Pretibial TENS for Pain and Anxiety During Intravesical OnabotulinumtoxinA Injection

July 13, 2026 updated by: SEZGIN, Başakşehir Çam & Sakura City Hospital

The Effect of Pretibial Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) on Pain and Anxiety During Intravesical OnabotulinumtoxinA Injection: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial

Overactive bladder is a common condition that causes a frequent, urgent need to urinate and can significantly reduce quality of life. When other treatments do not work well enough, doctors can inject a medication called onabotulinumtoxinA (a form of botulinum toxin) into the bladder wall. This procedure is often done in the office and is effective, but it can cause pain and anxiety during the injection.

Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) is a non-invasive, drug-free method that uses mild electrical pulses delivered through pads placed on the skin. It is thought to reduce the sensation of pain and is already used to help with discomfort during some office procedures.

The purpose of this study is to find out whether applying TENS to the front of the lower legs (the pretibial area) reduces pain and anxiety in patients undergoing an intravesical onabotulinumtoxinA injection. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups. In one group, the TENS device will be turned on (active). In the other group, the pads will be placed in the same location but the device will not be turned on (placebo). Neither the patient nor the doctor performing the assessment will know which group the patient is in.

Pain will be measured during the procedure using a visual analog scale. Anxiety will be measured before the procedure using a standard questionnaire, and patient satisfaction will be measured afterward. The study aims to enroll 68 participants in total.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Background: Overactive bladder (OAB) is a chronic urological condition that substantially impairs quality of life, and intravesical onabotulinumtoxinA (BTX-A) injection is an effective treatment option. Although performing this procedure in an office setting reduces hospital and operating room costs, the pain and anxiety experienced during the procedure can negatively affect patient comfort. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) is a non-invasive, non-pharmacological, and safe analgesic method believed to reduce pain perception through the gate control mechanism. Prior work has reported clinically meaningful reductions in pain scores when active TENS is applied during intravesical BTX-A injection; however, the effect of TENS applied specifically to the pretibial region during this procedure has not been previously investigated.

Objectives: The primary objective is to evaluate the effect of pretibial TENS on pain during office-based intravesical BTX-A injection, assessed using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Secondary objectives are to examine the relationship between pre-procedure anxiety level (measured with the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, STAI) and the pain experience, and to measure patient satisfaction using a 0-10 Likert scale.

Design: This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Participants will be randomized 1:1 using a sealed-envelope method. Envelopes will be prepared by an independent researcher not involved in conducting the study. Patients will be blinded to whether the device is active or inactive during the procedure, and blinding of the outcome assessment will be maintained.

Groups:

  • Active group: TENS pads applied bilaterally to the pretibial region with the device operating in active mode.
  • Control group: TENS pads applied to the same anatomical region with the device not activated (placebo).

In both groups, the intravesical BTX-A injection will be performed according to the standard routine clinical protocol without any modification.

Measurements will be collected in the following order as part of the patient's routine clinical visit:

  • Before the procedure: the patient completes the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI).
  • During the procedure: pain is assessed by the performing physician using a VAS (0-10; 0 = no pain, 10 = unbearable pain).
  • After the procedure: patient satisfaction is assessed using a 0-10 Likert scale.

Sample size: Based on a power analysis assuming an effect size (Cohen's d) of 0.7, a significance level (alpha) of 0.05, and power (1-beta) of 0.80, 34 participants per group were required, for a total sample size of 68 participants.

Statistical analysis: Continuous variables will be compared using the Student t-test or the Mann-Whitney U test, as appropriate. Categorical variables will be analyzed using the chi-square test. The relationship between STAI and VAS scores will be assessed using Spearman correlation. A p-value < 0.05 will be considered statistically significant.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

68

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of overactive bladder (OAB) with an indication for intravesical onabotulinumtoxinA (BTX-A) treatment
  • No previous history of TENS application
  • Age 18 years or older
  • Provision of written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of a cardiac pacemaker or any implanted neuromodulator device
  • Impaired skin integrity in the pretibial region or peripheral neuropathy
  • Pregnancy
  • Coagulopathy that contraindicates the procedure, or active urinary tract infection

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Active TENS
TENS pads are applied bilaterally to the pretibial region and the device is operated in active mode during the intravesical onabotulinumtoxinA injection. The standard intravesical BTX-A injection is performed according to routine clinical protocol.
Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation delivered through pads placed bilaterally on the pretibial region, with the device turned on (active stimulation) during the intravesical onabotulinumtoxinA injection.
Placebo Comparator: Placebo TENS (Sham)
TENS pads are applied to the same pretibial anatomical region but the device is not activated (sham). The standard intravesical BTX-A injection is performed according to routine clinical protocol, identical to the active group.
Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation pads placed bilaterally on the pretibial region in an identical manner, but with the device not activated (no electrical stimulation delivered), during the intravesical onabotulinumtoxinA injection.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Procedural Pain Score (Visual Analog Scale, VAS)
Time Frame: During the intravesical onabotulinumtoxinA injection procedure (single assessment at the time of the procedure)
Pain experienced during the intravesical onabotulinumtoxinA injection, assessed by the physician using a Visual Analog Scale ranging from 0 to 10 cm (0 = no pain, 10 = unbearable pain). Higher scores indicate greater pain. Mean VAS scores will be compared between the active TENS group and the placebo (sham) TENS group.
During the intravesical onabotulinumtoxinA injection procedure (single assessment at the time of the procedure)
Patient Satisfaction (0-10 Likert Scale)
Time Frame: Immediately after the intravesical onabotulinumtoxinA injection procedure (single assessment)
Patient satisfaction with the procedure, assessed after the injection using a 0-10 Likert scale. Higher scores indicate greater satisfaction. Mean satisfaction scores will be compared between the active TENS group and the placebo (sham) TENS group.
Immediately after the intravesical onabotulinumtoxinA injection procedure (single assessment)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pre-procedure Anxiety Level (State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, STAI)
Time Frame: Immediately before the intravesical onabotulinumtoxinA injection procedure (single assessment)
Anxiety level measured before the procedure using the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). The relationship between the pre-procedure STAI score and the intraprocedural VAS pain score will be assessed. Higher STAI scores indicate greater anxiety.
Immediately before the intravesical onabotulinumtoxinA injection procedure (single assessment)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

July 20, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

February 20, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 10, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 13, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 13, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

July 16, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 16, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 13, 2026

Last Verified

July 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Individual participant data will not be shared publicly. De-identified data may be made available upon reasonable request to the corresponding author, subject to institutional and ethics committee approval.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Data will be available beginning 6 months and ending 36 months after publication of the main results.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

De-identified data will be available to qualified researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal, approved by the principal investigator and the local ethics committee. Requests should be directed to the corresponding author. A data use agreement may be required.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Anxiety

Clinical Trials on Active Pretibial TENS

Subscribe