Week 96.
|
Use of concomitant medications during the study period, including medication name, reason for use, dosage form, dose, route, frequency, start date, and end date.
|
Concomitant medication use was recorded from randomization through Week 96.
|
|
Absolute CD4+ T-cell count
Time Frame: Week 96
|
Change in absolute CD4+ T-cell count, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
|
Week 96
|
|
Immune reconstitution response rate
Time Frame: Week 96
|
Response is defined as CD4+ T-cell count >350 cells/uL or a >=30% increase from baseline; non-response is defined as a <30% increase from baseline.
|
Week 96
|
|
CD45RA+ T-cell proportion
Time Frame: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period aUrinary red blood cell resultnd follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
Change in CD45RA+ T-cell proportion, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
|
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period aUrinary red blood cell resultnd follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- 中华医学会感染病学分会艾滋病丙型肝炎学组. 艾滋病免疫功能重建不全者临床诊疗专家共识(2023版)[J]. 中华传染病杂志, 2024, 42(1): 3-13. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn311365-20230927-00098.
- 中华医学会感染病学分会艾滋病学组, 中国疾病预防控制中心. 中国艾滋病诊疗指南(2024版)[J]. 协和医学杂志, 2024, 15(6): 1261-1288. DOI: 10.12290/xhyxzz.2024-0766.
- 中华中医药学会防治艾滋病分会, 刘颖, 梁碧颜. 艾滋病中医诊疗专家共识[J]. 中国艾滋病性病, 2025, 31(9): 1029-1034. DOI: 10.13419/j.cnki.aids.2025.09.18
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Blood-Borne Infections
- Urogenital Diseases
- Genital Diseases
- Immune System Diseases
- Infections
- RNA Virus Infections
- Virus Diseases
- Communicable Diseases
- Sexually Transmitted Diseases, Viral
- Sexually Transmitted Diseases
- Lentivirus Infections
- Retroviridae Infections
- Immunologic Deficiency Syndromes
- Slow Virus Diseases
- HIV Infections
- Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome
- Therapeutics
- Drug Therapy
- Drug Therapy, Combination
- Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active
Other Study ID Numbers
- CTCM-HIV-INR-FYJD-2026
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome
-
VA Eastern Colorado Health Care SystemPublic Health Grant Program, Veterans Health Administration Office of Public...CompletedHuman Immunodeficiency Virus Infection(HIV)/Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (AIDS) | Self-Directed ViolenceUnited States
-
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases...CompletedHuman Immunodeficiency Virus | Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome Virus | Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome Virus | AIDS Virus | Human Immunodeficiency VirusesUnited States
-
Columbia UniversityNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH); Ministry of Health and Social Welfare...CompletedHIV (Human Immunodeficiency Virus) | AIDS (Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome)Tanzania
-
Janssen-Cilag International NVCompletedHIV Infections | Human Immunodeficiency Virus | Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome Virus | AIDS VirusUnited Kingdom, Belgium, Germany, Spain, Portugal, Israel, Denmark, Russian Federation, Austria, Hungary, Switzerland
-
Emory UniversityGrady Health SystemCompleted
-
Columbia UniversityNational Institute of Nursing Research (NINR)CompletedHIV (Human Immunodeficiency Virus) | AIDS (Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome)United States
-
St. Jude Children's Research HospitalCompletedHuman Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) | Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (AIDS)United States
-
Janssen-Cilag International NVCompletedHuman Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) Infections | Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (AIDS) VirusFrance, United Kingdom, Belgium, Germany, Spain, Switzerland, Denmark, Israel, Austria, Poland, Hungary, Sweden, Ireland
-
Columbia UniversityNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)CompletedHuman Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) | Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS)Ethiopia
-
Columbia UniversityCenters for Disease Control and PreventionCompletedHuman Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) | Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS)South Africa
Clinical Trials on Antiretroviral Therapy (ART)
-
Beijing University of Chinese MedicineChengdu University of Traditional Chinese MedicineNot yet recruitingAcquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome | HIV-1 Infection | Immune Reconstitution Failure | Immunological Non-responder | Lung-Spleen Qi Deficiency SyndromeChina
-
Gustavo Reyes-TeranCompletedHIV/AIDS | ANTIRETROVIRAL TREATMENTMexico
-
David HoNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID); US Military... and other collaboratorsActive, not recruitingHIV-1-infectionTanzania
-
University of MinnesotaNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)Completed
-
Emory UniversityEli Lilly and CompanyNot yet recruiting
-
King Abdullah University HospitalCompletedPTSD - Post Traumatic Stress DisorderJordan
-
Florida International UniversityNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)RecruitingDepression | Inflammation | HIV-1-infectionUnited States
-
Dokuz Eylul UniversityRecruitingAnxiety | Sleep Disturbance | Colorectal Cancer (Diagnosis)Turkey (Türkiye)
-
US Department of Veterans AffairsCanadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR); Medical Research CouncilCompletedHIV Infections | AIDSUnited States, Puerto Rico