A Novel Digital Music-based Autonomous Personalized Walking Intervention to Improve Gait and Walking Automaticity in Parkinson Disease (MyMusiQ)

August 21, 2026 updated by: Boston University Charles River Campus
The purpose of this research study is to examine the effects of a 3-month personalized community-based walking program using a digital music-based device designed for self-directed gait training in people with Parkinson disease (PD). The study uses music cues delivered through this digital device to improve walking outcomes. The investigators want to know if personalized music cueing through the digital device can improve walking quality, walking ability, daily walking amount and intensity, and quality of life, while helping walking feel more automatic and require less mental effort. Participants will take part in this research study for approximately 18 weeks in total. During this time, participants will complete 4 study visits at designated research centers at Boston University, Washington University in St. Louis, or the University of Utah, depending on the site of enrollment.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Detailed Description

The overall goal of this single-arm, multi-center repeated baselines study (N=162) is to examine how a personalized closed-loop music-based digital gait intervention, using MR-005 (MedRhythms, Inc.), improves gait quality, capacity, real-world walking performance, and gait automaticity in Parkinson disease (PD). Participants will complete a community-based, self-directed walking program using the digital music-based device 4 days a week for 12 weeks, designed to promote sustained walking beyond the use of the device.

This study builds on a stepwise investigation beginning with a proof-of-concept feasibility study (N=23) followed by a 6-week randomized controlled trial (RCT; N=44). This mechanistic-focused study will examine the substrates of a personalized approach that underlie changes in walking outcomes, as well as identify determinants that determine responsiveness to the intervention. This study is a critical next step to elucidate mechanistic understanding of closed-loop personalized gait approaches and to determine those with PD who benefit most.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

200

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Franchino Porciuncula, EdD PT DScPT
  • Phone Number: 617-353-7571
  • Email: fporciun@bu.edu

Study Locations

    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02215
        • Recruiting
        • Boston University Center for Neurorehabilitation
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Terry D. Ellis, PhD, PT
    • Missouri
      • St Louis, Missouri, United States, 63110
        • Recruiting
        • Washington University School of Medicine
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Gammon Earhart, PT, PhD
    • Utah
      • Salt Lake City, Utah, United States, 84108
        • Recruiting
        • University of Utah
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Lee Dibble, PT, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Self-report of diagnosis of typical Parkinson disease determined by a medical doctor
  • ≥ 40 years of age
  • Community-dwelling (e.g. home, independent living, senior housing)
  • Have stable PD medications for at least two weeks prior to enrollment
  • Modified Hoehn and Yahr stages 1-3 per physical exam by a licensed physical therapist
  • Able to walk independently without physical assistance for at least 10 minutes (assistive devices allowed with reciprocal gait pattern)
  • Willing and able to provide informed consent
  • Provide HIPAA Authorization to allow communication with the primary healthcare provider for communication (as needed) during the study period

Exclusion Criteria:

  • < 40 years of age
  • Diagnosis of atypical Parkinsonism
  • Modified Hoehn and Yahr stages 4-5
  • Significantly disturbing freezing episodes during daily walking based on the New Freezing of Gait Questionnaire (Part III Item 7)
  • Fall frequencies >1x/week on average, over the past month.
  • Currently participating in physical therapy for Parkinson gait rehabilitation
  • Currently performing walking exercise at moderate intensities or higher for at least 30 min. per session ≥ 3x/week
  • Self-reported cardiac problems that interfere with the ability to safely exercise (e.g., congestive heart failure, uncontrolled cardiac arrhythmias, chest pain;
  • Orthopedic problems in the lower extremities or spine that may limit walking distance (e.g., severe arthritis, spinal stenosis, or significant pain)
  • Any other medical conditions that would preclude successful participation as determined by the researcher/ physical therapist
  • Cognitive impairment (i.e., Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA < 21)
  • Unable to walk independently (i.e., without physical assistance) at a comfortable speed ≥ 0.4m/s as measured using the 10-meter Walk Test (10mWT) as examined in Baseline #1
  • Resting tachycardia (> 100 beats/min) or uncontrolled blood pressure (resting systolic BP > 160 mmHg or diastolic BP >100 mmHg)) as measured by the researcher/ physical therapist
  • Unable to independently use the music-based digital therapeutic during training
  • Significant hearing impairment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: MyMusiQ (MMQ) Walking intervention
Participants use MR-005 (MedRhythms, Inc., Portland, ME) during self-directed, home/community-based walking for 12 weeks to improve walking outcomes.
MR-005 (MedRhythms, Inc., Portland, ME) is a personalized, closed-loop, autonomous music-based digital gait intervention designed for self-directed gait training in Parkinson disease (PD). The system uses two shoe-worn gait sensors that communicate in real time with proprietary software on a touchscreen device, which controls the delivery of individualized, progressive rhythmic auditory stimulation (RAS), provided as music cues through bone conduction headphones. The software operates autonomously and does not require manual input or adjustment by the patient or clinician during a session.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Minutes of Moderate Intensity Walking
Time Frame: Baseline 1
The amount of moderate intensity walking, defined as mean number of minutes per day with >100 steps/min, measured using research-grade wearable sensors.
Baseline 1
Minutes of Moderate Intensity Walking
Time Frame: Baseline 2 (2-3 weeks after Baseline 1)
The amount of moderate intensity walking, defined as mean number of minutes per day with >100 steps/min, measured using research-grade wearable sensors.
Baseline 2 (2-3 weeks after Baseline 1)
Minutes of Moderate Intensity Walking
Time Frame: Immediately after the intervention (about 3 months)
The amount of moderate intensity walking, defined as mean number of minutes per day with >100 steps/min, measured using research-grade wearable sensors.
Immediately after the intervention (about 3 months)
Minutes of Moderate Intensity Walking
Time Frame: Follow-Up (about 1 month post-intervention)
The amount of moderate intensity walking, defined as mean number of minutes per day with >100 steps/min, measured using research-grade wearable sensors.
Follow-Up (about 1 month post-intervention)
Daily Step Counts
Time Frame: Baseline 1
Daily step counts refer to the number of steps taken per day. This will be measured using research-grade activity monitors validated for use in PD.
Baseline 1
Daily Step Counts
Time Frame: Baseline 2 (2-3 weeks after Baseline 1)
Daily step counts refer to the number of steps taken per day. This will be measured using research-grade activity monitors validated for use in PD.
Baseline 2 (2-3 weeks after Baseline 1)
Daily Step Counts
Time Frame: Immediately after the intervention (about 3 months)
Daily step counts refer to the number of steps taken per day. This will be measured using research-grade activity monitors validated for use in PD.
Immediately after the intervention (about 3 months)
Daily Step Counts
Time Frame: Follow-Up (about 1 month post-intervention)
Daily step counts refer to the number of steps taken per day. This will be measured using research-grade activity monitors validated for use in PD.
Follow-Up (about 1 month post-intervention)
6-Minute Walk Test
Time Frame: Baseline 1
This is a test of long-distance walking capacity. The participant will be asked to "cover as much distance as they safely can" for 6 minutes. Total distance (m) is the main metric, with greater distance indicating greater walking capacity.
Baseline 1
6-Minute Walk Test
Time Frame: Baseline 2 (2-3 weeks after Baseline 1)
This is a test of long-distance walking capacity. The participant will be asked to "cover as much distance as they safely can" for 6 minutes. Total distance (m) is the main metric, with greater distance indicating greater walking capacity.
Baseline 2 (2-3 weeks after Baseline 1)
6-Minute Walk Test
Time Frame: Immediately after the intervention (about 3 months)
This is a test of long-distance walking capacity. The participant will be asked to "cover as much distance as they safely can" for 6 minutes. Total distance (m) is the main metric, with greater distance indicating greater walking capacity.
Immediately after the intervention (about 3 months)
6-Minute Walk Test
Time Frame: Follow-Up (about 1 month post-intervention)
This is a test of long-distance walking capacity. The participant will be asked to "cover as much distance as they safely can" for 6 minutes. Total distance (m) is the main metric, with greater distance indicating greater walking capacity.
Follow-Up (about 1 month post-intervention)
Gait Speed
Time Frame: Baseline 1
Gait speed (m/s) will be measured using research-grade wearable sensors.
Baseline 1
Gait Speed
Time Frame: Baseline 2 (2-3 weeks after Baseline 1)
Gait speed (m/s) will be measured using research-grade wearable sensors.
Baseline 2 (2-3 weeks after Baseline 1)
Gait Speed
Time Frame: Immediately after the intervention (about 3 months)
Gait speed (m/s) will be measured using research-grade wearable sensors.
Immediately after the intervention (about 3 months)
Gait Speed
Time Frame: Follow-Up (about 1 month post-intervention)
Gait speed (m/s) will be measured using research-grade wearable sensors.
Follow-Up (about 1 month post-intervention)
Stride Length
Time Frame: Baseline 1
Quantified metrics of stride length (m) will be collected using research-grade wearable sensors.
Baseline 1
Stride Length
Time Frame: Baseline 2 (2-3 weeks after Baseline 1)
Quantified metrics of stride length (m) will be collected using research-grade wearable sensors.
Baseline 2 (2-3 weeks after Baseline 1)
Stride Length
Time Frame: Immediately after the intervention (about 3 months)
Quantified metrics of stride length (m) will be collected using research-grade wearable sensors.
Immediately after the intervention (about 3 months)
Stride Length
Time Frame: Follow-Up (about 1 month post-intervention)
Quantified metrics of stride length (m) will be collected using research-grade wearable sensors.
Follow-Up (about 1 month post-intervention)
Variability of Stride Time
Time Frame: Baseline 1
Stride-to-stride variability of stride time of the gait cycle will be measured using research-grade wearable sensors. Stride time variability is calculated by dividing the standard deviation of stride time by the mean of stride time, multiplied by 100 to express as a percentage.
Baseline 1
Variability of Stride Time
Time Frame: Baseline 2 (2-3 weeks after Baseline 1)
Stride-to-stride variability of stride time of the gait cycle will be measured using research-grade wearable sensors. Stride time variability is calculated by dividing the standard deviation of stride time by the mean of stride time, multiplied by 100 to express as a percentage.
Baseline 2 (2-3 weeks after Baseline 1)
Variability of Stride Time
Time Frame: Immediately after the intervention (about 3 months)
Stride-to-stride variability of stride time of the gait cycle will be measured using research-grade wearable sensors. Stride time variability is calculated by dividing the standard deviation of stride time by the mean of stride time, multiplied by 100 to express as a percentage.
Immediately after the intervention (about 3 months)
Variability of Stride Time
Time Frame: Follow-Up (about 1 month post-intervention)
Stride-to-stride variability of stride time of the gait cycle will be measured using research-grade wearable sensors. Stride time variability is calculated by dividing the standard deviation of stride time by the mean of stride time, multiplied by 100 to express as a percentage.
Follow-Up (about 1 month post-intervention)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
10-Meter Walk Test (10MWT) - Comfortable Walking Speed
Time Frame: Baseline 1
This is a test of short-distance walking function. The participant will be asked to walk at comfortable walking speed (CWS) on a ten-meter straight walkway.
Baseline 1
10-Meter Walk Test (10MWT) - Comfortable Walking Speed
Time Frame: Baseline 2 (2-3 weeks after Baseline 1)
This is a test of short-distance walking function. The participant will be asked to walk at comfortable walking speed (CWS) on a ten-meter straight walkway.
Baseline 2 (2-3 weeks after Baseline 1)
10-Meter Walk Test (10MWT) - Comfortable Walking Speed
Time Frame: Immediately after the intervention (about 3 months)
This is a test of short-distance walking function. The participant will be asked to walk at comfortable walking speed (CWS) on a ten-meter straight walkway.
Immediately after the intervention (about 3 months)
10-Meter Walk Test (10MWT) - Comfortable Walking Speed
Time Frame: Follow-Up (about 1 month post-intervention)
This is a test of short-distance walking function. The participant will be asked to walk at comfortable walking speed (CWS) on a ten-meter straight walkway.
Follow-Up (about 1 month post-intervention)
10-Meter Walk Test (10MWT) - Fast Walking Speed
Time Frame: Baseline 1
This is a test of short-distance walking function. The participant will be asked to walk at fast walking speed (FWS) on a ten-meter straight walkway.
Baseline 1
10-Meter Walk Test (10MWT) - Fast Walking Speed
Time Frame: Baseline 2 (2-3 weeks after Baseline 1)
This is a test of short-distance walking function. The participant will be asked to walk at fast walking speed (FWS) on a ten-meter straight walkway.
Baseline 2 (2-3 weeks after Baseline 1)
10-Meter Walk Test (10MWT) - Fast Walking Speed
Time Frame: Immediately after the intervention (about 3 months)
This is a test of short-distance walking function. The participant will be asked to walk at fast walking speed (FWS) on a ten-meter straight walkway.
Immediately after the intervention (about 3 months)
10-Meter Walk Test (10MWT) - Fast Walking Speed
Time Frame: Follow-Up (about 1 month post-intervention)
This is a test of short-distance walking function. The participant will be asked to walk at fast walking speed (FWS) on a ten-meter straight walkway.
Follow-Up (about 1 month post-intervention)
Five Times Sit-to-Stand
Time Frame: Baseline 1
This test provides a method to quantify the time it takes for a person to stand up and sit down five times without using their hands.
Baseline 1
Five Times Sit-to-Stand
Time Frame: Baseline 2 (2-3 weeks after Baseline 1)
This test provides a method to quantify the time it takes for a person to stand up and sit down five times without using their hands.
Baseline 2 (2-3 weeks after Baseline 1)
Five Times Sit-to-Stand
Time Frame: Immediately after the intervention (about 3 months)
This test provides a method to quantify the time it takes for a person to stand up and sit down five times without using their hands.
Immediately after the intervention (about 3 months)
Five Times Sit-to-Stand
Time Frame: Follow-Up (about 1 month post-intervention)
This test provides a method to quantify the time it takes for a person to stand up and sit down five times without using their hands.
Follow-Up (about 1 month post-intervention)
Generic Walking Scale (Walk-12G)
Time Frame: Baseline 1
This test is a self-report questionnaire that measures everyday walking difficulties. Scores range from 12 to 60, with higher scores indicating greater perceived walking difficulties.
Baseline 1
Generic Walking Scale (Walk-12G)
Time Frame: Baseline 2 (2-3 weeks after Baseline 1)
This test is a self-report questionnaire that measures everyday walking difficulties. Scores range from 12 to 60, with higher scores indicating greater perceived walking difficulties.
Baseline 2 (2-3 weeks after Baseline 1)
Generic Walking Scale (Walk-12G)
Time Frame: Immediately after the intervention (about 3 months)
This test is a self-report questionnaire that measures everyday walking difficulties. Scores range from 12 to 60, with higher scores indicating greater perceived walking difficulties.
Immediately after the intervention (about 3 months)
Generic Walking Scale (Walk-12G)
Time Frame: Follow-Up (about 1 month post-intervention)
This test is a self-report questionnaire that measures everyday walking difficulties. Scores range from 12 to 60, with higher scores indicating greater perceived walking difficulties.
Follow-Up (about 1 month post-intervention)
Global Rating of Change (GROC) Scale
Time Frame: Immediately after the intervention (about 3 months)
This self-reported rating scale measures overall perceived improvement in areas related to amount of walking, intensity of walking, and walking capacity. Scores range from -7 to +7, with higher scores indicating greater improvement.
Immediately after the intervention (about 3 months)
Mini Balance Evaluation Systems Test (Mini-BESTest)
Time Frame: Baseline 1
This test is a clinical balance assessment tool designed to examine various elements of balance control. Scores range from 0 to 28, with higher scores indicating better balance.
Baseline 1
Mini Balance Evaluation Systems Test (Mini-BESTest)
Time Frame: Baseline 2 (2-3 weeks after Baseline 1)
This test is a clinical balance assessment tool designed to examine various elements of balance control. Scores range from 0 to 28, with higher scores indicating better balance.
Baseline 2 (2-3 weeks after Baseline 1)
Mini Balance Evaluation Systems Test (Mini-BESTest)
Time Frame: Immediately after the intervention (about 3 months)
This test is a clinical balance assessment tool designed to examine various elements of balance control. Scores range from 0 to 28, with higher scores indicating better balance.
Immediately after the intervention (about 3 months)
Mini Balance Evaluation Systems Test (Mini-BESTest)
Time Frame: Follow-Up (about 1 month post-intervention)
This test is a clinical balance assessment tool designed to examine various elements of balance control. Scores range from 0 to 28, with higher scores indicating better balance.
Follow-Up (about 1 month post-intervention)
Prefrontal Cortex Activity
Time Frame: Baseline 1
Prefrontal cortex activity (based on oxygenated hemoglobin) will be measured using Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS) during walking. This will be collected only for the cohort at Boston University.
Baseline 1
Prefrontal Cortex Activity
Time Frame: Baseline 2 (2-3 weeks after Baseline 1)
Prefrontal cortex activity (based on oxygenated hemoglobin) will be measured using Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS) during walking. This will be collected only for the cohort at Boston University.
Baseline 2 (2-3 weeks after Baseline 1)
Prefrontal Cortex Activity
Time Frame: Immediately after the intervention (about 3 months)
Prefrontal cortex activity (based on oxygenated hemoglobin) will be measured using Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS) during walking. This will be collected only for the cohort at Boston University.
Immediately after the intervention (about 3 months)
Dual-Task Cost on Gait Speed
Time Frame: Baseline 1
Dual-task cost is the difference between single-task walking and dual-task walking divided by single-task walking, multiplied by 100 to express as a percentage.
Baseline 1
Dual-Task Cost on Gait Speed
Time Frame: Baseline 2 (2-3 weeks after Baseline 1)
Dual-task cost is the difference between single-task walking and dual-task walking divided by single-task walking, multiplied by 100 to express as a percentage.
Baseline 2 (2-3 weeks after Baseline 1)
Dual-Task Cost on Gait Speed
Time Frame: Follow-Up (about 1 month post-intervention)
Dual-task cost is the difference between single-task walking and dual-task walking divided by single-task walking, multiplied by 100 to express as a percentage.
Follow-Up (about 1 month post-intervention)
Dual-Task Cost on Gait Speed
Time Frame: Immediately after the intervention (about 3 months)
Dual-task cost is the difference between single-task walking and dual-task walking divided by single-task walking, multiplied by 100 to express as a percentage.
Immediately after the intervention (about 3 months)
Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS Section I)
Time Frame: Baseline 1
The MDS-UPDRS is the most widely used clinical rating scale for Parkinson disease. Part I is an examination of non-motor experiences of daily living. Part IA is conducted by the rater, and Part IB is completed independently of the rater. Scores range from 0 to 52, with higher scores indicating greater impairment.
Baseline 1
Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS Section I)
Time Frame: Baseline 2 (2-3 weeks after Baseline 1)
The MDS-UPDRS is the most widely used clinical rating scale for Parkinson disease. Part I is an examination of non-motor experiences of daily living. Part IA is conducted by the rater, and Part IB is completed independently of the rater. Scores range from 0 to 52, with higher scores indicating greater impairment.
Baseline 2 (2-3 weeks after Baseline 1)
Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS Section I)
Time Frame: Immediately after the intervention (about 3 months)
The MDS-UPDRS is the most widely used clinical rating scale for Parkinson disease. Part I is an examination of non-motor experiences of daily living. Part IA is conducted by the rater, and Part IB is completed independently of the rater. Scores range from 0 to 52, with higher scores indicating greater impairment.
Immediately after the intervention (about 3 months)
Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS Section I)
Time Frame: Follow-Up (about 1 month post-intervention)
The MDS-UPDRS is the most widely used clinical rating scale for Parkinson disease. Part I is an examination of non-motor experiences of daily living. Part IA is conducted by the rater, and Part IB is completed independently of the rater. Scores range from 0 to 52, with higher scores indicating greater impairment.
Follow-Up (about 1 month post-intervention)
Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS Section II)
Time Frame: Baseline 1
The MDS-UPDRS is the most widely used clinical rating scale for Parkinson disease. Part II is a self-administered questionnaire to examine motor experiences of daily living. Scores range from 0 to 52, with higher scores indicating greater impairment.
Baseline 1
Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS Section II)
Time Frame: Baseline 2 (2-3 weeks after Baseline 1)
The MDS-UPDRS is the most widely used clinical rating scale for Parkinson disease. Part II is a self-administered questionnaire to examine motor experiences of daily living. Scores range from 0 to 52, with higher scores indicating greater impairment.
Baseline 2 (2-3 weeks after Baseline 1)
Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS Section II)
Time Frame: Follow-Up (about 1 month post-intervention)
The MDS-UPDRS is the most widely used clinical rating scale for Parkinson disease. Part II is a self-administered questionnaire to examine motor experiences of daily living. Scores range from 0 to 52, with higher scores indicating greater impairment.
Follow-Up (about 1 month post-intervention)
Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS Section II)
Time Frame: Immediately after the intervention (about 3 months)
The MDS-UPDRS is the most widely used clinical rating scale for Parkinson disease. Part II is a self-administered questionnaire to examine motor experiences of daily living. Scores range from 0 to 52, with higher scores indicating greater impairment.
Immediately after the intervention (about 3 months)
Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale Motor Subsection (MDS-UPDRS Section III)
Time Frame: Baseline 1
The MDS-UPDRS is the most widely used clinical rating scale for Parkinson disease. Part III is a motor examination conducted by the rater. Scores range from 0 to 132, with higher scores indicating greater impairment.
Baseline 1
Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale Motor Subsection (MDS-UPDRS Section III)
Time Frame: Baseline 2 (2-3 weeks after Baseline 1)
The MDS-UPDRS is the most widely used clinical rating scale for Parkinson disease. Part III is a motor examination conducted by the rater. Scores range from 0 to 132, with higher scores indicating greater impairment.
Baseline 2 (2-3 weeks after Baseline 1)
Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale Motor Subsection (MDS-UPDRS Section III)
Time Frame: Immediately after the intervention (about 3 months)
The MDS-UPDRS is the most widely used clinical rating scale for Parkinson disease. Part III is a motor examination conducted by the rater. Scores range from 0 to 132, with higher scores indicating greater impairment.
Immediately after the intervention (about 3 months)
Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale Motor Subsection (MDS-UPDRS Section III)
Time Frame: Follow-Up (about 1 month post-intervention)
The MDS-UPDRS is the most widely used clinical rating scale for Parkinson disease. Part III is a motor examination conducted by the rater. Scores range from 0 to 132, with higher scores indicating greater impairment.
Follow-Up (about 1 month post-intervention)
Variability of Stride Time During Walking with Digital Music Device
Time Frame: Baseline 1
Stride time variability will be measured during walking with digital music device during in-lab assessments. Stride-to-stride variability of stride time of the gait cycle will be measured using research-grade wearable sensors. Stride time variability is calculated by dividing the standard deviation of stride time by the mean of stride time, multiplied by 100 to express as a percentage.
Baseline 1
Variability of Stride Time During Walking with Digital Music Device
Time Frame: Baseline 2 (2-3 weeks after Baseline 1)
Stride time variability will be measured during walking with digital music device during in-lab assessments. Stride-to-stride variability of stride time of the gait cycle will be measured using research-grade wearable sensors. Stride time variability is calculated by dividing the standard deviation of stride time by the mean of stride time, multiplied by 100 to express as a percentage.
Baseline 2 (2-3 weeks after Baseline 1)
Variability of Stride Time During Walking with Digital Music Device
Time Frame: Immediately after the intervention (about 3 months)
Stride time variability will be measured during walking with digital music device during in-lab assessments. Stride-to-stride variability of stride time of the gait cycle will be measured using research-grade wearable sensors. Stride time variability is calculated by dividing the standard deviation of stride time by the mean of stride time, multiplied by 100 to express as a percentage.
Immediately after the intervention (about 3 months)
Variability of Stride Time During Walking with Digital Music Device
Time Frame: Follow-Up (about 1 month post-intervention)
Stride time variability will be measured during walking with digital music device during in-lab assessments. Stride-to-stride variability of stride time of the gait cycle will be measured using research-grade wearable sensors. Stride time variability is calculated by dividing the standard deviation of stride time by the mean of stride time, multiplied by 100 to express as a percentage.
Follow-Up (about 1 month post-intervention)
Speed During Walking with Digital Music Device
Time Frame: Baseline 1
Speed (m/s) will be measured during walking with digital music device during in-lab assessments.
Baseline 1
Speed During Walking with Digital Music Device
Time Frame: Baseline 2 (2-3 weeks after Baseline 1)
Speed (m/s) will be measured during walking with digital music device during in-lab assessments.
Baseline 2 (2-3 weeks after Baseline 1)
Speed During Walking with Digital Music Device
Time Frame: Immediately after the intervention (about 3 months)
Speed (m/s) will be measured during walking with digital music device during in-lab assessments.
Immediately after the intervention (about 3 months)
Speed During Walking with Digital Music Device
Time Frame: Follow-Up (about 1 month post-intervention)
Speed (m/s) will be measured during walking with digital music device during in-lab assessments.
Follow-Up (about 1 month post-intervention)
Stride Length During Walking with Digital Music Device
Time Frame: Baseline 1
Stride length (m) will be measured during walking with digital music device during in-lab assessments.
Baseline 1
Stride Length During Walking with Digital Music Device
Time Frame: Baseline 2 (2-3 weeks after Baseline 1)
Stride length (m) will be measured during walking with digital music device during in-lab assessments.
Baseline 2 (2-3 weeks after Baseline 1)
Stride Length During Walking with Digital Music Device
Time Frame: Immediately after the intervention (about 3 months)
Stride length (m) will be measured during walking with digital music device during in-lab assessments.
Immediately after the intervention (about 3 months)
Stride Length During Walking with Digital Music Device
Time Frame: Follow-Up (about 1 month post-intervention)
Stride length (m) will be measured during walking with digital music device during in-lab assessments.
Follow-Up (about 1 month post-intervention)
Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire-39 (PDQ-39)
Time Frame: Baseline 1
The PDQ-39 is a self-report questionnaire that assesses quality of life across 8 different dimensions. Items are scored based on a 5-point ordinal system with lower scores reflecting better quality of life (min = 0, max = 100).
Baseline 1
Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire-39 (PDQ-39)
Time Frame: Baseline 2 (2-3 weeks after Baseline 1)
The PDQ-39 is a self-report questionnaire that assesses quality of life across 8 different dimensions. Items are scored based on a 5-point ordinal system with lower scores reflecting better quality of life (min = 0, max = 100).
Baseline 2 (2-3 weeks after Baseline 1)
Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire-39 (PDQ-39)
Time Frame: Immediately after the intervention (about 3 months)
The PDQ-39 is a self-report questionnaire that assesses quality of life across 8 different dimensions. Items are scored based on a 5-point ordinal system with lower scores reflecting better quality of life (min = 0, max = 100).
Immediately after the intervention (about 3 months)
Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire-39 (PDQ-39)
Time Frame: Follow-Up (about 1 month post-intervention)
The PDQ-39 is a self-report questionnaire that assesses quality of life across 8 different dimensions. Items are scored based on a 5-point ordinal system with lower scores reflecting better quality of life (min = 0, max = 100).
Follow-Up (about 1 month post-intervention)
Self-Efficacy of Walking - Duration (SEW-D)
Time Frame: Baseline 1
The SEW-D is a self-report that will be administered to determine participants' beliefs of their physical capabilities to successfully complete incremental 5-minute intervals (5 to 40 minutes) of walking at a moderately fast pace, with responses made on 11-point Likert scale (0% = not at all confident; 100% = highly confident), with higher scores indicating higher confidence.
Baseline 1
Self-Efficacy of Walking - Duration (SEW-D)
Time Frame: Baseline 2 (2-3 weeks after Baseline 1)
The SEW-D is a self-report that will be administered to determine participants' beliefs of their physical capabilities to successfully complete incremental 5-minute intervals (5 to 40 minutes) of walking at a moderately fast pace, with responses made on 11-point Likert scale (0% = not at all confident; 100% = highly confident), with higher scores indicating higher confidence.
Baseline 2 (2-3 weeks after Baseline 1)
Self-Efficacy of Walking - Duration (SEW-D)
Time Frame: Immediately after the intervention (about 3 months)
The SEW-D is a self-report that will be administered to determine participants' beliefs of their physical capabilities to successfully complete incremental 5-minute intervals (5 to 40 minutes) of walking at a moderately fast pace, with responses made on 11-point Likert scale (0% = not at all confident; 100% = highly confident), with higher scores indicating higher confidence.
Immediately after the intervention (about 3 months)
Self-Efficacy of Walking - Duration (SEW-D)
Time Frame: Follow-Up (about 1 month post-intervention)
The SEW-D is a self-report that will be administered to determine participants' beliefs of their physical capabilities to successfully complete incremental 5-minute intervals (5 to 40 minutes) of walking at a moderately fast pace, with responses made on 11-point Likert scale (0% = not at all confident; 100% = highly confident), with higher scores indicating higher confidence.
Follow-Up (about 1 month post-intervention)
Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC)
Time Frame: Baseline 1
This test is a questionnaire that measures an individual's confidence (in percentage) that he/she will not lose balance or become unsteady while performing physical activities. The scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater confidence.
Baseline 1
Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC)
Time Frame: Baseline 2 (2-3 weeks after Baseline 1)
This test is a questionnaire that measures an individual's confidence (in percentage) that he/she will not lose balance or become unsteady while performing physical activities. The scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater confidence.
Baseline 2 (2-3 weeks after Baseline 1)
Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC)
Time Frame: Immediately after the intervention (about 3 months)
This test is a questionnaire that measures an individual's confidence (in percentage) that he/she will not lose balance or become unsteady while performing physical activities. The scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater confidence.
Immediately after the intervention (about 3 months)
Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC)
Time Frame: Follow-Up (about 1 month post-intervention)
This test is a questionnaire that measures an individual's confidence (in percentage) that he/she will not lose balance or become unsteady while performing physical activities. The scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater confidence.
Follow-Up (about 1 month post-intervention)
Trail-Making Test (TMT)
Time Frame: Baseline 1
This test measures the time it takes (seconds) to complete two visual-motor tasks. Higher scores indicate slower processing speed and greater cognitive impairment.
Baseline 1
Trail-Making Test (TMT)
Time Frame: Baseline 2 (2-3 weeks after Baseline 1)
This test measures the time it takes (seconds) to complete two visual-motor tasks. Higher scores indicate slower processing speed and greater cognitive impairment.
Baseline 2 (2-3 weeks after Baseline 1)
Trail-Making Test (TMT)
Time Frame: Immediately after the intervention (about 3 months)
This test measures the time it takes (seconds) to complete two visual-motor tasks. Higher scores indicate slower processing speed and greater cognitive impairment.
Immediately after the intervention (about 3 months)
Trail-Making Test (TMT)
Time Frame: Follow-Up (about 1 month post-intervention)
This test measures the time it takes (seconds) to complete two visual-motor tasks. Higher scores indicate slower processing speed and greater cognitive impairment.
Follow-Up (about 1 month post-intervention)
Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)
Time Frame: Baseline 1
The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) is a brief screening tool designed to examine cognitive impairment. The score ranges from 0-30, with higher scores indicating less cognitive impairment.
Baseline 1
Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)
Time Frame: Baseline 2 (2-3 weeks after Baseline 1)
The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) is a brief screening tool designed to examine cognitive impairment. The score ranges from 0-30, with higher scores indicating less cognitive impairment.
Baseline 2 (2-3 weeks after Baseline 1)
Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)
Time Frame: Immediately after the intervention (about 3 months)
The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) is a brief screening tool designed to examine cognitive impairment. The score ranges from 0-30, with higher scores indicating less cognitive impairment.
Immediately after the intervention (about 3 months)
Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)
Time Frame: Follow-Up (about 1 month post-intervention)
The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) is a brief screening tool designed to examine cognitive impairment. The score ranges from 0-30, with higher scores indicating less cognitive impairment.
Follow-Up (about 1 month post-intervention)
Variability of Stride Time During MMQ Walking Program with Digital Music Device
Time Frame: During training (about 3 months)
Stride time variability will be measured during the MMQ walking program with the digital music device. Stride-to-stride variability of stride time of the gait cycle will be measured using integrated sensors from the music device. Stride time variability is calculated by dividing the standard deviation of stride time by the mean of stride time, multiplied by 100 to express as a percentage.
During training (about 3 months)
Speed During MMQ Walking Program with Digital Music Device
Time Frame: During training (about 3 months)
Speed (m/s) will be measured during the MMQ walking program with the digital music device. Speed will be measured using integrated sensors from the music device.
During training (about 3 months)
Stride Length During MMQ Walking Program with Digital Music Device
Time Frame: During training (about 3 months)
Stride length (m) will be measured during the MMQ walking program with the digital music device. Stride length will be measured using integrated sensors from the music device.
During training (about 3 months)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Terry D. Ellis, PhD PT, Boston University Center for Neurorehabilitation

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 20, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

February 28, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 6, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 13, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

July 15, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 24, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 21, 2026

Last Verified

August 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

De-identified data may be shared within reasonable request.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Beginning 3 months and ending 3 years after the publication of results

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Data relevant to eventual publication may be made available within reasonable request. Other datasets generated from the study may be accessed through requests in compliance with the study funder's protocol.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe